http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49411
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-15
06:32:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 24533
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24533
gcc47-pr49411.patch
Untested fix. Alternatively, we could for the rotation instead just always
mask
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49411
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49415
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Revision 175071 fails to bootstrap on
x86_64-apple-darwin10
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49412
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49389
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|jason at redh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49369
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49117
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107
--- Comment #22 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-15
03:52:02 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jun 15 03:51:59 2011
New Revision: 175073
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175073
Log:
PR c++/49107
* cp-tree.h (DEFERRED_NOEXCEP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49371
--- Comment #29 from Jack Howarth 2011-06-15
03:21:04 UTC ---
While we are fixing the pie/PIE handling on darwin, we should also address a
change required for darwin11 which defaults its linker to -pie. This causes
breakage in gcj and pch since F
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49371
--- Comment #28 from Jack Howarth 2011-06-15
03:15:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 24532
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24532
patch to fix pie handling for darwin11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #25 from Anitha Boyapati
2011-06-15 02:37:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> The testcase at the head of the PR is now fixed.
>
> For the 4.6 branch, this required also backporting
>
(Assuming that backporting implies the emis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49413
--- Comment #7 from Matt Gattis 2011-06-15 01:19:57
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> The problem is:
> double *v = (qp == &(t->q)) ? t->xyz->va : t->xyz->vb;
>
> the pointer v is a pointer to a 8 byte aligned data but you supply it with
> so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49413
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2011-06-15
01:13:14 UTC ---
The problem is:
double *v = (qp == &(t->q)) ? t->xyz->va : t->xyz->vb;
the pointer v is a pointer to a 8 byte aligned data but you supply it with
something which is only 4 byte alig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49413
--- Comment #5 from Matt Gattis 2011-06-15 01:10:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I think this code is undefined as the alignment requirements of double is 8
> bytes but the original (t->xyz->va/t->xyz->vb) is packed so it has a alignment
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49413
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2011-06-15
01:00:34 UTC ---
Personally, I find the expression "over-optimization" misleading: either we
have a compiler *bug*, which therefore is performing an incorrect
transformation, or we don't, thus the code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49414
Summary: gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c failed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49413
--- Comment #3 from Matt Gattis 2011-06-15 00:39:06
UTC ---
Created attachment 24531
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24531
verbose gcc output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49413
--- Comment #2 from Matt Gattis 2011-06-15 00:38:29
UTC ---
Created attachment 24530
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24530
verbose gcc output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49413
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-06-15
00:34:37 UTC ---
I think this code is undefined as the alignment requirements of double is 8
bytes but the original (t->xyz->va/t->xyz->vb) is packed so it has a alignment
of 4 bytes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49413
Summary: over-optimization that causes valid code to segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49412
Summary: __dso_handle should be hidden
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49290
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49411
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #19 from eraman at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14 22:58:24 UTC ---
Author: eraman
Date: Tue Jun 14 22:58:20 2011
New Revision: 175063
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175063
Log:
2011-06-14 Easwaran Raman
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49411
Summary: [4.6/4.7] ICE: unrecognizable insn with -mxop in
_mm_roti_epi8 with negative number
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49409
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-14
22:34:34 UTC ---
some warnings would seem sensible to me
I tried clang++ which only warns about the first two, via
-Wtautological-compare
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49365
--- Comment #5 from Changpeng Fang 2011-06-14
22:22:11 UTC ---
It seems there is a prefetch generation bug on Bulldozer.
With -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -march=bdver1
-fprefetch-loop-arrays, I got a normal timing of 795s.
Howev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49390
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49369
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-14
22:13:32 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 14 22:13:29 2011
New Revision: 175059
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175059
Log:
PR c++/49369
* class.c (build_base_path): F
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49117
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-14
22:13:39 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 14 22:13:36 2011
New Revision: 175060
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175060
Log:
PR c++/49117
* call.c (perform_implicit_con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49290
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-14
22:13:24 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 14 22:13:19 2011
New Revision: 175058
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175058
Log:
PR c++/49290
* semantics.c (cxx_eval_indire
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49410
Summary: Internal compiler error in change-stack at
reg-stack.c:2540
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49396
--- Comment #4 from dcb 2011-06-14 21:13:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Same error on all branches back to 4.4.
Interesting. Worth generalising so that source code pattern
if (X)
{
}
else if (X)
{
}
would cause a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48613
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2011-06-14
20:51:53 UTC ---
Patch posted to mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01108.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48727
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-14 20:26:13
UTC ---
Author: sje
Date: Tue Jun 14 20:26:08 2011
New Revision: 175055
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175055
Log:
2011-06-14 Steve Ellcey
PR testsuite/48727
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #21 from Jason Merri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49409
Summary: some possible new warnings for strange code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49408
--- Comment #1 from Jan Kratochvil
2011-06-14 19:14:19 UTC ---
This Bug may not longer make sense due to:
Bug 49312 - Make DW_AT_name contain only simple name, no template-id
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #23 from Richard Henderson 2011-06-14
19:13:04 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Tue Jun 14 19:13:00 2011
New Revision: 175049
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175049
Log:
PR debug/48459
* dwarf2out.c (frame_poin
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: jan.kratoch...@redhat.com
CC: do...@gcc.gnu.org
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
FAIL gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20110614 (prerelease)
FAIL gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20110614 (experimental)
struct S {
void m (int x) {}
};
template
struct K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49407
Summary: unusable debuginfo for dll-imported functions.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49407
--- Comment #1 from Pawel Sikora 2011-06-14 19:04:34
UTC ---
Created attachment 24528
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24528
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-14
18:37:28 UTC ---
your program is invalid
if a function is declared inline in one translation unit (such as Base.c++)
then it must be declared inline in all translation units that refer to it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
--- Comment #8 from neotheone222 at gmail dot com 2011-06-14 18:36:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 24527
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24527
InlineText preprocessed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
--- Comment #7 from neotheone222 at gmail dot com 2011-06-14 18:36:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 24526
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24526
InlineText main file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
--- Comment #6 from neotheone222 at gmail dot com 2011-06-14 18:35:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 24525
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24525
Derived preprocessed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
--- Comment #5 from neotheone222 at gmail dot com 2011-06-14 18:35:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 24524
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24524
Derived implementation file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
--- Comment #4 from neotheone222 at gmail dot com 2011-06-14 18:34:43 UTC ---
Created attachment 24523
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24523
Derived header file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
--- Comment #3 from neotheone222 at gmail dot com 2011-06-14 18:34:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 24522
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24522
Base preprocessed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
--- Comment #2 from neotheone222 at gmail dot com 2011-06-14 18:33:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 24521
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24521
Base implementation file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
--- Comment #1 from neotheone222 at gmail dot com 2011-06-14 18:33:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 24520
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24520
Base header file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36610
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #23 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
Summary: Inlining in inheritance seems broken
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49117
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-14
18:16:08 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 14 18:16:06 2011
New Revision: 175044
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175044
Log:
PR c++/49117
* call.c (perform_implicit_con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49369
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-14
18:15:53 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 14 18:15:51 2011
New Revision: 175042
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175042
Log:
PR c++/49369
* class.c (build_base_path): F
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49389
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-14
18:16:00 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 14 18:15:58 2011
New Revision: 175043
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175043
Log:
PR c++/49389
* typeck2.c (build_m_component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49290
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-14
18:15:46 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 14 18:15:43 2011
New Revision: 175041
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175041
Log:
PR c++/49290
* semantics.c (cxx_fold_indire
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49405
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49405
Summary: Inlining in inheritance seems broken
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49402
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47364
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
16:36:50 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Jun 14 16:36:45 2011
New Revision: 175036
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175036
Log:
Expand strlen to Pmode.
2011-06-14 H.J. Lu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47364
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
16:36:16 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Jun 14 16:36:12 2011
New Revision: 175035
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175035
Log:
Pass POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED to convert_to_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #22 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-06-14
16:32:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> (In reply to comment #19)
> > > A full build for AVR fails, but that seems to be related to other
> > > open bugs.
> >
> > What bugs?
>
> Perhaps I s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47364
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
16:32:01 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Jun 14 16:31:57 2011
New Revision: 175034
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175034
Log:
Properly expand strlen to Pmode.
2011-06-14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49214
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
--- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-14 15:47:16 UTC ---
> --- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-12
> 12:48:32 UTC ---
> A target issue as it only depends on the assembler used. Rainer, as people
> don't have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49375
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-14 15:41:50 UTC ---
IMO this is a clear example why LD_LIBRARY_PATH is evil: the execution
tests in the testsuite should be linked with -R/-rpath/whatever is
required so the correct ta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49402
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton 2011-06-14 15:32:49
UTC ---
Fixed in mainline.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49403
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton 2011-06-14 15:32:13
UTC ---
Fixed in mainline.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49403
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton 2011-06-14 15:30:15
UTC ---
Author: nickc
Date: Tue Jun 14 15:30:05 2011
New Revision: 175030
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175030
Log:
PR target/49403
* config/v850/v850.c (v850_m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49402
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton 2011-06-14 15:30:15
UTC ---
Author: nickc
Date: Tue Jun 14 15:30:05 2011
New Revision: 175030
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175030
Log:
PR target/49403
* config/v850/v850.c (v850_m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-14
15:28:27 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 14 15:28:21 2011
New Revision: 175029
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175029
Log:
PR fortran/49103
* tree.h (DECL_NONSHAREAB
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-14
15:27:28 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 14 15:27:24 2011
New Revision: 175028
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175028
Log:
PR fortran/49103
* tree.h (DECL_NONSHAREAB
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45098
--- Comment #15 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14 15:05:29 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Jun 14 15:05:26 2011
New Revision: 175025
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175025
Log:
2011-06-14 Tom de Vries
PR target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49390
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-14
15:01:15 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 14 15:01:10 2011
New Revision: 175024
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175024
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/49390
Revert:
2010-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49390
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-14
14:59:55 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 14 14:59:52 2011
New Revision: 175023
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175023
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/49390
Revert:
2010-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45098
--- Comment #14 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14 14:30:01 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Jun 14 14:29:58 2011
New Revision: 175022
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175022
Log:
2011-06-14 Zdenek Dvorak
Tom d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49362
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48365
Gabriel Dos Reis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gdr at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48365
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022
--- Comment #26 from Paolo Carlini 2011-06-14
14:02:15 UTC ---
... among other things, std::valarray, at variance with the containers, does
*not* have member begin and end, thus I don't even think novice programmers may
have expectations about th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022
--- Comment #25 from Gabriel Dos Reis 2011-06-14
14:01:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Ok, now I see, it's the operator[] of _BinBase which returns by value, I
> overlooked that.
Yes, "val" in "valarray" stands for "value", e.g. a valarr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36610
--- Comment #22 from js-gcc at webkeks dot org
2011-06-14 14:02:05 UTC ---
Nope, it's still using __builtin_apply.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022
--- Comment #24 from Gabriel Dos Reis 2011-06-14
13:54:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> It should be identical to
>
> auto&& range = v1 + v2;
> for (auto b = std::begin(range), e = std::end(range); b != e; ++b)
> { ... }
> (see 6.5.4 [s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36610
--- Comment #21 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-14 13:53:56 UTC ---
objc.dg/torture/forward-1.m now seems to XPASS (almost?) everywhere with
-fgnu-runtime:
alpha-dec-osf5.1b
i386-pc-solaris2.1[01] -m64
mips
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022
--- Comment #23 from Paolo Carlini 2011-06-14
13:50:56 UTC ---
Ok, now I see, it's the operator[] of _BinBase which returns by value, I
overlooked that. Thus, fine it seems confirmed that range-based for-loop itself
is Ok, but making sure we have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49362
mark.pupilli at dyson dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolutio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49404
Summary: ARM _Unwind_Backtrace returns _URC_FAILURE too eagerly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #21 from Richard Henderson 2011-06-14
13:31:47 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Tue Jun 14 13:31:43 2011
New Revision: 175018
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175018
Log:
PR debug/48459
* dwarf2out.c (frame_poin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49396
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-06-14 13:23:09 UTC ---
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I think it should be
>
> Index: c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c
> ===
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #20 from Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022
--- Comment #22 from Paolo Carlini 2011-06-14
13:27:03 UTC ---
To be clear: I fully agree with the exclusion sentence. But I had to play a bit
with this stuff to realize that really adding overloads to begin() and end()
cannot work.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022
--- Comment #21 from Paolo Carlini 2011-06-14
13:23:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 24519
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24519
patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022
--- Comment #20 from Paolo Carlini 2011-06-14
13:22:13 UTC ---
I'm not sure, really. I'm going to attach a variant which more explicitly only
uses return by const ref and shows the same fundamental problem for me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49324
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2011-06-14
13:07:07 UTC ---
(Comment fixed 8 fixed the missing deep copy.)
Regarding the reallocate (cf. comment 6, but using scalars to reduce the dump
size): For
type t
integer, allocatable :: A
end ty
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-14
13:01:24 UTC ---
Ah, no the problem is std::__addressof(__ex()[0]) which takes the
address of a temporary returned by operator[]
The range-based for seems to do the right thing
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
