http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46010
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-10-14
03:33:07 UTC ---
Try compiling your program with -std=f95.
What we have here is what I believe is a non-standard extension byting us in
the you know where. Regardless, I will investigate further. Sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46010
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44130
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Version|unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44130
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-14
02:28:01 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Oct 14 02:27:59 2010
New Revision: 165447
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165447
Log:
Add a testcase for PR middle-end/44130.
201
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44144
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-14
02:22:12 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Oct 14 02:22:09 2010
New Revision: 165446
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165446
Log:
Add a testcase for PR middle-end/44144.
201
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45932
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45980
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44180
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Version|unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44180
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-14
02:12:03 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Oct 14 02:11:59 2010
New Revision: 165445
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165445
Log:
Add a testcase for PR target/44180.
2010-10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41219
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41219
--- Comment #26 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-10-14
01:29:41 UTC ---
*** Bug 45998 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45998
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45984
--- Comment #2 from tbp 2010-10-14 01:03:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Author: jason
> Date: Thu Oct 14 00:50:26 2010
> New Revision: 165443
>
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165443
Thanks!
Am i right to infer this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45984
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2010-10-14
00:50:30 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Oct 14 00:50:26 2010
New Revision: 165443
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165443
Log:
PR c++/45984
* class.c (fixup_attribute_var
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45990
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-13
22:52:28 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Oct 13 22:52:25 2010
New Revision: 165438
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165438
Log:
PR libstdc++/45990
* include/bits/regex.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45912
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-13
22:16:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)>
> So no one makes sure that the standard gcc/g++ testsuite
> compiles without valgrind errors at all times ?
No what happens is that g++.dg/abi testsuite is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875
--- Comment #8 from dcb 2010-10-13 22:14:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> This testcase was reduced from testsuite/g++.dg/abi/covariant3.C, but is seems
> to be the same problem.
So no one makes sure that the standard gcc/g++ testsuite
compi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45969
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
* ira-costs.c (ira_tune_allocno_costs_and_cover_classes): Test the
regno of registers instead of their index to compute the alignment.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20101013-1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/ira-costs.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46010
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44180
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-13
21:20:12 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Oct 13 21:20:07 2010
New Revision: 165436
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165436
Log:
Addd 256bit AVX vectorizer patterns.
2010-1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46010
Summary: reading of structure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45878
--- Comment #16 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-13
20:30:17 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 13 20:30:10 2010
New Revision: 165435
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165435
Log:
2010-10-13 Richard Guenther
PR objc/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45878
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44832
--- Comment #57 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-10-13
20:26:06 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Oct 13 20:26:02 2010
New Revision: 165434
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165434
Log:
PR debug/44832
* tree-ssa-live.c (mark_all_vars
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41359
--- Comment #6 from mikael.morin at sfr dot fr 2010-10-13 19:05:15 UTC ---
> this still fails with a recent trunk.
> Mikael, do you plan to commit your patch?
Thanks for the remainder.
I'm currently on something else, but I plan to do it during st
> this still fails with a recent trunk.
> Mikael, do you plan to commit your patch?
Thanks for the remainder.
I'm currently on something else, but I plan to do it during stage 3.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45878
--- Comment #15 from Nicola Pero 2010-10-13
18:47:52 UTC ---
Try the following testcase, which requires no includes:
==
typedef struct objc_object { Class class_pointer; } *id;
typedef unsigned char BOOL;
@interface Object
{
Cla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45878
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-13
18:37:55 UTC ---
Hm, where are objc headers in a build tree? I can't seem to compile the
original testcase:
/obj/trunk-g/gcc$ ./xgcc -B. -S gimple_call.m
gimple_call.m:1:22: fatal error: objc/obj
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45878
--- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-13
18:25:12 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 13 18:25:08 2010
New Revision: 165430
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165430
Log:
2010-10-13 Richard Guenther
PR objc/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085
--- Comment #13 from Artem Anisimov 2010-10-13
17:46:51 UTC ---
> Artem, did you tried to make concurrent build ( make -j2 or anything more than
> -j1 ) ?
I know about this trick and did a -j1 build :). Anyway, thanks for pointing
this out.
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
--- Comment #84 from Steve Ellcey 2010-10-13 17:36:15
UTC ---
> > My patch is not finished and doesn't bootstrap, I'll look at it (promised)
> > next
> > weekend. I suggest just using BOOT_CFLAGS="-O2 -fno-forward-propagate".
>
> I'll give it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45990
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2010-10-13 17:20:59 UTC ---
Sure: with this patch, the test aborts:
Assertion failed: t.isctype('e', t.lookup_classname(name,
name+sizeof(name)-1)), file
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46009
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-13
16:59:28 UTC ---
Related to PR 21998.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45878
--- Comment #12 from Nicola Pero 2010-10-13
16:58:34 UTC ---
Yes, the testcase still fails for me after applying the patch.
By the way, Richard, thanks a lot for looking into this. I really appreciate
it :-)
Thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46009
Summary: ?: vectorized, very similar if is not
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46008
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-10-13
16:19:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 22031
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22031
gcc46-pr46008.patch
The ifcvt fix (untested). Still the vectorizer gives up, because the floating
p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46008
Summary: Floating point condexpr not vectorized
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45878
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45788
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45788
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-13
15:42:50 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 13 15:42:46 2010
New Revision: 165425
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165425
Log:
2010-10-13 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46005
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Don't allow "auto" as the |[C++0x] Don't allow "auto"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46007
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Morin 2010-10-13
15:30:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Interestingly, if one uses:
> tmp = shape(int1d_retrieved)
> one has:
> integer(kind=4) A.1[1];
> atmp.0.dim[0].lbound = 0;
> atmp.0.dim[0].
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46005
--- Comment #2 from Johannes Schaub 2010-10-13
15:28:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I'm getting 'error: ‘autot’ does not name a type' with both current trunk and
> 4.5. 4.4 gives "error: conflicting specifiers in declaration of ‘autot’"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45878
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe 2010-10-13 15:27:09
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Yes, I have already extracted a testcase from GNUstep - it's in the first
> comment in the issue. :-)
>
> On my Linux i386, that (valid) piece of code fails
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45878
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-10-13
15:16:39 UTC ---
With the patch in comment #6 and revision 164908, I get the same results as
with revision 164908 reverted on powerpc-apple-darwin9:
=== objc Summary for unix/-m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46002
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46005
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2010-10-13 15:12:13
UTC ---
I'm getting 'error: ‘autot’ does not name a type' with both current trunk and
4.5. 4.4 gives "error: conflicting specifiers in declaration of ‘autot’" which
is the better error messa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085
--- Comment #12 from Sylvia 2010-10-13 15:10:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Artem, did you tried to make concurrent build ( make -j2 or anything more than
-j1 ) ?
there shouldnt be any collisions when building with single task (make -j1)
D
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45878
--- Comment #8 from Nicola Pero 2010-10-13 15:05:13
UTC ---
Yes, I have already extracted a testcase from GNUstep - it's in the first
comment in the issue. :-)
On my Linux i386, that (valid) piece of code fails to compile with 'internal
compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45939
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46007
Summary: wrong code for SHAPE in a scalarized loop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45939
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Severity|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085
Sylvia changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fierevere at ya dot ru
--- Comment #10 from Sylv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45878
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe 2010-10-13 14:25:57
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
thanks for the patch ...
> It is likely a miscommunication (or lack of definition) on what the middle-end
> expects from an OBJ_TYP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46006
Summary: vectorization outside of loops
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45788
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|rtl-optimi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45979
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson 2010-10-13
14:02:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 22030
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22030
define TRY_EMPTY_VM_SPACE for ARM
Preliminary patch which defines TRY_EMPTY_VM_SPACE for ARM and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45979
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson 2010-10-13
13:57:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Most likely when the linux arm kernel decided to randomize the heap.
Confirmed. Bisection of the kernel identified:
From: Nicolas Pitre
Date: Tue, 15
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45878
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-13
13:54:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I think the patch that broke this should be backed out until the semantics are
> sorted out. I think the middle-end people should decide on which part of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46005
Summary: Don't allow "auto" as the simple-type-specifier of a
typedef
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46004
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-13
13:24:59 UTC ---
Ah! thanks for clearing that up.
So in cases where I do want/need a template ctor with &&-style deduction I'll
use enable_if to prevent it being instantiated to perform a copy.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42647
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus 2010-10-13
13:21:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> allocate(a1, a1%b1, a1%b1%c1)
This ALLOCATE statement is INVALID! It violates the following:
"An allocate-object [...] shall not depend [...] on the [...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45730
--- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth 2010-10-13
13:16:06 UTC ---
This bug was either fixed or went latent between r164895 and r164962 on
x86_64-apple-darwin10.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45984
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46004
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45970
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45970
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-13
13:03:37 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 13 13:03:31 2010
New Revision: 165422
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165422
Log:
2010-10-13 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45788
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor 2010-10-13
12:42:04 UTC ---
This might be a duplicate of PR 45874 which has just been fixed. Can you
please try it again with the current trunk? Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45996
--- Comment #3 from Udo Steinberg 2010-10-13
12:19:57 UTC ---
According to the gcc manpage:
-Os disables the following optimization flags: -falign-functions
-falign-jumps -falign-loops -falign-labels -freorder-blocks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45996
--- Comment #2 from Udo Steinberg 2010-10-13
12:06:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 22029
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22029
Testcase
gcc -Os -falign-functions=32 foo.cc -o foo
nm foo | c++filt | grep func_
004004f6 T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46004
Summary: [C++0x] template constructor used to copy object
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45967
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-13
11:54:58 UTC ---
Testcase:
extern void abort (void);
void __attribute__((noinline,noclone))
foo (void *p_)
{
int *p;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < sizeof(int *); ++i)
((char *)&p)[i] = ((char *)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46003
Summary: cond5.C fails for ARM EABI tests.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
--- Comment #83 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-10-13 11:42:45 UTC ---
> My patch is not finished and doesn't bootstrap, I'll look at it (promised)
> next
> weekend. I suggest just using BOOT_CFLAGS="-O2 -fno-forward-propagate".
I'll gi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41359
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-07-28 20:01:09 |2010-10-13 20:01:09
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45982
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.2, 4.6.0
Summary|[4.3/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45982
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-13
11:33:54 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 13 11:33:51 2010
New Revision: 165419
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165419
Log:
2010-10-13 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45982
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-13
11:31:26 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 13 11:31:22 2010
New Revision: 165418
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165418
Log:
2010-10-13 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46002
Summary: ICE: in update_copy_costs, at ira-color.c:319 with
-fira-algorithm=priority
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46001
Summary: [4.6 Regression] diagnostic refers to type
'__java_boolean'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45874
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45874
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-13
10:06:33 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 13 10:06:28 2010
New Revision: 165416
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165416
Log:
2010-10-13 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46000
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43628
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #9 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45856
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45999
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-13
09:42:58 UTC ---
Reduced
#include
int main()
{
std::vector b(4);
b.push_back(1);
return 0;
}
There's no pretty printer for vector
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46000
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-13
09:31:57 UTC ---
Hmm, that looks like PR 44645, which is fixed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45999
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46000
Summary: runtime error in std::set python pretty printer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45996
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-13
09:10:05 UTC ---
Works for me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45999
Summary: runtime error in std::vector python pretty printer.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45874
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23214
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23214
--- Comment #9 from Nicola Pero 2010-10-13 08:16:44
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Wed Oct 13 08:16:42 2010
New Revision: 165414
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165414
Log:
In libobjc/:
2010-10-13 Nicola Pero
PR l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45998
Ozkan Sezer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sezeroz at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45998
Summary: libgfortran/io/write.c: warning: discards 'const'
qualifier from pointer target
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
