[Bug c++/46221] huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so alias missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra 2010-10-29 05:40:02 UTC --- Created attachment 22198 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22198 locale-inst.s 20101014

[Bug c++/46221] huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so alias missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra 2010-10-29 05:38:59 UTC --- Created attachment 22197 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22197 locale-inst.s 20101028

[Bug c++/46221] New: huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so alias missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221 Summary: huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so alias missing Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 C

[Bug testsuite/46211] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c compilation on powerpc-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46211 --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor 2010-10-29 03:13:01 UTC --- When I look at the source code for the test I don't see how this could possibly happen. The whole test is suppressed on powerpc systems. Would you be able to do a bit of testing o

[Bug c++/46220] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Error: invalid covariant return type generated for incomplete class type and different qualifer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46220 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/46220] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Error: invalid covariant return type generated for incomplete class type and different qualifer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46220 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-29 00:50:53 UTC --- However p6 says If the return type of D::f differs from the return type of B::f, the class type in the return type of D::f shall be complete at the point of declaration of D::f or s

[Bug c++/46220] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Error: invalid covariant return type generated for incomplete class type and different qualifer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46220 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-29 00:45:26 UTC --- It certainly is a covariant return type, it meets the criteria in all three bullet points of 10.3 [class.virtual] p5

[Bug target/41822] pdp11 code generation bug & temporary fix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41822 Paul Koning changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/46220] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Error: invalid covariant return type generated for incomplete class type and different qualifer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46220 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/46220] New: Error: invalid covariant return type generated for incomplete class type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46220 Summary: Error: invalid covariant return type generated for incomplete class type Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/46219] Generate indirect jump instruction on x86-64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46219 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/46219] New: Generate indirect jump instruction on x86-64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46219 Summary: Generate indirect jump instruction on x86-64 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assi

[Bug tree-optimization/45219] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in dominated_by_p (dominance.c:973) with -O2 -fprofile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45219 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-28 22:39:39 UTC --- It was fixed by revision 163775: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00066.html

[Bug fortran/46196] [OOP] gfortran compiles invalid generic TBP: dummy arguments are type compatible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 f

[Bug tree-optimization/46216] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SSA corruption

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46216 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/43168] internal compiler error for xgcc when building gcc for pdp11-unknown-aout

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43168 Paul Koning changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ni1d at arrl dot net --- Comment #1 from Pa

[Bug target/30974] pdp11-dec-bsd will not successfully build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30974 Paul Koning changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ni1d at arrl dot net --- Comment #4 from Pa

[Bug other/46218] New: TARGET_PREFERRED_OUTPUT_RELOAD_CLASS is not documented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46218 Summary: TARGET_PREFERRED_OUTPUT_RELOAD_CLASS is not documented Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: other Assigned

[Bug fortran/46196] [OOP] gfortran compiles invalid generic TBP: dummy arguments are type compatible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-10-28 21:06:36 UTC --- > Maybe you could check if there are any 'false alarm' errors among that ... I'll do it. Meanwhile I am puzzled by the patch. My understanding of compare_type_rank and compare_

[Bug target/45591] gcc generates illegal asm at -O2 with -fdollars-in-identifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45591 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/46217] [4.6 Regression] store to volatile is removed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/46217] New: [4.6 Regression] store to volatile is removed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217 Summary: [4.6 Regression] store to volatile is removed Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Ass

[Bug target/46153] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2110 (unrecognizable insn) with -ffloat-store and __builtin_ia32_movlhps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46153 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-28 20:49:56 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Thu Oct 28 20:49:46 2010 New Revision: 166047 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166047 Log: Partially revert: 2010-10-28 Uros B

[Bug middle-end/45555] Add warnings for changes to code with option "-fipa-sra"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Component|c++

[Bug tree-optimization/45522] VRP misses oppurtunity for statement folding.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45522 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|UN

[Bug c++/45509] program abort after compiled with gcc-4.5.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45509 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||EH Severity|blocker

[Bug tree-optimization/45219] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in dominated_by_p (dominance.c:973) with -O2 -fprofile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45219 --- Comment #5 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-10-28 20:36:20 UTC --- It seems to have disappeared between r163636 and r165699. Both original and reduced testcase stopped crashing between those revisions. 4.5 r165781 doesn't crash as well.

[Bug tree-optimization/45219] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in dominated_by_p (dominance.c:973) with -O2 -fprofile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45219 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-28 20:26:24 UTC --- This works with GNU C (GCC) version 4.6.0 20101026 (experimental) [trunk revision 165988] (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

[Bug c++/45431] specify the field for initializer-string for array of chars is too long

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45431 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/46216] New: ice: SSA corruption

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46216 Summary: ice: SSA corruption Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org Rep

[Bug bootstrap/45285] Bootstrap failure on Cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45285 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/43170] gcc 4.5 20100218 bootstrap compare fails on os x 10.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43170 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot |

[Bug middle-end/45274] __restrict__ type qualifier does not work on pointers to bitfields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45274 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu |powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/46213] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/aliasing_array_result_1.f90 ICE: in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4046 with custom compiler flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46213 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/46215] New: ICE: verify_stmts failed: type mismatch in comparison expression with -fstrict-overflow -fno-tree-ch -ftree-loop-linear

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46215 Summary: ICE: verify_stmts failed: type mismatch in comparison expression with -fstrict-overflow -fno-tree-ch -ftree-loop-linear Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status

[Bug middle-end/45270] CPU2006 435.gromacs: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45270 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/45214] Poor initial RTL for bitfield operations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45214 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |middle-end Host|i686-pc-lin

[Bug tree-optimization/46214] internal compiler error: in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2135

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46214 --- Comment #1 from Steve Talmage 2010-10-28 19:13:04 UTC --- Created attachment 22193 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22193 .ii file from -save-temps

[Bug tree-optimization/46213] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/aliasing_array_result_1.f90 ICE: in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4046 with custom compiler flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46213 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-10-28 19:11:46 UTC --- The test was introduced at revision 161550 along a patch fixing pr44582. Note that before this revision the test compiles with the flags, but abort at run time.

[Bug tree-optimization/46214] New: internal compiler error: in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2135

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46214 Summary: internal compiler error: in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2135 Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 C

[Bug target/46200] [4.6 Regression] optimization regression in simple pointer loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46200 davidxl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug middle-end/46212] Segfault in reg_nonzero_bits_for_combine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46212 --- Comment #3 from Ryan Mansfield 2010-10-28 18:45:10 UTC --- Reduced testcase: static __inline__ unsigned foo(void *__ptr) { unsigned __val = *(volatile unsigned *)(__ptr); return (((__val) >> 24) | (((__val) >> 8) & 0xff00) | (((__val)

[Bug tree-optimization/46213] New: [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/aliasing_array_result_1.f90 ICE: in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4046 with custom compiler flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46213 Summary: [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/aliasing_array_result_1.f90 ICE: in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4046 with custom compiler flags Product: gcc

[Bug target/45402] [4.6 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2127 for gcc.dg/pr28796-2 on rx-elf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45402 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 Summary|[Regression

[Bug target/46195] r165965 regresses i386 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195 --- Comment #22 from Jack Howarth 2010-10-28 18:12:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) > A patch is posted at > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg02414.html The gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-18 and gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-18

[Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12 from

[Bug target/46200] [4.6 Regression] optimization regression in simple pointer loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46200 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xinliangli at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from

[Bug middle-end/45722] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-2.c execution at -O1 and -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|hppa*-*-* (32-bit) |hppa*-*-* (32-bit), |

[Bug c++/46203] constexpr weirdness w/ default ctors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46203 --- Comment #2 from Benjamin Kosnik 2010-10-28 17:46:29 UTC --- Only with --disable-checking

[Bug target/46153] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2110 (unrecognizable insn) with -ffloat-store and __builtin_ia32_movlhps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46153 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-28 17:45:57 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Thu Oct 28 17:45:52 2010 New Revision: 166031 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166031 Log: PR target/46153 * config/i386/sse.md

[Bug c++/32402] Error while allocating array of pointers to objects of a pure virtual class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32402 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONF

[Bug target/46200] [4.6 Regression] optimization regression in simple pointer loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46200 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 20

[Bug middle-end/46212] Segfault in reg_nonzero_bits_for_combine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46212 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||46034 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug middle-end/46212] Segfault in reg_nonzero_bits_for_combine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46212 --- Comment #1 from Ryan Mansfield 2010-10-28 17:37:25 UTC --- Working on reducing the testcase. I originally encountered the ICE as: internal compiler error: vector VEC(reg_stat_type,base) index domain error, in reg_nonzero_bits_for_combine at

[Bug target/46195] r165965 regresses i386 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED URL|

[Bug middle-end/46212] New: Segfault in reg_nonzero_bits_for_combine

: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: rmansfi...@qnx.com $ ./xgcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=./xgcc Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../configure --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=c Thread model: posix gcc version 4.6.0 20101028 (experimental) [trunk revision 166029

[Bug c++/32402] Error while allocating array of pointers to objects of a pure virtual class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32402 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-28 17:30:28 UTC --- It doesn't depend on abstract types, this fails, even though it should be able to declare an array of pure* without seeing the definition of pure: struct pure; void f() { pure*

[Bug c++/32402] Error while allocating array of pointers to objects of a pure virtual class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32402 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-28 17:21:03 UTC --- (N.B. this now gets the bogus warning from PR 46159) Grammatically: new (pure (*[3])); is a new-expression, with type-id "pure(*[3])" that type-id has type-specifier-seq "pure

[Bug target/46200] [4.6 Regression] optimization regression in simple pointer loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46200 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/46034] [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46034 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-28 16:05:44 UTC --- It is caused by revision 163383: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-08/msg00595.html

[Bug libstdc++/44436] [C++0x] Implement insert(&&) and emplace* in associative and unordered containers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44436 --- Comment #12 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-28 16:01:11 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Oct 28 16:01:05 2010 New Revision: 166030 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166030 Log: 2010-10-28 Paolo Carlini PR lib

[Bug target/46179] Codegen/TLS: invalid assembler syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46179 --- Comment #7 from Finn Thain 2010-10-28 15:34:06 UTC --- On Sun, 24 Oct 2010, Andreas Schwab wrote: > This should habe [sic] been fixed up by m68k_final_prescan_insn. (In reply to comment #4) > The invalid address is generated by output_move_

[Bug fortran/46196] [OOP] gfortran compiles invalid generic TBP: dummy arguments are type compatible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-28 15:32:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > With the patch in comment #2, several of my codelets are rejected: for > instance > the test in comment #24 of pr42274 is rejected with: > > [macb

[Bug fortran/45494] [OOP] Wrong dummy argument not rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45494 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/46179] Codegen/TLS: invalid assembler syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46179 --- Comment #6 from Finn Thain 2010-10-28 15:21:36 UTC --- Created attachment 22191 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22191 possible fix

[Bug target/46200] [4.6 Regression] optimization regression in simple pointer loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46200 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/46170] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] g++ wrongly rejects pointer-to-member in template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2010-10-28 14:49:30 UTC --- Excellent. Thanks again!

[Bug c++/46162] Invalid SFINAE with static member function/variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46162 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/46170] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] g++ wrongly rejects pointer-to-member in template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added CC||greg.r.rogers at gmail dot

[Bug c++/46170] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] g++ wrongly rejects pointer-to-member in template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22180|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/46170] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] g++ wrongly rejects pointer-to-member in template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170 --- Comment #6 from Dodji Seketeli 2010-10-28 14:44:54 UTC --- "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" writes: > Thanks Dodji for working on this. Please remember to resolve PR46162 > too (very likely a duplicate) while you are at it... Ah. Thanks f

[Bug target/45693] [4.6 regression] All Tru64 UNIX C++ EH tests fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45693 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p

[Bug target/46131] Some TLS execution tests fail on Tru64 UNIX with emutls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46131 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p

[Bug target/45693] [4.6 regression] All Tru64 UNIX C++ EH tests fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45693 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Depends on|

[Bug target/46131] Some TLS execution tests fail on Tru64 UNIX with emutls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46131 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-code | Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/46211] New: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c compilation on powerpc-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46211 Summary: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c compilation on powerpc-*-* Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/46210] segfault when using large arrays with -fopenmp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46210 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/46195] r165965 regresses i386 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195 --- Comment #20 from Jack Howarth 2010-10-28 13:10:34 UTC --- Created attachment 22189 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22189 preprocessed source file for gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-18_x.c at -m32 Created with... /Users/ho

[Bug c++/46170] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] g++ wrongly rejects pointer-to-member in template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2010-10-28 12:34:52 UTC --- Thanks Dodji for working on this. Please remember to resolve PR46162 too (very likely a duplicate) while you are at it...

[Bug fortran/46210] segfault when using large arrays with -fopenmp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46210 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Werner Boschmann 2010-10-28 12:23:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) Sorry, I was to quick. The reason is already given in the valgrind output. The stack size is to small. So it's neither gcc's fault nor openmp's fault.

[Bug fortran/46210] New: segfault when using large arrays with -fopenmp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46210 Summary: segfault when using large arrays with -fopenmp Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: u

[Bug fortran/45494] [OOP] Wrong dummy argument not rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45494 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug libstdc++/46207] std::atomic::store(...) fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-28 11:11:09 UTC --- I haven't followed it, but it wouldn't surprise me if a few issues were closed as NAD Editorial without actually being fixed

[Bug target/46208] redundant extensions of argument registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46208 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2010-10-28 11:02:59 UTC --- Created attachment 22188 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22188 Minimal patch

[Bug target/46208] redundant extensions of argument registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46208 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target||sparc-*-* Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/46208] TARGET_PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES for SPARC V8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46208 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot |

[Bug rtl-optimization/46034] [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46034 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug libstdc++/46207] std::atomic::store(...) fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug libstdc++/46207] std::atomic::store(...) fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2010-10-28 09:59:43 UTC --- Thanks Jon, much better implementing it ;)

[Bug libstdc++/46207] std::atomic::store(...) fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-28 09:54:24 UTC --- http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#879

[Bug libstdc++/46207] std::atomic::store(...) fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2010-10-28 09:50:37 UTC --- Note, we have a much more general issue with atomic<_Tp*> vs atomic_address: everywhere we are assuming _Tp is not cv-qualified and this is not going to work with atomic_address, which

[Bug fortran/45494] [OOP] Wrong dummy argument not rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45494 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-10-28 09:36:02 UTC --- This pr seems to be fixed by revision 166018: [macbook] f90/bug% gfc pr45494.f90 pr45494.f90:43.16: call src%mold(trg2) ! This is wrong 1 Error: Actual argu

[Bug libstdc++/46207] std::atomic::store(...) fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/21917] Missing warning when trying to explicitly construct a virtual base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21917 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-28 09:17:23 UTC --- I've relied on exactly this behaviour and wouldn't want a warning. struct Base : virtual std::ios { Base() : std::ios(0) { } std::streambuf buf; }; struct MyStream : Base, std:

[Bug target/46153] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2110 (unrecognizable insn) with -ffloat-store and __builtin_ia32_movlhps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46153 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at g

[Bug c++/46043] attribute to mark virtual methods that can't be further overriden so they can be devirtualized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46043 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-28 08:50:07 UTC --- This should be suspended, the C++0x mechanisms are not finalised (pun intended) and might become keywords rather than attributes http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2

[Bug target/46209] pmovmskb, useless sign extension

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46209 tbp changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug target/46209] New: pmovmskb, useless sign extension

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46209 Summary: pmovmskb, useless sign extension Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.g

[Bug target/46208] New: TARGET_PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES for SPARC V8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46208 Summary: TARGET_PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES for SPARC V8 Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...