http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47199
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47200
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46807
--- Comment #4 from rwgk at yahoo dot com 2011-01-07 04:28:46 UTC ---
I just saw the "GCC 4.6.0 Status Report (2011-01-04), Stage 3 is over"
announcement.
This bug should be a P1 since it is an ICE on valid code.
If necessary I'll try to reduce t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47198
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47201
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in adjust_mems
(var-tracking.c:814) with -O -fPIC -g
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47200
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47200
Summary: [C++0x] ICE: in adjust_temp_type, at
cp/semantics.c:5821 with missing definition of
constexpr function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47199
Summary: [C++0x] ICE: expected class 'type', have 'declaration'
(function_decl) in
same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p, at
cp/typeck.c:1407 with -fno-elide-constructors
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47041
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47041
--- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-01-07 01:25:52
UTC ---
Created attachment 22916
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22916
even shorter testcase
$ gcc -std=c++0x -fno-elide-constructors pr47041-2.C
pr47041-2.C: In construct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44463
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47198
Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: tree check: expected
var_decl or function_decl, have template_decl in
check_bases_and_members, at cp/class.c:4654 on invalid
code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47041
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-01-07 00:16:29
UTC ---
Created attachment 22915
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22915
reduced testcase
Probably the same issue.
$ gcc -fno-elide-constructors -std=c++0x pr47041.C
pr4704
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47197
Summary: ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7153 on AltiVec
code (vec_dst)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46704
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46704
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-06
23:36:28 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Jan 6 23:36:25 2011
New Revision: 168557
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168557
Log:
PR debug/46704
* dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47141
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47196
Summary: --disable-libquadmath breaks bootstrap in libgfortran
(quadmath_weak.h not found)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45721
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47174
Ralf Wildenhues changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47174
--- Comment #2 from Ralf Wildenhues 2011-01-06
22:09:44 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Thu Jan 6 22:09:41 2011
New Revision: 168555
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168555
Log:
Fix PR fortran/47174
libquadmath/:
PR fortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46240
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44341
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47195
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47195
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Franke 2011-01-06
21:42:56 UTC ---
Author: dfranke
Date: Thu Jan 6 21:42:53 2011
New Revision: 168554
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168554
Log:
2011-01-06 Daniel Franke
PR fortran/47195
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42445
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47195
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-01-06
21:09:58 UTC ---
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/interface_33.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
This is fixed by the following patch:
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/interface_33.f902011-01-06
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47195
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47195
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43309
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43309
--- Comment #14 from Rainer Orth 2011-01-06 19:44:35
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Thu Jan 6 19:44:32 2011
New Revision: 168553
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168553
Log:
PR target/43309
* config/i386/i386.c (legitimiz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
--- Comment #3 from Ralf Wildenhues 2011-01-06
19:40:57 UTC ---
Can you attach output of the failing command when '-o ' is removed and -c
is replaced with -E? And please post the full failing command, the one you
posted has '; else true; fi' but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47182
--- Comment #2 from Ralf Wildenhues 2011-01-06
19:38:41 UTC ---
The first patch looks wrong for multilib configurations.
The second patch looks ok to me, but I haven't tested it extensively.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47195
Summary: [4.6 regression] New Fortran test failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47192
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47174
Ralf Wildenhues changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38118
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth 2011-01-06 19:00:14 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Thu Jan 6 19:00:10 2011
New Revision: 168550
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168550
Log:
PR target/38118
* config/sol2.h (ASM_OUTPUT_ALIG
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47032
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn 2011-01-06 18:55:20
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> David, does GCC 4.5.x build on AIX?
GCC 4.5 libgfortran builds on AIX 5.3, but not AIX 6.1. GCC 4.4 libgfortran
built on both, so this is a regression, bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47193
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-06 18:52:28 UTC
---
> typedef int vtype;
> static vtype Wv10a __attribute__((weakref ("Wv10b")));
> static vtype Wv10b __attribute__((weakref ("Wv10c")));
> static vtype Wv10c __attribute__((weakref ("Wv10d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47188
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-06
18:50:22 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Jan 6 18:50:20 2011
New Revision: 168548
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168548
Log:
PR lto/47188
* collect2.c (main): Do not e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47193
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-01-06 18:34:31
UTC ---
- testcase2.c -
typedef int vtype;
static vtype Wv10a __attribute__((weakref ("Wv10b")));
static vtype Wv10b __attribute__((weakref ("Wv10c")));
static vtype Wv10c __attribute__
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47193
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45915
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45915
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth 2011-01-06 18:29:41 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Thu Jan 6 18:29:39 2011
New Revision: 168546
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168546
Log:
PR other/45915
* configure.ac (gcc_cv_as_gnu_uni
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47194
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47193
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-06 18:00:31 UTC
---
> static int i __attribute__ ((weakref ("j")));
> static int j __attribute__ ((weakref ("k")));
Also invalid, will make fix for that too.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42445
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-march=native isn't saved |LTO performance:
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46535
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41580
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22907|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47194
Summary: [OOP] EXTENDS_TYPE_OF still returns the wrong result
if the polymorphic variable is unallocated
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47193
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in
function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:857 with
static var weakref'd to other weakref'd static var
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42445
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-01-06 16:47:48 UTC ---
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> GCC driver translates -march=native to something cc1/cc1plus
> knows. Since -march=native isn't saved in COLLEC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45505
--- Comment #15 from Martin Jambor 2011-01-06
16:41:34 UTC ---
I've played around with this a bit more and came to the conclusion
that we could refine SRA heuristics some more to not scalarize this if
we added two more attributes to struct access
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42445
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-06 16:34:30
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I know nothing about what the issue is supposed to be here or what is or
> is not supposed to be in COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS or how COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS is
> used.
We
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33117
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46478
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46478
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Franke 2011-01-06
16:08:29 UTC ---
Author: dfranke
Date: Thu Jan 6 16:08:24 2011
New Revision: 168542
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168542
Log:
gcc/fortran/:
2011-01-06 Daniel Franke
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33117
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Franke 2011-01-06
16:08:28 UTC ---
Author: dfranke
Date: Thu Jan 6 16:08:24 2011
New Revision: 168542
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168542
Log:
gcc/fortran/:
2011-01-06 Daniel Franke
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42445
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-01-06 16:02:11 UTC ---
I know nothing about what the issue is supposed to be here or what is or
is not supposed to be in COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS or how COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS is
used.
Dear developers,
I downloaded GNAT User's Guide at
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gnat_ugn_unw.pdf (GCC 4.6.0) and found the
following copyright notice:
Copyright (C) 1995-2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
According to section "Copyright Notices" of the manual "Information for
Maintainers of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47190
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47192
Summary: m68k target - gcc uses stack frame after it has been
unlinked when compiling with -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42445
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from H.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36580
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35891
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23616
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47156
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47173
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47191
Summary: Misleading error message if part-ref starts with DATA
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47188
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-01-06 14:45:17 UTC ---
Collect2-based LTO (when CFLAGS = -flto -fwhole-program) fails, too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42445
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at ucw dot cz
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40831
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47190
Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in
function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:934 with
static weakref variable
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47188
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-06 13:44:09 UTC
---
The problem is that collect2 should be in LTO_MODE_NONE when plugin is used but
it confuses itself and sets itself into LTO_MODE_LTO. Consequently compilation
is done twice, once correct
The problem is that collect2 should be in LTO_MODE_NONE when plugin is used but
it confuses itself and sets itself into LTO_MODE_LTO. Consequently compilation
is done twice, once correctly with plugin and then once again with collect2
path.
I am testing the attached patch. It will also make non-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47188
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-06 13:31:36 UTC
---
This is driver bug. With -flto-partition=none it for whatever reason forgets
about -fresolution:
../lto1 -quiet -dumpdir ./ -dumpbase prog -mtune=generic -march=x86-64
-auxbase-strip
This is driver bug. With -flto-partition=none it for whatever reason forgets
about -fresolution:
../lto1 -quiet -dumpdir ./ -dumpbase prog -mtune=generic -march=x86-64
-auxbase-strip /tmp/cctgIO6R.lto.o -version -flto-partition=none
-fuse-linker-plugin -fwhole-program -fdump-ipa-all-details @
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47189
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47188
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-06 13:18:03 UTC
---
The bug seems to be that lto-symtab incorrectly sets resolution info of the
callgraph node as unknown. Looking into it.
Honza
The bug seems to be that lto-symtab incorrectly sets resolution info of the
callgraph node as unknown. Looking into it.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47189
Summary: [OOP] calling STORAGE_SIZE on a NULL-initialized class
pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46416
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-06
11:40:38 UTC ---
There is no __real128, just __float128. Also, I think either it should use
some extern inlinish quadmath.h specific macro (and it needs to care about g++
vs. gcc difference and which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47188
Summary: Undefined reference errors when combining IR and
non-IR object files
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46416
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-06
11:11:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Very lightly tested patch to add ca{sin,cos,tan}{,h}q and fix broken atan2q.
Now posted to: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00279.html
* * *
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47150
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regress
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46883
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47150
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-06
10:37:09 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 6 10:37:02 2011
New Revision: 168537
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168537
Log:
PR c/47150
* c-convert.c (convert): When co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47187
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-06
10:29:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 22911
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22911
gcc46-pr47187.patch
Very lightly tested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47185
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47185
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-06 10:14:42 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Jan 6 10:14:37 2011
New Revision: 168536
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168536
Log:
2011-01-06 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47187
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47185
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-06
10:05:16 UTC ---
Our TR1 implementation is effectively frozen and this isn't a serious enough
issue to warrant changing it. If it was causing real problems someone would
have noticed it by now eithe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47187
Summary: [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure on i386
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47182
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-06
09:42:51 UTC ---
A) Simplest patch:
Index: libquadmath.texi
===
--- libquadmath.texi(revision 168535)
+++ libquadmath.texi(worki
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47185
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Heller 2011-01-06
09:33:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> A fix seems to me safe enough even at this Stage, I'll post it momentarily.
> Note, we are not going to fiddle with TR1, very serious regressions only.
Sinc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47186
Summary: -O2 moves invariant address load INTO loop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassi
96 matches
Mail list logo