[Bug target/50150] misc vect.exp failures for target arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50150 --- Comment #4 from Carrot 2011-09-26 02:16:15 UTC --- After adding '--with-fpu=neon' '--with-float=softfp' to my configuration, most of the failure disappeared, but there are still several gcc FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-120.c scan-tree-dump-times v

[Bug c/50521] New: -fstrict-volatile-bitfields is not strict

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50521 Bug #: 50521 Summary: -fstrict-volatile-bitfields is not strict Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug target/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 --- Comment #20 from Jack Howarth 2011-09-26 00:47:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > Created attachment 25359 [details] > wip 3 > Regtest on darwin11 at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-09/msg02611.html.

[Bug java/50520] New: getReaderForText never returns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50520 Bug #: 50520 Summary: getReaderForText never returns Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/48974] VIS intrinsics improvement opportunities

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48974 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug target/48974] VIS intrinsics improvement opportunities

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48974 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/26748] gimplify_expr_stmt in cp-gimplifer.c does warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26748 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-

[Bug c++/31044] Compilation fails on definition of a static template class member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31044 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug fortran/50514] gfortran should check ISHFT & ISHFTC aruments (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50514 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/34023] Wrong using of user-defined conversion operator for converting rvalue to reference on constant.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34023 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/37657] static template member definition fails when parameter is another template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37657 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/50519] -Wconversion false positive warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50519 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/40752] -Wconversion generates false warnings for operands not larger than target type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40752 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebrahim at mohammadi dot ir --- Com

[Bug c++/50519] -Wconversion false positive warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50519 Ebrahim Mohammadi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebrahim at mohammadi dot ir --- Comme

[Bug c++/50519] New: -Wconversion false positive warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50519 Bug #: 50519 Summary: -Wconversion false positive warning Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug regression/50484] [4.6 regression] ia64-portbld-freebsd9.0, conftest.c:16:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50484 --- Comment #4 from Gerald Pfeifer 2011-09-25 20:45:38 UTC --- Well, my "fix" may not really be one (it definitely is a hack and not the right fix) and thus it may actually be causing the segmentation fault even. I think http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi

[Bug c++/50518] New: repeated c++11 opaque enum declarations are invalid

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50518 Bug #: 50518 Summary: repeated c++11 opaque enum declarations are invalid Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/20039] uninitialized const in `new' of `const struct'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20039 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-25 20:29:09 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Sep 25 20:29:04 2011 New Revision: 179170 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179170 Log: Core 234 - allow const objects with no initiali

[Bug c++/42844] const variable requires initializer / no explicitly declared default constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42844 --- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-25 20:29:09 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Sep 25 20:29:04 2011 New Revision: 179170 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179170 Log: Core 234 - allow const objects with no initial

[Bug regression/50484] [4.6 regression] ia64-portbld-freebsd9.0, conftest.c:16:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50484 --- Comment #3 from Anton Shterenlikht 2011-09-25 20:25:19 UTC --- Created attachment 25362 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25362 libgcc config.log from ia64 FreeBSD

[Bug regression/50484] [4.6 regression] ia64-portbld-freebsd9.0, conftest.c:16:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50484 --- Comment #2 from Anton Shterenlikht 2011-09-25 20:24:24 UTC --- Gerald has provided a fix for the _Unwind_FindTableEntry FreeBSD ia64 issue (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45650). With this fix, 4.7 on ia64 FreeBSD now gives the

[Bug fortran/50517] New: gfortran must detect that actual argument type is different from dummy argument type (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50517 Bug #: 50517 Summary: gfortran must detect that actual argument type is different from dummy argument type (r178939) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug fortran/50516] New: gfortran must detect illegal statements in a block data (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50516 Bug #: 50516 Summary: gfortran must detect illegal statements in a block data (r178939) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50515] New: gfortran should not accept an external that is a common (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50515 Bug #: 50515 Summary: gfortran should not accept an external that is a common (r178939) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50514] New: gfortran should check ISHFT & ISHFTC aruments (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50514 Bug #: 50514 Summary: gfortran should check ISHFT & ISHFTC aruments (r178939) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug rtl-optimization/50489] [UPC/IA64] mis-schedule of MEM ref with -ftree-vectorize and -fschedule-insns2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50489 --- Comment #6 from Gary Funck 2011-09-25 19:58:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > D.3059_11 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(D.3058); > > looks like bogus IL to me. You view D.3058, a struct of size 16, as > a pointer (of size 8). I suppose you want

[Bug bootstrap/50513] cross configurations fail to build ipa-inline-analysis.o with -Werror

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50513 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #1

[Bug c/50507] Huge amount of memory used while building GCC4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50507 --- Comment #2 from Roger Meyer 2011-09-25 19:03:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) i'm using the stock gcc 4.4 that comes with debian 6 i386 compiling gcc 4.5.3 with the following options ./configure --with-newlib --with-headers=no --prefix=/

[Bug bootstrap/50513] New: cross configurations fail to build ipa-inline-analysis.o with -Werror

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50513 Bug #: 50513 Summary: cross configurations fail to build ipa-inline-analysis.o with -Werror Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug ada/48835] Porting GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835 --- Comment #32 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-09-25 18:05:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #31) > * expmed.c > (store_bit_field_1): Use the new interfaces. > > I'll continue trying to minimize the changeset. Of the three translatio

[Bug c/50506] gcc fails at assembly with -O1 while inlining is forced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506 --- Comment #12 from Rafał Mużyło 2011-09-25 18:02:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) Does the WONTFIX resolution here mean that glibc will need a fix then ?

[Bug c/50444] unaligned movdqa instruction after inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/43393] integral promotion of long bit-fields broken in gcc 4.4.0?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43393 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/32118] ICE in c++ code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32118 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/50506] gcc fails at assembly with -O1 while inlining is forced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/34014] conversion operators misprinted in gimple dump

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34014 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/50512] surprising change in overloading resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50512 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/50512] surprising change in overloading resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50512 --- Comment #1 from mm at mezzarobba dot net 2011-09-25 16:51:17 UTC --- Created attachment 25361 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25361 testcase

[Bug c++/43393] integral promotion of long bit-fields broken in gcc 4.4.0?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43393 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-09-25 16:51:02 UTC --- On Sun, 25 Sep 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > I'm tempted to close this, then. Comment #4 raises a C issue, however, maybe > Joseph wants to have a loo

[Bug c++/50512] New: surprising change in overloading resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50512 Bug #: 50512 Summary: surprising change in overloading resolution Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/41995] Incorrect point of instantiation for function template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41995 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |NEW CC|gcc-bugs at gcc do

[Bug c++/41966] g++ produces spurious alignment errors for prototypes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41966 --- Comment #2 from Jens Gustedt 2011-09-25 16:33:05 UTC --- Just to add to the list, since this finally found some attention. The problem is also manifest for 4.5.2, only the difference is that this time the three line version at the end of the

[Bug c++/44725] -pedantic should report gcc extension

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44725 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/46858] ICE: in cp_lexer_new_from_tokens, at cp/parser.c:464

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46858 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/39751] ICE in cp_lexer_new_from_tokens, at cp/parser.c:342

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39751 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-25 16:08:15 UTC --- *** Bug 46858 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/39699] No error reporting when function and variable have the same name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39699 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/42032] Aliasing errors in stl_tree.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42032 --- Comment #11 from Evan Martin 2011-09-25 16:02:25 UTC --- I am on personal leave until 2012. If you're within Google, you can read http://www/~evanm/leave.html for more. Otherwise, for Chrome questions you can try asking t...@chromium.org, a

[Bug c++/42032] Aliasing errors in stl_tree.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42032 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/41966] g++ produces spurious alignment errors for prototypes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41966 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/45169] C++ Hello World mudflap violations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45169 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/45880] Template-Methode in Shared Object not resolved when compiled with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45880 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50504] g++ 4.5.2 -O2 with complex produces incorrect code on AMD64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50504 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-09-25 15:25:01 UTC --- According to my bisection, the bug started on trunk for 4.5.0 with r147851, stopped on trunk for 4.6.0 with r164136, and stopped on 4.5 branch with r175813. I can't say if those fi

[Bug c/50444] unaligned movdqa instruction after inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444 --- Comment #1 from John Salmon 2011-09-25 15:22:07 UTC --- Here's a slightly smaller test case. The problem is the 'movdqa'. According the x86-64 ABI, rsp+8 is 16-bit aligned at the entry to main, and therefore so is %rdi when we try to execut

[Bug c++/48667] [ skipping N instantiation contexts ] Skips exactly those which are of interest to me

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48667 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/44783] implement -ftemplate-backtrace-limit=

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||brian.amberg at unibas dot

[Bug c++/48667] [ skipping N instantiation contexts ] Skips exactly those which are of interest to me

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48667 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/18835] memory consumption is high for C++ testcase

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18835 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/41158] segfault while using PCH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41158 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/39778] Using DJGPP to compile CPP file and get failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39778 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/40855] undefined reference to `typeinfo for __int128'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40855 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for __float128 and __int128

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||john.salmon at deshaw dot

[Bug c++/42222] GCC ooms when building KDE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/45509] program abort after compiled with gcc-4.5.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45509 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/47791] finish function is using absolute value instead of the #defined one

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47791 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-25 14:52:50 UTC --- It seems to me that the SF_* that you are mentioning actually are meant for start_preparsed_function, not for finish_function. The latter should probably have its own FF_* in cp-tree.h

[Bug c++/48562] [C++0x] warn about uses of initializer_list that will lead to dangling pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48562 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|paolo.carlini at o

[Bug c++/48562] [C++0x] warn about uses of initializer_list that will lead to dangling pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48562 --- Comment #6 from Johannes Schaub 2011-09-25 14:22:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Johannes, sorry about the dumb question: now I understand the issue decently > well - and after all boils down to adding a warning - but I'm not sure to >

[Bug c++/44499] No default constructor available

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44499 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/44499] [4.7 Regression?] No default constructor available

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44499 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-25 13:57:13 UTC --- Probably this change: 2011-09-23 Jason Merrill Core 253 - allow const objects with no initializer or user-provided default constructor if the defaulted construc

[Bug c/50506] gcc fails at assembly with -O1 while inlining is forced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506 --- Comment #10 from Rafał Mużyło 2011-09-25 13:51:14 UTC --- So, I ran one more test: gcc-4.6.1 -O2 -Wall -c -o fprintf-mini-bug-4.6.o fprintf-mini-bug-4.6.i -fno-align-functions -fno-align-jumps -fno-align-labels -fno-align-loops -fno-caller-sa

[Bug c/50506] gcc fails at assembly with -O1 while inlining is forced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506 --- Comment #9 from Rafał Mużyło 2011-09-25 13:33:42 UTC --- What I'm trying to say is that gcc should either: - accept the code even with -fno-ipa-cp - reject the code even with -fipa-cp - print better diagnostics, if -fipa-cp should be the magi

[Bug c++/50504] g++ 4.5.2 -O2 with complex produces incorrect code on AMD64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50504 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-25 13:30:28 UTC --- Actually I tried 179164, not 4.5.3 proper, sorry. The fix must be very recent, then.

[Bug c++/50504] g++ 4.5.2 -O2 with complex produces incorrect code on AMD64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50504 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/50504] g++ 4.5.2 -O2 with complex produces incorrect code on AMD64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50504 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-25 12:56:53 UTC --- Indeed 4.5.3 works for me.

[Bug c/50506] gcc fails at assembly with -O1 while inlining is forced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506 Rafał Mużyło changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/46105] Ordering failure among partial specializations with non-deduced context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46105 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 f

[Bug target/49468] SH Target: inefficient integer abs code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49468 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24625|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/48667] [ skipping N instantiation contexts ] Skips exactly those which are of interest to me

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48667 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug c++/50504] g++ 4.5.2 -O2 with complex produces incorrect code on AMD64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50504 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/50507] Huge amount of memory used while building GCC4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50507 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/49126] timevar_stack faild because define_label

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49126 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c/50506] gcc fails at assembly with -O1 while inlining is forced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/50489] [UPC/IA64] mis-schedule of MEM ref with -ftree-vectorize and -fschedule-insns2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50489 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-25 12:13:44 UTC --- D.3059_11 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(D.3058); looks like bogus IL to me. You view D.3058, a struct of size 16, as a pointer (of size 8). I suppose you want to load D.3058.vaddr here?

[Bug testsuite/50485] gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-blendps.c fails spuriously on i686

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50485 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug regression/50484] [4.6 regression] ia64-portbld-freebsd9.0, conftest.c:16:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50484 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||ia64-*-freebsd9.0 Target Milestone|-

[Bug lto/50483] lto turns visibility from HIDDEN to DEFAULT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50483 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/50480] 10% performance regression on Spec2006 410.bwaves

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50480 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i?86-*-* --- Comment #3 from Richard G

[Bug driver/50475] [4.7 regression] internal compiler error at passes.c:1730

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50475 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/50474] GCC (cc1plus) hangs forever compiling with -O2 (-fcse-follow-jumps)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50474 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/38502] static_assert vs. enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38502 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug regression/50472] Volatile qualification in data is not enough to avoid optimization over pointer to data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50472 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/40574] -O3 cause segfault in loop in hunspell

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40574 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/43393] integral promotion of long bit-fields broken in gcc 4.4.0?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43393 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug c++/44499] [4.7 Regression?] No default constructor available

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44499 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/45581] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45581 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/50452] [4.7 Regression] Internal compiler error: verify_flow_info failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50452 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/50460] [4.7 Regression] __builtin___strcpy_chk/__builtin_object_size don't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50460 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-25 11:11:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Looking at: > const char *str1 = "JIHGFEDCBA"; > #define strcpy(x,y) __builtin___strcpy_chk (x, y, __builtin_object_size (x, > 1)) > > int > f1 (void) >

[Bug preprocessor/48839] #error should terminate compilation - similar to missing #include

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48839 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/50463] [4.6/4.7 Regression] -ftree-dse leeds to wrong code with gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50463 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-25 11:07:48 UTC --- Smells like a Frontend decl merging issue.

[Bug c/50466] Compiled code behaves differently with "-O2 -fPIC" flag combination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50466 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48562] [C++0x] warn about uses of initializer_list that will lead to dangling pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48562 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-25 10:54:07 UTC --- Johannes, sorry about the dumb question: now I understand the issue decently well - and after all boils down to adding a warning - but I'm not sure to understand your code snippet: is

  1   2   >