[Bug c++/43601] Enormous increase in DLL object files size in 4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601 --- Comment #58 from Dongsheng Song 2011-04-10 04:32:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #57) > (In reply to comment #56) > > What works for me on Cygwin, and so may well also work for anyone using > > MSYS, > > is setting the heap_chunk_in_mb regis

[Bug c++/48537] New: C++0x: ICE using union with non-trivial member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48537 Summary: C++0x: ICE using union with non-trivial member Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unass

[Bug libstdc++/48526] [C++0x] std::is_constructible::value shall be false

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48526 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-10 00:45:26 UTC --- For 4.7 we'll have a completely new implementation, conforming to N3242. Will not happen in 4_6-branch though.

[Bug driver/48524] spec language does not cover switches with separated form

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-04-10 00:27:28 UTC --- On Sat, 9 Apr 2011, dirtyepic at gentoo dot org wrote: > Sorry, i just wanted a trivial example. The actual rule we use is > > %{!D_FORTIFY_SOURCE:%{!D_FORTIFY_SOUR

[Bug c++/48536] New: C++0x Automatic Enumerator Incrementation is not compliant with Clause 7.2/5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48536 Summary: C++0x Automatic Enumerator Incrementation is not compliant with Clause 7.2/5 Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/48535] New: [C++0x][SFINAE] Hard errors during list-value-initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48535 Summary: [C++0x][SFINAE] Hard errors during list-value-initialization Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c++/48534] New: [C++0x][SFINAE] Compiler break down on explicit scoped enum => bool conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48534 Summary: [C++0x][SFINAE] Compiler break down on explicit scoped enum => bool conversion Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug libfortran/48511] Implement Steele-White algorithm for numeric output

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48511 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48525] -O0 produces incorrect results for inlined functions sharing the same name.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48525 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot

[Bug middle-end/48464] [4.7 Regression] @171649: ICE in setup_pressure_classes, at ira.c:877

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48464 --- Comment #2 from Jan-Benedict Glaw 2011-04-09 20:58:00 UTC --- Just to mention: This is not an ICE that shows up on this specific code snipplet, but it is rather a start-up problem that either got merged in with the IRA update or was uncovered

[Bug preprocessor/48532] Wrong location of namespaced pragma involing macros

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48532 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgcj/48533] New: Installer fails on libjava component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48533 Summary: Installer fails on libjava component Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcj AssignedTo: unassig...@g

[Bug c++/48528] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/sfinae10.C (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48528 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/48528] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/sfinae10.C (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48528 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-09 19:04:14 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sat Apr 9 19:04:11 2011 New Revision: 172230 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172230 Log: PR c++/48528 * g++.dg/cpp0x/sfinae10.C: Rem

[Bug driver/48524] spec language does not cover switches with separated form

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524 --- Comment #2 from Ryan Hill 2011-04-09 18:51:20 UTC --- Sorry, i just wanted a trivial example. The actual rule we use is %{!D_FORTIFY_SOURCE:%{!D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=*:%{!U_FORTIFY_SOURCE:-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2}}} but this is just one example of s

[Bug preprocessor/48532] New: Wrong location of namespaced pragma involing macros

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48532 Summary: Wrong location of namespaced pragma involing macros Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor Ass

[Bug c++/48531] New: [C++0x][SFINAE] Hard errors with arrays of unknown bound

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48531 Summary: [C++0x][SFINAE] Hard errors with arrays of unknown bound Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/48525] -O0 produces incorrect results for inlined functions sharing the same name.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48525 --- Comment #3 from Jon Roelofs 2011-04-09 17:08:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > When compiling multiple files with inline functions which share the same > > signature and name -O0 produces results inconsistent

[Bug c++/48530] New: [C++0x][SFINAE] Hard errors with deleted d'tors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48530 Summary: [C++0x][SFINAE] Hard errors with deleted d'tors Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unas

[Bug rtl-optimization/48496] [4.7 Regression] 'asm' operand requires impossible reload in libffi/src/ia64/ffi.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from

[Bug tree-optimization/48484] [4.7 Regression] ICE: vector VEC(use_pred_info_t,base) index domain error, in pred_chain_length_cmp at tree-ssa-uninit.c:1626 with -Wuninitialized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48484 --- Comment #3 from davidxl 2011-04-09 16:32:37 UTC --- Fixed in r172229. David

[Bug c/48509] Fails to Vectorize loop involving doubles which was vectorized in 4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48509 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/48366] [4.7 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2024

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48366 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/48529] New: [x32] Testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48529 Summary: [x32] Testsuite failures Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug c++/48528] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/sfinae10.C (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48528 Summary: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/sfinae10.C (test for excess errors) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug driver/48524] spec language does not cover switches with separated form

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-04-09 11:28:33 UTC --- Specs are an internal GCC implementation detail, subject to change whenever convenient for implementation purposes. (Whoever put documentation for them in invoke.tex

[Bug libstdc++/48521] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] std::result_of doesn't work with pointer to member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48521 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-09 10:55:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > This means we don't accept std::async(X::foo, ...) Oops, meant to say std::async(&X::foo, ...)

[Bug objc/48527] Incorrect list of methods in @protocol used across compilation units

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48527 Nicola Pero changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug objc/48527] New: Incorrect list of methods in @protocol used across compilation units

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48527 Summary: Incorrect list of methods in @protocol used across compilation units Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/48389] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in make_edges, at cfgbuild.c:319 with -mtune=pentiumpro

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48389 --- Comment #14 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com 2011-04-09 10:08:57 UTC --- On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:38 PM, matz at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > --- Comment #10 from Michael Matz 2011-04-08 > 11:37:59 UTC --- > I was asking what specifically does

[Bug libstdc++/48526] New: [C++0x] std::is_constructible::value shall be false

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48526 Summary: [C++0x] std::is_constructible::value shall be false Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libs

[Bug c++/48525] -O0 produces incorrect results for inlined functions sharing the same name.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48525 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-09 09:52:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > When compiling multiple files with inline functions which share the same > signature and name -O0 produces results inconsistent with -O1, -O2, and -O3 > (w

[Bug c++/48525] -O0 produces incorrect results for inlined functions sharing the same name.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48525 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|