[Bug libstdc++/26458] Passing a NULL char* into output stream now breaks the output stream

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26458 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com --- Comment #11 fr

[Bug target/48053] ICE in in build_int_cst_wide, when building cpu2000 galgel/equake/ammp/fma3d/sixtrack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48053 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/48053] ICE in in build_int_cst_wide, when building cpu2000 galgel/equake/ammp/fma3d/sixtrack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48053 --- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner 2011-03-13 04:06:46 UTC --- Author: bergner Date: Sun Mar 13 04:06:41 2011 New Revision: 170920 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170920 Log: gcc/ PR target/48053 * config/rs6000/pred

[Bug c++/32385] g++ rejects struct in default argument of template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32385 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code, | |monitored

[Bug c++/47125] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE occurs in combination with partial specialization and invalid template function.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47125 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-13 01:17:17 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 13 01:17:14 2011 New Revision: 170919 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170919 Log: PR c++/47125 * pt.c (tsubst) [TYPENAME_TYPE

[Bug middle-end/45273] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] The compiler depends on the host double (-fprofile-corection only)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45273 --- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher 2011-03-13 00:32:06 UTC --- Created attachment 23643 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23643 Use mpfr in predict.c instead of sreal, and in mcf.c instead of host double This completely untest

[Bug lto/48100] [4.6 Regression] Assertion failed in lto_varpool_replace_node, at lto-symtab.c:304

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48100 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-03-13 00:06:08 UTC --- Created attachment 23642 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23642 Testcase

[Bug lto/48100] New: [4.6 Regression] Assertion failed in lto_varpool_replace_node, at lto-symtab.c:304

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48100 Summary: [4.6 Regression] Assertion failed in lto_varpool_replace_node, at lto-symtab.c:304 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug tree-optimization/48098] internal compiler error: in build_vector_from_val, at tree.c:1380

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48098 --- Comment #1 from Erik Schnetter 2011-03-12 23:30:41 UTC --- Here is a reduced test case: void BndRot180VI () { static char *restrict * slab_setups; static int num_slab_setups = 0; num_slab_setups = GetRefinementLevels (0); slab_setups

[Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig 2011-03-12 23:18:11 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Mar 12 23:18:09 2011 New Revision: 170913 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170913 Log: 2011-03-12 Thomas Koenig PR libfortran/4

[Bug c++/40866] [4.5 Regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:504

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40866 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/40866] [4.5 Regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:504

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40866 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig 2011-03-12 23:13:58 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Mar 12 23:13:56 2011 New Revision: 170912 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170912 Log: 2011-03-12 Thomas Koenig PR libfortra

[Bug c++/48074] [trans-mem] regular function used instead of clone in a transaction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48074 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/48074] [trans-mem] regular function used instead of clone in a transaction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48074 --- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson 2011-03-12 22:58:25 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Sat Mar 12 22:58:23 2011 New Revision: 170911 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170911 Log: PR 48074 * trans-mem.c (ipa_tm_transform_tran

[Bug middle-end/48099] Evaluation order of arguments in a call expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48099 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23639|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/48099] Evaluation order of arguments in a call expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48099 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw 2011-03-12 22:52:59 UTC --- Created attachment 23639 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23639 diff for 48099

[Bug middle-end/48099] New: Evaluation order of arguments in a call expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48099 Summary: Evaluation order of arguments in a call expression Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assign

[Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6|[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 --- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-12 22:49:40 UTC --- Opened radar Bug ID# 9126174 for this issue with builtin-attr-1.s attached as the example of the potential assembler bug in Xcode 3.2.6 and 4.0.1.

[Bug tree-optimization/48098] New: internal compiler error: in build_vector_from_val, at tree.c:1380

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48098 Summary: internal compiler error: in build_vector_from_val, at tree.c:1380 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 C

[Bug c++/40866] [4.5 Regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:504

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40866 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig 2011-03-12 22:39:38 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Mar 12 22:39:33 2011 New Revision: 170908 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170908 Log: 2011-03-12 Thomas Koenig PR libfortran/40

[Bug c++/48074] [trans-mem] regular function used instead of clone in a transaction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48074 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/47127] gcc.dg/graphite/id-14.c ICEs with cloog-parma

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47127 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/47127] gcc.dg/graphite/id-14.c ICEs with cloog-parma

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47127 --- Comment #7 from Sebastian Pop 2011-03-12 22:05:41 UTC --- Author: spop Date: Sat Mar 12 22:05:38 2011 New Revision: 170907 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170907 Log: Fix PR47127: call cloog_state_malloc and cloog_state

[Bug c++/48075] [trans-mem] infinite loop when compiling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48075 --- Comment #1 from Richard Henderson 2011-03-12 22:03:29 UTC --- It is not TM related. If you remove the TM constructs, the test case still crashes with stack overflow in mainline. Of course, there are a number of errors produced beforehand, w

[Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-12 21:31:36 UTC --- The same executable examined with Xcode 4.0's lldb shows... [MacPro:x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0/libjava/testsuite] howarth% /Developer/usr/bin/lldb ./Throw_2.exe Current executable set

[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

/X11R6/include --x-libraries=/usr/X11R6/lib --program-suffix=-fsf-4.6 --enable-checking=yes --enable-cloog-backend=isl Thread model: posix gcc version 4.6.0 20110312 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c/48090] gcc 4.5.2 miscompilation when building on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-03-12 21:19:40 UTC --- The test case was fixed for 4.6 by r159644. However, that patch was described as a minor improvement to double-word regis

[Bug target/48097] New: new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 Summary: new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: u

[Bug target/48096] gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE fails with Xcode 4.0

/X11R6/include --x-libraries=/usr/X11R6/lib --program-suffix=-fsf-4.6 --enable-checking=yes --enable-cloog-backend=isl Thread model: posix gcc version 4.6.0 20110312 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/48096] gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE fails with Xcode 4.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48096 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-12 21:12:40 UTC --- A similar failure is seen for g++.dg/tree-prof/partition1.C compilation, -g -fprofile-use... Executing on host: /sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/

[Bug target/48096] New: gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE fails with Xcode 4.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48096 Summary: gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE fails with Xcode 4.0 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/48094] ld: warning: section has unexpectedly large size errors in objc/obj-c++ lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe 2011-0

[Bug lto/48094] ld: warning: section has unexpectedly large size errors in objc/obj-c++ lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/48095] [OOP] Invalid assignment to procedure pointer component not rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48095 --- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-12 17:46:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > I think it is invalid, because the PPC 'get_special_area' is declared to > expect > a CLASS argument, but then the procedure it points to has a TYP

[Bug c/48090] gcc 4.5.2 miscompilation when building on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-03-12 17:38:12 UTC --- Created attachment 23637 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23637 standalone test case Reduced standalone test case. Fails with gcc-4.5-20110310 -march=armv5t, w

[Bug fortran/48095] New: [OOP] Invalid assignment to procedure pointer component not rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48095 Summary: [OOP] Invalid assignment to procedure pointer component not rejected Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug lto/48094] ld: warning: section has unexpectedly large size errors in objc/obj-c++ lto

/X11R6/include --x-libraries=/usr/X11R6/lib --program-suffix=-fsf-4.6 --enable-checking=yes --enable-cloog-backend=isl Thread model: posix gcc version 4.6.0 20110312 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug lto/48094] New: ld: warning: section has unexpectedly large size errors in objc/obj-c++ lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094 Summary: ld: warning: section has unexpectedly large size errors in objc/obj-c++ lto Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/47845] [OOP] Polymorphic deferred function: Not matched class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47845 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig 2011-03-12 17:22:50 UTC --- This one looks better: Index: m4/ifunction_logical.m4 === --- m4/ifunction_logical.m4 (Revisi

[Bug fortran/48059] [4.6 Regression][OOP] ICE in in gfc_conv_component_ref: character function of extended type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48059 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/48059] [4.6 Regression][OOP] ICE in in gfc_conv_component_ref: character function of extended type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48059 --- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-12 16:58:36 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Sat Mar 12 16:58:33 2011 New Revision: 170906 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170906 Log: 2011-03-12 Janus Weil PR fortran/

[Bug target/47997] gcc on macosx: "ld: warning: -fwritable-strings not compatible with literal CF/NSString"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997 --- Comment #11 from Mike Stump 2011-03-12 16:23:45 UTC --- Ok for the patch in comment #9.

[Bug other/48093] New: -mtls-dialect= is undocumented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48093 Summary: -mtls-dialect= is undocumented Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.

[Bug fortran/48059] [4.6 Regression][OOP] ICE in in gfc_conv_component_ref: character function of extended type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48059 --- Comment #12 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com 2011-03-12 16:07:47 UTC --- Ha! That's what I suspected. Good. I'll OK the submission. Thanks Paul PS I'll keep quiet about it being a bit of a dubious "regression" :-) On Fri, Mar 11

[Bug target/48084] [x32] internal compiler error: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:630

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48084 --- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-12 15:50:41 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Sat Mar 12 15:50:38 2011 New Revision: 170904 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170904 Log: Convert to Pmode if needed. gcc/ 2011-03-1

[Bug c/48090] gcc 4.5.2 miscompilation when building on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-03-12 15:42:13 UTC --- I have a runtime test case (given test file + separate file with main and missing support functions) that works with gcc-4.5-20110310 -march=armv5te but fails with -march=armv5t.

[Bug target/48084] [x32] internal compiler error: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:630

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48084 --- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-12 15:41:24 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Sat Mar 12 15:41:20 2011 New Revision: 170902 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170902 Log: Convert memory to Pmode if needed. gcc/ 20

[Bug libfortran/47439] Fun with scratch files on Windows MKTEMP only allows for 26 files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47439 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|UNCONF

[Bug target/48084] [x32] internal compiler error: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:630

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48084 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-12 15:22:11 UTC --- Another one [hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-31]$ cat r.i int _rdrand16_step (unsigned short *__P) { return __builtin_ia32_rdrand16_step (__P); } [hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-31]$ make r.s /export/build/gnu/gcc-x32

[Bug tree-optimization/48092] New: associative property of sqrt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48092 Summary: associative property of sqrt Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassig..

[Bug target/47997] gcc on macosx: "ld: warning: -fwritable-strings not compatible with literal CF/NSString"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997 --- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe 2011-03-12 13:45:38 UTC --- patch @ comment #9 works for me on *-darwin9 (places the strings in .cstring). I would propose this rather than the one in comment #2.

[Bug c/48088] -Werror=frame-larger-than=100 does not work as expected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48088 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/48089] [C++0x] ICE on in(?)valid in constexpr constructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48089 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-12 13:20:53 UTC --- N.B. I don't think there's any GCC extension involving initializing class members with themselves. Doing so is almost certainly a mistake.

[Bug c++/48089] [C++0x] ICE on in(?)valid in constexpr constructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48089 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug inline-asm/37895] AVR inline assembly clobbers input value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37895 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eric.weddington at atmel

[Bug c/48090] gcc 4.5.2 miscompilation when building on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090 --- Comment #3 from arnaud patard 2011-03-12 12:16:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > I get correct-looking code on armv5tel-linux with vanilla gcc-4.6-20110305 and > gcc-4.5-20110310, with 4.4 the code looks different but not obviously broken

[Bug c/48090] gcc 4.5.2 miscompilation when building on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #2

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-apple-darwin10 |*-apple-darwin{9,10} Host|x86

[Bug target/43700] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] global register variables defect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43700 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 CC|

[Bug middle-end/47691] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in create_linear_expr_from_tree, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1138 with -fgraphite-identity -ffast-math -fno-tree-scev-cprop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47691 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug libfortran/48054] Documentation for LOG intrinsic function is ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48054 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Keywords|

[Bug fortran/47552] CTIME: Valgrind warning "depends on uninitialised value"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47552 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/48054] Documentation for LOG intrinsic function is ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48054 --- Comment #1 from Francois-Xavier Coudert 2011-03-12 10:33:56 UTC --- Author: fxcoudert Date: Sat Mar 12 10:33:54 2011 New Revision: 170899 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170899 Log: PR fortran/48054 * intrinsic.

[Bug fortran/47552] CTIME: Valgrind warning "depends on uninitialised value"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47552 --- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert 2011-03-12 10:28:04 UTC --- Author: fxcoudert Date: Sat Mar 12 10:28:01 2011 New Revision: 170898 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170898 Log: PR fortran/47552 * tr

[Bug fortran/48025] Unnecessary function evaluations in arguments to size and ubound

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48025 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/46411] MOVE_ALLOC wrongly rejected as impure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46411 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/47722] With -static "__mingw_vsprintf" on MinGW32 is not found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47722 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig 2011-03-12 10:15:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > --- m4/ifunction_logical.m4 (Revision 170320) > +++ m4/ifunction_logical.m4 (Arbeitskopie) > @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ >src_kind = GFC_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE (

[Bug fortran/45909] [4.4/4.5] internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45909 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig 2011-03-12 10:10:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Of course, the patch does not work as "dest" is not NULL ... > > I wonder whether a patch like the following would be correct. Probably, although it might

[Bug target/47997] gcc on macosx: "ld: warning: -fwritable-strings not compatible with literal CF/NSString"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997 --- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe 2011-03-12 10:08:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) firstly, I don't think you need to worry overly about the warning (we do place the strings in the __TEXT segment, just not in the __cfstring section). IMO ld i

[Bug libfortran/47883] libgfortran configuration should use AC_LINK_IFELSE instead of AC_TRY_LINK

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47883 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe 2011-03-12 09:56:07 UTC --- confirmed that: (a) we create too many sections for the gcc.dg/torture/builtin-attr-1.c testcase (598) (b) that 'as' does not detect this @XCode 3.2.5 looking at the output of otool -l,

[Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-12 09:38:18 UTC --- Of course, the patch does not work as "dest" is not NULL ... I wonder whether a patch like the following would be correct. One probably needs to go through all the users of ifunction{

[Bug c/48091] New: No warning when given function arguments mismatch earlier, old style K&R function definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48091 Summary: No warning when given function arguments mismatch earlier, old style K&R function definition Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/48090] gcc 4.5.2 miscompilation when building on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090 --- Comment #1 from arnaud patard 2011-03-12 09:02:30 UTC --- Created attachment 23636 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23636 test file

[Bug c++/48074] [trans-mem] regular function used instead of clone in a transaction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48074 Patrick Marlier changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical

[Bug c/48090] New: gcc 4.5.2 miscompilation when building on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090 Summary: gcc 4.5.2 miscompilation when building on arm Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassi

[Bug c++/48089] New: ICE on in(?)valid in constexpr constructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48089 Summary: ICE on in(?)valid in constexpr constructors Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassi

[Bug fortran/47552] CTIME: Valgrind warning "depends on uninitialised value"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47552 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-12 08:03:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > Which is wrong. This is fixed by the patch: The patch is OK with a changelog and CCing the patch to gcc-patches@/fortran@