3-yr-old infloop in dwarf2out.c

coverity pointed out the infinite loop below. I guess it is unreachable or at least hard to reach, or it would have been reported/fixed before now: 17605 if (index && TREE_CODE (index) == RANGE_EXPR) 17606 { 17607 int count = tree_low_cst (TREE

[Bug target/49186] optimize problem with unsigned long long value.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49186 --- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-05-30 06:05:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Could you backport each branches? I'll do so.

[Bug target/48767] compiler error: Segmentation fault with set void in va_arg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48767 --- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-05-30 06:03:35 UTC --- It isn't a regression, is it? My gcc-4.2 segfaults too for that testcase.

[Bug target/48767] compiler error: Segmentation fault with set void in va_arg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48767 --- Comment #4 from Nobuhiro Iwamatsu 2011-05-30 05:36:31 UTC --- Could you backport earch branches? If you need patch, I will create.

[Bug target/49186] optimize problem with unsigned long long value.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49186 --- Comment #4 from Nobuhiro Iwamatsu 2011-05-30 05:33:52 UTC --- Hi, Thanks! I confirmed resolved this problem by this patch on gcc-4.4, 4.5, 4.6 and trunk. Could you backport each branches?

[Bug fortran/48699] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP] MOVE_ALLOC inside SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48699 --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-29 22:19:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > Moreover, I think that this test case is in fact invalid, cf. PR 48887. I have only reported what I saw. My understanding of the standard past f77

[Bug fortran/48699] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP] MOVE_ALLOC inside SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48699 --- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-29 21:51:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > The patch in comment #11 fixes the runtime for the tests in comments #0 and > #9. > However the other tests give a backtrace on x86_64-apple-darw

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on several platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/47601] [OOP] Internal Error: mio_component_ref(): Component not found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601 --- Comment #28 from Rich Townsend 2011-05-29 21:10:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #27) > r174416 fixes all the test cases in this PR (except comment #11, which is > invalid). I'm glad we finally nailed this one. > > Closing as fixed. Thanks fo

[Bug c++/49221] [4.7 Regression] Several ICEs in the obj-c++ test suite after revision 174307

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49221 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-29 21:02:33 UTC --- Same failures on powerpc-apple-darwin9 also.

[Bug fortran/47601] [OOP] Internal Error: mio_component_ref(): Component not found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libgcj/48533] Installer fails on libjava component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48533 Åke Ragnar Dahlgren changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joakimds at kth dot se --- Comment

[Bug fortran/47601] [OOP] Internal Error: mio_component_ref(): Component not found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601 --- Comment #26 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-29 20:32:14 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Sun May 29 20:32:11 2011 New Revision: 174416 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174416 Log: 2011-05-29 Janus Weil PR fortran/

[Bug libfortran/49214] [4.7 Regression] Broken pipe in backtrace for x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49214 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.0 |--- --- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist

[Bug libfortran/48931] Backtrace functionality not async-signal-safe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48931 --- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-05-29 20:13:56 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Sun May 29 20:13:52 2011 New Revision: 174415 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174415 Log: PR 48931 Use async-signal-safe execve instead of exe

[Bug target/48830] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] unrecognized insn: storing invalid upper fp reg in SImode to stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48830 --- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou 2011-05-29 20:01:45 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Sun May 29 20:01:41 2011 New Revision: 174414 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174414 Log: PR target/48830 * rtlanal.c (simplify_

[Bug target/49226] problematic _Complex long double argument passing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49226 --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou 2011-05-29 19:49:59 UTC --- Created attachment 24392 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24392 Testcase

[Bug target/49226] New: problematic _Complex long double argument passing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49226 Summary: problematic _Complex long double argument passing Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo:

[Bug c++/49225] New: [C++0x] Weird SFINAE behavior with variadic templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49225 Summary: [C++0x] Weird SFINAE behavior with variadic templates Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo

[Bug middle-end/49201] [4.7 Regression] ice in tree_add_const_value_attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49201 --- Comment #4 from dcb 2011-05-29 19:13:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > Please provide full command line option. > > > > g++ -g attachment.cpp ? > > Please try revision 174380.

[Bug c++/44870] [4.7 regression] [C++0x] error when calling function with rvalue argument inside template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44870 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug rtl-optimization/49095] Horrible code generation for trivial decrement with test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49095 --- Comment #13 from Linus Torvalds 2011-05-29 18:56:44 UTC --- Thanks guys.

[Bug rtl-optimization/49095] Horrible code generation for trivial decrement with test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49095 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/49095] Horrible code generation for trivial decrement with test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49095 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-29 18:51:51 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sun May 29 18:51:48 2011 New Revision: 174413 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174413 Log: PR rtl-optimization/49095 * config/i386/pr

[Bug fortran/45786] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Relational operators .eq. and == are not recognized as equivalent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45786 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig 2011-05-29 18:41:03 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun May 29 18:41:00 2011 New Revision: 174412 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174412 Log: 2011-05-29 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/4578

[Bug fortran/18918] Eventually support Fortran 2008's coarrays [co-arrays]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918 --- Comment #53 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-29 18:17:44 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sun May 29 18:17:40 2011 New Revision: 174411 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174411 Log: 2011-05-29 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/1

[Bug fortran/18918] Eventually support Fortran 2008's coarrays [co-arrays]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918 --- Comment #52 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-29 18:15:15 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sun May 29 18:15:08 2011 New Revision: 174410 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174410 Log: 2011-05-29 Tobias Burnus Richard G

[Bug c++/49221] [4.7 Regression] Several ICEs in the obj-c++ test suite after revision 174307

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49221 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-29 18:13:30 UTC --- The tests also fails on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu and hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-05/msg03299.html and http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresul

[Bug target/43700] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] global register variables defect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43700 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/43700] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] global register variables defect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43700 --- Comment #16 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-29 18:10:46 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Sun May 29 18:10:44 2011 New Revision: 174409 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174409 Log: gcc/ PR target/43700 * co

[Bug target/43995] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on Mips64 crossbuild of ext2progs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43995 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/43995] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on Mips64 crossbuild of ext2progs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43995 --- Comment #12 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-29 17:50:57 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Sun May 29 17:50:53 2011 New Revision: 174407 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174407 Log: gcc/ PR target/43995 * co

[Bug target/43700] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] global register variables defect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43700 --- Comment #15 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-29 17:51:07 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Sun May 29 17:51:03 2011 New Revision: 174408 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174408 Log: gcc/ PR target/43700 * co

[Bug target/43700] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] global register variables defect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43700 --- Comment #14 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-29 17:50:23 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Sun May 29 17:50:18 2011 New Revision: 174406 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174406 Log: Add PR target/43700 to last chang

[Bug tree-optimization/49218] Incorrect optimization of a 'for' loop creates an infinite loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49218 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-29 17:48:21 UTC --- C testcase: float f; int main() { long long i = f; if (i <= 10) do { ++i; asm(""); } while (i != 11); return 0; }

[Bug target/43995] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on Mips64 crossbuild of ext2progs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43995 --- Comment #11 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-29 17:47:53 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Sun May 29 17:47:51 2011 New Revision: 174404 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174404 Log: gcc/ PR target/43995 * co

[Bug target/43700] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] global register variables defect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43700 --- Comment #13 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-29 17:45:30 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Sun May 29 17:45:27 2011 New Revision: 174403 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174403 Log: Add PR target/43700 to an earlier

[Bug target/43995] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on Mips64 crossbuild of ext2progs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43995 --- Comment #10 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-29 17:41:53 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Sun May 29 17:41:50 2011 New Revision: 174402 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174402 Log: gcc/ PR target/43995 * co

[Bug tree-optimization/49218] Incorrect optimization of a 'for' loop creates an infinite loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49218 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-29 17:19:36 UTC --- It's VRP being confused about the IV-optimized variant : std::basic_istream::_M_extract (&cin, &ans); ans.1_2 = ans; i_3 = (long long int) ans.1_2; if (i_3 <= 10) goto

[Bug tree-optimization/49218] Incorrect optimization of a 'for' loop creates an infinite loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49218 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-29 17:07:11 UTC --- Works for me with a x86_64 multilibbed 4.6 from Debian on i?86-linux as well. Bulding non-multilibbed variant now.

[Bug tree-optimization/49217] Wrong optimization of code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49217 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-29 17:03:42 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Sun May 29 17:03:38 2011 New Revision: 174400 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174400 Log: 2011-05-29 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug tree-optimization/49217] Wrong optimization of code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49217 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/49217] Wrong optimization of code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49217 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-29 17:00:16 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Sun May 29 17:00:13 2011 New Revision: 174399 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174399 Log: 2011-05-29 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug testsuite/49222] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr49038.c (test for excess errors) on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49222 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug testsuite/49222] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr49038.c (test for excess errors) on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49222 --- Comment #5 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-29 16:47:09 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Sun May 29 16:47:05 2011 New Revision: 174398 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174398 Log: PR testsuite/49222 * gcc.dg/vect/pr

[Bug tree-optimization/49199] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction at tree-vect-loop.c:3445 with -O -fno-tree-scev-cprop -ftree-vectorize -funswitch-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49199 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com AssignedTo|una

[Bug tree-optimization/49218] Incorrect optimization of a 'for' loop creates an infinite loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49218 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i686-pc-linux-gnu, |

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on several platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on several platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7 Regression] Bootstrap |[4.7 Regression] Bootstrap

[Bug target/48529] [x32] Testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48529 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-29 15:36:33 UTC --- New failures at revision 174396 on x32 branch: FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_weekday/char/38081-1.cc execution test FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_weekday/char/38081-2.cc execution test They

[Bug libfortran/49214] [4.7 Regression] Broken pipe in backtrace for x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49214 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-29 15:33:37 UTC --- At revision 174395, the backtrace is now Backtrace for this error: ** Something went wrong while running addr2line. ** ** Falling back to a simpler backtrace scheme. ** Back

[Bug tree-optimization/49222] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr49038.c (test for excess errors) on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49222 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-29 15:21:16 UTC --- > Could you please check if this works? ... Yes, it does (at least on x86_64-apple-darwin10). Thanks.

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 --- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth 2011-05-29 15:12:50 UTC --- It is strange that regress is still able to bootstrap powerpc-apple-darwin9 with r174286 present. The powerpc-apple-darwin9 target also has... auto-host.h:/* #undef HAVE_GAS_WEAKREF *

[Bug c++/49224] New: Scoped enumeration instantiated even if not required

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49224 Summary: Scoped enumeration instantiated even if not required Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo:

[Bug libfortran/49214] [4.7 Regression] Broken pipe in backtrace for x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49214 --- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-05-29 13:17:20 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Sun May 29 13:17:17 2011 New Revision: 174395 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174395 Log: PR 49214 fd_gets should return NULL if nothing was r

[Bug fortran/45786] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Relational operators .eq. and == are not recognized as equivalent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45786 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1 Summary|Relational opera

[Bug fortran/47601] [OOP] Internal Error: mio_component_ref(): Component not found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601 --- Comment #25 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-29 13:02:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #24) > Just one question: > > + if (q) > +associate_integer_pointer (p, q); > > What happens if q==0? q == 0 means that the symbol of the

[Bug middle-end/49220] ICE in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.c:401

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49220 Kazumoto Kojima changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code CC|

[Bug libstdc++/49219] [c++0x] comparing unordered containers illegally require key compare

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49219 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/49219] [c++0x] comparing unordered containers illegally require key compare

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49219 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug tree-optimization/49222] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr49038.c (test for excess errors) on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49222 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com --- Comment #3 from Ir

[Bug tree-optimization/49218] Incorrect optimization of a 'for' loop creates an infinite loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49218 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/49221] [4.7 Regression] Several ICEs in the obj-c++ test suite after revision 174307

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49221 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7 Regression] Several|[4.7 Regression] Several

[Bug tree-optimization/49222] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr49038.c (test for excess errors) on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49222 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr49038.c |FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr49038.c

[Bug tree-optimization/49222] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr49038.c (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49222 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr49038.c |FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr49038.c

[Bug libfortran/49214] [4.7 Regression] Broken pipe in backtrace for x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49214 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-29 11:00:42 UTC --- AFAICT this PR is fixed by the patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-05/msg00220.html , except may be for the following test program allocate_assign implicit none ty

[Bug tree-optimization/49217] Wrong optimization of code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49217 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/49221] [4.7 Regression] Several ICEs in the obj-c++ test suite after revision 174307 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49221 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/49218] Incorrect optimization of a 'for' loop creates an infinite loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49218 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-29 10:22:24 UTC --- Works for me on the 4.6 branch on x86_64-darwin.

[Bug tree-optimization/49217] Wrong optimization of code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49217 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/49215] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/pointer_traits/pointer_to.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49215 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug libfortran/49214] [4.7 Regression] Broken pipe in backtrace for x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49214 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guen

[Bug c++/49223] New: Internal compiler error when using OpenMP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49223 Summary: Internal compiler error when using OpenMP Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...

[Bug tree-optimization/49222] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr49038.c (test for excess errors) on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49222 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr49038.c (test for excess errors) on *-apple-darwin* Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/49221] New: [4.7 Regression] Several ICEs in the obj-c++ test suite after revision 174307 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49221 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Several ICEs in the obj-c++ test suite after revision 174307 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug libfortran/19155] [4.0 only] blanks not treated as zeros in 'E' format read (NIST FM110.FOR)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19155 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/48982] libgfortran on sysv never uses fpsetmask

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48982 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/19155] [4.0 only] blanks not treated as zeros in 'E' format read (NIST FM110.FOR)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19155 --- Comment #28 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-05-29 08:59:47 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Sun May 29 08:59:44 2011 New Revision: 174393 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174393 Log: PR 19155 Check for strtod failure via endptr Modif

[Bug middle-end/49210] [4.7 regression] verify_gimple fails building ada/einfo.o at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49210 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2011-05-29 08:04:42 UTC --- Created attachment 24390 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24390 Reduced testcase for x86 Run gnatchop and compile the adb file at -O3 -gnata. Suitable for gnat.dg.