http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50888
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-24
07:24:49 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 24 07:24:43 2011
New Revision: 181688
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181688
Log:
PR bootstrap/50888
* prims.cc: Don't inclu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50888
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-24
07:23:24 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 24 07:23:16 2011
New Revision: 181687
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181687
Log:
PR bootstrap/50888
* prims.cc: Don't inclu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50888
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-24
07:21:50 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 24 07:21:39 2011
New Revision: 181686
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181686
Log:
PR bootstrap/50888
* prims.cc: Don't inclu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50888
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-24
07:18:21 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 24 07:18:16 2011
New Revision: 181685
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181685
Log:
PR bootstrap/50888
* prims.cc: Don't inclu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51291
Bug #: 51291
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in ix86_init_builtins (i386.c:27691) with
any fortran code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50829
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2011-11-24
03:47:06 UTC ---
I should note that have used that trick (and the same regrename.c patch) on two
different targets (PowerPC and MIPS) while at two different companies.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50829
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-11-24
03:45:24 UTC ---
As for stack allocation. crtl->stack_realign_needed == 1 results in
frame_pointer_needed:=1 in ira.c::ira_setup_eliminable_regset. I don't
remember the origin of the code. Probab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50829
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50829
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51279
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2011-11-24
01:36:48 UTC ---
Caused by...
r181014 | jakub | 2011-11-05 15:58:37 -0400 (Sat, 05 Nov 2011) | 23 lines
PR tree-optimization/50693
* tree-cfg.c (gimple_can_merge_blocks_p): Allow merg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51290
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #10 from Cesar Strauss 2011-11-24
00:22:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > Hmm, this is due usage of "%lld" in printf-formatter. Does following patch
> > fix your issue?
>
> I did encounter the build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51290
Bug #: 51290
Summary: Bogus warning: zero as null pointer constant
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51250
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin 2011-11-23
23:20:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I will take care of this one after mid-december.
>
I couldn't help having a look.
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
index 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51261
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51289
Bug #: 51289
Summary: Template template alias causes ICE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51288
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-11-23
21:16:37 UTC ---
put_money too of course.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51288
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50882
L. Lepine changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lepine.gnu at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41975
--- Comment #33 from François Dumont 2011-11-23
20:30:25 UTC ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Wed Nov 23 20:30:18 2011
New Revision: 181677
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181677
Log:
2011-11-23 François Dumont
PR libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51261
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-23
20:29:11 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 23 20:29:08 2011
New Revision: 181676
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181676
Log:
PR target/51261
* config/i386/i386.c (decid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197
--- Comment #7 from Harald Anlauf 2011-11-23 20:14:24
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> If this means writing
>
> Program received signal 8 (SIGFPE).
>
> to stderr (which is where the backtrace dump goes)
> before the actual backtrace, this wo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197
--- Comment #6 from Harald Anlauf 2011-11-23 20:13:05
UTC ---
Created attachment 25905
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25905
Patch the reproduce desired behavior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51179
--- Comment #10 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-11-23 20:11:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> What about current 4.7 SVN?
The fastest 4x10 . 10x10 multiply as found with tiny_find.f90 yields somewhat
better results with 4.7, but not quite as ef
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51288
Bug #: 51288
Summary: get_money implementation is missing the sentry object
(does not skip leading whitespace)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51124
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51279
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2011-11-23
19:38:32 UTC ---
Regression hunt started. ICE is not present at r180996.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51285
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47013
--- Comment #11 from revital.eres at linaro dot org 2011-11-23 18:59:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> any progress on resolving this .. or any more input needed?
I will revisit this. Thanks for the ping.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=772
Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||3dw4rd at veri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51280
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Marlier
2011-11-23 18:53:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 25904
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25904
testcase
Of course this bug also affect openMP.
(see testcase)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48455
--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-11-23
18:51:21 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Nov 23 18:51:17 2011
New Revision: 181675
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181675
Log:
2011-11-23 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51285
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51287
Bug #: 51287
Summary: [4.7 regression] 252.eon compfail with -march=atom
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51180
--- Comment #1 from trashyankes at wp dot pl 2011-11-23 18:34:43 UTC ---
I find easy workaround this bug.
---
---
template class M>
struct m
{
template
struct _inner_fix
{
typedef
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51286
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-11-23
18:26:41 UTC ---
Aren't you using some Mac OSX? If so, it is a duplicate of pr30617.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51286
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51267
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl
2011-11-23 17:56:17 UTC ---
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 09:33:37AM +, priv123 at hotmail dot fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51267
>
> > -fno-tree-ds seems to do the trick: from the C manua
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50823
Diego Novillo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51286
Bug #: 51286
Summary: function with print statement hangs when called as
argument of a print statement
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51225
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51246
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51179
--- Comment #9 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-11-23 17:19:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > (if nobody beats me, I'll try to reduce the code and open a new pr).
> If reproduced the ICE with 4.7, and started a delta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51285
Bug #: 51285
Summary: [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in
check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51176
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50237
--- Comment #27 from H.J. Lu 2011-11-23 17:15:58
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> > Checking linker version is inaccurate since this feature requires
> > support in assembler, linker as well as libc. We can disable it by'
> > default when 2 li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50237
--- Comment #26 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-23 16:53:16 UTC ---
> Checking linker version is inaccurate since this feature requires
> support in assembler, linker as well as libc. We can disable it by'
> default when 2 linkers
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51268
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-11-23
16:51:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> So basically you mean that in the gfortran implementation the subroutine name
> is part of the scope this subroutine defines (which forbids any other entity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50682
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-23
16:47:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 25903
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25903
gcc47-pr50682.patch
We can perhaps only call it if any landing pads were actually removed after the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50682
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50237
--- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu 2011-11-23 16:42:43
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> > --- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu 2011-11-22
> > 18:03:09 UTC ---
> > (In reply to comment #22)
> >> But this is the common case: you cannot expect or require the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51284
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
--- Comment #1 from Tobias
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51284
Bug #: 51284
Summary: [OOP] CLASS and VALUE attribute: No copy to temporary
done
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51277
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Ridge 2011-11-23
16:30:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > - in the first case, the location of the using-declaration or using-
> >directive (if there are several, any one of them sho
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50628
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50822
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50237
--- Comment #24 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-23 15:27:22 UTC ---
> --- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu 2011-11-22 18:03:09
> UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #22)
>> But this is the common case: you cannot expect or require the bootstr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47494
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51282
--- Comment #6 from mutz at kde dot org 2011-11-23 14:35:52 UTC ---
I was confused that I had applied the patch to Qt, but it still failed to
compile. I since learned that the unpatched code was still lurking in the PCH,
so yes, this is invalid.
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51075
--- Comment #1 from koen.poppe at cs dot kuleuven.be 2011-11-23 14:32:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 25902
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25902
ICE with allocatable type component
>> gfortran -c -std=f2008 -Wall -Wextra ehe.f03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50415
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51275
--- Comment #4 from Michael Matz 2011-11-23 14:12:11
UTC ---
Andrew: yes, I considered something similar. To work really well it requires
some changes to the conflict generation code, though. Without the clobbers
all objects stay live on the ex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50496
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51268
--- Comment #4 from Sebastien Bardeau 2011-11-23
13:56:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> For links to the standards see:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranStandards
Ok thank you for this link, very useful.
> I think the following of "11.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51271
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-23 13:35:13 UTC ---
triggering assert: gcc_checking_assert (cfi_row_equal_p (cur_row,
ti->beg_row));
relevant values:
...
(gdb) call debug_cfi_row (cur_row)
.cfi_def_cfa 29, 16
(gdb) call d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51248
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50496
--- Comment #9 from Chung-Lin Tang 2011-11-23
13:22:34 UTC ---
Author: cltang
Date: Wed Nov 23 13:22:30 2011
New Revision: 181664
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181664
Log:
2011-11-23 Chung-Lin Tang
PR rtl-optimiza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50888
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51282
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50917
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mutz at kde dot org
--- Comment #5 from P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51283
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51283
Bug #: 51283
Summary: g++ yields different behaviour for postfix increment
and decrement operators with fundamental types vs.
classes
Classification: Unclassified
Produc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51282
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51261
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-23
12:14:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 25900
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25900
gcc47-pr51261.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51277
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-23
12:05:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> - in the first case, the location of the using-declaration or using-
>directive (if there are several, any one of them should suffice)
> // What I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51282
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marc.glisse at normalesup
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51271
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-23 11:43:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 25899
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25899
res_hconf.c.228r.dwarf2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51271
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-23 11:41:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 25898
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25898
res_hconf.c.227r.nothrow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51271
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-23 11:40:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 25897
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25897
res_hconf.c.221r.mach
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51271
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-23 11:40:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 25896
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25896
res_hconf.c.220r.vartrack
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51282
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-23
11:11:46 UTC ---
in any case, please provide a complete testcase - noone is going to download
and configure Qt to investigate this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51282
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-23
11:10:50 UTC ---
dup of PR 50917 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51275
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51269
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
--- Comment #2 from Ir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51269
--- Comment #1 from Ira Rosen 2011-11-23 10:46:00 UTC
---
Created attachment 25895
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25895
patch
Right, this looks like a bug. The attached (not really tested) patch tries to
propagate prologue_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51268
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-11-23
10:22:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Well, we are definitely interested in what the standard says exactly.
For links to the standards see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranStandards
I think t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51282
Bug #: 51282
Summary: [regression] error: unable to find string literal
operator ‘operator"" on string literal concatenation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51267
--- Comment #5 from Mathieu 2011-11-23 09:33:37 UTC
---
> -fno-tree-ds seems to do the trick: from the C manual
with -fno-tree-dse it works as I expect. Thanks.
Because reading the manual I didn't see this option (or more exactly I didn't
unde
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49675
Markus Geimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mg1102 at web dot de
--- Comment #8 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48704
Markus Geimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51268
--- Comment #2 from Sebastien Bardeau 2011-11-23
09:22:12 UTC ---
Well, we are definitely interested in what the standard says exactly. Because
if this is explicitly forbidden, we are wondering what the Fortran committee
had in mind for programs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51179
--- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-11-23 08:34:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (if nobody beats me, I'll try to reduce the code and open a new pr).
If reproduced the ICE with 4.7, and started a delta reduce. It goes very
slowly, s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51145
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51145
--- Comment #5 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-11-23
08:24:08 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Wed Nov 23 08:23:59 2011
New Revision: 181653
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181653
Log:
PR c++/51145 - Alias template in elaborated-type-s
95 matches
Mail list logo
