[Bug ada/50503] New: GNAT fails to compile a modification of B433001 ACATS test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50503 Bug #: 50503 Summary: GNAT fails to compile a modification of B433001 ACATS test Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/50502] New: GNAT fails to compile a modification of B37101A ACATS test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50502 Bug #: 50502 Summary: GNAT fails to compile a modification of B37101A ACATS test Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/50501] Insertion of complex into a stream may fail without invalidating the stream

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50501 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-24 00:35:13 UTC --- What failure scenario are you talking about? Surely if there's a memory allocation failure it will throw a bad_alloc exception, so __s.str() will never get called?

[Bug libstdc++/50501] Insertion of complex into a stream may fail without invalidating the stream

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50501 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/50501] New: Insertion of complex into a stream may fail without invalidating the stream

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50501 Bug #: 50501 Summary: Insertion of complex into a stream may fail without invalidating the stream Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNC

[Bug c++/50500] New: [C++0x] [DR 1082] move constructor should cause copy constructor to be deleted, but still declared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50500 Bug #: 50500 Summary: [C++0x] [DR 1082] move constructor should cause copy constructor to be deleted, but still declared Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug c++/44267] SFINAE does not handle down static_cast over virtual inheritance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/44267] SFINAE does not handle down static_cast over virtual inheritance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-23 22:50:50 UTC --- Looks like we need to pass complain down into build_base_path.

[Bug c++/46309] optimization a==3||a==1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46309 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/46858] ICE: in cp_lexer_new_from_tokens, at cp/parser.c:464

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46858 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Status|UN

[Bug c++/50458] [4.6 Regression] ICE when using brace-initializer for new array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50458 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE when using |[4.6 Regression] ICE when

[Bug c++/49514] [C++0x] Crashes on valid use of constexpr constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49514 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/48562] [C++0x] warn about uses of initializer_list that will lead to dangling pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48562 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/48562] [C++0x] warn about uses of initializer_list that will lead to dangling pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48562 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug c++/48562] [C++0x] warn about uses of initializer_list that will lead to dangling pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48562 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/50494] gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c fails spuriously on ppc with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-23 22:12:13 UTC --- Configure line for compiler same as http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50499#c2

[Bug target/50499] segmentation fault in gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-1 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o with ppc -m64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50499 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-23 22:10:51 UTC --- gcc -v configure line: ... Configured with: /scratch/vries/b6/pr43864.42.all-fsf-mainline-powerpc-linux-gnu.cfg/src/gcc-mainline/configure --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --host=i68

[Bug tree-optimization/29751] not optimizing access a[0] , a[1]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29751 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2011-09-23 22:09:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Created attachment 18307 [details] > Patch which I am testing There is one bug in that patch which I have a fix for.

[Bug target/50499] segmentation fault in gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-1 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o with ppc -m64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50499 --- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-23 22:08:12 UTC --- Created attachment 25352 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25352 preprocessed struct-by-value-1_y.c to reproduce: $ powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc -c-m64 struct-by-v

[Bug c++/48562] [C++0x] Prematurely destroys initializer_list array when using new-expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48562 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Summa

[Bug target/50499] New: segmentation fault in gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-1 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o with ppc -m64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50499 Bug #: 50499 Summary: segmentation fault in gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-1 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o with ppc -m64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7

[Bug c++/48035] [4.4 Regression] Mismatch on size of class when initializing hierarchy involving virtual inheritance and empty base classes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48035 --- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-23 21:57:15 UTC --- Jakub, shall we close this?

[Bug c++/49485] Performance problem with C++ code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49485 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/48665] type of const member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iant at google dot com --- Comment #2 fro

[Bug c++/42194] performance degradation with STL complex convolution operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42194 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/43734] cerr related segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43734 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at CeBiTec dot |

[Bug c++/40831] g++ generated symbols for cloned function that be demangled.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40831 --- Comment #12 from Cary Coutant 2011-09-23 21:39:13 UTC --- Author: ccoutant Date: Fri Sep 23 21:39:10 2011 New Revision: 179132 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179132 Log: include/ChangeLog: PR 40831 * demangle.

[Bug c++/44267] SFINAE does not handle down static_cast over virtual inheritance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-23 21:38:33 UTC --- Jason, can you help me triaging this PR? Thanks..

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50400 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hans.buchmann at fhnw dot

[Bug c++/45158] Nested classes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45158 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/20039] uninitialized const in `new' of `const struct'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20039 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-23 21:30:52 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Sep 23 21:30:48 2011 New Revision: 179130 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179130 Log: Core 234 - allow const objects with no initiali

[Bug c++/42844] const variable requires initializer / no explicitly declared default constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42844 --- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-23 21:30:52 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Sep 23 21:30:48 2011 New Revision: 179130 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179130 Log: Core 234 - allow const objects with no initial

[Bug c++/47964] logical || returns false result, optimization level 02 or 03

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47964 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/48875] Segmentation fault in maybe_clone_body with -fsyntax-only

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48875 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by build/genhooks) ‏

On Thursday 22 September 2011 11:56:12 Teodori Serge wrote: > Hello, > I'm building a toolchain in /opt dir. I have already build and installed > glibc-2.14 and binutils-2.21.1a in /opt. > Now I want to build and install gcc-4.6.1 with gmp, mpfr and mpc also in > /opt. > > Here is my configure: >

[Bug middle-end/50496] [4.7 regression] ICE in redirect_jump, at jump.c:1497

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50496 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, lto Component

[Bug lto/50496] [4.7 regression] ICE in redirect_jump, at jump.c:1497

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50496 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-09-23 19:50:31 UTC --- Created attachment 25351 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25351 testcase Somewhat reduced testcase.

[Bug target/50498] __sync_bool_compare_and_swap_16 isn't supported for x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50498 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/50498] New: __sync_bool_compare_and_swap_16 isn't supported for x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50498 Bug #: 50498 Summary: __sync_bool_compare_and_swap_16 isn't supported for x86_64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/50495] Optimize exact matches in overload resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495 --- Comment #8 from Mathias Gaunard 2011-09-23 17:58:41 UTC --- Created attachment 25350 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25350 Bash script to more easily drive python script Same usage as generate.py, but doesn't take the fir

[Bug c++/50495] Optimize exact matches in overload resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495 --- Comment #7 from Mathias Gaunard 2011-09-23 17:56:48 UTC --- Created attachment 25349 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25349 Python script to generate C++ files with many overloads Syntax is ./generate.py [use single functi

[Bug rtl-optimization/50489] [UPC/IA64] mis-schedule of MEM ref with -ftree-vectorize and -fschedule-insns2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50489 --- Comment #4 from Gary Funck 2011-09-23 17:38:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Does the problem vanish if you add -fno-strict-aliasing? > > One more thing, you mention -O2 in the flags, but then refer to selective > scheduler, which is on

[Bug debug/50497] gcc 4.6.x '-g' option no longer emits the .debug_pubnames section

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50497 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug debug/50497] gcc 4.6.x '-g' option no longer emits the .debug_pubnames section

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50497 --- Comment #1 from Geir Johansen 2011-09-23 17:20:49 UTC --- If there is some workaround that will enable previous behavior please add that to this bug.

[Bug debug/50497] New: gcc 4.6.x '-g' option no longer emits the .debug_pubnames section

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50497 Bug #: 50497 Summary: gcc 4.6.x '-g' option no longer emits the .debug_pubnames section Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/50447] [avr] Better support of AND, OR, XOR and PLUS with constant integers for 16- and 32-bit values

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50447 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50495] Optimize exact matches in overload resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-23 17:08:57 UTC --- By the way, since apparently you ran actual benchmarks, some testcases (and relative numbers?) would not hurt here...

[Bug target/50447] [avr] Better support of AND, OR, XOR and PLUS with constant integers for 16- and 32-bit values

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50447 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-09-23 17:06:49 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Sep 23 17:06:44 2011 New Revision: 179124 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179124 Log: * config/avr/avr.md (adjust_len): Add alternat

[Bug target/50447] [avr] Better support of AND, OR, XOR and PLUS with constant integers for 16- and 32-bit values

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50447 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-09-23 17:02:20 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Sep 23 17:02:10 2011 New Revision: 179123 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179123 Log: PR target/50447 * config/avr/avr.md: (adju

[Bug c++/50495] Optimize exact matches in overload resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495 --- Comment #5 from Mathias Gaunard 2011-09-23 16:38:11 UTC --- clang was already 50% faster in my tests, so I guess that will put gcc 4.7 on par with it.

[Bug c++/50258] [C++0x] -std=gnu++0x should allow in-class initialization of static const floating types without constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50258 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50258] [C++0x] -std=gnu++0x should allow in-class initialization of static const floating types without constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50258 --- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-23 16:20:00 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Sep 23 16:19:52 2011 New Revision: 179121 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179121 Log: /cp 2011-09-23 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug libgomp/50386] [4.7 Regression] libgomp.h:87:5: error: unnamed struct/union that defines no instances

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50386 --- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-09-23 16:04:18 UTC --- On 9/20/2011 6:32 PM, ramana at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50386 > > --- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan > 2011-09-20 22:32

[Bug c++/50495] Optimize exact matches in overload resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-23 16:00:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > I recently made a number of improvements that will be in 4.7.0; see PR 48481. The fn_set change in particular should cut your overload resolution time by 50

[Bug c++/50495] Optimize exact matches in overload resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/50394] [meta-bug] Issues with building libreoffice with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394 --- Comment #26 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-09-23 15:52:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) > New ICE with today's gcc and today's libreoffice: > > /var/tmp/portage/app-office/libreoffice--r1/work/libreoffice-core-/dbaccess/source/co

[Bug lto/50496] [4.7 regression] ICE in redirect_jump, at jump.c:1497

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50496 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-09-23 15:50:00 UTC --- Testcase is too big ATM: 1193 kilobytes. Will post reduced testcase later.

[Bug c++/50495] Optimize exact matches in overload resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495 --- Comment #2 from Mathias Gaunard 2011-09-23 15:46:50 UTC --- Would you happen to have a reference to those changes or discussed improvements? I'm not testing with a very recent GCC.

[Bug lto/50496] New: [4.7 regression] ICE in redirect_jump, at jump.c:1497

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50496 Bug #: 50496 Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE in redirect_jump, at jump.c:1497 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/50481] builtin to reverse the bit order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50481 Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé changed: What|Removed |Added CC||de...@the-user.org --- Comment

[Bug lto/50492] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

-prefix=/usr --enable-languages=all,ada,java,obj-c++ --with-build-config='bootstrap-lto bootstrap-debug' Thread model: posix gcc version 4.6.2 20110923 (prerelease) [gcc-4_6-branch revision 179117] (GCC)

[Bug target/50494] gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c fails spuriously on ppc with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-23 15:05:19 UTC --- Same issue occurs for gcc.dg/vect/pr44507.c with -m64.

[Bug c++/50495] Optimize exact matches in overload resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug target/50494] gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c fails spuriously on ppc with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 --- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-23 14:52:55 UTC --- Created attachment 25348 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25348 test.c minimized from gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c To reproduce: $ powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc

[Bug c++/50495] New: Optimize exact matches in overload resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495 Bug #: 50495 Summary: Optimize exact matches in overload resolution Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug c++/44906] g++ is giving error: parse error in template argument list while using a c++ code.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44906 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/50494] New: gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c fails spuriously on ppc with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 Bug #: 50494 Summary: gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c fails spuriously on ppc with -flto Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/50493] New: ICE in neon_disambiguate_copy, at config/arm/arm.c:20388

ble-target-optspace target_alias=arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi --enable-languages=c++ --disable-shared --disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 20110923 (experimental) [trunk revision 179117] (GCC) $ ./xgcc -B. -O3 -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp ~/ice.i -fpic /home/ryan/ic

[Bug tree-optimization/10980] vararg functions are not inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10980 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-23 14:10:53 UTC --- I bet it just ignores the attribute that is not how the attribute is supposed to work. We output error in this case intentionally (and warning in at the same spot if function is declar

Re: [Bug tree-optimization/10980] vararg functions are not inlined

I bet it just ignores the attribute that is not how the attribute is supposed to work. We output error in this case intentionally (and warning in at the same spot if function is declared inline and -Winline is given). Functions marked always_inlined really ought to be always inlined and attribute

[Bug c++/44906] g++ is giving error: parse error in template argument list while using a c++ code.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44906 --- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-09-23 13:59:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Honestly, nothing similar will happen any time soon, it means changing > completely the semantics of templates. Maybe we can produce a better > diagnos

[Bug tree-optimization/10980] vararg functions are not inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10980 --- Comment #9 from Ruben Van Boxem 2011-09-23 13:46:27 UTC --- Current Clang compiled everything without a hitch. It might ignore the attribute, I haven't checked. Perhaps this error should be made a warning?

[Bug tree-optimization/10980] vararg functions are not inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10980 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-23 13:40:55 UTC --- > This problem popped up when compiling LLVM's libc++: > M:\Development\Source\libc++\src\locale.cpp:1:0: warning: -fPIC ignored for > target (all code is position independent) [enabled

[Bug tree-optimization/10980] vararg functions are not inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10980 Ruben Van Boxem changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot

[Bug tree-optimization/49601] [4.7 Regression] ICE at ipa-inline-analysis.c:1188

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49601 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/49601] [4.7 Regression] ICE at ipa-inline-analysis.c:1188

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49601 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-23 13:29:23 UTC --- I believe I fixed this one, will double check.

[Bug tree-optimization/49601] [4.7 Regression] ICE at ipa-inline-analysis.c:1188

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49601 --- Comment #4 from Paulo J. Matos 2011-09-23 13:22:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Richard raised concerns about this PR being an old bug and already fixed. > Initially I only confirmed it in 4.6.1 but I can reproduce it in git head > 3618

[Bug regression/50472] Volatile qualification in data is not enough to avoid optimization over pointer to data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50472 Paulo J. Matos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Paulo.Matos at csr dot com --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/49601] [4.7 Regression] ICE at ipa-inline-analysis.c:1188

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49601 Paulo J. Matos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Paulo.Matos at csr dot com --- Comment #

[Bug regression/50472] Volatile qualification in data is not enough to avoid optimization over pointer to data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50472 --- Comment #2 from Paulo J. Matos 2011-09-23 13:18:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Duplicate of PR50078? Might be but I can't confirm. Surely we will know once Mat fixes PR50078.

[Bug c++/50258] [C++0x] -std=gnu++0x should allow in-class initialization of static const floating types without constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50258 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/45755] [C++0x] Member function template is instantiated to perform the copy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45755 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-23 13:09:22 UTC --- Ah, great, quite misleading indeed.

[Bug c++/50258] [C++0x] -std=gnu++0x should allow in-class initialization of static const floating types without constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50258 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-23 13:07:33 UTC --- permerror sounds good to me.

[Bug c++/45755] [C++0x] Member function template is instantiated to perform the copy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45755 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/46004] [C++0x] template constructor used to copy object

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46004 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||boostcpp at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug c++/45755] [C++0x] Member function template is instantiated to perform the copy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45755 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-23 12:56:54 UTC --- ... so I think this is a dup of PR 46004

[Bug c++/45755] [C++0x] Member function template is instantiated to perform the copy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45755 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-23 12:55:23 UTC --- That wording was changed to clarify that it means a template will never be instantiated to produce S::S(S), it does not mean a template cannot be used to perform copies, see http://w

[Bug c++/50258] [C++0x] -std=gnu++0x should allow in-class initialization of static const floating types without constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50258 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-23 12:45:43 UTC --- Of course would work for me.

[Bug c++/44906] g++ is giving error: parse error in template argument list while using a c++ code.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44906 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/50394] [meta-bug] Issues with building libreoffice with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394 --- Comment #25 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-09-23 12:42:26 UTC --- New ICE with today's gcc and today's libreoffice: [ build PAG ] writer [ build LNK ] Executable/oosplash [ build LNK ] Library/libspl_unxlo.so [ build CMP ] desktop/unx/splash

[Bug c++/45382] internal compiler error: tree code ‘call_expr’ is not supported in gimple streams

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45382 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/45755] [C++0x] Member function template is instantiated to perform the copy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45755 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Member function template is |[C++0x] Member function

[Bug lto/50492] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50492 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at nitro dot |

[Bug c++/45855] switched ; and : causes compile crash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45855 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/50492] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50492 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe 2011-09-23 12:28:21 UTC --- also on i686-darwin9.

[Bug c++/45853] Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45853 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50258] [C++0x] -std=gnu++0x should allow in-class initialization of static const floating types without constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50258 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-23 12:18:03 UTC --- How about using a permerror instead? Since it's deprecated, requiring users to give -fpermissive if they want to use it in C++11 seems reasonable to me.

[Bug c++/45993] ICE in uses_template_parms, at cp/pt.c:7064

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45993 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug lto/50492] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50492 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug lto/50492] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50492 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

  1   2   >