http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50244
--- Comment #5 from lcid-fire at gmx dot net 2011-09-02 06:41:29 UTC ---
It seems to be a mixup of gcc 4.4.3 and 4.5.3 include paths. Obviously the
headers are quite different - I'll have to sort it out.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
--- Comment #9 from Anders F Björklund
2011-09-02 06:40:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > hello world tests OK on Snow Leopard, with patch
>
> This patch fails on darwin11 when applied to gcc-4_6-branch...
Seems like the patch worked (= d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50272
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50272
--- Comment #1 from Jiangning Liu 2011-09-02
05:11:38 UTC ---
Richard gave some analysis at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-08/msg00037.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50272
Bug #: 50272
Summary: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50268
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-02
01:35:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 25174
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25174
Updated draft
This one is much better, and actually should lead to slightly better code than
C++98,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50271
Bug #: 50271
Summary: [C++0x] G++ fails to handle combination of explicit
and deduced variadic template arguments
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50268
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25173|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50268
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-01
22:17:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 25173
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25173
Draft patch
Hi Marc. This is a patch I'm working on. Can you see anything obviously wrong
with it? A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50183
--- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt 2011-09-01
21:41:19 UTC ---
This PHI:
:
# err2.395_561 = PHI
is removed by the second call to remove_phi in
translate_scalar_reduction_to_array (graphite-sese-to-poly.c). There appears
to be an implici
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50256
--- Comment #2 from NickParker at Eaton dot com 2011-09-01 21:30:41 UTC ---
I have the latest AVR GCC release from 2010-01-10 (4.3.3) and this is what I am
using.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-09-01
21:10:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This allows the code to compile, but one then gets a segfault
> or the right answer depending on memory layout. I think
> trans-expr.c(conv_isocbinding_proc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50260
--- Comment #3 from Pat Haugen 2011-09-01
20:34:00 UTC ---
This also shows up on PowerPC in the 3 cpu2000 benchmarks 178.galgel, 191.fma3d
and 200.sixtrack.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50270
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2011-09-01
19:59:18 UTC ---
Small testcase:
template class __attribute__ ((visibility ("default"))) vector {
public:
vector(){t=2;};
void push_back(a){t++;};
int t;
};
class __attribute__ ((visibility ("h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50270
--- Comment #3 from Rafael Almeida 2011-09-01
19:58:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 25172
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25172
Output of -save-temps -v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50270
--- Comment #2 from Rafael Almeida 2011-09-01
19:57:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 25171
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25171
foo.s generated by -save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50270
--- Comment #1 from Rafael Almeida 2011-09-01
19:57:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 25170
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25170
Preprocessed file generated by -save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50270
Bug #: 50270
Summary: Some symbols are exported even when
-fvisibility=hidden is used
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50050
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50267
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50268
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269
Bug #: 50269
Summary: Wrongly rejects element of assumed-shape array in
C_LOC
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2011-09-01 19:32:54
UTC ---
alloca is special with stack alignment. We may need to take
the new change into account.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50260
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50268
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-01
19:29:23 UTC ---
Urgh, I can't believe it's here:
#ifdef __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__
constexpr bitset(unsigned long long __val) noexcept
: _Base(__val) { }
#else
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01 19:26:48 UTC ---
> fold_builtin_alloca_for_var should record stack alignment change
After expand_var for D.2129 with 128-bit alignment, x_rtl looks like this:
...
(gdb) p x_rtl
$20 = {expr =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50268
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-01
19:23:37 UTC ---
Any idea where the problem is?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50268
Bug #: 50268
Summary: [C++0x] bitset doesn't sanitize input
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50050
--- Comment #15 from Mikael Morin 2011-09-01
19:20:05 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Thu Sep 1 19:19:55 2011
New Revision: 178427
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178427
Log:
2011-09-01 Mikael Morin
PR fortran/50050
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
Anders F Björklund changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||afb at users dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
--- Comment #6 from Anders F Björklund
2011-09-01 18:09:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 25168
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25168
updated patch for 4.6.1
hello world tests OK on Snow Leopard, with patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||areg.melikadamyan at gmail
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50257
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50257
--- Comment #6 from Justin SB 2011-09-01 17:33:32
UTC ---
Thanks so much for the help. I created a test case (attached) and tried out
the patch (the second version); it is a big improvement.
Here are the timings:
g++ -g -O3 --std=c++0x test.cc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50257
--- Comment #5 from Justin SB 2011-09-01 17:06:04
UTC ---
Created attachment 25167
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25167
Test case
Test case that stresses unordered_map construction
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50192
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01 16:29:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 25166
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25166
ira dump
and after ira, the reference to framereg is still there:
...
(insn 29 28 30 6 (set
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50259
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-09-01
16:20:06 UTC ---
With valgrind, I get now:
test.f90:4.19:
CHARACTER (len=default_path_length), DIMENSION(:,:), POINTER ::
1
Error: Expected another dimension in array declara
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50259
--- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-09-01 16:15:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (strangely, I can't reproduce the exact error message I posted earlier )
actually could be due to this:
==30794== Invalid read of size 8
==30794==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50259
--- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-09-01 16:03:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I get with 4.7.0 ([trunk revision 178394])
Internal Error at (1):
gfc_is_constant_expr(): Unknown expression type
(strangely, I can't reproduce the exa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50050
--- Comment #14 from Mikael Morin 2011-09-01
15:52:42 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Thu Sep 1 15:52:39 2011
New Revision: 178424
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178424
Log:
2011-09-01 Mikael Morin
PR fortran/50050
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50116
bero at arklinux dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bero at arklinux dot org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50266
bero at arklinux dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25164|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50266
Bug #: 50266
Summary: internal compiler error: in decode_addr_const, at
varasm.c:2638
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50265
Bug #: 50265
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure
"BufferedImage.java:336:0: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault" on *-apple-darwin*
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01 13:25:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 25163
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25163
dump before ira
main contains references to frame:
(insn 29 28 30 6 (set (reg:SI 63 [ D.20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50264
Bug #: 50264
Summary: -Wdisabled-optimizations without -O generates strange
errors
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01 13:06:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 25162
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25162
optimized dump
1. The alloca in main is transformed into this declaration:
D.2129[24];
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01 12:43:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 25161
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25161
testcase for -O2
To reproduce with O2:
i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc 20010209-1.c -O2 -c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50263
Bug #: 50263
Summary: Constant integer in multidimensional array 'Range(X)
crashes GNAT
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255
--- Comment #5 from Stephan Bergmann 2011-09-01 12:10:54 UTC ---
By the way, the problem of the rodata section having a different GroupName than
the text section is also present when you compile vbasheetobjects.cxx with
plain (non-RedHat-modified)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50258
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-01
11:51:36 UTC ---
That extension has been deprecated for years:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Deprecated-Features.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50208
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
--- Comment #4 from Ir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50208
--- Comment #3 from Ira Rosen 2011-09-01 11:42:24 UTC
---
Created attachment 25159
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25159
patch
Right. The attached patch does the suggested checks also in
vect_handle_widen_mult_by_const(). I'l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50257
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-01
11:31:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 25158
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25158
Alternate patchlet
Or we can do this, which optimizes 0 too, should be also useful.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50252
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01 11:28:35 UTC ---
Unfortunately the patch in comment #2 did not survive the regression test. It
fails at least on:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/dynamic_dispatch_10.f03 -O0 (test for excess errors)
FAIL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50262
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50193
Andrew Stubbs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50262
Bug #: 50262
Summary: PTA doesn't disambiguate locally allocated heap
objects from pointed to by arguments
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49960
--- Comment #2 from razya at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01 09:57:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created attachment 24901 [details]
> self dependence testcase
Another testcase failing due to a slightly different problem with the self data
depen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50254
Vladimir Zapolskiy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50254
Vladimir Zapolskiy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25154|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50257
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-01
09:27:04 UTC ---
I just attached a patchlet (vs mainline, 4.6.x may require a bit of tweaking,
the patch is trivial anyway) implementing the straightforward optimization for
the value of 10. Please let
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50257
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-01
09:23:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 25156
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25156
Mainline patchlet optimizing for 10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50242
--- Comment #7 from congruwer at yahoo dot co.uk 2011-09-01 09:21:33 UTC ---
Answering my own question: because of the ret instruction. Duh.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50242
--- Comment #6 from congruwer at yahoo dot co.uk 2011-09-01 09:16:18 UTC ---
Why not? In any case, without inline it also doesn't work:
test.s: Assembler messages:
test.s:628: Warning: .type pseudo-op used outside of .def/.endef ignored.
test.s:628
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-01
09:10:11 UTC ---
It looks to me that the C++ FE could detect that the vtable pointer update
would adjust it to itself (I even can't construct a testcase that would
adjust it _not_ to itself ...).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50257
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|unordered_map slow |[C++0x] unordered_map slow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50178
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50260
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49804
--- Comment #2 from Anton Shterenlikht 2011-09-01
08:52:43 UTC ---
I haven't looked at it for a while.
It seems ia64 is indeed fixed, I've built gcc-4.7.0.20110730.
However sparc64 still gives this error.
Building 4.7.0.20110730:
gmake[3]: Le
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50178
--- Comment #7 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01 08:47:05 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Thu Sep 1 08:46:59 2011
New Revision: 178397
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178397
Log:
PR tree-optimization/50178
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255
--- Comment #4 from Stephan Bergmann 2011-09-01 08:39:59 UTC ---
caolanm: will work on it, yes (wanted to clarify first whether looking at
those group name mismatches is actually looking in the right direction)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50254
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50256
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255
Caolan McNamara changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||caolanm at redhat dot com,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50178
--- Comment #6 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01 08:29:41 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Thu Sep 1 08:29:33 2011
New Revision: 178396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178396
Log:
PR tree-optimization/50178
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
congruwer at yahoo dot co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||congruwer at yahoo dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50242
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-09-01
08:12:30 UTC ---
Obviously it can't be inline...
You can't inline a naked function either.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50242
--- Comment #4 from congruwer at yahoo dot co.uk 2011-09-01 08:09:59 UTC ---
Doesn't work:
---(start)---
inline __attribute__((always_inline)) void foobar();
asm (".globl __6foobarv; .type __6foobarv, @function;\n"
"__6foobarv: ret; .size __6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50261
Bug #: 50261
Summary: [c++0x] ICE on brace-initialize an array member
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50259
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50260
Bug #: 50260
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault at
../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-live.c:88
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50252
--- Comment #3 from Arjen Markus 2011-09-01
07:18:30 UTC ---
Hi Janus,
that seems quite to the point and it is much more straightforward than
my (minimal)
adjustment. Thanks.
The reason I brought this is that is a fairly recent addition and I
g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50178
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
--- Comment #5 from Ir
88 matches
Mail list logo
