[Bug c/50284] possible miscompilation with -fstrict-aliasing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50284 Rafael Avila de Espindola changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25188|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/50287] New: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsnprintf-chk.c compilation, -O2 -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50287 Bug #: 50287 Summary: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsnprintf-chk.c compilation, -O2 -flto Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNC

[Bug c/50286] New: Missed optimization, fails to propagate bool

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50286 Bug #: 50286 Summary: Missed optimization, fails to propagate bool Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priori

[Bug c/50284] possible miscompilation with -fstrict-aliasing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50284 --- Comment #4 from Rafael Avila de Espindola 2011-09-03 22:54:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > struct Value { > struct jsval data; > }; > ... > struct jsval y = t3.array[i]; > struct Value *z = (struct Value*)&y; > if (z->data.

[Bug other/50283] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c/50284] possible miscompilation with -fstrict-aliasing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50284 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-03 20:52:49 UTC --- struct Value { struct jsval data; }; ... struct jsval y = t3.array[i]; struct Value *z = (struct Value*)&y; if (z->data.tag == 0xFF85) { that's invalid in GCCs re

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50285 Bug #: 50285 Summary: no known conversion for argument 1: 'X' to 'X&' Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug middle-end/49886] [4.6/4.7 Regression] pass_split_functions cannot deal with function type attributes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49886 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug java/49847] m68k gcj-4.6 NULL deref in fold_rtx (prev_insn_cc0 == NULL)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847 Thorsten Glaser changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical --- Comment #1 from Thorsten G

[Bug c/50284] possible miscompilation with -fstrict-aliasing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50284 --- Comment #2 from Rafael Avila de Espindola 2011-09-03 19:07:54 UTC --- Forgot to mention, this only reproduces with -fPIC. So to reproduce this you need * a linux 32 bit build older than 160947 * run cc1 with: -quiet -fPIC -O2 -std=c99

[Bug c/50284] possible miscompilation with -fstrict-aliasing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50284 --- Comment #1 from Rafael Avila de Espindola 2011-09-03 18:53:58 UTC --- Created attachment 25188 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25188 testcase

[Bug c/50284] New: possible miscompilation with -fstrict-aliasing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50284 Bug #: 50284 Summary: possible miscompilation with -fstrict-aliasing Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug other/50283] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2011-09-03 18:21:24 UTC --- Created attachment 25187 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25187 .s file

[Bug other/50283] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2011-09-03 18:20:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > Thought at first that this might be caused by stack allocation instruction > being placed in call delay slot, but fail also occurs at -O0. This is wron

[Bug other/50283] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283 Bug #: 50283 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C execution test Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/50091] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -fstack-check gives bad assembly on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50091 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou 2011-09-03 17:28:32 UTC --- > bootstrapped with your amended change to rs6000.c > ./gcc/xgcc -Bgcc ../tests/hello.c -o hc -fstack-check -save-temps > -fverbose-asm > -fdump-rtl-all > ... shows that the stack c

[Bug bootstrap/50237] [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failure for libcpp/lex.o

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50237 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p |

[Bug target/50091] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -fstack-check gives bad assembly on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50091 --- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe 2011-09-03 16:48:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Created attachment 25183 [details] > Tentative fix (2) > > Still untested. bootstrapped with your amended change to rs6000.c ./gcc/xgcc -Bgcc ../tests/hell

[Bug middle-end/50232] [4.7 Regression] reorg.c:3971: undefined reference to `make_return_insns'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50232 --- Comment #7 from John David Anglin 2011-09-03 16:30:42 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Sep 3 16:30:32 2011 New Revision: 178501 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178501 Log: PR middle-end/50232 Correct log entry

[Bug middle-end/50232] [4.7 Regression] reorg.c:3971: undefined reference to `make_return_insns'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50232 --- Comment #6 from John David Anglin 2011-09-03 16:21:38 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Sep 3 16:21:27 2011 New Revision: 178500 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178500 Log: PR Bug middle-end/50232 * config/pa/p

[Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin 2011-09-03 15:33:37 UTC --- Created attachment 25186 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25186 tree dump

[Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2011-09-03 15:31:12 UTC --- Created attachment 25185 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25185 tree dump

[Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2011-09-03 15:29:32 UTC --- Created attachment 25184 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25184 tree dump

[Bug fortran/49149] Dependency autogeneration with `-M` rendered useless by requiring .mod files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49149 --- Comment #14 from Zaak 2011-09-03 14:46:57 UTC --- cricket

[Bug target/50091] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -fstack-check gives bad assembly on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50091 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25182|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/50091] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -fstack-check gives bad assembly on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50091 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou 2011-09-03 14:45:01 UTC --- > Thanks, starting bootstrap in a minute .. . > > ... your patch + this (and some unrelated fixes for powerpc ADA bootstrap): > > Index: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c > ===

[Bug middle-end/50266] [4.6/4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:2638

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50266 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2011-09-03 14:32:01 UTC --- > and we have a CTOR and not individual initializations because of Erics > const-pool changes I believe. No, we have the constructor with GCC 4.5 as well, my patch only makes it go th

[Bug c++/48660] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ARM ICE in expand_expr_real_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48660 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose 2011-09-03 14:18:30 UTC --- works with 4.4.6, not with 4.5/4.6/trunk 20110824

[Bug target/50091] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -fstack-check gives bad assembly on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50091 --- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe 2011-09-03 14:17:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Created attachment 25182 [details] > Tentative fix > > Untested as of this writing. Thanks, starting bootstrap in a minute .. . ... your patch + this (and

[Bug target/50091] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -fstack-check gives bad assembly on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50091 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2011-09-03 13:28:43 UTC --- Created attachment 25182 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25182 Tentative fix Untested as of this writing.

[Bug middle-end/50266] [4.6/4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:2638

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50266 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|ebotcazou at

[Bug c++/2316] g++ fails to overload on language linkage

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2316 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25140|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/50251] [4.7 Regression] Revision 178353 caused many test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251 --- Comment #18 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-03 12:40:12 UTC --- > Does this force stack realignment, or only the use of the DRAP if we already > do stack realignment? only the use of the DRAP if we already do stack realignment.

[Bug target/50256] AVR GCC - several unnecessary register moves

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50256 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target|atmel avr |avr CC|

[Bug c++/50282] pointer-to-member cast works incorrectly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50282 --- Comment #4 from zhuli 2011-09-03 12:17:35 UTC --- yes, you are right. As an addition, compiling with -O2 might yield an warning, as you metioned. but i checked my env(32-bit) and used default compiler option, so i just simply assumed 4byte-

[Bug c++/50282] pointer-to-member cast works incorrectly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50282 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-03 12:00:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > I've never used any unint32_t tu hold any pointer-to-member, > I just tested and find out the sizeof (pointer-to-member-function) is 16, > then i used a

[Bug c++/50282] pointer-to-member cast works incorrectly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50282 --- Comment #2 from zhuli 2011-09-03 11:31:57 UTC --- I've never used any unint32_t tu hold any pointer-to-member, I just tested and find out the sizeof (pointer-to-member-function) is 16, then i used a pointer-to-uint32_t four times to dump th

[Bug middle-end/50251] [4.7 Regression] Revision 178353 caused many test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot |

[Bug bootstrap/50237] [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failure for libcpp/lex.o

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50237 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7 regression] comparison |[4.7 regression] bootstrap

[Bug c++/50282] pointer-to-member cast works incorrectly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50282 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal

[Bug c++/50282] pointer-to-member cast works incorrectly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50282 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-03 08:55:38 UTC --- uint32_t isn't big enough to hold a pointer-to-member value, and that conversion isn't valid anyway

[Bug target/50281] result registers are overwritten giving incorrect result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50281 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/50279] [4.7 Regression] ICE while building the go front-end with LTO enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50279 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code Target Milestone|-

[Bug fortran/50278] [4.7 Regression] SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50278 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug target/49987] [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c fails on powerpc-darwin9 from r176228

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50282] pointer-to-member cast works incorrectly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50282 zhuli changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|major

[Bug c++/50282] New: pointer-to-member cast works incorrectly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50282 Bug #: 50282 Summary: pointer-to-member cast works incorrectly Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priorit