[Bug target/49832] too many memory references for `lea'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49832 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2011-07-25 06:55:23 UTC --- Please mark x32 bugs with [x32]. (In reply to comment #0) > [hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-8]$ make x.o > /export/build/gnu/gcc-x32/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/xgcc > -B/export/build/gnu/gcc-x32/build-x8

[Bug c++/49813] [C++0x] sinh vs asinh vs constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49823] [C++0x] ICE on decltype(expr)::type with template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49823 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49823] [C++0x] ICE on decltype(expr)::type with template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49823 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-25 05:03:54 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jul 25 05:03:50 2011 New Revision: 176732 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176732 Log: PR c++/49823 * parser.c (cp_parser_qualifyi

[Bug bootstrap/49835] [4.7 Regression] Revision 176720 caused bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49835 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-25 04:55:01 UTC --- This should be fixed already.

[Bug debug/49825] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49825 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/49831] arm-linux-gnueabi bootstrap failures due to ICE in dwarf2cfi.c connect_traces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49831 --- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson 2011-07-25 03:35:08 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Mon Jul 25 03:35:05 2011 New Revision: 176730 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176730 Log: PR debug/49831 * dwarf2cfi.c (connect_tra

[Bug debug/49825] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49825 --- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson 2011-07-25 03:26:37 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Mon Jul 25 03:26:35 2011 New Revision: 176729 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176729 Log: PR debug/49825 * dwarf2cfi.c (dwarf2out_s

[Bug debug/49827] [4.7 regression] sparc64-linux and cris-elf bootstrap failures due to ICE in dwarf2cfi.c connect_traces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49827 --- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson 2011-07-25 03:18:15 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Mon Jul 25 03:18:13 2011 New Revision: 176728 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176728 Log: PR debug/49827 * dwarf2cfi.c (create_trac

[Bug debug/49825] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49825 --- Comment #4 from Richard Henderson 2011-07-25 03:05:11 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Mon Jul 25 03:05:06 2011 New Revision: 176726 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176726 Log: PR debug/49825 Test case gcc.c-torture/compile/p

[Bug bootstrap/49835] [4.7 Regression] Revision 176720 caused bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49835 --- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-25 02:08:49 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Jul 25 02:08:44 2011 New Revision: 176725 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176725 Log: Remove the unused demangle_flag in collect2.

[Bug bootstrap/49835] New: [4.7 Regression] Revision 176720 caused bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49835 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Revision 176720 caused bootstrap failure Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c++/49834] New: type deduction in for-each loop in template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49834 Summary: type deduction in for-each loop in template function Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo:

[Bug target/49833] New: PIC doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833 Summary: PIC doesn't work Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org R

[Bug target/49832] New: too many memory references for `lea'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49832 Summary: too many memory references for `lea' Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@g

[Bug debug/49827] [4.7 regression] sparc64-linux and cris-elf bootstrap failures due to ICE in dwarf2cfi.c connect_traces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49827 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug debug/49830] [4.7 regression] m68k-linux bootstrap failure due to ICE in dwarf2out_notice_stack_adjust

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49830 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/49831] arm-linux-gnueabi bootstrap failures due to ICE in dwarf2cfi.c connect_traces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49831 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug debug/49827] [4.7 regression] sparc64-linux and cris-elf bootstrap failures due to ICE in dwarf2cfi.c connect_traces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49827 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Target|sparc64-linux, |sparc64-linux, cris-elf

[Bug debug/49831] New: arm-linux-gnueabi bootstrap failures due to ICE in dwarf2cfi.c connect_traces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49831 Summary: arm-linux-gnueabi bootstrap failures due to ICE in dwarf2cfi.c connect_traces Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P

[Bug c++/33255] A warning for "unused" typedefs?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33255 --- Comment #20 from Paolo Carlini 2011-07-24 22:54:05 UTC --- ... or maybe not, because actually _GLIBCXX_CONCEPT_CHECKS defines used typedefs, only, pointless besides type checking. We should also check -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG. This one is serious.

[Bug c++/33255] A warning for "unused" typedefs?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33255 --- Comment #19 from Paolo Carlini 2011-07-24 22:49:32 UTC --- Just as a note, wanted also to add that if I understand correctly the (temporary?!?) small issue with system headers, it would also affect people building their code with -D_GLIBCXX_C

[Bug c++/33255] A warning for "unused" typedefs?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33255 --- Comment #18 from Paolo Carlini 2011-07-24 22:37:39 UTC --- By the way, an obvious positive additional testcase, involving templates, would be one inspired by libstdc++/33084 that is involving *before* the fix for that bug. Shouldn't be too h

[Bug c++/33255] A warning for "unused" typedefs?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33255 --- Comment #17 from Paolo Carlini 2011-07-24 22:32:22 UTC --- Beautiful. And of course I don't think PB_DS_STATIC_ASSERT gonna be a serious problem.

[Bug target/46898] libgcc build failure on lm32-elf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46898 Eric Weddington changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eric.weddington at atmel

[Bug debug/49827] [4.7 regression] sparc64-linux and arm-linux-gnueabi bootstrap failures due to ICE in dwarf2cfi.c connect_traces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49827 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 Daniel Franke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/33255] A warning for "unused" typedefs?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33255 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24820|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 --- Comment #12 from Hugh 2011-07-24 22:08:42 UTC --- I apologize for not getting back to you. The recommendation was to change to a newer version of the compiler which I did and the problem went away. Hugh McCutchen On Jul 24, 2011, at 12:04

[Bug c++/33255] A warning for "unused" typedefs?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33255 --- Comment #15 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-07-24 21:57:47 UTC --- Created attachment 24820 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24820 Work in progress patch This works only on the C++ FE (not on the C FE yet) for now and has been li

[Bug libstdc++/49293] 22_locale/time_get/get_weekday/char/38081-[12].cc fail with glibc 2.14

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49293 --- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-24 21:50:51 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Sun Jul 24 21:50:48 2011 New Revision: 176719 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176719 Log: Backport from mainline 2011-06-07 P

[Bug debug/49830] [4.7 regression] m68k-linux bootstrap failure due to ICE in dwarf2out_notice_stack_adjust

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49830 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code Compone

[Bug rtl-optimization/49807] Missed byte (subreg) extraction when storing to volatile mem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49807 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug target/47509] avr-gcc error: could not split insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47509 Eric Weddington changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eric.weddington at atmel

[Bug debug/49827] [4.7 regression] sparc64-linux and arm-linux-gnueabi bootstrap failures due to ICE in dwarf2cfi.c connect_traces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49827 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug debug/49827] [4.7 regression] sparc64-linux and arm-linux-gnueabi bootstrap failures due to ICE in dwarf2cfi.c connect_traces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49827 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/49826] [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/49822] [4.7 regression] Segfault in remove_prop_source_from_use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49822 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 Summary|[gcc-4.7 regress

[Bug c++/49776] [C++0x]ICE in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5499

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49776 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug tree-optimization/48795] -Warray-bounds false positive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48795 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/48833] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr34415.c FAILs with -flto -fipa-cp-clone -fno-merge-constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48833 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-24 21:01:18 UTC --- It works for me with: GNU GIMPLE (GCC) version 4.7.0 20110723 (experimental) [trunk revision 176707] (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) compiled by GNU C version 4.7.0 20110723 (experiment

[Bug target/49206] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] RA failure in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2113

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49206 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/49129] confusing diagnostic for missing semi-colon after member template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49129 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/49126] timevar_stack faild because define_label

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49126 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/49054] useless cmp+jmp generated for switch when "default:" is unreachable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49054 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48993] [C++0x\ segmentation fault when compiling this program with constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48993 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48992] inline assembly "i" constraint does not accept constexpr function return value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48992 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/48980] Misleading error message when a conversion is invalid while calling a protected base constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48980 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/48962] I am getting an error new.h: No such file or directory on Fedora 13

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48962 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/48923] Type with Allocatable Length Character Component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48923 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48914] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wc++0x-compat" doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48914 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/44352] ICE in string_to_single_character

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352 --- Comment #16 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-24 20:05:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > Was this ever backported? Should it still be backported? No, it has only been fixed for 4.6 (and thus 4.7), but not for 4.5. It is not a regression but al

[Bug fortran/49627] NINT(x,16) doesn't work (at all, ever, I don't think)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49627 Daniel Franke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org Seve

[Bug fortran/49138] Add /usr/include/fortran/{,gcc-} to the file/module search path

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49138 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-24 19:58:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Isn't this the same as bug #35707? Hmm, maybe. I think strictly speaking they are different issues, but both try to solve the same problem.

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-24 19:56:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Tobias, did comment #4/#5 implement #35161? No. The original issue of this PR and of PR 35161 is unfixed. (I think they are duplicates.) The only change (c

[Bug fortran/48718] gfortran crash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48718 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/48718] gfortran crash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48718 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-24 19:50:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Works with -fno-realloc-lhs -- thus, it should be one of the recently fixed > > 4.6/4.7 regressions. > Can this be closed, then?

[Bug fortran/48864] -Ofast should imply -fno-protect-parens

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48864 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/49830] New: [4.7 regression] m68k-linux bootstrap failure due to ICE in dwarf2out_notice_stack_adjust

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49830 Summary: [4.7 regression] m68k-linux bootstrap failure due to ICE in dwarf2out_notice_stack_adjust Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/47720] problems with makefile dependency generation using -M

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47720 Daniel Franke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug fortran/48718] gfortran crash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48718 Daniel Franke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug inline-asm/38804] libgcj multilib fails if not able to exec "non" native programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38804 --- Comment #13 from Rob 2011-07-24 19:19:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > It has always been the case that configure needs to be able to execute code > for all multilibs. If you have a target where this is not possible (like > Solaris or I

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 Daniel Franke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug other/49829] New: --disable-static --enable-shared regression: cannot find -lstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829 Summary: --disable-static --enable-shared regression: cannot find -lstdc++ Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 C

[Bug fortran/48864] -Ofast should imply -fno-protect-parens

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48864 Daniel Franke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/49138] Add /usr/include/fortran/{,gcc-} to the file/module search path

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49138 Daniel Franke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/49149] Dependency autogeneration with `-M` rendered useless by requiring .mod files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49149 Daniel Franke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 Daniel Franke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/49501] support ATTRIBUTES ALIGN in gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49501 Daniel Franke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug debug/49828] New: reversed order of inlined function parameters

: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: jan.kratoch...@redhat.com Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu FAIL: gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20110724 (prerelease) FAIL: gcc (GCC) 4.5.4 20110724 (prerelease) FAIL: gcc (GCC) 4.6.2 20110724 (prerelease) FAIL: gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20110719 (experimental

[Bug fortran/49297] ICE gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.c:268 when compiling molcas7.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49297 Daniel Franke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/46703] Wrong I/O output (only) when running under valgrind

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46703 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Franke 2011-07-24 18:53:21 UTC --- Any news here? May this report be closed?

[Bug fortran/44352] ICE in string_to_single_character

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352 --- Comment #15 from Daniel Franke 2011-07-24 18:51:30 UTC --- Was this ever backported? Should it still be backported?

[Bug fortran/40766] this fortran program is too slow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40766 --- Comment #21 from Daniel Franke 2011-07-24 18:49:19 UTC --- One year down. Did anything happen here?

[Bug fortran/38913] Fortran does not set TYPE_CANONICAL properly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38913 Daniel Franke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/49683] The system cannot execute the specified program

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49683 Daniel Franke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/49438] error during make

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49438 Daniel Franke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/49813] [C++0x] sinh vs asinh vs constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813 --- Comment #25 from Daniel Krügler 2011-07-24 14:55:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) As far as I could follow this discussion, LWG 2013 seems to be the right location from the library view of point. But a compiler should not allow for funct

[Bug target/49057] scheduling difference of subs cause 80% performance difference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49057 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/49827] [4.7 regression] sparc64-linux and arm-linux-gnueabi bootstrap failures due to ICE in dwarf2cfi.c connect_traces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49827 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added Target|sparc64-linux |sparc64-linux, |

[Bug middle-end/49825] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49825 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot |

[Bug c/49820] Explicit check for integer negative after abs optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49820 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-24 09:40:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Why is the behavior different for signed and unsigned? > The expression (a + 5 < a) is reduced to always false when a is signed, but > not > when a is unsig

[Bug bootstrap/49827] New: [4.7 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap failure due to ICE in dwarf2cfi.c connect_traces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49827 Summary: [4.7 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap failure due to ICE in dwarf2cfi.c connect_traces Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/49820] Explicit check for integer negative after abs optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49820 --- Comment #8 from Agner Fog 2011-07-24 08:16:39 UTC --- Thanks for your comments. Why is the behavior different for signed and unsigned? The expression (a + 5 < a) is reduced to always false when a is signed, but not when a is unsigned. -Wal

[Bug c/49820] Explicit check for integer negative after abs optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49820 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-24 06:56:13 UTC --- > I think there is a disconnect between ISO/IEC and their desire to produce > portable code, secure programming, and practical implementations. Confer: > > ME: "I want to check the