http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
Summary|cross-compilat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47150
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from H.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47150
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47150
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46017
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47150
Summary: 4.5.1/4.5.2 ICE in gimplify_expr, at
gimplify.c:7146/7153 on fairly simple complex
expression
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47149
Summary: failing build: execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47146
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47148
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-01
21:08:40 UTC ---
Maybe it is fnsplit fault, it might want to look at DECL_ARG_TYPE of the
PARM_DECL in question (partial inlining means it always has a fndecl, so can
look at its DECL_ARGUMENTS to find
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47148
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47148
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |target
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47148
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-01 20:17:26
UTC ---
It is caused by revision 161433:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-06/msg01351.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47144
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47148
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47144
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5 Regression] Doesn't|[4.5, 4.6 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47144
--- Comment #4 from Johannes Schaub
2011-01-01 18:41:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > > what 4.6.0 version are you using?
> >
> > Hmm, "4.6.0 20101113 (experimental)".
>
> Ah, maybe that accepted it, but curren
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47148
Summary: likely wrong code bug
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47144
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-01
18:24:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> > what 4.6.0 version are you using?
>
> Hmm, "4.6.0 20101113 (experimental)".
Ah, maybe that accepted it, but current 4.6 rejects it.
I assume it was cha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47146
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-01
18:21:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Casting and rounding seems to be a problem.
Please be more specific.
Do you understand how floating point works?
Do you know that "0.39 * 100" has type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47144
--- Comment #2 from Johannes Schaub
2011-01-01 18:11:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> 4.4 rejects it:
>
> inv.cc:1: error: expected class-name before ‘int’
> inv.cc:1: error: expected ‘(’ before ‘int’
>
> 4.5 accepts it without error
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47144
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
Summary: gcc 4.6 fails to compile on NetBSD
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47141
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-01 17:08:59
UTC ---
It is caused by revision 161433:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-06/msg01351.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47143
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47143
Igor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47146
Summary: Floating point to integer conversions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47140
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
Summary: cross-compilation fails with "cannot check for file
existence when cross compiling"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47143
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47140
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47141
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47033
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-01 13:29:47 UTC
---
I at least checked in the fix for uninitialized var. It would indeed be nice to
know why the generated code is worse than before.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47143
--- Comment #3 from Igor 2011-01-01 13:16:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Not a bug. The function parameters are of type "pointer to array[4] of const
> double" because const on an array type applies to the element type,
> recursively, and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47143
Igor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47139
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.2
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47031
--- Comment #3 from js-gcc at webkeks dot org
2011-01-01 12:06:56 UTC ---
> The problem is that property accessors are basically general purpose routines
that may be used in the most varied situations.
It does not matter very much in which situa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47143
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47139
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47143
Igor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38662
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38662
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-01 11:05:45
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Sat Jan 1 11:05:41 2011
New Revision: 168389
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168389
Log:
ChangeLog gcc/
2011-01-01 Kai Tietz
PR target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47136
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47138
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47138
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
44 matches
Mail list logo