http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48597
--- Comment #8 from Lassi Tuura 2011-04-15 05:40:33 UTC ---
I confirm glibc 2.13 built with gcc 4.6.1 20110408 snapshot patched with
gcc46-pr48597.patch results in correct unwind info for __ieee754_lgammaf_r. I
checked all the locations using (v)m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #52 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-04-15
04:21:26 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Fri Apr 15 04:21:19 2011
New Revision: 172469
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172469
Log:
PR 47571 Fix bootstrap regression on alpha-dec-osf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48612
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48584
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-15 00:58:22
UTC ---
It seems fixed as of revision 172459:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-04/msg01267.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48068
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48614
Summary: gcc.target/i386/pr46084.c should require avx_runtime
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47923
Mirko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48531
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48531
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler
2011-04-14 23:00:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Here is a minimalistic example that provokes the same error. The essence is,
that the construction expression is evaluated combined with another
construction
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou 2011-04-14
22:22:35 UTC ---
Richard, did you have something like that in mind when writing comment #3?
What aliasing info do we have at the RTL level now?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41159
--- Comment #10 from Bill Pringlemeir
2011-04-14 22:00:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> .. I am not use to passing the linker options
err ... optimization options.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41159
Bill Pringlemeir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bpringlemeir at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48605
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-14
21:30:41 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 14 21:30:37 2011
New Revision: 172458
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172458
Log:
PR target/48605
* config/i386/sse.md (sse4_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48613
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, lto
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48613
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48612
Summary: [4.7 Regression] vminps instruction is generated with
-ftree-vectorize even without -mavx, causing SIGILL
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39633
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avr at gjlay dot de
--- Comment #5 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31981
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46886
--- Comment #7 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-04-14 19:03:46
UTC ---
Created attachment 23989
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23989
C testcase (reduced from libgomp.c/autopar-1.c)
$ gcc -O -ftree-parallelize-loops=4 -fno-tree-ch -fno
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48133
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23988|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48133
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-04-14 19:01:43
UTC ---
Created attachment 23988
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23988
C testcase (reduced from libgomp.c/autopar-1.c)
$ gcc -O -ftree-parallelize-loops=4 -fno-tree-ch -fno
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
Easwaran Raman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23968|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46779
--- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-04-14
18:50:16 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Apr 14 18:50:02 2011
New Revision: 172442
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172442
Log:
PR target/46779
PR target/45291
PR tar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45291
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-04-14
18:50:15 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Apr 14 18:50:02 2011
New Revision: 172442
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172442
Log:
PR target/46779
PR target/45291
PR tar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41894
--- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-04-14
18:50:15 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Apr 14 18:50:02 2011
New Revision: 172442
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172442
Log:
PR target/46779
PR target/45291
PR ta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48479
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48479
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Froyd 2011-04-14
18:46:48 UTC ---
Author: froydnj
Date: Thu Apr 14 18:46:34 2011
New Revision: 172441
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172441
Log:
PR objc++/48479
* typeck.c (cxx_mark_addre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48611
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in
remap_eh_region_nr (tree-inline.c:1194) with -Os
-fopenmp -fexceptions -fno-tree-ccp
-fno-tree-copy-prop on basic code
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48531
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-14
17:55:43 UTC ---
Thanks Jason. Now Daniel we have to figure out which other bug (ie, possibly
prepare a reduced testcase for Jason) prevents us from getting rid completely
of the special casing for def
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47527
--- Comment #7 from Bill Pringlemeir 2011-04-14
17:37:27 UTC ---
After applying the patch, the tmp.c files builds without issues.
#include
int main(void) { return 0; }
$ arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc -flto -o tmp.x
tmp.c
It seems to be the same
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48608
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48608
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-14
17:10:32 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Apr 14 17:10:24 2011
New Revision: 172438
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172438
Log:
Update alignment on local variables.
2011-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48610
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48610
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-04-14
17:06:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 23985
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23985
Bug "driver": compile options are unimportant, link to the other attachment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48610
Summary: [4.3 Regression]: loop miscompilation; load removed by
-funroll-loops
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48533
John T changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jrt at worldlinc dot net
--- Comment #2 from Joh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600
--- Comment #2 from Matt Hargett 2011-04-14 17:00:19 UTC
---
Created attachment 23983
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23983
source file which elicits the error at -O[123]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47527
Bill Pringlemeir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bpringlemeir at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622
--- Comment #9 from Steve Ward 2011-04-14 15:56:12
UTC ---
Created attachment 23982
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23982
This test-case shows how typeinfo for non-complex 128-bit types DOES NOT work,
but typeinfo for complex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45263
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42240
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44643
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40855
Steve Ward changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||planet36 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48446
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48589
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45261
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48605
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-14
15:17:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 23981
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23981
gcc46-pr48605.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48531
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44643
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48531
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-14
15:00:18 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 14 15:00:15 2011
New Revision: 172434
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172434
Log:
PR c++/48531
* init.c (build_value_init_noc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48557
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-14
15:00:12 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 14 15:00:07 2011
New Revision: 172433
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172433
Log:
PR c++/48557
* typeck.c (cp_build_binary_op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48446
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-14
15:00:03 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 14 14:59:58 2011
New Revision: 172432
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172432
Log:
PR c++/48446
* decl.c (compute_array_index_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48609
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Inefficient complex float |Inefficient complex float
|st
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48609
Summary: Inefficient complex float store
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48605
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48608
Summary: Alignment adjust of local variables is lost
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48607
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48607
Summary: Inefficient complex float parameter passing
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48597
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-14
12:38:16 UTC ---
void
foo (void)
{
register long s __asm ("r13");
register long t __asm ("r14");
register long u __asm ("r15");
asm volatile ("xorq %%r12, %%r12" : : : "r12");
asm volatile ("
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48590
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48597
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48590
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-14
12:19:35 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Apr 14 12:19:28 2011
New Revision: 172427
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172427
Log:
2011-04-14 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48597
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jeline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48606
Summary: [4.7 Regression] g++.dg/init/ctor9.C ICE: tree check:
expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark)
with -fkeep-inline-functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48604
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.5
Target Milestone|4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48605
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-04-14 10:43:21
UTC ---
Created attachment 23979
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23979
simpler testcase
$ gcc testcase2.c -msse4.1 -O
$ ./a.out
Aborted
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48604
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48604
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-rtems4.11-gcc |powerpc-rtems4.11
Status|UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48605
Summary: gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-insertps-2.c FAILs with
-mtune=geode - instruction insertps with memory
operands behaves differently
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48603
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-14
10:06:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> This extension is not about DW_AT_linkage_name vs. DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name.
> It is about DW_AT_{,MIPS_}linkage_name for DW_TAG_structure_type which did n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48603
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48603
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48601
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48597
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-14
09:24:22 UTC ---
Working on it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48597
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48603
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48604
Summary: [PowerPC] Wrong code with -frename-registers -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44643
--- Comment #8 from gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-14 08:38:29 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Apr 14 08:38:20 2011
New Revision: 172415
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172415
Log:
PR target/44643
* config/avr/avr.c (av
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47510
--- Comment #14 from Jan Kratochvil
2011-04-14 08:27:46 UTC ---
Comment 3 has been filed as new PR debug/48603.
: debug
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: jan.kratoch...@redhat.com
CC: do...@gcc.gnu.org
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
template
class F {
typedef struct { int i; } C;
C a;
};
F f;
g++ (GCC) 4.7.0 20110414 (experimental)
<1&
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48597
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47510
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|dodji at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48587
--- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-04-14 08:12:33
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I suppose one could put an OPEN .. CLOSE in a DO LOOP and see what happens
> now.
With gfortran 4.4.3 on Linux 2.6.32, /tmp on ext4, single SATA disk, an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48599
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48593
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
Summary: Invalid F conversion of G descriptor for values close
to powers of 10
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48601
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in lower_emutls_function_body, at
tree-emutls.c:623
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48597
--- Comment #1 from lat at cern dot ch 2011-04-14 07:53:27 UTC ---
For completeness I didn't look for unwind inaccuracies with half-register
writes other than the exact form "(v)movd %xmmN,%ebp". It's entirely possible
this bug happens only with %x
90 matches
Mail list logo
