http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725
Bug #: 50725
Summary: [4.7 regression] -O3 -mstackrealign -march=core2
generates invalid prologue code in callee procedure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50705
--- Comment #8 from SK 2011-10-14 04:48:13
UTC ---
Yes the HW engine that is present on the controller works in Little endian
therefore we need linux to work in LE on PPC.
I changed
Binutils
GLIBC
GCC
GCC Changes::
Binutils
gas/configure:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
Bug #: 50724
Summary: isnan broken by -ffinite-math-only in g++
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50705
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-14
03:36:38 UTC ---
How did you configure GCC?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50705
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-14
03:36:01 UTC ---
"Little-Endian 32-bit." Is there a reason why you are using little-endian with
PPC?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50705
--- Comment #5 from SK 2011-10-14 03:29:48
UTC ---
Wrong assembly being is generated in most of the bitwise and's conditions that
have pass are failing and those that have to fail are passing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50723
Bug #: 50723
Summary: [4.7 regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa
failed
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38174
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|paolo.carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38174
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50714
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50714
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-14 00:12:46 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Oct 14 00:12:40 2011
New Revision: 179948
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179948
Log:
2011-10-13 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50721
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722
Bug #: 50722
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr49994-3.c (test for excess errors)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38018
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49263
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24412|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50721
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-13
22:52:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 25490
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25490
test_c.c: Replacement for -lgsl -lgslcblas
The attached C file replaces -lgsl -lgslcblas. Use togeth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50721
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-13
22:30:31 UTC ---
Note: The program works if it is compiled with "-O" instead without
optimization (-O0). Unsurprisingly, for the big program is sufficient to
compile only fgsl.f90 with -O.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50718
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50721
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-13
22:15:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 25489
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25489
test.s: working, compiled with 2010-04-29-r158905
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50721
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-13
22:14:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 25488
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25488
test.s: failing, compiled with 2010-04-30-r158919
The dumps (-fdump-tree-all) look the same. However
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50721
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-13
22:04:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 25487
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25487
Test case - needs to be linked against -lgsl -lgslcblas
(In reply to comment #1)
> What were the com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50545
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50563
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50707
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50437
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50614
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50614
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-13
21:23:52 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Oct 13 21:23:47 2011
New Revision: 179945
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179945
Log:
PR c++/50614
* cp-tree.h (VAR_TEMPL_TYPE_FI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50437
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-13
21:23:42 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Oct 13 21:23:36 2011
New Revision: 179944
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179944
Log:
PR c++/50437
* cp-tree.h (struct tree_lambd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50721
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-13 21:17:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> That's with FGSL version 0.9.3 from
> http://www.lrz.de/services/software/mathematik/gsl/fortran/
>
> Using gfortran 4.7 or 4.6 to compile the libr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50614
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50721
Bug #: 50721
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] gfortran miscompiles FGSL
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50720
Bug #: 50720
Summary: "deprecated" doesn't work as expected for functions
returning pointer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48823
--- Comment #5 from Steve Ellcey 2011-10-13 20:16:46
UTC ---
I am not sure any set of flags will guarantee strict IEEE floating point
behavior. See PR37845 for some more information.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48823
--- Comment #4 from Jeroen Demeyer 2011-10-13
20:05:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> The difference in results is due to the use of the fma instructions (fused
> multiply add). If you don't want the fma instructions to be used you should
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50694
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo 2011-10-13 19:54:31 UTC
---
As it turns out, this is already handled by the line
#define DRIVER_SELF_SPECS "%{m2a:%{ml:%eSH2a does not support little-endian}}"
in sh.h.
However, it doesn't catch -m2a-nofpu, -m2a-s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50716
Artem Shinkarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||artyom.shinkaroff at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50716
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-13
19:44:32 UTC ---
I think vec has an alignment requirement which makes the testcase invalid.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50437
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50719
Bug #: 50719
Summary: segmentation fault when attempting to build libav with
gcc trunk
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49242
Serge Belyshev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50718
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-13
18:46:33 UTC ---
Untested draft patch:
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
@@ -3344,2 +3344,4 @@ gfc_conv_procedure_call (gfc_se * se, gfc_symbol * sym,
{
+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50718
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.2
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50618
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50618
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-13
18:02:34 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Oct 13 18:02:27 2011
New Revision: 179936
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179936
Log:
PR c++/50618
* init.c (expand_aggr_init_1):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48035
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-13
18:03:01 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Oct 13 18:02:53 2011
New Revision: 179937
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179937
Log:
PR c++/48035
* init.c (build_zero_init_1):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48035
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50618
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-13
18:03:13 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Oct 13 18:03:06 2011
New Revision: 179938
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179938
Log:
PR c++/50618
* init.c (expand_aggr_init_1):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50618
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-13
18:02:15 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Oct 13 18:02:10 2011
New Revision: 179935
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179935
Log:
PR c++/50618
* init.c (expand_aggr_init_1):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50618
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-13
18:01:58 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Oct 13 18:01:51 2011
New Revision: 179934
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179934
Log:
PR c++/50618
* init.c (expand_aggr_init_1):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48823
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50715
--- Comment #2 from Sean McGovern 2011-10-13
17:52:32 UTC ---
Here's a better snippet of what it was up to:
libtool: link: /BUILD/gcc/obj-179918/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc
-B/BUILD/gcc/obj-179918/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/BUILD/gcc/obj-179918/i386-pc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50715
--- Comment #1 from Sean McGovern 2011-10-13
17:46:26 UTC ---
configured thusly:
/SOURCES/gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/BUILD/gcc/179918
--target=i386-pc-solaris2.10 --enable-checking=release --with-gnu-as
--with-as=/usr/local/bin/as --with-gmp=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44382
--- Comment #9 from William J. Schmidt 2011-10-13
17:30:14 UTC ---
Just adding some status information well after the fact...
We experimented with adding powerpc64 hooks to use the parallel reassociation
support from comment #8. We elected not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50718
Bug #: 50718
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE (fold_convert) with
-fcheck=pointer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50717
Andrew Stubbs changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ams at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50326
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Blocks|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30282
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50717
--- Comment #3 from Matthew Gretton-Dann
2011-10-13 15:50:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 25486
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25486
Incorrect tree output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50717
--- Comment #2 from Matthew Gretton-Dann
2011-10-13 15:49:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 25485
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25485
Correct tree output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50717
--- Comment #1 from Matthew Gretton-Dann
2011-10-13 15:49:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 25484
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25484
Single function testcase (not executable)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50717
Bug #: 50717
Summary: Silent code gen fault with incorrect widening of
multiply
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50709
Serge Belyshev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|x86_64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50659
--- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-13 15:04:05 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Thu Oct 13 15:03:58 2011
New Revision: 179923
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179923
Log:
2011-10-13 Janus Weil
PR fortran/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50716
Bug #: 50716
Summary: Segmentation fault caused by misaligned vector access
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50715
Bug #: 50715
Summary: build with --enable-checking=release fails with linker
error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38174
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-13 14:27:12
UTC ---
Just use composite_pointer_type. :)
Jason
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50644
--- Comment #6 from Michael Matz 2011-10-13 14:04:36
UTC ---
See comment #2, you need to help in debugging it. I can't reproduce, the
emutls problem is fixed, and with the information I have I can't speculate
which (probably global) variables ne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50644
--- Comment #5 from Andi Kleen 2011-10-13
13:22:40 UTC ---
Note I need to keep reverting this patch to do any substantial builds.
I hear it's also failing for other too.
Any progress in fixing it? Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50354
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50712
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50714
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-13
12:42:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 25482
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25482
testcase
Here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50684
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-13 12:31:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
>
> > call move_alloc (x%a, a) ! Invalid (2)
>
> This one corresponds to the original test case.
Sorry, of course I meant this one:
call
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50684
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-13 12:27:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I think the comments of the following program are correct; however, the
> compilers I tested either rejected all - or they compiled it without warn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50703
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-13
12:22:45 UTC ---
Note that in case problems persist, a testcase is *required* for anything
concrete to happen. It's impossible to diagnose in any serious detail
thread-safety issues without knowing the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50714
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-13
12:16:26 UTC ---
Richard knows - we exchanged some messages off-Bugzilla - that the real issue
with the original bug report he is handling is that no codecvt specs are
provided by our implementation fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50714
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-13
12:13:07 UTC ---
Richard, could you attached the testcase you referred to?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50714
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-13
12:10:50 UTC ---
If you want, you can do that, but in practice nothing will work anyway... Up to
you, I wont be able to do any serious QoI work on these features for a lng
time.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50714
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-13
12:07:57 UTC ---
(Bah, I didn't actually mean to change the status, my browser did it for me!)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50712
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-13
12:07:49 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 13 12:07:44 2011
New Revision: 179919
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179919
Log:
2011-10-13 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50714
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50703
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-13
12:01:56 UTC ---
was gcc built with a non-default value for --enable-clocale ?
what locale is being used by the application?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50714
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50714
Bug #: 50714
Summary: codecvt_byname::codecvt::_M_c_locale_codecvt not
initialized by destroyed
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
--- Comment #13 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-13 11:18:14 UTC ---
Author: vries
Revision: 179655
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Thu Oct 13 11:18:09 2011
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
--- Comment #12 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-13 11:10:06 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Oct 13 11:10:01 2011
New Revision: 179916
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179916
Log:
Fix PR middle-end/50527 ChangeLog entry
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50589
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50589
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou 2011-10-13
10:54:23 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Oct 13 10:54:19 2011
New Revision: 179911
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179911
Log:
PR ada/50589
* s-linux-alpha.ads: Do no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50705
--- Comment #4 from SK 2011-10-13 10:46:32
UTC ---
Please download the full dump(14MB)from ftp0.lsil.com by following below
commands
login:
user: ftp,
password: anonymous,
cd pub
binary #
get gcc_bug_ppc_476_mini.zip (NOTE:: ls/dir not supporte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50712
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-13
10:44:12 UTC ---
I have a patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50702
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49777
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50712
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50712
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-13
10:06:04 UTC ---
Reduced testcase (suspicious because of address-taking of a valist):
typedef __builtin_va_list __va_list;
typedef __va_list __gnuc_va_list;
typedef __gnuc_va_list va_list;
struct M
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49777
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50713
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38174
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-13
09:38:57 UTC ---
Thanks Jason, I thought we had to purely *add* overloads. Therefore we'll have
to refactor the code a bit I guess, to always have a single call at the end of
add_builtin_candidate. For
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50711
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50712
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50709
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
