http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48509
Summary: Fails to Vectorize loop involving doubles which was
vectorized in 4.5
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #75 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-08 06:52:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #74)
> Interesting. -O3 makes no difference for me. I will look into your dumps if I
> can spot something useful.
> ...
> If GCC fail to link even such a s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
--- Comment #15 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-08
06:42:22 UTC ---
Just to remind the middle-end folks that stage 1 is a fine time for deciding on
middle-end volatile semantics, before we forget about this for another 6 months
:)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48500
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-08
06:08:37 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 8 06:08:31 2011
New Revision: 172165
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172165
Log:
PR c++/48500
* semantics.c (potential_const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48481
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-08
06:08:27 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 8 06:08:21 2011
New Revision: 172164
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172164
Log:
PR c++/48481
* tree.c (build_overload): All
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48481
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-08
06:08:16 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 8 06:08:13 2011
New Revision: 172163
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172163
Log:
PR c++/48481
* cp-tree.h (OVL_ARG_DEPENDENT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48481
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-08
06:08:09 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 8 06:08:04 2011
New Revision: 172162
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172162
Log:
PR c++/48481
* call.c (build_user_type_conv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48456
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48360
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #47 from gfunck at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-08 02:39:06 UTC ---
Author: gfunck
Date: Fri Apr 8 02:38:59 2011
New Revision: 172160
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172160
Log:
2011-04-07 Gary Funck
Merge tru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48451
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-08
02:03:29 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 8 02:03:25 2011
New Revision: 172159
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172159
Log:
PR c++/48451
* pt.c (fn_type_unification):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48440
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-08
00:23:05 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Apr 8 00:23:02 2011
New Revision: 172156
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172156
Log:
Properly get inner mode for constant op0.
2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48172
PcX changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from PcX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48508
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-07
23:25:43 UTC ---
Created attachment 23922
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23922
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48508
Summary: ICE in output_die, at dwarf2out.c:11409
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48447
--- Comment #10 from Patrick Oppenlander
2011-04-07 22:50:25 UTC ---
Ok, thanks for explaining that.
Another problem I've run into here is that I also need to pass through ecrtn.o
with -Wl,-plugin-opt=-pass-through to make sure it gets linked la
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48447
--- Comment #9 from Dave Korn 2011-04-07 22:22:51
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > The correct fix is going to be in the linker, not the compiler, by
> > implementing
> > a second library scan pass and obsoleting the pass-through mechanism.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48141
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48507
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48466
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48507
--- Comment #1 from overseer55 at gmail dot com 2011-04-07 22:19:12 UTC ---
Comment on attachment 23921
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23921
Source code (19 lines long)
Ignore the 'private' in sub_pred...I originally had it as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48507
Summary: Functor Declared In Templated Method Not Recognized By
std::sort
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48447
--- Comment #8 from Patrick Oppenlander
2011-04-07 22:15:56 UTC ---
> The correct fix is going to be in the linker, not the compiler, by
> implementing
> a second library scan pass and obsoleting the pass-through mechanism. I've
> got
> a revi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #74 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-07
22:07:38 UTC ---
Interesting. -O3 makes no difference for me. I will look into your dumps if I
can spot something useful.
The behavior I observe is that GCC optimize away all the strings that are
plac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48505
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48207
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-07
21:56:25 UTC ---
*** Bug 48505 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48506
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-04-07
21:53:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I'd do the checkin, if you let me know if you prefer the one case removed, or
> volatile added.
Hmm, this testcase works for me in 4.6.x and on the trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48506
--- Comment #2 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
21:51:06 UTC ---
I'd do the checkin, if you let me know if you prefer the one case removed, or
volatile added.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48506
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
Known to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48506
Summary: ssa-ccp-17.c = g.i fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48468
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-07
21:48:04 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 7 21:48:00 2011
New Revision: 172148
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172148
Log:
PR c++/48468
* except.c (build_noexcept_spe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48452
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-07
21:47:55 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 7 21:47:53 2011
New Revision: 172147
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172147
Log:
PR c++/48452
* typeck.c (build_x_compound_e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48450
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-07
21:47:48 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 7 21:47:45 2011
New Revision: 172146
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172146
Log:
PR c++/48450
* call.c (resolve_args): Take
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48450
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-07
21:47:41 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 7 21:47:38 2011
New Revision: 172145
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172145
Log:
PR c++/48450
* typeck.c (check_for_casting_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48450
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-07
21:47:27 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 7 21:47:24 2011
New Revision: 172143
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172143
Log:
PR c++/48450
* tree.c (build_cplus_new, bui
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48449
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-07
21:47:14 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 7 21:47:10 2011
New Revision: 172141
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172141
Log:
PR c++/48449
* typeck2.c (build_functional_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48450
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-07
21:46:50 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 7 21:46:48 2011
New Revision: 172138
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172138
Log:
PR c++/48450
* c-family/c-common.c (c_commo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48505
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-04-07 21:35:10 UTC ---
Akin to bug 48207...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48117
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-07
21:28:56 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 7 21:28:52 2011
New Revision: 172134
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172134
Log:
PR fortran/48117
* gfortran.dg/gomp/pr48117
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48466
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-07
21:28:02 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 7 21:27:59 2011
New Revision: 172133
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172133
Log:
Backported from mainline
2011-04-06 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48389
--- Comment #9 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com
2011-04-07 21:28:12 UTC ---
> --- Comment #7 from Michael Matz 2011-04-07
> 15:38:38 UTC ---
> Hmpf, what doesn't work with just moving the rebuild_jump_labels call?
> The testcase works, but I h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48141
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-07
21:27:06 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 7 21:27:02 2011
New Revision: 172132
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172132
Log:
Backported from mainline
2011-03-17 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46491
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-07
21:25:51 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 7 21:25:47 2011
New Revision: 172129
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172129
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46491
Backported from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48272
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-04-07
21:22:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Confirmed (nice non-sensical set of options, btw.)
>
> The problem is that register pressure code is not prepared for new insns
> created during scheduli
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48481
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-07
20:47:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 23920
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23920
additional patch
This ought to help with the OVERLOAD garbage.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48505
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-07
20:23:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 23919
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23919
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48505
Summary: LTO ICE lhd_set_decl_assembler_name, at
langhooks.c:158
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #73 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-07 19:59:30 UTC ---
Jan,
elfhack only fails to build if I use:
ac_add_options --enable-optimize=-O3
in my .mozconfig.
When I delete the =-O3 part everything builds fine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48474
--- Comment #2 from Mike Stump 2011-04-07
19:41:04 UTC ---
I'd expect that I could change the target to make things compile. The point of
the bug report was to report a rough edge where if one doesn't define a pattern
for eh_return, then things
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48504
Summary: Add Variable Length Array (VLA) support for
-fstack-protector(-all)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #72 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-07 19:39:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 23918
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23918
elfhack.wpa.000i.cgraph
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #71 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-07 19:38:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 23917
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23917
-lm.res
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #70 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-07
19:15:19 UTC ---
I can not reproduce the aforementioned elfhack failure. For me build fails
later at
/abuild/jh/trunk-install/bin/g++ -flto=24 -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-rtti -Wall
-Wpointer-arith -Woverl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47779
--- Comment #5 from Joseph S. Myers 2011-04-07
18:54:14 UTC ---
The real problem is that a large pile of logically host-only definitions are
included in tm.h for the target, and the real (but hard) fix would be to stop
target code from including
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48500
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48204
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48141
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.3
Summary|[4.4/4.5 Regress
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48389
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-04-07 18:41:14
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/07/11 09:38, matz at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48389
>
> Michael Matz changed:
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47963
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47809
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47391
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48117
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48117
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-07
18:34:18 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 7 18:34:14 2011
New Revision: 172121
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172121
Log:
PR fortran/48117
* gfortran.dg/gomp/pr48117
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48117
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-07
18:33:36 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 7 18:33:34 2011
New Revision: 172120
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172120
Log:
PR fortran/48117
* gfortran.dg/gomp/pr48117
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48117
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-07
18:31:45 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 7 18:31:43 2011
New Revision: 172119
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172119
Log:
PR fortran/48117
* gfortran.dg/gomp/pr48117
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48466
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-07
18:30:39 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 7 18:30:36 2011
New Revision: 172118
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172118
Log:
Backported from mainline
2011-04-06 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48204
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-07
18:29:31 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 7 18:29:28 2011
New Revision: 172117
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172117
Log:
Backported from mainline
2011-03-24 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48141
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-07
18:28:33 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 7 18:28:29 2011
New Revision: 172116
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172116
Log:
Backported from mainline
2011-03-17 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47963
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-07
18:27:24 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 7 18:27:20 2011
New Revision: 172115
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172115
Log:
Backported from mainline
2011-03-03 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47809
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-07
18:25:53 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 7 18:25:50 2011
New Revision: 172114
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172114
Log:
Backported from mainline
2011-02-19 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-07
18:24:45 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 7 18:24:43 2011
New Revision: 172113
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172113
Log:
Backported from mainline
2011-01-26 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47391
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-07
18:22:54 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 7 18:22:50 2011
New Revision: 172112
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172112
Log:
PR tree-optimization/47391
* tree-ssa-ccp.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48447
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-04-07 18:18:00 UTC ---
LD with patch from comment 6 fails on testcase from PR ld/12277.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48343
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48343
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-07
18:05:11 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 7 18:05:08 2011
New Revision: 172110
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172110
Log:
PR debug/48343
* combine.c (combine_instru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48503
Summary: http/cgi FAILs if libgcc_s.so.1 isn't in default
ld.so.1 search path
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48502
Summary: os_test.TestStartProcess FAILs on Solaris 2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
AssignedTo: i...@airs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48343
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-07
17:58:07 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 7 17:58:05 2011
New Revision: 172109
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172109
Log:
PR debug/48343
* combine.c (combine_instru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48343
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-07
17:57:29 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 7 17:57:26 2011
New Revision: 172108
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172108
Log:
PR debug/48343
* combine.c (combine_instruc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48501
Summary: 64bit-out.go, select5-out.go, tmp.go compilation times
out
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48499
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48500
Summary: Regression: Failing to convert template argument to
concrete type, in C++0x mode.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48499
Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE compiling 64-bit
gcc.dg/vect/{slp-21.c, no-vfa-pr29145.c} on SPARC
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48498
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2011-04-07 17:38:05 UTC
---
Created attachment 23916
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23916
no-vfa-pr29145.c -fdump-tree-vect-details output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48498
Summary: Several gcc.dg/vect tests XPASS on SPARC
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48497
Summary: gfortran.dg/graphite/vect-pr40979.f90 FAILs without
-march=pentium4
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072
--- Comment #20 from Dr. David Kirkby
2011-04-07 17:15:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> > IBM is aware of the issue (via me and others). The last tidbit I have is
> > that
> > it appears as if it is another assembler bug but that is not c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #34 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-07
16:36:04 UTC ---
While for 4.7 we can certainly do bigger changes, for 4.6 I think a safe fix
would be:
--- gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c2011-03-31 08:51:03.0 +0200
+++ gcc/tree-vect-data-ref
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48455
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw 2011-04-07
16:00:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 23914
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23914
first testcase
Compile with -Os -mcpu=arm7tdmi -marm -fno-short-enums -fno-builtin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #57 from Dongsheng Song
2011-04-07 15:53:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #56)
> What works for me on Cygwin, and so may well also work for anyone using MSYS,
> is setting the heap_chunk_in_mb registry parameter to some value in the ra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48447
--- Comment #6 from Dave Korn 2011-04-07 15:51:30
UTC ---
Created attachment 23913
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23913
WIP patch
Work in progress: see comment at start of do_rescan_work() re DT_NEEDED libs,
but should be wo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48447
--- Comment #5 from Dave Korn 2011-04-07 15:49:29
UTC ---
Well, this is basically a weakness in the pass-through solution implemented for
PR 42690; it only knows about the compilers stdlibs, and doesn't process any
user-specified libs on the comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
--- Comment #15 from Joel Sherrill 2011-04-07
15:44:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> From the test results you posted, it appears to have been
>
> +WARNING: program timed out.
> +FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-double.c -O2 -flto exe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48389
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
--- Comment #14 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-07
15:35:34 UTC ---
>From the test results you posted, it appears to have been
+WARNING: program timed out.
+FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-double.c -O2 -flto execution test
Probably unrelated.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
--- Comment #13 from Joel Sherrill 2011-04-07
15:28:39 UTC ---
Not a problem to redo.. just CPU time and if you don't use it, you lose it. :-D
I am repeating some information so it is all in one post.
In both cases, I built gcc + newlib multilib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496
Summary: [4.7 Regression] 'asm' operand requires impossible
reload in libffi/src/ia64/ffi.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo