http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50511
Bug #: 50511
Summary: gcc lto streamer in fragments memory badly
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50280
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35076
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38540
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39680
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43563
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45095
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |dje.gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45487
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50244
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-24
22:44:04 UTC ---
Thanks for the scripts!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50510
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50510
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-24 22:35:11 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Sep 24 22:35:02 2011
New Revision: 179150
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179150
Log:
2011-09-24 John Salmon
PR libstd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50510
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-24 22:34:57 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Sep 24 22:34:50 2011
New Revision: 179149
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179149
Log:
2011-09-24 John Salmon
PR libstd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50510
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50510
Bug #: 50510
Summary: transposed variable names in std::seed_seq::generate
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42507
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50019
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50261
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-24
20:30:48 UTC ---
Now many of these do not ice anymore for me, only the second of the second
block does.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50496
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-09-24 19:06:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 25358
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25358
fix
This patch from Chung-Lin Tang fixes both issues.
See: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50509
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-24 18:28:51 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Sep 24 18:28:48 2011
New Revision: 179145
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179145
Log:
2011-09-24 John Salmon
PR libstd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50509
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50509
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-24 18:28:40 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Sep 24 18:28:36 2011
New Revision: 179144
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179144
Log:
2011-09-24 John Salmon
PR libstd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50496
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-09-24 18:23:15 UTC ---
I've found a new testcase that results in the same ICE:
% < test.cpp
class GCAlloc {
};
class BaseAlloc {
};
class String;
class Base {
public:
virtual void destroy( Strin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50509
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50493
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50509
Bug #: 50509
Summary: incorrect code in std::seed_seq::generate
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50508
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-24
16:23:30 UTC ---
reduced
template
struct integral_constant {
typedef T value_type;
constexpr operator value_type() { return true; }
};
static constexpr bool value = integral_constant(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50508
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506
--- Comment #6 from Rafał Mużyło 2011-09-24 16:05:20
UTC ---
So, whose bug is it then ? glibc ?
cause before reduction, the code was
(http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365015):
#include
static void w_i(void *fp, int (*outf)(void *, const c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50508
Bug #: 50508
Summary: [C++0x] ICE cxx_eval_logical_expression
cp/semantics.c:6487 4.61/4.7 converting
std::intergal_constant to bool with &&
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2011-09-24
15:54:22 UTC ---
And this is not a bug in GCC really as GCC is correct it cannot inline
always_inline functions for indirect function calls.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45483
Pacho Ramos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45483
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu 2011-09-24 15:19:56
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> New output:
>
> \_ /usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.1/cc1 -quiet - -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
> -march=pentium-m -mno-cx16 -mno-sahf -mno-movbe -mno-aes -mno-pcl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50507
Bug #: 50507
Summary: Huge amount of memory used while building GCC4
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50496
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25351|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50505
--- Comment #5 from Pacho Ramos
2011-09-24 14:25:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> It shouldn't be hard to understand that -mtune=k8-sse3 is a *valid* option but
> has the same effects as -mtune=k8. Removing it from the manual would be wrong.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50505
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50505
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50505
--- Comment #2 from Pacho Ramos
2011-09-24 13:46:00 UTC ---
Because I wanted to confirm it from upstream as looked strange to me that both
mtune options are allowed if they do the same. Why do you keep both? Thanks for
the info :)
About the man
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506
--- Comment #4 from Rafał Mużyło 2011-09-24 13:38:47
UTC ---
Well,...
The actual result was quite a bit more interesting, cause:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.5.3/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506
--- Comment #3 from Rafał Mużyło 2011-09-24 13:17:59
UTC ---
OK, that's a bit surprising, -fipa-cp does help for attachment from comment 1,
but not for my final reduction - removing the attribute still works there,
though.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49069
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506
Rafał Mużyło changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25355|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506
Rafał Mużyło changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25354|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506
Bug #: 50506
Summary: gcc fails at assembly with -O1 while inlining is
forced
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50505
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-24
12:35:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> But, if that is true, gcc man page should be fixed to drop "k8-sse3" from
> -mtune options
No, because it's a valid option.
Since -march=k8 and -march-k8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50505
Bug #: 50505
Summary: gcc-4.6.1 doesn't use "-mtune=k8-sse3" when using
"-march=native"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40831
--- Comment #13 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-09-24 10:39:28 UTC ---
Thanks!
It would be nice to fix it in binutils and in gdb as well.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50504
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-24
10:05:08 UTC ---
I haven't really looked into the code, but both gcc4.6.x and mainline seem
fine. Thus in case would be a regression from 4.4.x present only in 4.5.x:
unless the fix is a relatively str
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44267
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44267
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-24 09:55:06 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Sep 24 09:55:01 2011
New Revision: 179141
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179141
Log:
/cp
2011-09-24 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46309
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50504
Bug #: 50504
Summary: g++ 4.5.2 -O2 with complex produces incorrect
code on AMD64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
53 matches
Mail list logo