http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47161
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47159
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47160
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47158
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47158
--- Comment #5 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
05:33:37 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 5 05:33:32 2011
New Revision: 168504
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168504
Log:
PR go/47158
PR go/47159
PR go/47
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47159
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
05:33:37 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 5 05:33:32 2011
New Revision: 168504
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168504
Log:
PR go/47158
PR go/47159
PR go/47
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47160
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
05:33:37 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 5 05:33:32 2011
New Revision: 168504
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168504
Log:
PR go/47158
PR go/47159
PR go/47
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47161
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
05:33:37 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 5 05:33:32 2011
New Revision: 168504
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168504
Log:
PR go/47158
PR go/47159
PR go/47
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
--- Comment #18 from Dongsheng Song
2011-01-05 05:31:08 UTC ---
This xml catalog testing passed on Debian and RHEL:
echo '' | xsltproc --noout --nonet \
http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/xhtml/docbook.xsl -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
Dongsheng Song changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dongsheng.song at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47154
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47154
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-01-05
04:18:43 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jan 5 04:18:39 2011
New Revision: 168503
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168503
Log:
2011-01-04 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47154
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-01-05
03:53:23 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jan 5 03:53:15 2011
New Revision: 168502
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168502
Log:
2011-01-04 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47173
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com
2011-01-05 02:56:51 UTC ---
I think one is the old abi and the other is the new one.
Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&T
On Jan 4, 2011 18:33, doko at ubuntu dot com
wrote:
ht
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47173
Summary: both objc_lookUpClass and objc_lookup_class are
exported symbols
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47158
--- Comment #4 from Martin Ettl 2011-01-05 01:19:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Let me know when you have signed it. Thanks.
I have signed a few minutes ago.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47158
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-01-05 01:07:49
UTC ---
Let me know when you have signed it. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40831
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46964
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46961
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46963
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46962
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46960
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46959
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46240
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-05
00:28:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 22902
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22902
pr46240.ii
Reduced testcase. Fails with -g -O3, works with -g -O3
-fno-var-tracking-assignments.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46963
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
00:24:35 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 5 00:24:15 2011
New Revision: 168500
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168500
Log:
PR go/46959
PR go/46960
PR go/46
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46959
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
00:24:30 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 5 00:24:15 2011
New Revision: 168500
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168500
Log:
PR go/46959
PR go/46960
PR go/46
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46962
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
00:24:39 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 5 00:24:15 2011
New Revision: 168500
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168500
Log:
PR go/46959
PR go/46960
PR go/46
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46964
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
00:24:34 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 5 00:24:15 2011
New Revision: 168500
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168500
Log:
PR go/46959
PR go/46960
PR go/46
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46960
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
00:24:37 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 5 00:24:15 2011
New Revision: 168500
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168500
Log:
PR go/46959
PR go/46960
PR go/46
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46961
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
00:24:34 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 5 00:24:15 2011
New Revision: 168500
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168500
Log:
PR go/46959
PR go/46960
PR go/46
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17381
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2011-01-05
00:15:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> This is the patch which fixes the issue:Index: regrename.c
> ===
> --- regrename.c (revision
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46958
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46965
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
00:08:07 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 5 00:07:59 2011
New Revision: 168495
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168495
Log:
PR go/46958
PR go/46965
Call __built
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46958
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
00:08:07 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 5 00:07:59 2011
New Revision: 168495
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168495
Log:
PR go/46958
PR go/46965
Call __built
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46965
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46958
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-01-05 00:08:43
UTC ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-04
23:22:35 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan 4 23:22:31 2011
New Revision: 168493
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168493
Log:
PR tree-optimization/47056
* cgraphbuil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213
--- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-04
23:18:32 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan 4 23:18:29 2011
New Revision: 168491
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168491
Log:
PR preprocessor/39213
* directives.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213
--- Comment #20 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-04
23:18:55 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan 4 23:18:52 2011
New Revision: 168492
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168492
Log:
PR preprocessor/39213
* directives.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213
--- Comment #18 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-04
23:18:15 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan 4 23:18:12 2011
New Revision: 168490
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168490
Log:
PR preprocessor/39213
* directives.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35722
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47172
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45520
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-04 22:47:10
UTC ---
It is caused by revision 158809:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-04/msg00916.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45520
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47165
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gcc-4.6/changes.html|gcc-4.6/changes.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47165
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47165
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47172
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47172
Summary: [C++0x] cannot call member function without object
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at ubuntu dot com
--- Comment #16 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47051
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47024
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46688
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-04
18:55:22 UTC ---
Should TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRUCTING be false for a zero-length/flexible array
member?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45520
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47162
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2011-01-04
18:49:33 UTC ---
Proposed fix posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00161.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47154
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-01-04
18:24:19 UTC ---
Thanks Janne,
You are absolutely right, the multiple hit_eof's which call the generate_error.
So far I do not think we need to fix anything in hit_eof. Thanks for review.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
--- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini 2011-01-04
18:23:23 UTC ---
Kai, thanks. Please commit the ChangeLog entry too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #21 from Sean McGovern 2011-01-04
18:11:09 UTC ---
Why not introduce a warning for 4.6 that it is linking against this object file
and that any other libraries alongside that are not tested against C99 may
experience side effects, wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47055
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47055
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-04 18:05:11
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Jan 4 18:05:06 2011
New Revision: 168475
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168475
Log:
2011-01-04 Kai Tietz
PR bootstrap/47055
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
--- Comment #13 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-04 17:59:45
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Jan 4 17:59:39 2011
New Revision: 168474
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168474
Log:
2011-01-04 Kai Tietz
PR libstdc++/47145
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-04
17:43:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> What's being checked for (pure form) is xsltproc + specific version of the
> HTML
> style sheets, which should be local and vendor supplied if possible
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
--- Comment #15 from Martin Jambor 2011-01-04
17:39:45 UTC ---
I'd also prefer a general solution and would not actually mind very
much if we regressed in cases like this. Nevertheless, if we have a
consensus that we should avoid regressing in 4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47170
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-01-04 17:39:49 UTC ---
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, ettl.martin at gmx dot de wrote:
> during a check of gcc's sources with the static code analysis tool cppcheck
> (http://sourceforge.net/projects/c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47131
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-04
17:17:34 UTC ---
> I'm wondering if this change to trans.c now causes SJLJ targets to pass the
> pack9 test as a side effect?
Looking at the aforementioned PR 46801 will give you the answer. :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Component|ada
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47171
Summary: [cppcheck][PATCH] found a resource leak in
gcc/gcc/java/resource.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47169
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47131
--- Comment #7 from John Marino 2011-01-04 16:21:17
UTC ---
When OpenBSD i386 finished the test suite, I was surprised to it passed gnat.dg
pack9 unexpectedly. This is the "scan tree dump not optimized" test that was
set to expect-fail a few wee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47170
Summary: [cppcheck][PATCH] found resource leaks in
gcc/intl/localealias.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47169
Summary: cannot deduce base class functions from a lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47161
--- Comment #1 from Martin Ettl 2011-01-04 15:46:07
UTC ---
Created attachment 22898
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22898
fixing more memleaks
A second run of cppcheck reveald further possible memory leaks. See "patch
go_mem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
--- Comment #4 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-01-04
15:32:53 UTC ---
I think what's happening is, at some point during template parameters
fixup (to build proper canonical types for dependent parms) we try to
substitute the U template parameter pack [a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47168
Summary: Error with use-renaming
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47154
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47167
Summary: Performance regression in numerical code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47154
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-01-04
14:24:56 UTC ---
The patch passes regression testing. I will commit tonight with ChangeLog and
test case if someone can approve.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40316
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47024
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04 13:49:27 UTC ---
The dump for the test case in comment #0 currently looks like this [excerpt]:
y._data = 0B;
{
[...]
_gfortran_st_write (&dt_parm.0);
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47162
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47024
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47162
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47082
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[OOP] ICE in|[4.6 Regression] [OOP] ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47082
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04 13:28:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This does not solve the problem fully, but it reduces it to PR46448:
>
> /tmp/cc9UG1CN.s: Assembler messages:
> /tmp/cc9UG1CN.s:65: Error: symbol `
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
--- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-04 13:28:11
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Kai, in order to help people actually using cross-compilation a lot, please
> install your patchlet. Actual patch pre-approved. Then we can figure out
> somethi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
--- Comment #7 from John Marino 2011-01-04 13:27:52
UTC ---
I confirm that test c62002a is still failing on OpenBSD i386 as of today (SVN
168458)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47131
--- Comment #6 from John Marino 2011-01-04 13:23:28
UTC ---
I rebuilt the OpenBSD i386 port (SVN 168458, after 4th change to trans.c
today). It now passes test 34011B.
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46448
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2011-01-04
13:02:50 UTC ---
Kai, in order to help people actually using cross-compilation a lot, please
install your patchlet. Actual patch pre-approved. Then we can figure out
something better...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46448
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04 12:59:26 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Jan 4 12:59:23 2011
New Revision: 168464
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168464
Log:
2011-01-04 Janus Weil
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45777
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #3 from Ian Bolton 2011-01-04 12:32:50
UTC ---
>
> pr47166/CMD - how to compile it
>
Sorry, I forgot to give cc1 commands:
cc1 -fpreprocessed rectmm.i -quiet -dumpbase rectmm.i -mthumb -mcpu=cortex-a9
-mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=vfpv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #2 from Ian Bolton 2011-01-04 12:30:23
UTC ---
Created attachment 22896
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22896
Preprocessed source, before/after .s file, before/after IRA dump
Contains the following:
pr47166/rectm
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo