[Bug testsuite/48402] autogen fixincludes in GCC 4.6.0 testsuite fails on OS X 10.6.7

2011-09-27 Thread sambler at nd dot edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48402 Stuart Ambler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sambler at nd dot edu --- Comment #2 from

[Bug testsuite/50485] gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-blendps.c fails spuriously on i686

2011-09-27 Thread mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50485 Maxim Kuvyrkov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mkuvyrkov at gcc dot |

[Bug debug/50279] [4.7 Regression] ICE while building the go front-end with LTO enabled

2011-09-27 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50279 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2011-09-27 22:52:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > The same error occurs while building xplor-nih on x86_64-apple-darwin11... > The failures building xplor-nih with -flto using gcc trunk are gone at r179288.

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

2011-09-27 Thread giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #8 from Christopher Yeleighton 2011-09-27 22:23:34 UTC --- > I agree that this would be an improvement, even without clang's selective > typedef unwrapping. But I have some doubts such a patch will be accepted. I > was > told in a co

[Bug c++/49855] [4.6/4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in fold_convert_const_int_from_real

2011-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49855 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/49855] internal compiler error: in fold_convert_const_int_from_real

2011-09-27 Thread navin.kumar at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49855 Navin Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||navin.kumar at gmail dot

[Bug c++/27527] invalid types produced out of argument deduction (SFINAE bug)

2011-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27527 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug c++/50533] Creating object by calling constructor explicitly

2011-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50533 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/31489] error says struct when it should say class

2011-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31489 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/31489] error says struct when it should say class

2011-09-27 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31489 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-27 21:52:23 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Sep 27 21:52:19 2011 New Revision: 179293 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179293 Log: /cp 2011-09-27 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

2011-09-27 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #111 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-27 20:48:19 UTC --- Mozilla now builds for me with slim LTO objects. I.e. with -flto=24 -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects One needs ar/nm/ranlib that works with slim LTO. I simply set PATH to direc

[Bug c++/50545] New: [C++0x] SFINAE does not handle an explicit type conversion (functional notation) with a braced-init-list well if target type is not dependent

2011-09-27 Thread gintensubaru at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50545 Bug #: 50545 Summary: [C++0x] SFINAE does not handle an explicit type conversion (functional notation) with a braced-init-list well if target type is not dependent Classification:

[Bug bootstrap/50543] Bootstrap fails to build for latest 4.6

2011-09-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50543 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-09-27 20:29:55 UTC --- I have no problem with /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-release/configure --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld --enable-languages=c,c++ i686-linux --prefix=/usr/gcc-4.6.

[Bug middle-end/43864] Same basic blocks should be merged

2011-09-27 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43864 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/9635] time_get<>::date_order unimplemented

2011-09-27 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9635 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-27 19:00:44 UTC --- None whatsoever, the Apache stdcxx project is the open source version of Rogue Wave's C++ library

[Bug libstdc++/9635] time_get<>::date_order unimplemented

2011-09-27 Thread sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9635 --- Comment #8 from Steve Ellcey 2011-09-27 18:23:56 UTC --- No, the patch I mentioned was not sent to this project. If I am reading the web site correctly (the first link in comment #6), I think the patch was sent to the apache version of the C+

[Bug libstdc++/9635] time_get<>::date_order unimplemented

2011-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9635 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|paolo.carlini at oracle dot | |com

[Bug fortran/50541] gfortran should not accept a pointer as a generic-name (r178939)

2011-09-27 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50541 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/50543] Bootstrap fails to build for latest 4.6

2011-09-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50543 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.6.2 |4.6.0 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-09-27 1

[Bug bootstrap/50326] [4.7 regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

2011-09-27 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50326 --- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-27 17:18:32 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Sep 27 17:18:22 2011 New Revision: 179285 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179285 Log: gcc/ PR middle-end/50386 P

[Bug libgomp/50386] [4.7 Regression] libgomp.h:87:5: error: unnamed struct/union that defines no instances

2011-09-27 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50386 --- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-27 17:18:29 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Sep 27 17:18:22 2011 New Revision: 179285 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179285 Log: gcc/ PR middle-end/50386 P

[Bug libstdc++/9635] time_get<>::date_order unimplemented

2011-09-27 Thread sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9635 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sje at cup dot hp.com --- Comment #6 from S

[Bug middle-end/49463] [4.7 Regression] LTO doesn't work symbol renamed via asm statement

2011-09-27 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49463 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/50544] New: Wrong esp offset in debug infos for functions that call stdcall functions

2011-09-27 Thread bernhardloos at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50544 Bug #: 50544 Summary: Wrong esp offset in debug infos for functions that call stdcall functions Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCON

[Bug middle-end/49463] [4.7 Regression] LTO doesn't work symbol renamed via asm statement

2011-09-27 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49463 --- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-27 16:28:37 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Tue Sep 27 16:28:24 2011 New Revision: 179280 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179280 Log: PR middle-end/49463 * gcc.c-torture/execut

[Bug bootstrap/50543] Bootstrap fails to build for latest 4.6.0

2011-09-27 Thread kirill.yukhin at intel dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50543 --- Comment #2 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-09-27 16:17:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > what do you mean latest 4.6.0? the 4.6.0 release, or the latest sources on > the > 4.6 branch? (which will become 4.6.2) Latest sources. Sorry for misunde

[Bug middle-end/43864] Same basic blocks should be merged

2011-09-27 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43864 --- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-27 16:12:48 UTC --- Author: vries Date: Tue Sep 27 16:12:35 2011 New Revision: 179276 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179276 Log: 2011-09-27 Tom de Vries PR middle-

[Bug middle-end/43864] Same basic blocks should be merged

2011-09-27 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43864 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-27 16:10:53 UTC --- Author: vries Date: Tue Sep 27 16:10:42 2011 New Revision: 179275 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179275 Log: 2011-09-27 Tom de Vries PR middle-

[Bug c++/14283] Diagnostic for invalid template-id could be improved

2011-09-27 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14283 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/50249] ira marks wrong value for inheriting

2011-09-27 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50249 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/50249] ira marks wrong value for inheriting

2011-09-27 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50249 --- Comment #7 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-09-27 14:55:16 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Tue Sep 27 14:55:11 2011 New Revision: 179272 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179272 Log: PR rtl-optimization/50249 * reload1.c (rel

[Bug c++/35722] [C++0x] Variadic templates expansion into non-variadic class template

2011-09-27 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35722 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|dodji at gcc dot

[Bug target/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

2011-09-27 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|enhancement |normal

[Bug bootstrap/50543] Bootstrap fails to build for latest 4.6.0

2011-09-27 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50543 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-27 14:39:05 UTC --- what do you mean latest 4.6.0? the 4.6.0 release, or the latest sources on the 4.6 branch? (which will become 4.6.2)

[Bug bootstrap/50543] New: Bootstrap fails to build for latest 4.6.0

2011-09-27 Thread kirill.yukhin at intel dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50543 Bug #: 50543 Summary: Bootstrap fails to build for latest 4.6.0 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug fortran/50525] gfortran should not allow early reference to entry dummy argument (r178939)

2011-09-27 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50525 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-09-27 14:27:39 UTC --- The patch causes regressions as it comes before the check in resolve_variable (search for "before the ENTRY", which covers a similar issue (cf PR 25090). Namely: gfortran.dg/entry_du

[Bug fortran/50542] New: gfortran should detect violation of Fortran 95 R536 (r178939)

2011-09-27 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50542 Bug #: 50542 Summary: gfortran should detect violation of Fortran 95 R536 (r178939) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50541] New: gfortran should not accept a pointer as a generic-name (r178939)

2011-09-27 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50541 Bug #: 50541 Summary: gfortran should not accept a pointer as a generic-name (r178939) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50540] New: Internal Error: Can't convert UNKNOWN to INTEGER(4) (r178939)

2011-09-27 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50540 Bug #: 50540 Summary: Internal Error: Can't convert UNKNOWN to INTEGER(4) (r178939) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50539] New: Internal error gfc_match_entry(): Bad state (r178939)

2011-09-27 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50539 Bug #: 50539 Summary: Internal error gfc_match_entry(): Bad state (r178939) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug fortran/50538] New: formal argument cannot be same as procedure name (r178939)

2011-09-27 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50538 Bug #: 50538 Summary: formal argument cannot be same as procedure name (r178939) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50537] New: explicit interface required (r178939)

2011-09-27 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50537 Bug #: 50537 Summary: explicit interface required (r178939) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug fortran/50536] New: an input item shall not appear as the do-variable of any io-implied-do

2011-09-27 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50536 Bug #: 50536 Summary: an input item shall not appear as the do-variable of any io-implied-do Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIR

[Bug fortran/50535] New: transformational intrinsic functions not allowed in statement functions

2011-09-27 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50535 Bug #: 50535 Summary: transformational intrinsic functions not allowed in statement functions Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug tree-optimization/40770] Vectorization of complex types, vectorization of sincos missing

2011-09-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40770 --- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-27 13:59:57 UTC --- *** Bug 50534 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/50534] sincos not supported for svlm

2011-09-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50534 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libgomp/50386] [4.7 Regression] libgomp.h:87:5: error: unnamed struct/union that defines no instances

2011-09-27 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50386 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug middle-end/50534] New: sincos not supported for svlm

2011-09-27 Thread vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50534 Bug #: 50534 Summary: sincos not supported for svlm Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/50513] cross configurations fail to build ipa-inline-analysis.o with -Werror

2011-09-27 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50513 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-09-27 13:34:56 UTC --- Probably fixed by Richard Sandiford in r179268.

[Bug middle-end/50527] inconsistent vla align

2011-09-27 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/50533] Creating object by calling constructor explicitly

2011-09-27 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50533 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-27 12:59:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > Please, look at this debate: No, please follow the bug reporting instructions at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ and post a testcase, not a link to somewhere els

[Bug middle-end/50530] [4.7 Regression] ICE in inline_read_section, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:2895

2011-09-27 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50530 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50533] Creating object by calling constructor explicitly

2011-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50533 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|malvikus at gmail dot com | Component|translation

[Bug translation/50533] New: Creating object by calling constructor explicitly

2011-09-27 Thread malvikus at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50533 Bug #: 50533 Summary: Creating object by calling constructor explicitly Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major P

[Bug fortran/50525] gfortran should not allow early reference to entry dummy argument (r178939)

2011-09-27 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50525 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-09-27 12:12:03 UTC --- I meant something like the following. Though, the wording could be improved. --- a/gcc/fortran/decl.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/decl.c @@ -4296,6 +4296,14 @@ gfc_match_formal_arglist (gfc_sym

[Bug c++/50531] ICE on defaulted template destructor

2011-09-27 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50531 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UN

[Bug libffi/50532] [patch] libffi needs FFI_MMAP_EXEC_WRIT on kfreebsd-amd64

2011-09-27 Thread Petr.Salinger at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50532 Petr.Salinger at seznam dot cz changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu

[Bug libffi/50532] New: [patch] libffi needs FFI_MMAP_EXEC_WRIT on kfreebsd-amd64

2011-09-27 Thread Petr.Salinger at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50532 Bug #: 50532 Summary: [patch] libffi needs FFI_MMAP_EXEC_WRIT on kfreebsd-amd64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/50531] New: ICE on defaulted template destructor

2011-09-27 Thread bepaald at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50531 Bug #: 50531 Summary: ICE on defaulted template destructor Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/50530] [4.7 Regression] ICE in inline_read_section, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:2895

2011-09-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50530 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/30066] option to make inline functions hidden

2011-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30066 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at redhat dot com,

[Bug middle-end/50527] inconsistent vla align

2011-09-27 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-09-27 11:08:01 UTC --- On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527 > > --- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-27 10:49:

[Bug middle-end/50527] inconsistent vla align

2011-09-27 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527 --- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-27 10:49:23 UTC --- > I think we can check if the size is constant in evaluate_stmt and > compute alignment according to that. We can only do that in the last ccp phase that does folding of vl

[Bug target/50038] redundant zero extensions

2011-09-27 Thread tocarip.intel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50038 --- Comment #2 from tocarip.intel at gmail dot com 2011-09-27 10:15:15 UTC --- Created attachment 25369 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25369 Possible solution Here is an experimental patch which solves this problem. I modified

[Bug middle-end/50530] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in inline_read_section, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:2895

2011-09-27 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50530 Bug #: 50530 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in inline_read_section, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:2895 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCO

[Bug c++/31489] error says struct when it should say class

2011-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31489 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug middle-end/50527] inconsistent vla align

2011-09-27 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-09-27 09:28:42 UTC --- On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527 > > --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-27 09:21:

[Bug middle-end/50527] inconsistent vla align

2011-09-27 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527 --- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-27 09:23:21 UTC --- Created attachment 25368 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25368 proposed patch > Hm, I suppose we should then make all replacement decls have > BIGGEST_AL

[Bug middle-end/50527] inconsistent vla align

2011-09-27 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-27 09:21:12 UTC --- > Or alternatively (given we re-compute alignment together with folding alloca), > assign the same alignment as folding would. At the point that we determine the alloca align

[Bug c++/30066] option to make inline functions hidden

2011-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30066 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/50528] [4.7 Regression] SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build with LTO

2011-09-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50528 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/50363] internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed

2011-09-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50363 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Component|c++

[Bug tree-optimization/50480] 10% performance regression on Spec2006 410.bwaves

2011-09-27 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50480 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-09-27 08:57:33 UTC --- On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, kirill.yukhin at intel dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50480 > > --- Comment #4 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-09-27 > 08:31:3

[Bug c/50444] -ftree-isa ignores alignment

2011-09-27 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-09-27 08:52:06 UTC --- On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444 > > H.J. Lu changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug c++/50363] internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed

2011-09-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50363 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-27 08:53:15 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Sep 27 08:53:08 2011 New Revision: 179247 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179247 Log: 2011-09-27 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug c++/25015] [gomp] Function names cannot be demangled due to ".omp_fn" suffix

2011-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25015 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug c++/18101] invalid declaration in struct not rejected

2011-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18101 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug tree-optimization/50480] 10% performance regression on Spec2006 410.bwaves

2011-09-27 Thread kirill.yukhin at intel dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50480 --- Comment #4 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-09-27 08:31:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > For 32bit only it seems. Supposedly a cost model issue, the register pressure > will be higher and we have only half the number of SSE regs. Richard, what'

[Bug c++/16057] Error message omits overload candidate

2011-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16057 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug libstdc++/49559] [C++0x] stable_sort calls self-move-assignment operator

2011-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49559 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.6.2 --- Comment #25 from Paolo Carlini

[Bug libstdc++/49559] [C++0x] stable_sort calls self-move-assignment operator

2011-09-27 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49559 --- Comment #24 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-27 08:22:22 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Sep 27 08:22:07 2011 New Revision: 179242 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179242 Log: 2011-09-27 Paolo Carlini PR lib

[Bug fortran/50525] gfortran should not allow early reference to entry dummy argument (r178939)

2011-09-27 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50525 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid CC|