http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45373
Alex Marshall changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600
Summary: [4.6 regression] ICE when using cold attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48599
Summary: [C++0x] no diagnostic for invalid use of auto with
array declarator
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48598
Summary: x86 backend fails to properly mark memory alignment
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48597
Summary: x86-64 unwind register save location misses
half-register write?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48526
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48526
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-13 22:52:48 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Apr 13 22:52:45 2011
New Revision: 172401
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172401
Log:
2011-04-13 Daniel Krugler
Pao
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48596
Kazumoto Kojima changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48596
Summary: [4.7 Regression] [SH] unable to find a register to
spill in class 'FPUL_REGS'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48366
--- Comment #11 from John David Anglin 2011-04-13
22:37:02 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Wed Apr 13 22:36:59 2011
New Revision: 172400
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172400
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2011-04-08
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48495
--- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner 2011-04-13
22:13:05 UTC ---
Pat, I tried recreating the ICE, but can't with either trunk (r172389) or the
FSF 4.6 branch (r172395). What revision and configure options did you use?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48594
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-13
20:51:26 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 13 20:51:23 2011
New Revision: 172395
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172395
Log:
PR c++/48594
* decl2.c (build_offset_ref_ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48594
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-13
20:50:29 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 13 20:50:26 2011
New Revision: 172394
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172394
Log:
PR c++/48594
* decl2.c (build_offset_ref_ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48595
Summary: score-elf fails to build with --enable-werror-always
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48594
Summary: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7] Rejects valid with
pointer-to-member in template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48456
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48360
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48589
--- Comment #1 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-13
19:00:44 UTC ---
OK , I will have a look, thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48587
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48533
--- Comment #1 from John T 2011-04-13 18:53:29 UTC
---
On building all components of GCC 4.6.0 except java, ada and go, there was no
problem installing with the prefix for 4.6.0 set to /usr/local. The problem
seems confined to the java files for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #53 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-04-13 18:47:24 UTC ---
reduced testcase for 4.7
MODULE M1
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: dp=8
TYPE realspace_grid_type
REAL(KIND=dp), DIMENSION ( :, :, : ), ALLOCATABLE :: r
END TYPE realspace_grid_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48360
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-13 18:38:21
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Apr 13 18:38:17 2011
New Revision: 172390
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172390
Log:
2011-04-13 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/48360
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48456
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-13 18:38:21
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Apr 13 18:38:17 2011
New Revision: 172390
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172390
Log:
2011-04-13 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/48360
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48593
Summary: Wrong return type when applying address operator to
inherited, template dependend member, using a typedef
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48455
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-04-13
18:26:55 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Apr 13 18:26:52 2011
New Revision: 172389
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172389
Log:
2011-04-13 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48580
Steven Fuerst changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||svfuerst at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48581
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45263
--- Comment #13 from gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-13 16:46:32 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Apr 13 16:46:29 2011
New Revision: 172385
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172385
Log:
Fix ChangeLog entry for PR target/45263
Mod
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45263
--- Comment #12 from gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-13 16:36:57 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Apr 13 16:36:50 2011
New Revision: 172384
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172384
Log:
PR target/45263
* config/avr/libgcc.S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48591
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48570
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48591
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-13
15:52:22 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 13 15:52:17 2011
New Revision: 172381
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172381
Log:
PR middle-end/48591
* omp-low.c (expand_omp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48591
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-13
15:50:12 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 13 15:50:02 2011
New Revision: 172379
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172379
Log:
PR middle-end/48591
* omp-low.c (expand_omp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48570
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-13
15:47:44 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 13 15:47:40 2011
New Revision: 172378
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172378
Log:
PR c++/48570
* semantics.c (cxx_eval_array_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48585
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2011-04-13
15:38:56 UTC ---
And indeed it does. Therefore I believe we should add it to the referenced set
of a clone in the WPA stage...?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48570
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-13
15:38:53 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 13 15:38:50 2011
New Revision: 172377
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172377
Log:
PR c++/48570
* semantics.c (cxx_eval_array_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48455
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-04-13
15:21:23 UTC ---
I found one problem with reg equivalences. They were just ignored. It is a
result of bad merging the big IRA patch and changes in IRA for last half year.
I found the problem solu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48574
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48574
--- Comment #11 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-04-13
15:19:42 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Wed Apr 13 15:19:40 2011
New Revision: 172376
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172376
Log:
Fix PR c++/48574
gcc/cp/
* class.c (fixed_t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48565
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-13
15:12:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> How did you configure the library to hit this
> problem?
I know you said with -pipe in your CFLAGS, is that all?
You could probably edit scripts/testsu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48574
--- Comment #10 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-04-13
15:12:21 UTC ---
Fixed in 4.7 (trunk)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48574
--- Comment #9 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-04-13
15:09:29 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Wed Apr 13 15:09:26 2011
New Revision: 172375
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172375
Log:
Fix PR c++/48574
gcc/cp/
* class.c (fixed_ty
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48565
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-13
15:09:36 UTC ---
It shouldn't happen unless the person running the testsuite specifies it, so
they can not specify it. How did you configure the library to hit this
problem?
Jakub's suggestion is t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48585
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48561
--- Comment #3 from Brian Davis
2011-04-13 14:28:15 UTC ---
Not sure why it didn't get attached before, but perhaps I uncompressed it on my
local file system after setting the path but before submitting the bug and
didn't check the results carefu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48561
--- Comment #2 from Brian Davis
2011-04-13 14:26:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 23974
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23974
preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48574
--- Comment #8 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-04-13
13:43:41 UTC ---
Candidate patch proposed at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg00985.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48585
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48592
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48592
Summary: alloca () calls are not DCEd
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48591
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-13
13:12:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 23973
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23973
gcc46-pr48591.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48585
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48580
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-04-13 12:45:35 UTC ---
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> For the latter reasons I think the builtins should be sth like
> __builtin_smul_ovfl_p (multiplication-result,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48591
Summary: OpenMP ICE with atomics on __float128 in 32-bit only
i686 cc1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp
Severity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48585
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48580
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48590
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-13
11:13:14 UTC ---
The following should be safe (but doesn't try to address the dead code
elimination issue).
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-alias.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48338
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-13
11:06:48 UTC ---
With gcc 4.6 built aio_suspend.os, it works even with -O0 or -O2 -fno-inline,
if __pthread_cleanup_routine has __attribute__((always_inline)).
With current trunk, even if that routine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48590
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48590
Summary: Alias analysis confused by builtin-stack-save/restore
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48587
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-04-13 10:46:42
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> There is a problem with reusing numbers - it is probably only a small one -
> but
> it might be larger than the problem of running out of unit IDs:
>
> T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48576
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48588
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48338
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48588
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Morin 2011-04-13
10:37:29 UTC ---
Confirmed on fairly recent trunk:
GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.7.0 20110404 (experimental)
Reduced testcase:
MODULE LA_PRECISION
IMPLICIT NONE
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: dp = K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48565
--- Comment #3 from Allan McRae 2011-04-13
10:35:24 UTC ---
So, just to clarify... Is this being seen as something that the person
building the gcc test-suite should deal with or something that should be dealt
with in the test-suite?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48574
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48588
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48587
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48589
Summary: Invalid G0/G0.d editing for NaN/infinity
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48519
--- Comment #10 from Herbert
2011-04-13 09:07:04 UTC ---
ah ok, thank you very much, this was the bug ;)
regards
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48584
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #14 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-04-13 08:05:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Fixed on 4.5.
Will 4.4 also be fixed? A release candidate for 4.4.6 was just released, so it
should probably happen quickly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48588
Summary: internal compiler error compiling a library
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090
--- Comment #17 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-04-13 07:56:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 01:53:48PM +, ramana at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > Still need to backport and test on the 4.6 branch. That is next.
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48574
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-13
07:48:13 UTC ---
--- gcc/cp/class.c.jj 2011-03-31 08:50:52.0 +0200
+++ gcc/cp/class.c 2011-04-13 09:41:42.0 +0200
@@ -5827,7 +5827,8 @@ fixed_type_or_null (tree instance, int *
switc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090
--- Comment #16 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-04-13 07:41:13 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Wed Apr 13 07:41:08 2011
New Revision: 172363
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172363
Log:
Fix PR target/48090
Modified:
branc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48587
Summary: Avoid exhausting unit number with NEWUNIT=
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48586
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085
--- Comment #21 from Sylvia 2011-04-13 07:24:32 UTC ---
Sorry, this mail address it not being used anymore, this message has been sent
automatically.
Извините, этот адрес более не используется, это сообщение было отправлено
автоматически.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085
Michael Hope changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael.hope at linaro dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48158
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48484
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-13
07:22:08 UTC ---
*** Bug 48158 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48484
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48586
Summary: missing no return warning in template operator
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unass
85 matches
Mail list logo