http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42566
Ralf Wildenhues changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47296
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-01-15
06:42:33 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jan 15 06:42:30 2011
New Revision: 168832
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168832
Log:
2011-01-14 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47295
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47296
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-01-15
06:33:15 UTC ---
This is easy enough and if you study the code path, it makes sense. The error
flag returned here is passed up the call chain where an "os" error is
generated. When attempting to open
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47305
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.1.3, 4.3.2
Severity|major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47305
--- Comment #1 from shockema at gmail dot com 2011-01-15 02:21:23 UTC ---
It appears that the version of erase that takes a range (two iterators) also
has a similar problem.
n,lto --no-create --no-recursion
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20110114 (experimental) (GCC)
COMPILER_PATH=/root/gcc-installed/libexec/gcc/powerpc64-linux/4.6.0/:/root/gcc-installed/libexec/gcc/powerpc64-linux/4.6.0/:/root/gcc-installed/libexec/gcc/powerpc64-linux/:/root/gcc-installed/li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47305
Summary: std::vector::erase() destroys the wrong element!
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47304
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in is_empty_class (class.c:6800) with
-fabi-version=1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47303
Summary: [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: in varpool_node, at
varpool.c:134 with -fabi-version=1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47302
Summary: ICE: same canonical type node for different types char
[(A::value ? 1 : 2)] and char [1] with
-fabi-version=1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47301
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22969|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47301
Summary: [C++0x] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1906
with -fabi-version=1 and constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47300
Summary: [C++0x] ICE: in decl_constant_var_p, at
cp/decl2.c:3564 when using incomplete type as
constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40625
Ryan Hill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #11 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36104
--- Comment #9 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-01-15
00:27:14 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Sat Jan 15 00:27:10 2011
New Revision: 168831
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168831
Log:
2011-01-14 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/36
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47289
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47067
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merril
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46903
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-01-14
23:55:12 UTC ---
*** Bug 47020 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47020
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46977
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46302
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor 2011-01-14
23:01:02 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Jan 14 23:00:59 2011
New Revision: 168825
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168825
Log:
2011-01-14 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimiza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45934
--- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor 2011-01-14
23:01:02 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Jan 14 23:00:59 2011
New Revision: 168825
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168825
Log:
2011-01-14 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimiz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46977
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46933
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47289
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milesto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19162
--- Comment #15 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-14
21:50:17 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Jan 14 21:50:11 2011
New Revision: 168824
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168824
Log:
PR 19162
* objc-act.c (generate_str
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47299
--- Comment #1 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-01-14 21:49:32 UTC ---
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47299
>
>Summary: Widening multiply optimization generate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47289
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13631
--- Comment #30 from François Dumont 2011-01-14
21:36:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 22967
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22967
locale message facet patch
Hi
Here is a patch proposition based on revision 168822. I can't ap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46933
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47289
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-01-14
21:26:50 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 14 21:26:47 2011
New Revision: 168822
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168822
Log:
PR c++/47289
* pt.c (coerce_template_parms)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47299
Summary: Widening multiply optimization generates bad code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47298
--- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-01-14 21:02:04 UTC ---
Actually, also on AMD I have at -O2 9.4s -O3 11.8s
model : 9
model name : AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6176 SE
stepping: 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47298
--- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-01-14 20:52:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It's faster for me with -O3 (Athlon64, using -march=native).
well not on
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5550 @ 2.67GHz
stepping
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47298
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-14
20:43:15 UTC ---
It's faster for me with -O3 (Athlon64, using -march=native).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47298
Summary: -O3 destroys beautifully vectorized code obtained at
-O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47284
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47285
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-01-14
20:01:18 UTC ---
*** Bug 47284 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47296
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47296
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-14
19:48:26 UTC ---
The problems seems to be that opp->file is not set for scratch files
(STATUS_SCRATCH) when tempfile fails. Thus, open_external just returns.
Then, in new_unit in the error handling bl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #20 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47273
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45989
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45989
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Orth 2011-01-14 18:47:53
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Jan 14 18:47:50 2011
New Revision: 168806
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168806
Log:
2011-01-08 Dominique d'Humieres
Rainer Orth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47219
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-01-14 18:27:40 UTC ---
sparc-sun-solaris2.11 bootstrap with Go included succeeded now (with a
couple of libgo patches already posted), make check still running, but
gcc/testsuite/go testr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47219
--- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-01-14 18:23:28
UTC ---
Proposed patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00916.html .
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-01-14
18:18:07 UTC ---
Properly fixed here; awaiting approval.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01003.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47246
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw 2011-01-14
17:37:14 UTC ---
*** Bug 47245 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47245
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45989
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47297
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-01-14 17:04:30 UTC ---
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, mateusz at loskot dot net wrote:
> In spite of the fact the behavior is undefined, I suspect the intent
> is to be consistent (which appears to be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47297
Summary: Inconsistent float-point to integer results depending
on -O flag
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47291
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from H.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47296
Summary: I/O Segfault when running out of file descriptors
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47295
Summary: libquadmath: List __complex128 and constants in the
.texi file
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47273
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-14
16:02:06 UTC ---
It works with
typedef int T __attribute__((aligned(1)));
struct s {
T a;
T& GetValr() { return a; }
} __attribute__((packed));
int main() {
struct s s1;
s1.GetVa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47294
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-14
15:58:21 UTC ---
some similarities to PR 42018
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47273
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46817
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46935
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries 2011-01-14
15:48:03 UTC ---
Related bug: PR 14799.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14799
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47294
Summary: definition of function template can be
explicitly-qualified with a namespace it isn't a
member of
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47273
--- Comment #6 from Waldemar Valdas Bancewicz 2011-01-14 15:42:57 UTC ---
About Comment #4:
This is a question to the GCC/G++ team. How are unaligned pointers dealt with?
I came up with the following possible options:
(1) Compiler inserts the fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #26 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-14
15:42:17 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 14 15:42:09 2011
New Revision: 168793
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168793
Log:
2011-01-14 Jan Hubicka
Jack Ho
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47293
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|libquadmath: strtoflt128 - |libquadmath: strtoflt128 -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47292
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-14
15:19:29 UTC ---
I think RedHat 4.4.4 is nowhere close to FSF GCC 4.4.x what debug info
is concerned. Thus I would suggest to report this bug to RedHat
and/or try to reproduce the issue with a stoc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47293
Summary: libquadmath: strtoflt128 - C99 hex floating point
format missing
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47179
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47179
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-14
15:02:27 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 14 15:02:20 2011
New Revision: 168788
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168788
Log:
2011-01-14 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47292
Summary: Violation of DWARF-3 spec for DW_FORM_strp
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47289
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 from H.J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47190
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46807
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47082
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47245
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Invalid immediate offset for Thumb
VFP store
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47291
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||memory-hog
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47273
--- Comment #5 from Waldemar Valdas Bancewicz 2011-01-14 14:08:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 22966
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22966
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47273
--- Comment #4 from Waldemar Valdas Bancewicz 2011-01-14 14:04:19 UTC ---
The reason pointers and references are treated differently:
Consider the following code fragment:
struct s {
char a;
int b;
int* GetValp() { return &b; }
/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32684
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47291
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in size_binop_loc
(fold-const.c:1427) with -g
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47273
--- Comment #3 from Waldemar Valdas Bancewicz 2011-01-14 13:44:04 UTC ---
This bug has to do with g++, not gcc. Should I delete this bug and re-submit?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47273
--- Comment #2 from Waldemar Valdas Bancewicz 2011-01-14 13:42:03 UTC ---
Consider the following program test.c:
#include
struct s {
char a;
int b;
int* GetValp() { return &b; }
int& GetValr() { return b; }
} __attribute__((pack
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46688
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46903
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32684
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|46926 |
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31249
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||46926
--- Comment #21 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32684
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||46926
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
Summary: memory exhausted compiling a destructor with an
infinite 'for (;;);' loop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31249
--- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-01-14 13:27:24 UTC ---
I have forgotten to give the optimization levels:
-O1 -O3
> gfc sincos_o.f904.23s8.32s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47280
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47280
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-14
13:20:28 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 14 13:20:22 2011
New Revision: 168784
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168784
Log:
2011-01-14 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46935
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #5
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
