[Bug fortran/50259] New: Internal Error at (1): gfc_resolve_expr(): Bad expression type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50259 Bug #: 50259 Summary: Internal Error at (1): gfc_resolve_expr(): Bad expression type Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/49533] [4.7 regression] Revision 174989 (ipa-inline-transform.c) regressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49533 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-09-01 06:44:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > has this been fixed? No.

[Bug ada/37245] GDB reports "No definition of "var1" in current context." for an existing variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37245 Arnaud Charlet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/50258] New: -std=gnu++0x should allow in-class initialization of static const floating types without constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50258 Bug #: 50258 Summary: -std=gnu++0x should allow in-class initialization of static const floating types without constexpr Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1

[Bug fortran/49149] Dependency autogeneration with `-M` rendered useless by requiring .mod files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49149 --- Comment #13 from Zaak 2011-09-01 01:27:46 UTC --- As for intrinsic F2003 modules, like ISO_C_BINDING, ISO_FORTRAN_ENV, etc. I would expect the compiler to be able to handle this appropriately, i.e. not require the presence of a iso_c_binding

[Bug ada/37245] GDB reports "No definition of "var1" in current context." for an existing variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37245 --- Comment #5 from nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr 2011-09-01 01:15:04 UTC --- During the Debian transition, the default gnat (4.4.6) uses its own gcc instead of the default gcc (4.6.1), as you can see in line 2 of your log. Summary of our resu

[Bug fortran/49149] Dependency autogeneration with `-M` rendered useless by requiring .mod files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49149 --- Comment #12 from Zaak 2011-09-01 01:14:40 UTC --- > Can you show me a specific passage in the GNU Make documentation > that states -M can be used to generate dependencies for > Fortran USE statements without the actual *.mod being > present?

[Bug libstdc++/50257] New: unordered_map slow initialization due to huge __prime_list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50257 Bug #: 50257 Summary: unordered_map slow initialization due to huge __prime_list Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/47818] Pragma Assert is rejected with No_Implementation_Pragmas restriction.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47818 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug ada/37245] GDB reports "No definition of "var1" in current context." for an existing variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37245 --- Comment #4 from Timo Lindfors 2011-09-01 00:31:16 UTC --- The bug still occurs for me on debian testing: lindi2:~/tmp$ gnatmake -ggdb3 -O0 gdb_bug_2 gcc-4.4 -c -ggdb3 -O0 gdb_bug_2.adb gdb_bug_2.adb:25:07: warning: variable "gs" is read but

[Bug ada/40986] [4.4 regression] Assert_Failure sinfo.adb:360, error detected at a-unccon.ads:23:27

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40986 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug ada/37245] GDB reports "No definition of "var1" in current context." for an existing variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37245 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug c/50256] New: AVR GCC - several unnecessary register moves

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50256 Bug #: 50256 Summary: AVR GCC - several unnecessary register moves Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.3.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug fortran/49149] Dependency autogeneration with `-M` rendered useless by requiring .mod files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49149 --- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl 2011-08-31 23:05:10 UTC --- On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:34:46PM +, zbeekman at gmail dot com wrote: > Additionally, if my entire premise is wrong what do you anticipate the use of > the -M flag will be for? It'

[Bug fortran/49149] Dependency autogeneration with `-M` rendered useless by requiring .mod files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49149 --- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl 2011-08-31 22:45:41 UTC --- On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:27:40PM +, zbeekman at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49149 > > --- Comment #8 from Zaak 2011-08-31 22:27:40 UTC >

[Bug fortran/49149] Dependency autogeneration with `-M` rendered useless by requiring .mod files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49149 --- Comment #9 from Zaak 2011-08-31 22:34:46 UTC --- Additionally, if my entire premise is wrong what do you anticipate the use of the -M flag will be for? It's not hard to figure out that .o files depend on the .f90 files with the same name. I do

[Bug fortran/49149] Dependency autogeneration with `-M` rendered useless by requiring .mod files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49149 --- Comment #8 from Zaak 2011-08-31 22:27:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:01:06PM +, zbeekman at gmail dot com wrote: > > > > I hope you are less confused now. > > > > I'm not confused. I do, however, use t

[Bug ada/32181] Legal program executes incorrectly, RM 3.4(27)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32181 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug fortran/49149] Dependency autogeneration with `-M` rendered useless by requiring .mod files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49149 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl 2011-08-31 22:17:48 UTC --- On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:01:06PM +, zbeekman at gmail dot com wrote: > > I hope you are less confused now. > I'm not confused. I do, however, use the grey matter between my ear

[Bug ada/18453] Legal instantiation rejected; illegal instantiation accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18453 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug fortran/49149] Dependency autogeneration with `-M` rendered useless by requiring .mod files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49149 --- Comment #6 from Zaak 2011-08-31 22:01:06 UTC --- I ma not saying gfortran is entirely broken, i'm merely claiming that there is a bug in the dependency resolution feature. Please see GNU Make documentation here for more information about Gener

[Bug ada/17953] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.9.2(9)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17953 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug c++/50255] Linker stumbles over non-grouped text/rodata for a non-virtual thunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-08-31 21:06:43 UTC --- This sounds like http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49538 but without a testcase it is hard to say if it was really on the 4.6 branch or only with RedHat's compiler.

[Bug other/49533] [4.7 regression] Revision 174989 (ipa-inline-transform.c) regressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49533 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski 2011-08-31 21:05:14 UTC --- has this been fixed?

[Bug c++/50255] Linker stumbles over non-grouped text/rodata for a non-virtual thunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-08-31 21:03:36 UTC --- >GCC 4.6.0 20110603 (Red Hat 4.6.0-10)). Does it happen with non RedHat version of the compiler meaning non modified version of GCC? Really you should have reported this first to red

[Bug fortran/49149] Dependency autogeneration with `-M` rendered useless by requiring .mod files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49149 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/50255] New: Linker stumbles over non-grouped text/rodata for a non-virtual thunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255 Bug #: 50255 Summary: Linker stumbles over non-grouped text/rodata for a non-virtual thunk Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug target/50223] AVRGCC - dont clear r26 and r27.....its a (small) waste of CPU cycles.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50223 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization CC

[Bug preprocessor/44526] libcpp should avoid circular dependencies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44526 Zaak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zbeekman at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from Zaak

[Bug fortran/49149] Dependency autogeneration with `-M` rendered useless by requiring .mod files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49149 --- Comment #4 from Zaak 2011-08-31 19:58:41 UTC --- Created attachment 25155 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25155 test case files with Makefile The Makefile.alt is configured to pass -E and -o /dev/null when building the dep

[Bug fortran/49149] Dependency autogeneration with `-M` rendered useless by requiring .mod files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49149 --- Comment #3 from Zaak 2011-08-31 19:49:20 UTC --- When I pass -E some strange behaviour occurs. First of all the code is preprocessed with the c preprocessor and unless the -o flag is passed the output is written to standard out, so this text w

[Bug fortran/50252] [OOP] Error message on "call x%y" (x not declared) can be more informative

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50252 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-31 19:31:10 UTC --- Ok, here is one thing that could be easily done. Preliminary patch, not regtested. Does this sound like an improvement? Index: gcc/fortran/match.c ==

[Bug fortran/50252] [OOP] Error message on "call x%y" (x not declared) can be more informative

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50252 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug lto/48851] lto-plugin.c:224:7: error: missing sentinel in function call [-Werror=format]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851 --- Comment #24 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-31 17:58:49 UTC --- I don't have the regeneration environment for fixincludes, could you post the patch with the regeneration bits in it and ask for approval?

[Bug target/47997] gcc on macosx: "ld: warning: -fwritable-strings not compatible with literal CF/NSString"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997 --- Comment #24 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-31 17:55:19 UTC --- I don't have a take on the best way to fix this. With that said, if you like the last patch and it tests out, Ok.

[Bug target/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #51 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-31 17:48:05 UTC --- So, I propose we fix this now and deal with any potential fallout later. Slightly bug pushing, which I'm not terribly fond of, but, better than leaving it sit. The other fi

[Bug libgcj/50241] Building from the "current" branch - 178337 fails.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50241 --- Comment #4 from George R. Goffe 2011-08-31 17:38:13 UTC --- Andrew, Thank you for your time and the hint. Regards, George...

[Bug middle-end/49886] [4.6/4.7 Regression] pass_split_functions cannot deal with function type attributes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49886 --- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor 2011-08-31 17:17:27 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Wed Aug 31 17:17:19 2011 New Revision: 178386 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178386 Log: 2011-08-31 Martin Jambor PR middle-end/49

[Bug c++/26099] support for type traits is not available

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26099 --- Comment #31 from Paolo Carlini 2011-08-31 17:11:38 UTC --- __is_convertible_to isn't such a big issue anymore, thanks to Core/1170 (in C++11 SFINAE includes access control, still unimplemented in GCC, though). However, we now need front-end s

[Bug c/50254] New: gcc-4.5 -fstrict-aliasing -fschedule-insns optimization produces wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50254 Bug #: 50254 Summary: gcc-4.5 -fstrict-aliasing -fschedule-insns optimization produces wrong code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNC

[Bug target/50242] __attribute__((naked)) is not implemented on IA32 (x86)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50242 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug bootstrap/50237] [4.7 regression] comparison failure caused by HAVE_INITFINI_ARRAY check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50237 --- Comment #14 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-08-31 15:46:46 UTC --- On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50237 > > --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-31 15:44:02 > U

[Bug target/50242] __attribute__((naked)) is not implemented on IA32 (x86)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50242 --- Comment #2 from congruwer at yahoo dot co.uk 2011-08-31 15:46:19 UTC --- Sometimes I want to implement an entire method or function in assembler. The main reasons are: 1) I want to thunk to another function &c. in a way that is hard to do from

[Bug bootstrap/50237] [4.7 regression] comparison failure caused by HAVE_INITFINI_ARRAY check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50237 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-31 15:44:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > > Arrange for the contents to have appropriate text values you can check for > with grep (or if you wish a custom C program to run on the build system to > ex

[Bug bootstrap/50237] [4.7 regression] comparison failure caused by HAVE_INITFINI_ARRAY check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50237 --- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-08-31 15:27:44 UTC --- On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50237 > > --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-31 04:21:53 > U

[Bug c++/50243] vtable for pure abstract class (interface) shouldn't be emitted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50243 --- Comment #2 from congruwer at yahoo dot co.uk 2011-08-31 15:27:52 UTC --- Not in this case. The example is set up such that the vtable is invisible, even if it is emitted. Since no one can access it, it cannot be required. (I have searched throu

[Bug libstdc++/50160] vector comparison very slow (no overload)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160 --- Comment #26 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-08-31 15:23:56 UTC --- Various processors have an instruction to reverse the bit order in a word (ARMv6T2 and later have RBIT, for example, and C6X has BITR on C64X and above). I think a

[Bug middle-end/50251] [4.7 Regression] Revision 178353 caused many test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/32164] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE when renaming predefined "=" and "/="

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32164 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug ada/31417] Illegal program not detected, RM 7.3(13), 4.9.1(1), nonstatic discriminants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31417 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug ada/40936] Assert_Failure atree.adb:884 on illegal code (mixture of protected object and accept of entry family)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40936 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug ada/18765] Illegal program not detected, "/=" when "=" is ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18765 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug fortran/50252] New: Error message on "call x%y" (x not declared) can be more informative

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50252 Bug #: 50252 Summary: Error message on "call x%y" (x not declared) can be more informative Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug ada/18454] Illegal program not detected, RM 10.1.5(4), 8.1(16)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18454 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug c++/2316] g++ fails to overload on language linkage

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2316 --- Comment #31 from Marc Glisse 2011-08-31 13:40:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) > (In reply to comment #23) > > I think you can do it with a alias-declaration in an extern "C" block: > > > > extern "C" { > > template > > using func_t

[Bug c++/50248] [C++0x] unnecessary instantiation of constexpr constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50248 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/31416] Illegal program not detected, RM 7.3(13), 4.9.1(1)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31416 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug ada/18221] Illegal program not detected, access to invisible type RM 8.2(9)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18221 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug middle-end/50251] [4.7 Regression] Revision 178353 caused many test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug ada/18205] Legal program rejected, RM 13.13.2(14)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18205 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug middle-end/50251] New: [4.7 Regression] Revision 178353 caused many test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251 Bug #: 50251 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Revision 178353 caused many test failures Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/17954] Legal program rejected, packed array of booleans

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17954 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug driver/50250] New: Driver documentation on -l does not mention shared libraries

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50250 Bug #: 50250 Summary: Driver documentation on -l does not mention shared libraries Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/50249] ira marks wrong value for inheriting

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50249 --- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-31 12:14:12 UTC --- I bisected the failure to r172389, but to me that looks more like a trigger than a cause: ... 2011-04-13 Vladimir Makarov PR rtl-optimization/48455 * ira-costs.c (

[Bug ada/17321] Illegal program not detected, name hidden by use clauses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17321 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug ada/17320] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.9.3(11)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17320 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug ada/16214] Legal program rejected, nested generic packages

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16214 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug ada/16212] ICE ada/gcc-interface/trans.c:1626 on legal Ada 83 program

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16212 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug rtl-optimization/50249] ira marks wrong value for inheriting

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50249 --- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-31 11:52:12 UTC --- Created attachment 25153 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25153 compiler patch necessary to trigger the problem Attached patch was used on top of r178259,

[Bug ada/16097] Illegal program not detected, RM 6.3.1(9), RM 8.5.4(5)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16097 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug ada/16096] Illegal program not detected, RM 8.5.4(5)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16096 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug ada/16095] Illegal program not detected, accessibility levels, RM 3.10.2(28)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16095 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug rtl-optimization/50249] ira marks wrong value for inheriting

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50249 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-31 11:40:47 UTC --- Created attachment 25152 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25152 dump of ira

[Bug rtl-optimization/50249] ira marks wrong value for inheriting

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50249 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-31 11:40:19 UTC --- Created attachment 25151 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25151 dump before ira

[Bug rtl-optimization/50249] ira marks wrong value for inheriting

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50249 --- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-31 11:39:32 UTC --- Created attachment 25150 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25150 test case testcase reduced from libstdc++-v3/testsuite/21_strings/basic_string/inserters_ex

[Bug ada/16094] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.4.1(5)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16094 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug rtl-optimization/50249] New: ira marks wrong value for inheriting

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50249 Bug #: 50249 Summary: ira marks wrong value for inheriting Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug ada/16084] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.10.2(24)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16084 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 --- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-31 11:28:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > > gfortran-4.7 -c module.f90 > > gfortran-4.7 program.f90 > > What about > gfortran-4.7 program.f90 module.o? > AFAIK there is not "object" in th

[Bug ada/16083] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.9.2(13)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16083 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug ada/16082] Legal program rejected, expect derived type in instantiation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16082 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug ada/16081] Illegal program not detected, ambiguous call to "="

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16081 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug ada/16077] Wrong output from legal program, pragma Import (Ada)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16077 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug tree-optimization/50138] [4.6 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50138 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-08-31 10:36:51 UTC --- This problem is not very important. If it's hard to fix this bug, then do not fix it.

[Bug ada/16076] Illegal program not detected, RM 13.14(5)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16076 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug ada/16075] Wrong output from legal program, ordered generic parameter association

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16075 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug ada/15917] Bug box in Gigi, code=103, on legal program

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15917 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug c++/50248] [C++0x] tries to use variadic constructor when it should use default constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50248 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-08-31 10:24:07 UTC --- Thanks for not posting an example of 30k lines :) another workaround is to add these constructors: MapSessionData(const MapSessionData&) = delete; MapSessionData() = defau

[Bug ada/15846] Illegal program not detected, self renames

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15846 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug ada/15845] Illegal program not detected, circular renames

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15845 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug ada/15844] Illegal program not detected, RM 8.3(8)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15844 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug tree-optimization/50138] [4.6 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50138 --- Comment #4 from Ira Rosen 2011-08-31 09:42:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > That's up to you to decide, you are the maintainer ;) Yes, but not the release manager... > My comment was just in the light of a longish ChangeLog entry, have

[Bug c++/50248] New: gcc confused, tries to use variadic template to copy itself when it should use default constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50248 Bug #: 50248 Summary: gcc confused, tries to use variadic template to copy itself when it should use default constructor Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0

[Bug middle-end/43513] The stack pointer is adjusted twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43513 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/50138] [4.6 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50138 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-31 08:46:46 UTC --- That's up to you to decide, you are the maintainer ;) My comment was just in the light of a longish ChangeLog entry, haven't read the actual changes how risky they are, if there were a

[Bug tree-optimization/50138] [4.6 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50138 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com --- Comment #2 from Ir

[Bug c++/50247] #pragma pack std::set segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50247 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/50239] compiled program segfault when -O0 is used to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50239 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-08-31 08:27:43 UTC --- There's no need to repeat the same info you already provided, please provide what you _didn't_ provide, as requested by http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#report we need preprocessed source,

[Bug c++/50247] New: #pragma pack std::set segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50247 Bug #: 50247 Summary: #pragma pack std::set segfault Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug ada/15798] Bug box in Gigi, code=201, on legal program with tasking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15798 Arnaud Charlet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

  1   2   >