http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46054
Summary: Linker cannot resolve a pointer to a static member of
a class in an anonymous namespace
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33595
--- Comment #18 from John David Anglin 2010-10-17
00:29:16 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Oct 17 00:29:12 2010
New Revision: 165574
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165574
Log:
Backport from mainline
2009-03-29 J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44206
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2010-10-16
23:47:13 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Oct 16 23:47:08 2010
New Revision: 165569
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165569
Log:
PR middle-end/44206
* g++.dg/torture/pr4420
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46053
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46053
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45629
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-10-16
23:22:19 UTC ---
I will look it over when I have a few other bugs out of the way.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46052
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46051
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40858
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2010-10-16
23:01:03 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Oct 16 23:00:55 2010
New Revision: 165568
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165568
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-09-06 Ja
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18451
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2010-10-16
23:01:00 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Oct 16 23:00:55 2010
New Revision: 165568
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165568
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-09-06 Ja
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40738
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin 2010-10-16
23:01:02 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Oct 16 23:00:55 2010
New Revision: 165568
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165568
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-09-06 Ja
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45543
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin 2010-10-16
23:01:00 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Oct 16 23:00:55 2010
New Revision: 165568
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165568
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-09-06 Ja
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45629
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45629
--- Comment #1 from Janne Blomqvist 2010-10-16 22:07:19
UTC ---
Created attachment 22068
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22068
Preliminary patch
Preliminary patch for getting rid of setjmp/longjmp, instead using an
errno-styl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46053
Summary: [4.6 Regression] g++.dg/torture/pr45699.C FAILs with
-fno-early-inlining
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46052
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in emit_move_insn, at
expr.c:3386 with -ftree-vectorize
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46051
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2110
with -mavx -ftree-vectorize
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45936
--- Comment #5 from gee 2010-10-16 19:28:07 UTC ---
#74655 0x00a146c0 in if_then_else_cond (x=0x7f2e6940, ptrue=0x4e7c64c,
pfalse=0x4e7c644) at ../.././gcc/combine.c:8490
#74656 0x00a146c0 in if_then_else_cond (x=0x7f2e6970, ptrue=0x4e7c6bc,
th-as=/export/home/arth/local/bin/as
--with-gnu-ld --with-ld=/export/home/arth/local/bin/ld
--enable-libstdcxx-pch=no --enable-objc-gc --build=i386-pc-solaris2.10
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20101016 (experimental) (GCC)
$
A build from yesterday morning failed, so some patch applied within the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41359
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46007
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
--- Comment #10 from John David Anglin 2010-10-16
18:58:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 22064
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22064
Tree dump.
gfortran.dg/pr45636.f90 fails on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu. Tree dump
attached.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20165
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46045
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45936
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6 regression] cc1 fails |[4.6 regression] cc1 enters
|to g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45865
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46049
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46050
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2010-10-16 16:23:14
UTC ---
Created attachment 22063
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22063
move some initializations
Does attached patch fix the failure for you?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46050
Summary: gcc/c-parser.c fails to build with -O2
-finline-functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31593
--- Comment #44 from Thomas Koenig 2010-10-16
16:06:16 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Oct 16 16:06:07 2010
New Revision: 165559
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165559
Log:
2010-10-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/2016
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43665
--- Comment #27 from Thomas Koenig 2010-10-16
16:06:16 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Oct 16 16:06:07 2010
New Revision: 165559
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165559
Log:
2010-10-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/2016
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20165
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig 2010-10-16
16:06:14 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Oct 16 16:06:07 2010
New Revision: 165559
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165559
Log:
2010-10-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/20165
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42734
--- Comment #38 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-16
15:54:16 UTC ---
I can confirm that this crash happens with GCC 4.4 when using -march=i386
But it isn't a problem with 4.5 and 4.6 because it fails to link
$ ~/gcc/4.5/bin/g++ -std=c++0x t.cc -m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46043
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-10-16 15:50:41
UTC ---
Thank you for answers, this is a really good news!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46043
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-16
15:46:44 UTC ---
Oops, that's not the right paper, but C++0x already has a [[final]] attribute,
so any work on this bug should be made compatible with the C++0x semantics, to
ease transition from GNU
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46046
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46048
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46047
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-16
15:26:29 UTC ---
*** Bug 46048 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46047
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46049
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in expand_widen_pattern_expr, at
optabs.c:522 with -ftree-vectorize
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46048
--- Comment #1 from Mikhail Semenov
2010-10-16 15:03:36 UTC ---
The code fails to compile is "this->inc(n);" is replaced with "inc(n);"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46048
Summary: lambda: access to a member function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46047
Summary: Lambda expressions: access to member functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46043
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-16
14:01:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> One idea I could come with would be omitting the "virtual" keyword causing the
> method to lose its "virtual" status. But that would break a lot of existin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46046
Summary: internal compiler error with SFINAE expression in a
template inside a template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2010-10-16
13:41:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> the optimize attribute isn't used in the preprocessed file but only the
> target attribute which is supported. Thus, "worksforme".
Using a stock build of gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46045
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42734
--- Comment #37 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-16
13:31:33 UTC ---
What I was thinking of is that bits/c++config.h defines the following based on
what was supported at the time the library is configured and built, not what is
supported later when
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46045
Summary: incorrect code generated if redecalring local variable
in do-while(0)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45785
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-10-16 13:17:14
UTC ---
I get the feeling search isn't as quick as it used to be, but it's just a
feeling without any data to support it.
However, I haven't seen a search failure for some time now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45904
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45811
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Frédéric Bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45785
--- Comment #2 from Frédéric Buclin 2010-10-16
13:04:59 UTC ---
Is it still an issue?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45782
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bugzilla internal error |When updating a bug, an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46044
--- Comment #1 from Jeroen Demeyer 2010-10-16
12:33:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 22060
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22060
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46044
Summary: ICE in get_attr_first_insn on ia64 Itanium
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46043
Summary: attribute to mark virtual methods that can't be
further overriden so they can be devirtualized
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44950
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-16
10:03:59 UTC ---
Hmhm, difficult. We're ending up with LANG_TYPE again in dealII, will add
a testcase for that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-16
09:46:38 UTC ---
the optimize attribute isn't used in the preprocessed file but only the
target attribute which is supported. Thus, "worksforme".
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-16
09:43:25 UTC ---
Hm, the question is if it is a good idea anyway given the target and
optimization
attributes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46042
Summary: install-plugin rule exceeds argument line length on a
host with argument list limitations
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
61 matches
Mail list logo