http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48678
Summary: [regression] unable to find a register to spill in
class ‘GENERAL_REGS’
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677
Summary: cpp.exe broken ?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #32 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-19 06:09:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> I can not reproduce the issue with optimization issue on my linux system
> x86-64.
>
> Thomas, what platform do you see the problem on? I only see it on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #31 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-19
06:06:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> I can not reproduce the issue with optimization issue on my linux system
> x86-64.
I can produce it with -m32 on Linux. Most such issues occur due to the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
--- Comment #2 from Nobuhiro Iwamatsu 2011-04-19
05:21:41 UTC ---
Work fine. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2011-04-19
05:19:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 24039
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24039
Proposed patch
This should work (and also fix some other bugs as well).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
Kazumoto Kojima changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48603
--- Comment #6 from Jan Kratochvil
2011-04-19 05:02:16 UTC ---
I guess it would be enough for GDB to provide there the name, without
namespaces.
Just in such case it needs to be a completely different attribute than
overloaded DW_AT{,_MIPS}_linka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
Summary: [sh] Unaligned userspace access in
gcc.dg/torture/pr37868.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48675
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48675
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-04-19
03:59:19 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Tue Apr 19 03:59:16 2011
New Revision: 172692
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172692
Log:
PR testsuite/48675
* testsuite/20_util/ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48675
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-04-19
03:58:08 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Tue Apr 19 03:58:04 2011
New Revision: 172691
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172691
Log:
PR testsuite/48675
* testsuite/20_util/ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48675
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48675
Summary: [4.7 Regression]: 20_util/hash/chi2_quality.cc timeout
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Ass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #30 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-19
02:06:52 UTC ---
I can not reproduce the issue with optimization issue on my linux system
x86-64.
Thomas, what platform do you see the problem on? I only see it on a Cygwin
installation.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
--- Comment #10 from Michael Hope 2011-04-19
01:05:42 UTC ---
The proposed patch bootstraps fine on i686, x86_64, and armv7l. See:
https://code.launchpad.net/~michaelh1/gcc-linaro/pr47976/+merge/58062
-FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45267
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48569
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48537
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48569
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-18
23:54:50 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Apr 18 23:54:47 2011
New Revision: 172680
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172680
Log:
PR c++/48569
* typeck2.c (build_functional_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 from H.J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr48661.C
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48537
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-18
23:29:33 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Apr 18 23:29:30 2011
New Revision: 172679
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172679
Log:
PR c++/48537
* init.c (build_value_init): H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47336
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-18
23:23:36 UTC ---
Here's another example which produces the "error reporting routines re-entered"
ICE, this time on invalid code:
template T declval();
template
struct S {
template
static U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-18
22:45:55 UTC ---
Yes, that looks OK too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48537
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-18
22:40:48 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Apr 18 22:40:43 2011
New Revision: 172678
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172678
Log:
PR c++/48537
* init.c (build_value_init): H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673
Summary: [4.7 Regression] GCC generates WAW and RAW conflicts
on IA64.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48661
--- Comment #6 from scott snyder 2011-04-18 21:58:51
UTC ---
Thanks Jakob!
I can confirm that that patch also fixes the problem in the original
source from which i derived that test case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48661
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-18
21:58:53 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Apr 18 21:58:51 2011
New Revision: 172677
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172677
Log:
PR middle-end/48661
* gimple-fold.c (gimple
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48661
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-18
21:58:05 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Apr 18 21:58:03 2011
New Revision: 172676
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172676
Log:
PR middle-end/48661
* gimple-fold.c (gimple
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48632
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-18
21:56:15 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Apr 18 21:56:12 2011
New Revision: 172675
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172675
Log:
PR c++/48632
* parser.c (cp_parser_omp_for_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48632
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-18
21:55:10 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Apr 18 21:55:07 2011
New Revision: 172674
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172674
Log:
PR c++/48632
* parser.c (cp_parser_omp_for_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48672
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-04-18
21:54:18 UTC ---
These warnings are semi correct. The problem is that GCC does not know that
the enum value of either this->version or Get_version() cannot be either
ALLOCATED_BLOCK_MAP_V1 or ALLOCATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48672
--- Comment #1 from Matt Hargett 2011-04-18 21:49:55 UTC
---
Created attachment 24038
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24038
g++ -O0 -Wreturn-type -c abm.i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48672
Summary: [4.6 regression] control reaches end of non-void false
positive
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48521
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-18
21:43:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> This is supposed to work, and did with 4.4:
>
> #include
> struct X
> {
> int foo();
> };
>
> typedef int (X::*pm)();
> std::result_of::type i = 0;
B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086
--- Comment #24 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-18
21:27:04 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Apr 18 21:27:00 2011
New Revision: 172671
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172671
Log:
2011-04-18 Jack Howarth
PR lto/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-18
21:23:46 UTC ---
Jason, when this bug is fixed will this be allowed too?
template
struct S
{
template
void f(Args1... args1, Args2&&... args2)
{
}
};
S s;
Currently this gives:
var.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48671
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48588
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-18
20:56:02 UTC ---
The following seems to mostly work. I think some double resolving could happen
- thus, one might need to tweak resolve_all_program_units.
Paul & Mikael: What do you think?
Test-suite
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48671
Summary: [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with
bootstrap-profiled
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48628
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #29 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-18
18:56:22 UTC ---
I should mention that optimization issue goes away at -O3.
It also goes away with -ffloat-store
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #28 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-18
18:46:00 UTC ---
This optimization test case is cute. We should ship it to the optimization
folks.
And it should be yet another PR, even if we can come up with a work around. I
am not going to have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48588
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-18
18:41:18 UTC ---
The problem is that when one goes via:
gfc_get_extern_function_decl -> gfc_get_function_type
one has for the "a" argument of DGESV_F90 in gfc_sym_type the value:
sym->as->type ==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48628
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
Summary: explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48537
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48629
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48652
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918
--- Comment #38 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-18
17:21:28 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Apr 18 17:21:24 2011
New Revision: 172658
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172658
Log:
2011-04-18 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48669
Summary: sel_sched_region_2's "need_stall" vs.
-Werror=uninitialized
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48438
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2011-04-18 17:02:32 UTC
---
Created attachment 24037
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24037
assembler output before and after the culprit patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
Matthias Kretz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #14 from Matthias K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
Summary: [4.6/4.7 regression] COMDAT Group signature not
emitted in group
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48661
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48648
--- Comment #7 from sebpop at gmail dot com
2011-04-18 16:51:23 UTC ---
> (I read somewhere ppl should be replaced with isl?)
Not true: GCC still depends on PPL.
The use of cloog-ppl is deprecated: GCC will not use it in the future.
Using cloog-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
--- Comment #13 from Rainer Orth 2011-04-18 16:49:29
UTC ---
I've now compared the assembler output on i386-pc-solaris2.11 with Sun as and
gas: with as, the g++-dg-lto-20091219-01.ltrans0.s file has a call to
call_ZL20__gthrw_pthread_o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Orth 2011-04-18 16:48:29
UTC ---
Created attachment 24035
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24035
assembler output with as and gas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46194
--- Comment #15 from Sebastian Pop 2011-04-18
16:09:49 UTC ---
The same patch applies to the 4.5 branch.
I am currently testing the patch on amd64-linux.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46317
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48251
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth 2011-04-18 15:54:59 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Apr 18 15:54:50 2011
New Revision: 172657
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172657
Log:
PR testsuite/48251
* gcc.dg/guality/guality.exp:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #56 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-04-18
15:49:23 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Mon Apr 18 15:49:16 2011
New Revision: 172656
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172656
Log:
PR 47571 Fix weakref trickery breakage on alpha-dec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48603
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46188
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46364
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46364
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
15:25:24 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 15:25:17 2011
New Revision: 172653
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172653
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
Backported
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
--- Comment #16 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
15:25:23 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 15:25:17 2011
New Revision: 172653
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172653
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
Backporte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46364
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
14:26:04 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 14:25:57 2011
New Revision: 172650
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172650
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48498
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-04-18 14:37:18 UTC ---
> --- Comment #2 from Ira Rosen 2011-04-17 12:15:29
> UTC ---
> Could you please attach vect dumps before the XPASSes? From the current dumps
> I
> can only unde
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48498
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth 2011-04-18 14:36:09 UTC
---
Created attachment 24033
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24033
no-vfa-pr29145.c -fdump-tree-vect-details output, 4.6 branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45267
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #21 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
14:37:18 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 14:37:08 2011
New Revision: 172652
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172652
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
Backporte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48632
--- Comment #3 from Phelippe Neveu 2011-04-18
14:48:45 UTC ---
Hi,
I tested the fix on the gcc-4_5-branch and it fixed the issue.
Regards,
Phelippe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48667
Summary: [ skipping N instantiation contexts ] Skips exactly
those which are of interest to me
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46188
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||44295
--- Comment #11 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47398
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||45606
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47899
--- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
14:37:18 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 14:37:08 2011
New Revision: 172652
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172652
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
Backporte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47899
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48035
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
14:37:17 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 14:37:08 2011
New Revision: 172652
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172652
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
Backported
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46194
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.5.4 |4.6.0
Target Milestone|4.5.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48498
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth 2011-04-18 14:35:21 UTC
---
Created attachment 24032
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24032
slp-3.c -fdump-tree-vect-details output, 4.6 branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #19 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
14:02:27 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 14:02:22 2011
New Revision: 172647
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172647
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
Backporte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45383
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
14:06:31 UTC ---
Yes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47899
--- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
14:02:27 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 14:02:22 2011
New Revision: 172647
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172647
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
Backporte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48330
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46304
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
14:28:50 UTC ---
C++ people?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46364
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
14:22:42 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 14:22:35 2011
New Revision: 172649
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172649
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47484
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #55 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-04-18 14:07:10 UTC ---
> --- Comment #53 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-18
> 11:47:45 UTC ---
> Rainer, all: Is the problem now fixed on 4.7? If so, should it be backported
Yes: I had the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48035
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
14:02:27 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 14:02:22 2011
New Revision: 172647
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172647
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
Backported
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48657
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-18
13:47:57 UTC ---
VectorDimension's DECL_INITIAL has different type (int rather than unsigned
int), and when build_integral_nontype_arg_conv calls convert_like for
ck_identity conversion that DECL_INITI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48666
Summary: [4.5.2/4.6 regression] -Warray-bounds doesn't trigger
anymore for simple case
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48611
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-18
13:36:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 24030
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24030
gcc46-pr48611.patch
While the bug is most probably elsewhere, I wonder why
note_eh_region_may_contai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48611
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo