http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47066
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47066
Summary: HOST=i386-unknown-freebsd6.2, TARGET=arm--elf,
cpu=arm7tdmi
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Compon
not found
$ gfortran-svn -v
gcc version 4.6.0 20101226 (experimental) (GCC)
The error is consistent and reproducible for me, nothing fishy from valgrind.
Although the error is identical, no idea if the reason to trigger it is the
same as the reporter's.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876
--- Comment #8 from Bill Long 2010-12-27 01:42:20 UTC
---
I am out of the office until Monday, January 3, 2011. Send technical questions
to spsl...@cray.com.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45676
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46703
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-12-27
01:03:55 UTC ---
-ffloat-store is the first thing I tried and no change. However, the run-time
side, libgfortran, is not compiled normally with -ffloat-store so maybe we
should try that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45988
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45909
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46520
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46411
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46405
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46703
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46874
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46825
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46917
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael.a.richmond at nasa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46917
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46979
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47039
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18584
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thenlich at users dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44081
Valeriy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nordq at ya dot ru
--- Comment #11 from Valeriy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-12-26
21:52:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> For this reason, I would find it bad if "gcc -std=c99" or "gcc -std=gnu99"
> would cause values-xpg6.o to be included in the link. Please close this
> is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47065
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig 2010-12-26
21:34:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 22852
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22852
Partial patch
This appears to work for the cases where there is no substring reference.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47065
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #18 from Paolo Carlini 2010-12-26
18:35:49 UTC ---
Rainer, can you have another look to this issue and possibly actually close it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
bruno at clisp dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bruno at clisp dot org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47065
Summary: Replace trim(a) by a(1:len_trim(a))
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45726
--- Comment #18 from Ryan Hill 2010-12-26
08:03:51 UTC ---
Ignore that.
29 matches
Mail list logo