http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49411
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-18
06:43:41 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jun 18 06:43:38 2011
New Revision: 175165
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175165
Log:
PR target/49411
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49458
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-18
05:58:42 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Jun 18 05:58:38 2011
New Revision: 175164
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175164
Log:
PR c++/49458
* call.c (convert_class_to_ref
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
--- Comment #12 from Jack Howarth 2011-06-18
05:54:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Further investigation revealed part of what's going on: the test in
> gnu::gcj::convert::IOConverter::iconv_init fails with EINVAL on Tru64
> UNIX, but the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49462
Summary: comparison of const bool and pointer does not yield an
error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
-20110617/configure --prefix=/sw
--prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.7 --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.7/info
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,java --with-gmp=/sw
--with-libiconv-prefix=/sw --with-ppl=/sw --with-cloog=/sw --with-mpc=/sw
--with-system-zlib --x-includes=/usr/X11R6/include --x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49446
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49446
HotHead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
HotHead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at emailgo dot de
--- Comment #15 from HotH
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49400
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
--- Comment #10 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-17 20:49:22
UTC ---
With regards to the question in comment #9, you would probably do better asking
it on the gcc-patches mailing list then in the comment of this bug report since
more people would see it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49458
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
--- Comment #9 from Easwaran Raman 2011-06-17
20:43:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Compiling x.c with a ia64-unknown-linux cross compiler, setting a breakpoint
> in
> can_escape(), I see that,
>
>
> (gdb) p debug_rtx (body)
> (set (mem/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43912
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43912
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-17
20:08:06 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 17 20:08:01 2011
New Revision: 175158
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175158
Log:
PR c++/43912
Generate proxy VAR_DECLs for b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48699
--- Comment #18 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17 20:03:07 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Fri Jun 17 20:03:04 2011
New Revision: 175151
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175151
Log:
2011-06-17 Janus Weil
PR fortran/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49460
--- Comment #1 from Roger Jarrett 2011-06-17
19:41:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 24555
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24555
preprocessed source file SmartInliner.ii (gzipped)
preprocessed file gzipped to allow upload
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49460
Summary: g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program
cc1plus) using -O2 or -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49459
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49454
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49459
Summary: attribute((mode(byte))) in a typedef produces wrong
debug information
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49458
Summary: [C++0x] Obvious candidate for conversion to function
lvalue rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7970
David Hammen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dhammen at odysseysr dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49457
Summary: integer comparison does not vectorize
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2011-06-17
16:55:48 UTC ---
> I haven't looked at in great detail yet to analyse what causes this problem
> but
> it appears to have appeared in the last week or so.
Maybe r175063 (significant dse.c change).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49444
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2011-06-17
16:25:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
>
> Well, that will then still run into the indirect-ref issue as
> the expansion for target-mem-refs and mem-refs works the same way.
> Only targets that sup
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-17 16:15:55 UTC ---
Further investigation revealed part of what's going on: the test in
gnu::gcj::convert::IOConverter::iconv_init fails with EINVAL on Tru64
UNIX, but the byte swappi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47606
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47606
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49383
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner 2011-06-17
15:53:39 UTC ---
We die on this assert:
gcc_assert (cgraph_function_or_thunk_node (node, NULL) == node);
Here's a couple of dumps of the two decls if that helps.
(gdb) frame 1
(gdb) ptree node->d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #24 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-06-17
15:08:55 UTC ---
Thanks for reminder, I've started bootstap and test on ia64 and x86-64.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445
--- Comment #5 from Juan Pedro Bolívar Puente
2011-06-17 14:41:03 UTC ---
You are right, I thought it worked for all fundamental types but reviewing the
proposal [1] makes me realise I was wrong. It remains unclear wether user
defined enums shoul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-17 14:06:12 UTC ---
> pr49441 is a totally different issue. That bug manifests itself as a runtime
> error with unresolved symbols from libiconv. I still don't understand why we
> ju
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #23 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-06-17 14:04:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> (In reply to comment #20)
> > Created attachment 24112 [details]
> > backported patch
> >
> > Good. Then attached is the initial backport, I ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49456
Summary: getstacktrace and getallthreads tests timeout on IRIX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49455
Summary: Thread_Interrupt Looper subtest FAILs on IRIX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49454
Summary: [4.7 Regression] /usr/include/libio.h:336:3: internal
compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49450
Johnny Willemsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #4 from Johnny Wil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49383
William J. Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49450
Johnny Willemsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49450
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
--- Comment #23 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-06-17 13:32:33 UTC ---
For 'gcc version 4.6.0 20110313 (experimental) [trunk revision 170921p5] (GCC)'
I get
7501.
-7501.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36610
--- Comment #25 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-06-17 13:29:33 UTC ---
I have the following patch in my working tree without regression
--- /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/torture/forward-1.m2011-06-07
16:48:47.0 +0200
+++ /opt/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36610
--- Comment #24 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-17 13:23:39 UTC ---
> --- Comment #23 from Nicola Pero 2011-06-14
> 18:26:40 UTC ---
[...]
> Summarizing, I would close the bug, or leave it open but just to remind me/us
> to:
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
--- Comment #22 from Thomas Henlich
2011-06-17 13:22:42 UTC ---
This is kind of bad:
print "(RU,F7.0)", 7500.0 ! 8. expected 7500.
print "(RD,F7.0)", -7500.0 ! -8. expected -7500.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49453
Summary: Accepts invalid syntax for partial specialization of
class template where the specialization is a class
template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.4
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-17 13:09:06 UTC ---
> --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres
> 2011-06-17 13:04:17 UTC ---
> Could this pr be related to pr49441?
No: the iconv functions only live in libiconv (no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49441
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-17
13:05:33 UTC ---
PR49314 reports also problems with iconv and java.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-17
13:04:17 UTC ---
Could this pr be related to pr49441?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49441
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2011-06-17
12:50:52 UTC ---
How is gcj supposed to properly find its linkage libraries on x86_64 linux when
using -m32? Since only a single copy of libgcj.spec is installed and used for
both the default -m64 and -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse 2011-06-17
12:07:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> It looks like C++11 only defines atomic and atomic, so a
> link-time error on atomic seems ok, no?
Sorry, please ignore the above comment, I should have read
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-06-17
12:02:10 UTC ---
One of the differences I must say I noticed is that at O2 - the call to y has a
NORETURN attribute marked to it but there's no reason why this should be marked
as NORETURN - sur
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
Summary: New testsuite failures with arm-linux-gnueabi
comp-goto failing with
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49451
Summary: FileHandleGcTest FAILS on IRIX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marc.glisse at normalesup
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49450
--- Comment #1 from Johnny Willemsen 2011-06-17
11:32:51 UTC ---
g++-4.6 (SUSE Linux) 4.6.0 20110505 [gcc-4_6-branch revision 173419]
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49115
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-17
11:27:41 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jun 17 11:27:37 2011
New Revision: 175148
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175148
Log:
2011-06-17 Richard Guenther
Backpo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
--- Comment #17 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-17
11:25:56 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Fri Jun 17 11:25:53 2011
New Revision: 175147
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175147
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48542
* gcc.dg/tortu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
--- Comment #16 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-17
11:24:57 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Fri Jun 17 11:24:55 2011
New Revision: 175146
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175146
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48542
* reload.c (fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #22 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-06-17 11:21:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> Created attachment 24112 [details]
> backported patch
>
> Good. Then attached is the initial backport, I have just verified that it
> passes th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
--- Comment #15 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-17
11:20:41 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Fri Jun 17 11:20:38 2011
New Revision: 175145
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175145
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48542
* gcc.dg/tortu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
--- Comment #14 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-17
11:20:05 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Fri Jun 17 11:20:01 2011
New Revision: 175144
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175144
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48542
* reload.c (fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
--- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-17
11:18:39 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Fri Jun 17 11:18:37 2011
New Revision: 175142
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175142
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48542
* gcc.dg/tortu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
--- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-17
11:17:37 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Fri Jun 17 11:17:34 2011
New Revision: 175141
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175141
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48542
* reload.c (fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-17
11:15:39 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Fri Jun 17 11:15:35 2011
New Revision: 175140
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175140
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48542
* gcc.dg/tortu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-17
11:13:42 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Fri Jun 17 11:13:38 2011
New Revision: 175139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175139
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48542
* reload.c (fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49450
Summary: not possible to call explicit destructor of
std::string
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #14 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-06-17
10:02:21 UTC ---
Partial success: I've just managed to bootstrap gcc-4.1.2 w/ gnat on
m68k-linux. Lots of patches applied though.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-17 09:56:50 UTC ---
As a quick hack, I've just removed the definition of HAVE_ICONV and
rebuilt libgcj.so. This way, testsuite results are clean.
I'll have to further investigate (pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445
--- Comment #2 from Juan Pedro Bolívar Puente
2011-06-17 09:35:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 24553
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24553
Test case for the "undefined reference" on atom bug
raskolnikov@nexus9:~$ make CXXFLAGS=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49361
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49444
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-17
09:06:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Something like this:
> Index: tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
> ===
> --- tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49449
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fche at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47516
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49315
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|alpha-dec-osf5.1b |alpha-dec-osf5.1b
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49315
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2011-06-17 08:33:17 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Jun 17 08:33:13 2011
New Revision: 175138
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175138
Log:
PR libgcj/49315
* include/solaris-signal.h: Rena
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #28 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-06-17 08:21:30 UTC ---
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, eraman at google dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
>
> --- Comment #27 from Easwaran Raman 2011-06-16
> 17:14:38 U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49442
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-17
08:15:38 UTC ---
ICC apparently has __assume_aligned (ptr, align) for this, and also
#pragma vector {aligned,unaligned,always,nontemporal}.
For alignment, I'd say having both hard alignment and likely
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49448
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2011-06-17 07:26:12
UTC ---
It should use $target_cpu.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49449
Summary: -fmudflapth -lmudflapth problems with
-fvisibility=hidden, missing posix_memalign wrapper
and pointers in varargs
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #30 from Anitha Boyapati
2011-06-17 07:07:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 24552
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24552
Make log for gcc-4_6-branch for comment 28
(In reply to comment #29)
> Works For Me.
>
> [rth@an
87 matches
Mail list logo
