http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47472
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47486
Summary: gfortran -M exits with fatal error when -o option is
used
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47472
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-27
07:03:03 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Jan 27 07:02:58 2011
New Revision: 169323
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169323
Log:
2011-01-27 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/47
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47485
Summary: gfortran -M output is incorrect when -MT option is
used
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47477
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i686
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44909
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47237
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46856
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46856
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-27 04:25:57
UTC ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Jan 27 04:25:49 2011
New Revision: 169321
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169321
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/46856
* postreload.c (r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47463
--- Comment #3 from Rich Townsend 2011-01-27
04:06:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > 4.5 fails with:
> > use hydro_recon
> > 1
> > Internal Error at (1):
> > mio_component_ref(): Component not f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47479
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47482
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46607
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45447
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42893
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47285
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47285
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-01-27
02:16:23 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jan 27 02:16:18 2011
New Revision: 169320
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169320
Log:
2011-01-26 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43082
--- Comment #9 from Nicola Pero 2011-01-27 02:09:19
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Thu Jan 27 02:09:13 2011
New Revision: 169319
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169319
Log:
In gcc/:
2011-01-26 Nicola Pero
PR c/43082
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47484
Summary: [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] share/python/aotcompile.py
and share/python/classfile.py pollute common namespace
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47483
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47464
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47478
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment #6 from H.J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47483
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-01-27
00:21:07 UTC ---
This sounds like what was just fixed for PR 47464.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47483
Summary: [4.6.0 regression] ce3 moves dereference before
implied non-NULL test
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
DJ Delorie changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47319
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47459
--- Comment #4 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-26 23:04:55
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Joel, can you verify the fix for 46878 fixes his problem on the m68k. I'm
> pretty sure it will, but an independent verification would be good.
>
> Thanks,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37273
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-26 22:47:02
UTC ---
Followup patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01938.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47464
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47464
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-26 22:45:07
UTC ---
Author: law
Date: Wed Jan 26 22:45:04 2011
New Revision: 169310
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169310
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/47464
* df-problems.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47482
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-26
22:41:50 UTC ---
the ICE goes away if K is not a template or if B is initialized with simply A,
rather than an expression involving A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47482
Summary: [C++0x] [4.6 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression
‘sizeof ("A")’ of kind sizeof_expr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47467
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44031
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-26 22:11:55
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/26/11 11:14, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44031
>
> Eric Botcazou changed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47467
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-26
22:10:26 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jan 26 22:10:23 2011
New Revision: 169308
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169308
Log:
PR bootstrap/47467
* targext.c: Include
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment #23 from dj at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-26
22:03:50 UTC ---
Author: dj
Date: Wed Jan 26 22:03:47 2011
New Revision: 169307
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169307
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/46878
* combine.c (insn_a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47467
--- Comment #8 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-26 22:01:56
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> > Is targext.c really supposed to be part of LIBGNAT_SRCS for the target or is
> > this just a host side compiler helper?
>
> Unfortunately the former. The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47447
--- Comment #2 from asharif at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-26 21:50:26 UTC ---
It seems like this bug is reproducible on older versions of the trunk.
This change:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=146776
seems to suppress it (or fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47467
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47479
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-26 21:48:10
UTC ---
I have to use exactly:
RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board='unix{-m32,}'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47479
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-26 21:37:19
UTC ---
There are
$(lang_checks_parallelized): check-% : site.exp
@if [ -z "$(filter-out --target_board=%, $(RUNTESTFLAGS))" ] \
&& [ "$(filter -j, $(MFLAGS))" = "-j" ]; then \
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47467
--- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-26 21:23:59
UTC ---
Since i386-rtems* blew up with an ICE, I wanted to verify the Makefile change
with another target. sparc-rtems* built Ada with this patch:
I really don't know why targext.c needs to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47478
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.2, 4.6.0
Summary|[4.4/4.5 Regres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47476
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47476
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-26
21:20:43 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 26 21:20:40 2011
New Revision: 169306
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169306
Log:
PR c++/47476
* semantics.c (potential_const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47478
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression]|[4.4/4.5 Regression]
|interna
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44469
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
on/44469
* cfgcleanup.c (try_optimize_cfg): Iterate in CFG layout mode too
after removing trivially dead basic blocks.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20110126-1.c
- copied unchanged from r169304,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20110126-1.c
Hello!
Tev telefona numurs izmainiijies?
Man paradijas reals risinajums Tavam problemam, tapec gribeju piezvanit, bet
telefons izslegts.
Skaidrs, lai vai tur kas, man viss super, jo es dabuju fantastiski labu darbu,
kas ir vienkarshaks par vienkarshu un 3825 USD menesi bez problemam man atlec.
V
on/44469
* cfgcleanup.c (try_optimize_cfg): Iterate in CFG layout mode too
after removing trivially dead basic blocks.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20110126-1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cfgcleanup.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47467
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
REG_UNUSED (reg:SI 6 bp [72])
(nil)
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.6.0 20110126 (experimental) [trunk revision 169296] (i386-pc-rtems4.11) GCC
error:|
| in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2105 |
| E
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47228
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor 2011-01-26
20:28:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 23137
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23137
untested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regress
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-26
20:07:02 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 26 20:06:57 2011
New Revision: 169299
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169299
Log:
PR c/47473
* c-lex.c (interpret_float): If
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42894
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-26
20:04:55 UTC ---
Fixed up patch posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01916.html
(one } was missing in the testcase).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45454
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47478
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47479
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-26 19:11:31
UTC ---
I tried RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board 'unix\{-m32,\}'". It doesn't
look like parallelized:
[hjl@gnu-32 gcc]$ ls build-x86_64-linux/gcc/testsuite
g++ gcc gfortran objc
[hjl@gnu-32 gcc]$
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47455
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-26
18:47:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 23136
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23136
Test case (hopefully correct)
Updated test case, hopefully correct. Fails with gfortran due to this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47228
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47466
--- Comment #1 from Guillaume Morin 2011-01-26
18:26:34 UTC ---
A recent 4.6 snapshot shows the same issue
.file"foo.cpp"
.text
.p2align 4,,15
.globltest_expect(EnumStruct const&)
.typetest_expect(EnumStruct const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47478
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Leaver-Fay 2011-01-26
18:21:36 UTC ---
I'd love a suggestion on how the code could be changed so that I no longer get
this segfault.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47382
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44031
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47480
Summary: GCC driver names a resolution file after the last
argument to the linker
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47270
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Summary
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43467
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47479
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-26 17:51:36
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Just use RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix\{-m32,\}'
> which is parallelized.
Is there a way to paralelize --target_board 'unix{-m32,}'?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46997
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey 2011-01-26 17:50:05
UTC ---
Author: sje
Date: Wed Jan 26 17:49:56 2011
New Revision: 169296
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169296
Log:
2011-01-26 Steve Ellcey
PR target/46997
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42502
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47479
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47478
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Leaver-Fay 2011-01-26
17:30:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 23135
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23135
-save-temps file (.ii) that produces this crash (too big to upload without
bzipping it -- sorry!)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47479
Summary: make -j 12 RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board 'unix{-m32,}'"
isn't parallelized
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47478
Summary: internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47472
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-26
17:17:04 UTC ---
Draft patch completely untested (not even compiled):
--- a/gcc/fortran/options.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/options.c
@@ -463,9 +463,10 @@ gfc_handle_module_path_options (const char *arg)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46856
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47474
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-26
16:58:28 UTC ---
Submitted patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-01/msg00235.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47475
--- Comment #3 from flo.goujeon at orange dot fr 2011-01-26 16:54:18 UTC ---
Oh, so that is the purpose of the 'template' keyword in nested-name-specifier.
That's tricky.
Thank you Jonathan, and sorry about this invalid report.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47475
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-26
16:47:53 UTC ---
Note that this is not related to variadic templates, this gives the same error
using no C++0x features:
template
struct test;
template<>
struct test
{
template
static void
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47459
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-26 16:43:43
UTC ---
Joel, can you verify the fix for 46878 fixes his problem on the m68k. I'm
pretty sure it will, but an independent verification would be good.
Thanks,
Jeff
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47476
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-26
16:43:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 23134
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23134
gcc46-pr47476.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47477
Summary: [4.6 regression] Sub-optimal mov at end of method
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47475
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment #20 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-26 14:56:14
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/26/11 07:51, mikpe at it dot uu.se wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
>
> Mikael Pettersson changed:
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47476
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47476
Summary: [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE in
potential_constant_expression_1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47379
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42894
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-26
15:34:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 23133
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23133
gcc46-pr42894.patch
The varasm.c alternative (untested).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46652
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-26
15:19:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 23132
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23132
gcc46-pr47473.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-26 15:14:10
UTC ---
It is caused by revision 147281:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-05/msg00255.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47474
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-26
15:04:53 UTC ---
Patch. The order was wrong; additionally, if there is an allocatable RESULT
variable, it seems to get zero initialized via sym->value or similarly. Thus
the sym->result == result check
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44469
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47475
Summary: Static member function template of class variadic
template can't be called from the inside
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47190
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: |[4.5 Regression] ICE: in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46948
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46652
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-26
14:46:40 UTC ---
Gold was updated to handle this well for binutils 2.11.1, so H.J.'s branch.
We still have issues with mainline GNU LD. Dave, what about getting this fixed
the gold way?
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
