http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48971
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||sparc-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48972
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-12
06:15:57 UTC ---
For the diagnostic, the following untested patch should do. For Unicode
file-name support more work needs to be done ...
--- a/gcc/fortran/io.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/io.c
@@ -1478,6 +1478
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34898
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47453
--- Comment #3 from Johannes Schaub
2011-05-12 05:23:15 UTC ---
I think we have the FDIS clear about these cases now. To update:
// invalid
struct A { int a[2]; A():a({1, 2}) { } };
// invalid
int a({0});
// invalid
int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48974
Summary: VIS intrinsics improvement opportunities
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48974
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48745
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48948
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48973
Summary: Inliner bug with one-bit (1-bit) bitfield
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48969
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48961
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-11
22:27:03 UTC ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-05/msg00087.html
Regarding the implementation of true async on Windows: One should also remember
to update
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48423
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-11 22:30:32
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> HJ, sorry, I'm not sure to understand the process: do you normally submit this
> kind of fix also to the "mainline" binutils? Can Vincenzo do something
> specific
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48956
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-05-11
21:57:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created attachment 24230 [details]
> patch to add a -Wconversion warning for complex -> real conversions
>
> I believe the attached patch (against gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48956
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48423
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-05-11
21:19:10 UTC ---
HJ, sorry, I'm not sure to understand the process: do you normally submit this
kind of fix also to the "mainline" binutils? Can Vincenzo do something specific
to help the process? (abo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48972
Summary: OPEN with Unicode file name
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid, diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48971
Summary: sparc-rtems does not build
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48745
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-11
21:29:40 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 11 21:29:35 2011
New Revision: 173678
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173678
Log:
PR c++/48745
* pt.c (value_dependent_expr_p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48948
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-11
21:30:23 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 11 21:30:18 2011
New Revision: 173683
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173683
Log:
PR c++/48948
* semantics.c (validate_conste
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48970
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-11 21:23:45
UTC ---
Also
const int mmxsse_to_integer; /* cost of moving mmxsse register to
integer and vice versa. */
isn't limited to integers:
/* Moves between SSE/MM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48384
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iant at google dot com
--- Comment #5 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48970
Summary: Inaccurate comments for processor_costs
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48969
Summary: ICE with -std=c++0x
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48889
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48889
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-11
20:31:17 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed May 11 20:31:14 2011
New Revision: 173675
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173675
Log:
2011-05-11 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/48
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48956
--- Comment #4 from stevenj at alum dot mit.edu 2011-05-11 20:16:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 24230
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24230
patch to add a -Wconversion warning for complex -> real conversions
I believe the attach
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48889
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-11
20:08:59 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed May 11 20:08:54 2011
New Revision: 173674
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173674
Log:
2011-05-11 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/48
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas 2011-05-11 19:57:21
UTC ---
Created attachment 24229
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24229
A fix for the PR
This fixes the problem in two steps:
(i) It reverts r162289; and
(ii) It adds the cor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48968
Summary: incorrect warning about longjmp/vfork clobbering a
local (-W -O2, x86-64)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48961
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-11
19:52:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 24228
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24228
async_system - example program for MinGW by Kai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48968
--- Comment #1 from eggert at gnu dot org 2011-05-11 19:35:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 24227
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24227
gzip-compressed u.i program, illustrating incorrect diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48961
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-11
19:19:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 24226
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24226
Draft patch (untested)
(In reply to comment #2)
> The program is executed, as the called program "he
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2011-05-11
19:00:06 UTC ---
Hmm... I wonder if this does the trick? It fixes the test case,
and passes all regression tests... Paul, what do you think?
Index: dependency.c
==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48967
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-11
17:56:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 24225
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24225
gcc46-pr48967.patch
Fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48967
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48944
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48967
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE during use_narrower_mode
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48947
--- Comment #4 from Vadim Markovtsev 2011-05-11
17:29:32 UTC ---
I checked those errors with both binutils 2.21 release and 2.22 CVS (10th of
May).
gcc -###
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/???/x86_64-gcc-4.6.0/bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/??
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48965
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Froyd 2011-05-11
17:12:57 UTC ---
No. The list is sorted by UID, but the numbers printed out are not the UID;
they are the order in which things were pushed on to the list. Full diff, with
duplicate entries and UID in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48965
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-11 17:05:23
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Differences between the two .gkd dumps for a failing run:
>
> --- pr45055.gkd2011-05-11 12:23:00.260424961 -0400
> +++ pr45055.gk.gkd2011-05-11 12:23:00.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48961
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Henlich
2011-05-11 16:38:52 UTC ---
The program is executed, as the called program "hello.exe" prints "Hello
world". After that hello.exe returns and the runtime error occurs.
Further testing shows that it is executed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48965
--- Comment #3 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com 2011-05-11 16:25:24 UTC ---
Differences between the two .gkd dumps for a failing run:
--- pr45055.gkd2011-05-11 12:23:00.260424961 -0400
+++ pr45055.gk.gkd2011-05-11 12:23:00.370420369 -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48965
--- Comment #2 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com 2011-05-11 16:21:51 UTC ---
I see this too; it happens about 1 out of every 10 tries.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48961
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48964
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48964
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-11
15:45:02 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 11 15:44:59 2011
New Revision: 173663
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173663
Log:
2011-05-11 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48966
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48966
--- Comment #1 from Geir Johansen 2011-05-11 15:24:05
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> The following test gets the wrong answer for optimization level -O2 (and -O3)
> for GCC 4.5.3. The correct answer occurs when -O1 is used. The problem does
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48965
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48964
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48964
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-11
15:23:28 UTC ---
Index: gcc/gimple.c
===
--- gcc/gimple.c(revision 173655)
+++ gcc/gimple.c(working copy)
@@ -4304,7 +
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48966
Summary: gcc 4.5 gets wrong answer at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48964
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48786
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |wrong-code
Target Milestone|4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15256
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-11
14:13:47 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 11 14:13:38 2011
New Revision: 173659
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173659
Log:
2011-05-11 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48964
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-11 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48962
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48786
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-11
13:45:52 UTC ---
A) Regarding the ambiguity issue (cf. comment 0 and comment 3): As written, I
believe the interface is indeed ambiguous - if that's the case, there is no
regression in gfortran and com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48964
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-11
13:43:26 UTC ---
I suspect it's http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173653, maybe
also causing some SPEC2k6 issues that I now run into.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48965
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr45055.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48159
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48964
Summary: [4.7 Regression] LTO profiledbootstrap failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48159
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-11
13:07:59 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 11 13:07:54 2011
New Revision: 173657
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173657
Log:
PR debug/48159
* tree-ssa.c (reset_debug_u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48944
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-05-11 13:08:05 UTC ---
On Wed, 11 May 2011, gjl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I followed the recommendations in "Optimize disk usage" of
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SvnSetup
>
> and applied
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48963
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48962
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-11
12:56:14 UTC ---
*** Bug 48963 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48159
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-11
12:53:49 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 11 12:53:43 2011
New Revision: 173656
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173656
Log:
PR debug/48159
* tree-ssa.c (reset_debug_u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48953
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-11
12:23:49 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk, queued for backporting.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48926
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|bur...@net-b.de |dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48944
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-05-11
12:23:00 UTC ---
I followed the recommendations in "Optimize disk usage" of
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SvnSetup
and applied it to the following directories:
libada gnattools gcc/ada gcc/testsuite/ad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48953
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-11
12:23:15 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 11 12:23:12 2011
New Revision: 173653
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173653
Log:
2011-05-11 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48947
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-11
12:02:53 UTC ---
Ok. The error seems to be gold-specific though - what binutils version are
you using? Does the error persist if you use GNU ld (you need at least
binutils 2.21 for that to support
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48947
--- Comment #2 from Vadim Markovtsev 2011-05-11
11:43:03 UTC ---
I ensured that. ffmpeg does not use cmake, just ordinary GNU make; no libtool
is called at all down to the point where gcc fails (checked it with "make -n"
and "configure --cc='gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48963
Summary: I am getting an error new.h in Fedora 13
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48962
Summary: I am getting an error new.h: No such file or
directory on Fedora 13
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18041
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-11
10:53:00 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 11 10:52:57 2011
New Revision: 173650
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173650
Log:
2011-05-11 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
-1000/gcc-4.7-20110511/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_20.f90
-O -fcoarray=single -S -m32 -o coarray_20.s(timeout = 300)
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1000/gcc-4.7-20110511/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_20.f90:10.9:^M
^M
call bar(A) ! { dg-error "Rank mismatch in argument" }^M
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48078
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-11
10:35:28 UTC ---
I've just hit another variation of this bug myself.
Reduced:
class F {
void f();
};
template
void b() {
(void) &F::f;
}
template void b();
/../../
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0/i386/libgfortran/
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1000/gcc-4.7-20110511/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray/image_index_2.f90
-fcoarray=single -O2
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10634
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-11
10:21:05 UTC ---
C++0x supports the desired functionality with 'constexpr'
struct Struct {
static constexpr unsigned char * pointer = (unsigned char*)0x123;
};
I think this enhancement request s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28467
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48944
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-05-11 10:23:53 UTC ---
On Wed, 11 May 2011, gjl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I get the following output from configure
>
> *** This configuration is not supported in the following subdirecto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48957
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-05-11 10:16:53 UTC ---
On Wed, 11 May 2011, psmith at gnu dot org wrote:
> I think that the include-fixed directory should be associated with the
> sysroot,
It should be associated with ea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48953
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48889
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48944
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-05-11
09:25:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 24222
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24222
pr48944.diff
I get the following output from configure
*** This configuration is not supported i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48961
Summary: EXECUTE_COMMAND_LINE(WAIT=.false.) fails on MinGW
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48159
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-11
09:06:30 UTC ---
The obvious problem is that there is no temporary needed for either of the
variable expressions on the right hand side - only for their combination.
Thus, one needs to check whether a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48889
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-11
08:49:38 UTC ---
Some more debugging: While e->symtree == NULL, the symbols seems to be properly
resolved as e->value.function contains:
(gdb) p e->value.function->name
$11 = 0x2ac273f0 "sparsity_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48856
Thiago Macieira changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48960
Summary: OPEN statement modifies NEWUNIT variable on error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48956
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48956
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-05-11
08:16:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> PS. Note -Wconversion already DOES emit a warning for conversion to complex to
> real in gfortran. e.g.
Except for very few exceptions, the diagnosti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48869
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48959
Summary: Dummy procedure: Argument mismatch not diagnosed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48958
Summary: Add runtime diagnostics for SIZE intrinsic function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
99 matches
Mail list logo
