[Bug c/49467] New: Enhancement: Intrinsic to read CARRY and OVERFLOW flags (where applicable)

2011-06-18 Thread noloader at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49467 Summary: Enhancement: Intrinsic to read CARRY and OVERFLOW flags (where applicable) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priorit

[Bug target/49461] boehm-gc and gcj incompatible with pie

2011-06-18 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2011-06-19 01:51:46 UTC --- Can we also get r175182 back ported onto gcc-4_5-branch and gcc-4_6-branch?

[Bug fortran/49466] New: Memory leak with assignment of extended derived types

2011-06-18 Thread townsend at astro dot wisc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49466 Summary: Memory leak with assignment of extended derived types Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assign

[Bug testsuite/49464] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/ext/altivec-17.C (test for errors, line 15)

2011-06-18 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49464 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-06-18 23:54:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > (note that it is likely also a 4.6 regression). It is, g++.dg/ext/altivec-17.c fails for me on powerpc64-linux with gcc-4.6-20110617, while it didn't fa

[Bug middle-end/49465] New: [4.7 Regression] Revision 175114 miscompiled 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006

2011-06-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49465 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Revision 175114 miscompiled 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/49446] avr-g++ does not optimize when using bitshift in inlined function

2011-06-18 Thread gcc at emailgo dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49446 --- Comment #6 from HotHead 2011-06-18 20:19:56 UTC --- compiler output with gcc-4.7.0 : http://pastebin.com/XHNPB6WX

[Bug target/49446] avr-g++ does not optimize when using bitshift in inlined function

2011-06-18 Thread gcc at emailgo dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49446 --- Comment #4 from HotHead 2011-06-18 20:18:48 UTC --- Created attachment 24556 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24556 output assembly, notice the unnecessary bitshifts

[Bug target/49446] avr-g++ does not optimize when using bitshift in inlined function

2011-06-18 Thread gcc at emailgo dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49446 --- Comment #5 from HotHead 2011-06-18 20:19:07 UTC --- Created attachment 24557 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24557 intermediate file

[Bug target/49446] avr-g++ does not optimize when using bitshift in inlined function

2011-06-18 Thread gcc at emailgo dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49446 HotHead changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Version|4.6.0

[Bug c++/43321] [c++0x] ICE on valid auto

2011-06-18 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43321 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug testsuite/49464] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/ext/altivec-17.C (test for errors, line 15)

2011-06-18 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49464 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/ext/altivec-17.C (test for errors, line 15) Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/48617] [C++0x] Problem with non-type template parameters and decltype

2011-06-18 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48617 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot

[Bug c++/43646] [C++0x] decltype and std::integral_constant

2011-06-18 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43646 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/43831] [C++0x] gcc-4.5.0 does not fail invalid lambda captures (against n3092 5.1.2/8)

2011-06-18 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43831 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug testsuite/49432] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/invalid-type-1.mm

2011-06-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49432 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/49417] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] ICE on invalid CLASS component declaration

2011-06-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49417 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Summa

[Bug rtl-optimization/44194] struct returned by value generates useless stores

2011-06-18 Thread xinliangli at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194 --- Comment #31 from davidxl 2011-06-18 16:32:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #30) > > Is Easwaran's patch a reasonable way to go? > > So, in the end, you weren't talking about the general situation, were you? > Let's try first to avoid spillin

[Bug target/49461] boehm-gc and gcj incompatible with pie

2011-06-18 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461 --- Comment #1 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-18 15:06:30 UTC --- Author: mrs Date: Sat Jun 18 15:06:26 2011 New Revision: 175182 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175182 Log: PR target/49461 * libjava/configure.

[Bug other/49325] Incorrect target HAVE_INITFINI_ARRAY check

2011-06-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49325 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/49325] Incorrect target HAVE_INITFINI_ARRAY check

2011-06-18 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49325 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-18 14:48:17 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Sat Jun 18 14:48:14 2011 New Revision: 175181 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175181 Log: Properly check if .init_array can be used wi

[Bug target/44643] ice in c-typeck.c

2011-06-18 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44643 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.6.1

[Bug middle-end/49463] [4.7 Regression] LTO testcase failures

2011-06-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49463 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-18 14:19:17 UTC --- It is caused by revision 175167: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-06/msg00657.html

[Bug testsuite/49432] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/invalid-type-1.mm

2011-06-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49432 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-18 12:59:51 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Jun 18 12:59:48 2011 New Revision: 175179 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175179 Log: PR testsuite/49432 * obj-c++.dg/invalid-typ

[Bug testsuite/49432] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/invalid-type-1.mm

2011-06-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49432 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-18 12:56:59 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Jun 18 12:56:56 2011 New Revision: 175178 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175178 Log: PR testsuite/49432 * obj-c++.dg/invalid-typ

[Bug middle-end/49463] New: [4.7 Regression] LTO testcase failures

2011-06-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49463 Summary: [4.7 Regression] LTO testcase failures Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassi

[Bug fortran/49400] [F08] Proc-pointer declaration in BLOCK construct

2011-06-18 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49400 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/49400] [F08] Proc-pointer declaration in BLOCK construct

2011-06-18 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49400 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-18 12:47:00 UTC --- Fixed with r175177. Closing.

[Bug fortran/49400] [F08] Proc-pointer declaration in BLOCK construct

2011-06-18 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49400 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-18 12:36:47 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Sat Jun 18 12:36:45 2011 New Revision: 175177 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175177 Log: 2011-06-18 Janus Weil PR fortran/4

[Bug lto/48246] ICE in lto_wpa_write_files

2011-06-18 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246 --- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-18 10:53:08 UTC --- The problem should be fixed on mainline now. Concerning comment #8, the problem is that LTO files needs to be rebuild after every compiler update. Official release will bump up LTO fil

[Bug lto/48246] ICE in lto_wpa_write_files

2011-06-18 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-18 10:51:45 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Jun 18 10:51:43 2011 New Revision: 175175 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175175 Log: oops, comitted with wrong PR# :( PR lto/48246

[Bug java/23754] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression]: tree check error in check_inner_circular_reference

2011-06-18 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23754 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-18 10:48:10 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Jun 18 10:48:08 2011 New Revision: 175174 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175174 Log: PR lto/23754 * lto.c (lto_1_to_1_map): Don'

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

2011-06-18 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #105 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-06-18 10:18:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #104) > > Even with 8c1fce46fc0 reverted libxul fails to link during > > a profiledbuild. Normal build is fine. > > I didn't really tested profiledbuild f

[Bug tree-optimization/49040] ICE in translate_clast, at graphite-clast-to-gimple.c:1123

2011-06-18 Thread bero at arklinux dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49040 --- Comment #2 from bero at arklinux dot org 2011-06-18 09:57:10 UTC --- Probably the same as 48648 (which has a reduced test case)

[Bug tree-optimization/48648] internal compiler error: in translate_clast, at graphite-clast-to-gimple.c:1123

2011-06-18 Thread bero at arklinux dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48648 --- Comment #8 from bero at arklinux dot org 2011-06-18 09:55:58 UTC --- ppl 0.11.2

[Bug rtl-optimization/44194] struct returned by value generates useless stores

2011-06-18 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194 --- Comment #30 from Eric Botcazou 2011-06-18 09:27:36 UTC --- > Is Easwaran's patch a reasonable way to go? So, in the end, you weren't talking about the general situation, were you? Let's try first to avoid spilling to memory, if possible.

[Bug target/49411] [4.6/4.7] ICE: unrecognizable insn with -mxop in _mm_roti_epi8 with negative number

2011-06-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49411 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/49411] [4.6/4.7] ICE: unrecognizable insn with -mxop in _mm_roti_epi8 with negative number

2011-06-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49411 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-18 09:07:24 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Jun 18 09:07:20 2011 New Revision: 175170 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175170 Log: PR target/49411 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_

[Bug rtl-optimization/44194] struct returned by value generates useless stores

2011-06-18 Thread xinliangli at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194 --- Comment #29 from davidxl 2011-06-18 09:05:10 UTC --- Is Easwaran's patch a reasonable way to go? David (In reply to comment #28) > On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, eraman at google dot com wrote: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4419

[Bug bootstrap/49383] [4.7 regression] powerpc64-linux bootstrap failure due to ice in cgraph_only_called_directly_p

2011-06-18 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49383 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-18 09:00:22 UTC --- Hi, the problem is in cgraph_only_called_directl_p call within call_abi_of_interest. Getting the one can probably fix the problem by: Index: rs6000.c

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

2011-06-18 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #104 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-18 08:53:37 UTC --- > Even with 8c1fce46fc0 reverted libxul fails to link during > a profiledbuild. Normal build is fine. I didn't really tested profiledbuild for a while, so I will check. Last time I tr

[Bug fortran/47516] testsuite failure: realloc_on_assign_2.f03 (with --disable-bootstrap)

2011-06-18 Thread paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47516 --- Comment #7 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com 2011-06-18 08:45:08 UTC --- Dear All, It was never there for me :-) Yes, please close it. Cheers Paul On 6/17/11, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Bug tree-optimization/49452] comp-goto-2.c regresses in testing

2011-06-18 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452 --- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-06-18 08:37:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > > I haven't looked at in great detail yet to analyse what causes this problem > > but > > it appears to have appeared in the last week or so. > > Ma

[Bug testsuite/49432] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/invalid-type-1.mm

2011-06-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49432 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Summa

[Bug c++/49462] comparison of const bool and pointer does not yield an error

2011-06-18 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49462 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID

[Bug c++/49462] comparison of const bool and pointer does not yield an error

2011-06-18 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49462 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/48296] [C++0x] constexpr member function cannot use the class type it belongs as parameter type or return type

2011-06-18 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48296 --- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-06-18 07:53:12 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Sat Jun 18 07:53:09 2011 New Revision: 175166 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175166 Log: PR 49296 List directed read of string ending in EOF.

[Bug libfortran/49296] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong END OF FILE error for list-directed I/O with strings

2011-06-18 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296 --- Comment #10 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-06-18 07:53:12 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Sat Jun 18 07:53:09 2011 New Revision: 175166 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175166 Log: PR 49296 List directed read of string ending in EOF