http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
--- Comment #26 from Tobias Burnus 2011-08-29
06:47:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> Your code in comment #14 is (I believe) invalid, and gfortran
> is issuing the correct error message.
I get:
Error: Variable 'length' cannot appear in t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50204
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-08-29
03:00:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 25124
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25124
Patch which was tested on x86_64 without any regressions
Note I am going to add this patch here as t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50194
Doug Kwan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dougkwan at google dot com
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50223
Bug #: 50223
Summary: AVRGCC - dont clear r26 and r27.its a (small)
waste of CPU cycles.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50222
--- Comment #1 from klondike 2011-08-28
22:08:56 UTC ---
Just for the record I can reproduce this with vanilla gcc:
# LANG="C" gcc -O2 -funswitch-loops -ftree-loop-distribution -I. -I.. -I../..
nutenc.c -include libavutil/internal.h -I ../../ -c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50193
--- Comment #1 from Michael Hope 2011-08-28
21:40:01 UTC ---
Also occurs when building LLVM trunk. See:
http://builds.linaro.org/toolchain/llvm-3.0~svn138625/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild172-ursa1-cortexa9r1/llvm-build.txt
/scratch/cbuild/slave/sla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50222
Bug #: 50222
Summary: ICE with -O{1,2} -funswitch-loops
-ftree-loop-distribution
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50221
Bug #: 50221
Summary: Allocatable string length fails with array assignment
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48582
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48582
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-28
15:38:33 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Aug 28 15:38:29 2011
New Revision: 178144
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178144
Log:
Core DR 342
PR c++/48582
* pt.c (check_
function:
internalbug.cpp:5:10: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
$ g++-svn --version
g++ (GCC) 4.7.0 20110828 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundatio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50219
Bug #: 50219
Summary: Combine pass generated wrong code for unsigned char
comparison on MIPS target
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.4
Status: U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50218
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50218
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-28 12:08:45 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Sun Aug 28 12:08:41 2011
New Revision: 178141
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178141
Log:
2011-08-28 Mikael Pettersson
PR bo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50215
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-28
12:05:51 UTC ---
Verified now, without the var-tracking.c fix this:
--- rtl.def (revision 178135)
+++ rtl.def (working copy)
@@ -296,12 +296,6 @@ DEF_RTL_EXPR(CALL, "call", "ee", RTX_EXT
DEF_RTL_EXPR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50215
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-28
12:01:52 UTC ---
I think the rtl.def changes resulted in different hashing of the RTLs in
question.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50215
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-08-28
11:44:05 UTC ---
How was this caused by my patch then? I can't even reproduce this here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50215
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50215
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48417
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-08-28
10:25:41 UTC ---
I guess !global_regs[regno] vs !fixed_regs[regno] matters for compilation units
that are compiled with -ffixed-$N but where there is no global register
variable declaration for $N
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40866
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig 2011-08-28
10:08:54 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Aug 28 10:08:50 2011
New Revision: 178140
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178140
Log:
2011-08-28 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/4086
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50218
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-08-28
09:46:26 UTC ---
Patch posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg02234.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50218
Bug #: 50218
Summary: [4.7 regression] tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c triggers
-Werror=maybe-uninitialized breaking i686-linux
bootstrap
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50215
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50213
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target
25 matches
Mail list logo
