http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50334
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51025
Bug #: 51025
Summary: Compilation bug during coreutils 8.5 make run, as
described in LFS 6.7
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51024
Bug #: 51024
Summary: OpenMP: ICE with type(c_ptr) in private()
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51013
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse 2011-11-08
07:44:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I'm sorry, I misunderstood you, you meant C++11 does not mandate the constexpr
> in the primary. Actually, I guess it doesn't hurt,
I agree, it was your expre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48543
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47970
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51023
--- Comment #1 from John Regehr 2011-11-08 05:53:57
UTC ---
Slightly smaller testcase:
int printf (const char *, ...);
short func_11 (int si1) {
return si1;
}
int main () {
int l_141 = 0x4272A;
printf ("%d\n", func_11 (l_141) == l_141);
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51023
Bug #: 51023
Summary: likely integer wrong code bug
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30282
--- Comment #25 from Alan Modra 2011-11-08 05:21:57
UTC ---
Actually, the testcase in #1 still fails on gcc-4.4. Looks like gcc-4.4 (and
earlier) need to use a bigger blockage.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50762
John Regehr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||regehr at cs dot utah.edu
--- Comment #1 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51022
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2011-11-08 04:08:53
UTC ---
Configure command as reported by config.log in the top of the build tree.
/users/joel/test-gcc/gcc-svn/configure
--with-ppl=/users/joel/test-gcc/install-svn --disable-werror
--enable-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51022
Bug #: 51022
Summary: powerpc libgcc static-object.mk error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50999
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-11-08
04:01:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Does the attached patch help? It tries to start to address the (yet unsolved)
> issue of preserving lang-dependent options.
It does fix this regressio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51021
Bug #: 51021
Summary: mips optab.c compilation error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51011
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod 2011-11-08
03:18:36 UTC ---
Yeah, it looks like I'll have to change the built-in mechanism slightly. I
followed the __sync methodology, but they dont resolve to function calls unless
they are in libgcc I think.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51020
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-11-08 03:03:58 UTC ---
Note that in 4.7 all options will be validated by the .opt machinery
(producing "gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '---'") by the
driver and only options p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51020
--- Comment #1 from Colin Watson 2011-11-08
02:05:33 UTC ---
Looking more closely, I wonder if the problem here is that `starred' isn't
getting reset. This construction is effectively a switch statement, isn't it?
I can't see why the presence o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51020
Bug #: 51020
Summary: %{...; :default} spec lines cause all switches to be
validated
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13822
Alexander Peslyak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||solar-gcc at openwall dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51018
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-08 01:39:48 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Nov 8 01:39:44 2011
New Revision: 181147
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181147
Log:
2011-11-07 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51019
Bug #: 51019
Summary: unclear documentation on -fomit-frame-pointer default
for -Os and different platforms
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50870
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50848
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
Status|NE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50848
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-08
01:10:48 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Nov 8 01:10:43 2011
New Revision: 181143
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181143
Log:
PR c++/50848
* pt.c (tsubst_copy_and_build)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51013
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-08
01:08:16 UTC ---
Hmm, I think adding the overloads would interfere with usage of complex
temporaries in a constant expression.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51018
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51017
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Peslyak
2011-11-08 00:56:47 UTC ---
The affected code is in DES_bs_b.c: DES_bs_crypt_25(). (Sorry, I should have
mentioned that right away.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51017
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Peslyak
2011-11-08 00:47:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> [...] Similar behavior
> is seen with current CVS version of John the Ripper, even though it has OpenMP
> support for DES heavily revised and integrated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50870
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-08
00:46:10 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Nov 8 00:46:06 2011
New Revision: 181140
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181140
Log:
PR c++/50870
* pt.c (tsubst_copy): Handle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50852
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51018
Bug #: 51018
Summary: Test failures on NetBSD
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51017
Bug #: 51017
Summary: GCC 4.6 performance regression (vs. 4.4/4.5)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25731|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40154
--- Comment #4 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2011-11-08 00:29:17 UTC ---
Patch is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01106.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51013
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51011
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-11-08 00:10:53 UTC ---
On 7-Nov-11, at 3:03 PM, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote:
> The problem is the atomic functions are not being typed correctly:
>
> /usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisfied symbols:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51013
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-11-08
00:05:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Isn't the const redundant here?
Maybe, the code predates constexpr.
> Actually, I only see constexpr for the specializations in the standard, not
> for
>t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51015
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51016
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50943
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||orestis at cs dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51013
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marc.glisse at normalesup
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51016
Bug #: 51016
Summary: "asm goto" crashes if used in static class method
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26252
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50960
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50870
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-07
22:52:27 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 7 22:52:23 2011
New Revision: 181131
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181131
Log:
PR c++/50870
* pt.c (tsubst_copy): Handle N
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47972
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|WAITIN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50863
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-07
22:52:34 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 7 22:52:32 2011
New Revision: 181132
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181132
Log:
PR c++/50863
* parser.c (cp_parser_initiali
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50863
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46611
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50046
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49438
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49149
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49438
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45114
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-07
22:46:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 25746
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25746
make use of alias-declarations in libstdc++
here's the library patch to enable all the alias-decl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49738
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49943
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47394
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pavel.belomestnov at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50231
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
it
calls simplify_gen_subreg, which then aborts:
Starting program: /home/amylaar/epiphany/bld-epiphany-2007/gcc/cc1plus
-fpreprocessed check_nan.ii -quiet -dumpbase check_nan.cc -auxbase check_nan -g
-g -g -O2 -O2 -O2 -version -fmessage-length=0 -ffunction-sections
-fdata-sections -o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49683
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48972
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48729
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49188
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49336
--- Comment #4 from Francois-Xavier Coudert
2011-11-07 22:22:02 UTC ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Mon Nov 7 22:21:54 2011
New Revision: 181127
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181127
Log:
PR libfortran/49188
PR libfor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49336
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49188
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert
2011-11-07 22:22:02 UTC ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Mon Nov 7 22:21:54 2011
New Revision: 181127
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181127
Log:
PR libfortran/49188
PR libfor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50863
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50870
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz 2011-11-07 22:04:00
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Nov 7 22:03:51 2011
New Revision: 181125
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181125
Log:
PR target/51007
* quadmath-imp.h (ieee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45114
--- Comment #14 from Benoit Jacob 2011-11-07
21:57:18 UTC ---
\o/
You rock!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45114
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2972
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-07
21:45:44 UTC ---
new patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01068.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45114
--- Comment #13 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-11-07
21:28:55 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Mon Nov 7 21:28:50 2011
New Revision: 181118
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181118
Log:
PR c++/45114 - Support C++11 alias-declaration
g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51015
Bug #: 51015
Summary: ice in vect_determine_vectorization_factor with -O3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50999
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-11-07
21:24:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created attachment 25734 [details]
> proposed patch
>
> Hm, on x86_64 the EH table is not empty (look at g++.dg/lto/20081109_1.C,
> the usual symtom is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35688
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35688
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-07
21:17:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 25744
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25744
patch for 4.6
I think I'm not going to apply this to release branches, as it's a pretty
significant
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51014
Bug #: 51014
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in apply_opt_in_copies, at
loop-unroll.c:2283 with -O2 -g -funroll-loops
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50997
--- Comment #3 from Fredrik Hederstierna
2011-11-07 21:11:13 UTC ---
Ok, answer to myself. I found the patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-11/msg00169.html
I think the patch is very unfortunate, if I knew I should have objected.
It's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51013
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|paolo at gcc dot gnu.org|gdr at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51013
Bug #: 51013
Summary: complex::{imag,real}() should maintain
lvalue-returning extension in C++11
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51011
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-11-07 20:03:43 UTC ---
On 11/7/2011 2:27 PM, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote:
> Is dejagnu on hpux limited somehow
That's not the problem.
The problem is the atomic functions are not being type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #16 from Steve Kargl
2011-11-07 19:49:39 UTC ---
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 07:25:32PM +, inform at tiker dot net wrote:
> --- Comment #15 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-11-07
> 19:25:32 UTC ---
> Zydrunas and I have successfully comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51012
Bug #: 51012
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at
fold-const.c:1897 with -fno-early-inlining and passing
incompatible function ptr
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22065
Serge Belyshev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Summary|Quadmath I/O doe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51011
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #15 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-11-07
19:25:32 UTC ---
Zydrunas and I have successfully completed the copyright assignment process,
and we're ready to move forward with this patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51011
Bug #: 51011
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic-generic.c (test for excess errors)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20634
Serge Belyshev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50919
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50919
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 18:41:16 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Nov 7 18:41:12 2011
New Revision: 181107
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181107
Log:
2011-11-07 Janus Weil
PR fortran/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49313
--- Comment #12 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-11-07
18:08:40 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Nov 7 18:08:35 2011
New Revision: 181104
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181104
Log:
PR target/49313
* config/avr/lib1funcs.S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50822
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-07 17:54:00 UTC ---
> I am testing the attached patch that ought to solve the issue.
A sparc-sun-solaris2.11 bootstrap with Sun as is now into stage3, so
this looks quite good so far.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35688
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-07
17:51:43 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 7 17:51:40 2011
New Revision: 181102
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181102
Log:
PR c++/35688
* decl2.c (constrain_visibilit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33255
--- Comment #28 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-07
17:51:28 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 7 17:51:24 2011
New Revision: 181100
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181100
Log:
PR c++/33255
* decl.c (save_function_data)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51004
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #47 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-07 16:45:36 UTC ---
> --- Comment #44 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-07
> 15:12:26 UTC ---
> Great, thanks - we can leave it open for now until it's fully resolved.
>
> As I said in c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #46 from Rainer Orth 2011-11-07 16:43:35
UTC ---
David,
I had been waiting to see if the remaining AIX gthread issues were releated to
my patch. Since that's not the case and my own testing had completed
successfully,
I've now check
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
