http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49467
Summary: Enhancement: Intrinsic to read CARRY and OVERFLOW
flags (where applicable)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2011-06-19
01:51:46 UTC ---
Can we also get r175182 back ported onto gcc-4_5-branch and gcc-4_6-branch?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49466
Summary: Memory leak with assignment of extended derived types
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49464
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-06-18
23:54:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> (note that it is likely also a 4.6 regression).
It is, g++.dg/ext/altivec-17.c fails for me on powerpc64-linux with
gcc-4.6-20110617, while it didn't fa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49465
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Revision 175114 miscompiled 403.gcc
in SPEC CPU 2006
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49446
--- Comment #6 from HotHead 2011-06-18 20:19:56 UTC ---
compiler output with gcc-4.7.0 : http://pastebin.com/XHNPB6WX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49446
--- Comment #4 from HotHead 2011-06-18 20:18:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 24556
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24556
output assembly, notice the unnecessary bitshifts
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49446
--- Comment #5 from HotHead 2011-06-18 20:19:07 UTC ---
Created attachment 24557
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24557
intermediate file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49446
HotHead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Version|4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43321
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49464
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/ext/altivec-17.C (test
for errors, line 15)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48617
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43646
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43831
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49432
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49417
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #31 from davidxl 2011-06-18 16:32:32
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> > Is Easwaran's patch a reasonable way to go?
>
> So, in the end, you weren't talking about the general situation, were you?
> Let's try first to avoid spillin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461
--- Comment #1 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-18
15:06:30 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Sat Jun 18 15:06:26 2011
New Revision: 175182
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175182
Log:
PR target/49461
* libjava/configure.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49325
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49325
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-18
14:48:17 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Jun 18 14:48:14 2011
New Revision: 175181
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175181
Log:
Properly check if .init_array can be used wi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44643
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49463
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-18 14:19:17
UTC ---
It is caused by revision 175167:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-06/msg00657.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49432
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-18
12:59:51 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jun 18 12:59:48 2011
New Revision: 175179
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175179
Log:
PR testsuite/49432
* obj-c++.dg/invalid-typ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49432
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-18
12:56:59 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jun 18 12:56:56 2011
New Revision: 175178
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175178
Log:
PR testsuite/49432
* obj-c++.dg/invalid-typ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49463
Summary: [4.7 Regression] LTO testcase failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49400
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49400
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-18 12:47:00 UTC ---
Fixed with r175177. Closing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49400
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-18 12:36:47 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Jun 18 12:36:45 2011
New Revision: 175177
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175177
Log:
2011-06-18 Janus Weil
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-18
10:53:08 UTC ---
The problem should be fixed on mainline now. Concerning comment #8, the problem
is that LTO files needs to be rebuild after every compiler update. Official
release will bump up LTO fil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-18
10:51:45 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Jun 18 10:51:43 2011
New Revision: 175175
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175175
Log:
oops, comitted with wrong PR# :(
PR lto/48246
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23754
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-18
10:48:10 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Jun 18 10:48:08 2011
New Revision: 175174
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175174
Log:
PR lto/23754
* lto.c (lto_1_to_1_map): Don'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #105 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-06-18 10:18:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #104)
> > Even with 8c1fce46fc0 reverted libxul fails to link during
> > a profiledbuild. Normal build is fine.
>
> I didn't really tested profiledbuild f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49040
--- Comment #2 from bero at arklinux dot org 2011-06-18 09:57:10 UTC ---
Probably the same as 48648 (which has a reduced test case)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48648
--- Comment #8 from bero at arklinux dot org 2011-06-18 09:55:58 UTC ---
ppl 0.11.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #30 from Eric Botcazou 2011-06-18
09:27:36 UTC ---
> Is Easwaran's patch a reasonable way to go?
So, in the end, you weren't talking about the general situation, were you?
Let's try first to avoid spilling to memory, if possible.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49411
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49411
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-18
09:07:24 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jun 18 09:07:20 2011
New Revision: 175170
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175170
Log:
PR target/49411
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #29 from davidxl 2011-06-18 09:05:10
UTC ---
Is Easwaran's patch a reasonable way to go?
David
(In reply to comment #28)
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, eraman at google dot com wrote:
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4419
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49383
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-18 09:00:22 UTC
---
Hi,
the problem is in cgraph_only_called_directl_p call within
call_abi_of_interest.
Getting the one can probably fix the problem by:
Index: rs6000.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #104 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-18 08:53:37
UTC ---
> Even with 8c1fce46fc0 reverted libxul fails to link during
> a profiledbuild. Normal build is fine.
I didn't really tested profiledbuild for a while, so I will check.
Last time I tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47516
--- Comment #7 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com 2011-06-18 08:45:08 UTC ---
Dear All,
It was never there for me :-)
Yes, please close it.
Cheers
Paul
On 6/17/11, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-06-18
08:37:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > I haven't looked at in great detail yet to analyse what causes this problem
> > but
> > it appears to have appeared in the last week or so.
>
> Ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49432
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49462
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49462
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48296
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-06-18 07:53:12
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sat Jun 18 07:53:09 2011
New Revision: 175166
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175166
Log:
PR 49296 List directed read of string ending in EOF.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
--- Comment #10 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-06-18
07:53:12 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sat Jun 18 07:53:09 2011
New Revision: 175166
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175166
Log:
PR 49296 List directed read of string ending in EOF
47 matches
Mail list logo