--- Comment #38 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2009-12-23 07:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=19378)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19378&action=view)
Force alignment of reduce only
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41082
--- Comment #37 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2009-12-23 07:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=19377)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19377&action=view)
Force alignment but don't vectorize
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41082
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 07:54 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
--- Comment #36 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2009-12-23 07:54 ---
Thanks!
So, it is alignment of the vectorized arrays. I'd like to do two more checks:
1. Just force alignment of the two arrays (temp and reduce) and do not
vectorize.
2. Force alignment of reduce only (and vectorize bo
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 07:53 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #11 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 07:53 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 07:53 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
--- Comment #8 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 07:52 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
--- Comment #8 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 07:51 ---
Subject: Bug 42180
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 23 07:51:05 2009
New Revision: 155423
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155423
Log:
Fix PR42180.
2009-12-18 Sebastian Pop
PR middle-end/42
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 07:51 ---
Subject: Bug 42180
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 23 07:50:53 2009
New Revision: 155422
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155422
Log:
Fix PR42180.
2009-12-18 Sebastian Pop
PR middle-end/42
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 07:51 ---
Subject: Bug 42393
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 23 07:50:43 2009
New Revision: 155421
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155421
Log:
Fix PR42393.
2009-12-17 Sebastian Pop
PR middle-end/42
--- Comment #8 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 07:51 ---
Subject: Bug 42186
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 23 07:50:32 2009
New Revision: 155420
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155420
Log:
Fix PR42186.
2009-12-17 Sebastian Pop
PR middle-end/42
--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 07:50 ---
Subject: Bug 42205
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 23 07:50:22 2009
New Revision: 155419
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155419
Log:
Fix PR42205.
2009-12-17 Sebastian Pop
PR middle-end/4
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 07:50 ---
Subject: Bug 42178
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 23 07:50:12 2009
New Revision: 155418
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155418
Log:
Fix PR42334: correct the update of the LST on loop interchange and
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 07:50 ---
Subject: Bug 42334
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 23 07:50:12 2009
New Revision: 155418
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155418
Log:
Fix PR42334: correct the update of the LST on loop interchange and
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 07:50 ---
Subject: Bug 42181
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 23 07:50:00 2009
New Revision: 155417
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155417
Log:
Fix PR42181.
2009-12-14 Sebastian Pop
PR middle-end/42
--- Comment #46 from sodiumgood at gmail dot com 2009-12-23 07:09 ---
*** Bug 42473 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
sodiumgood at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from sodiumgood at gmail dot com 2009-12-23 07:09 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 57 ***
--
sodiumgood at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #8 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 07:04 ---
Subject: Bug 42221
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 23 07:04:32 2009
New Revision: 155416
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155416
Log:
Revert patch for PR42221.
2009-12-18 Sebastian Pop
Rev
--- Comment #1 from sodiumgood at gmail dot com 2009-12-23 06:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=19376)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19376&action=view)
preproccessed file of the codes that produce the errors
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42473
The compiler failed to parse the template syntax in the line:
Derived(int arg0 = Base::var){}
which is a constructor definition of the class called Derived.
However, if we replace 'Base' with an alias, the error no longer occurs:
typedef Base B
Derived(int arg0 = B::var){}
If Base has thre
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 06:04 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155333
broke bootstrap on the Graphite branch. I will revert this and rework on the
patch for fixing this PR.
Sebastian
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
I have two variables in the Class primes i,p and they are assigned with values
in the constructor but they are not reflected in the method isprimes.
pr4.h
#include
#include
#include
#include
using namespace std;
#define MAX 65535
class primes {
typedef unsigned long ulong;
ulong pr[MAX];
The following C++ code compiles and executes correctly:
#include
using namespace std;
class Base
{
int i;
public:
Base(): i( -1 ) { cout << "Base()" << endl; }
Base( int a ) : i( a ) { cout << "Base(int), i: " << i << endl; }
Base( Base& b ) { i = b.i; cout <
The C++ code:
#include
using namespace std;
class Base
{
int i;
public:
Base(): i( -1 ) { cout << "Base()" << endl; }
Base( int a ) : i( a ) { cout << "Base(int), i: " << i << endl; }
Base( Base& b ) { i = b.i; cout << "Base(Base&), i: " << i << endl; }
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-23 00:53 ---
It is caused by revision 154402:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-11/msg00623.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42395
--- Comment #3 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 00:45 ---
Fixed in 4.5. Not going to apply the fix to the branches.
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 00:31 ---
Subject: Bug 42260
Author: dodji
Date: Wed Dec 23 00:31:33 2009
New Revision: 155415
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155415
Log:
Fix PR c++/42260
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/42260
--- Comment #3 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 00:22
---
Confirmed.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #4 from ccoutant at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 00:15
---
Caused a regression: If !text_section_used, would omit the DW_AT_ranges
attribute from the compile_unit DIE.
--
ccoutant at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 00:13
---
Confirmed.
It also crashes on i686-pc-linux-gnu if you add -msse2 to the command line.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #10 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 23:46
---
Fixed.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIG
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 23:17 ---
Subject: Bug 42466
Author: jason
Date: Tue Dec 22 23:16:46 2009
New Revision: 155411
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155411
Log:
PR c++/42466
* pt.c (reduce_template_parm_level):
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 23:16 ---
Subject: Bug 42331
Author: jason
Date: Tue Dec 22 23:16:38 2009
New Revision: 155410
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155410
Log:
PR c++/42331
* typeck.c (cp_build_modify_expr): F
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40657
--- Comment #13 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 22:39 ---
Can't reproduce with trunk or release branches for the attached testcase.
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 22:36 ---
Updating summary and Component.
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-22 22:15
---
Doesn't link with 4.5.0. And doesn't link with ICC and SunStudio either, thus,
I'm rather skeptical it should. I also skimmed quickly through the discussion
on comp.lang.c++ and didn't notice any neat statement
--- Comment #7 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 22:11 ---
Subject: Bug 41605
Author: janis
Date: Tue Dec 22 22:11:27 2009
New Revision: 155408
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155408
Log:
2009-12-22 Iain Sandoe
gcc/
PR target/41605
*
--- Comment #4 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 22:06 ---
Can't reproduce with 4.3 branch, 4.4 branch , trunk and arm-eabi / arm-elf
Tested with
-O2 , -O3 , -Os
-march=armv5te, armv4t , armv7-a
-marm -mthumb
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #6 from H9XLrv5oXVNvHiUI at spambox dot us 2009-12-22 21:52
---
Did anyone try this against 4.5? Considering that at this stage only bugfixes
are accepted in the codebase for the next release I'd really like to see a
possible fix to this in. I tried to compile GCC 4.5 on my
--- Comment #4 from hutchinsonandy at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 21:20
---
Testsuite fails all lto/whopr tests:
Example:
Executing on host: /media/verbatim/gcchead/obj-dir/gcc/xgcc
-B/media/verbatim/gcchead/obj-dir/gcc/
/media/verbatim/gcchead/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/ex
--- Comment #3 from hutchinsonandy at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 21:18
---
Created an attachment (id=19375)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19375&action=view)
PATCH to add avr-c.c
Here is patch that I believe moves out the C related stuff to avr-c.
builtin_defi
--- Comment #20 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 21:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=19374)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19374&action=view)
patch to turn off multiple inclusion guard for fenv.h C++ wrapper
Comment #18 confirms #13.
It is probably suff
--- Comment #5 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 20:49 ---
Patch posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg01044.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42398
Here are also gcc --help=fortran lines where localization fails. At the
beginning translated text is not shown and later on the option string is shown
twice.
#: c.opt:42
msgid ""
"Assert the to . Putting '-' before disables "
"the to "
A
C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Joined Separate
-A= Assert the to
--- Comment #3 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 20:26 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> The only reason for keeping the old predication-based code is that it can
> handle an important case that the generic code cannot. Specifically, it can
> conditionally skip a call to a func
--- Comment #6 from gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net 2009-12-22 19:52
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> It would be nice if could provide a manageable reproducer. Did you try delta
> already?
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction
>
> Thanks in advance.
Do you know
Here is another bug like 42467
#: java/lang.opt:81
msgid "Deprecated; use --classpath instead"
fCLASSPATH=
Java JoinedOrMissing RejectNegative
--CLASSPATH Deprecated; use --classpath instead
There are 4 other that kind bugs. Diffs for all 5 are here below:
< msgid "Deprecated; use --classp
--- Comment #1 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 19:47
---
Proposed patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg01032.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41757
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 19:32 ---
Or wait most are done that way ...
Looks like the way .pot is generated is incorrect .
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42467
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 19:31 ---
All the *.opt are done that way.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42467
The file gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot includes lines:
#: ada/gcc-interface/lang.opt:100
msgid "Specify options to GNAT"
msgstr "Translation with any language"
But file ada/gcc-interface/lang.opt includes the following lines:
gnat
Ada Joined
-gnat Specify options to GNAT
Therefore, the following fix s
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 19:05 ---
Patch posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg01040.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42366
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 18:51 ---
The bug (which I didn't know from the documentation) is that -mvsx -mno-altivec
is not a valid combination but is not reported as an error. Instead the
compiler accepts it and then generates invalid code.
--
http
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-22 18:29
---
Maybe Jason is willing to have a look. If it's legal, and I think it is, it's a
pity that g++ users can't write this type of nifty constructor.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
Wh
--- Comment #12 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-12-22
18:29 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> I tried to build gcc on darwin to debug this but the build fails with a link
> failure (sorry, don't remember exactly where). Do I need to do something
> special to build on dar
--- Comment #5 from gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net 2009-12-22 18:22
---
U(In reply to comment #4)
> Also you might want to try 4.4.2 which has fixed some TOC related ICEs.
>
Unfortunately, I am stuck with this version but I will try that to find out if
it does fix the issue to make
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 18:21 ---
Confirmed, not a regression as far as I can tell either.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 18:19 ---
Mine
--
jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 18:18 ---
Subject: Bug 42357
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Dec 22 18:17:53 2009
New Revision: 155403
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155403
Log:
Backport testcases from mainline.
2009-12-22 H.J. Lu
Bac
--- Comment #21 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 18:18 ---
Subject: Bug 42225
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Dec 22 18:17:53 2009
New Revision: 155403
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155403
Log:
Backport testcases from mainline.
2009-12-22 H.J. Lu
Ba
--- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 18:18 ---
Subject: Bug 42386
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Dec 22 18:17:53 2009
New Revision: 155403
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155403
Log:
Backport testcases from mainline.
2009-12-22 H.J. Lu
Ba
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 18:18 ---
Subject: Bug 42358
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Dec 22 18:17:53 2009
New Revision: 155403
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155403
Log:
Backport testcases from mainline.
2009-12-22 H.J. Lu
Bac
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 18:16 ---
Also you might want to try 4.4.2 which has fixed some TOC related ICEs.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #16 from mdorey at bluearc dot com 2009-12-22 18:12 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> you missed the part where I said "but 0 is still a valid definition of NULL"
(I didn't quote it but I did explicitly agree with it.)
> You claimed in comment 12 that the compiler will be *re
--- Comment #3 from gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net 2009-12-22 18:11
---
Nope, I did not. Will take a look.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42465
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-22 18:10
---
It would be nice if could provide a manageable reproducer. Did you try delta
already?
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction
Thanks in advance.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com chan
The test code:
template
struct A
{
IntT val_;
A() : val_(X) {}
A(IntT arg) : val_(arg) {}
template
A(const A& other) : val_(other.val_) {}
};
int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
A a;
A b = a;
A c;
A d = c;
A e;
A f = e;
}
fails to compile on gcc 4.3.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42335
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42257
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42284
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42354
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41235
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42373
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42144
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32280
--- Comment #5 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-12-22 17:49 ---
For me it's fine to close it, however note that 2161 was reported on a
(generated) real-world program. I don't know whether there were really 11,000
else-ifs in the real-world program, probably not.
--
http://gcc.gnu.o
--- Comment #3 from ccoutant at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 17:45
---
Fixed at r155402.
--
ccoutant at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
St
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42422
--- Comment #2 from ccoutant at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 17:38
---
Subject: Bug 42454
Author: ccoutant
Date: Tue Dec 22 17:37:57 2009
New Revision: 155402
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155402
Log:
PR debug/42454
* dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_fi
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42456
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-22 17:31 ---
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 17:18 ---
Jakub: Agreed. How can we resolve/close/etc this bug?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40760
--- Comment #1 from gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net 2009-12-22 17:12
---
Created an attachment (id=19373)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19373&action=view)
The output of -save-temps
Zip file. Unfortunately files were too big to attach so I had to compress them.
I am experiencing the above error when compiling a Boost Math test. The output
of g++ -v is below and I will attach the preprocessed sources.
/usr/bin/g++ -v -save-temps -o
build/debug/vendor/boost_1_39_0/libs/math/octonion/octonion_test.o -c -Wall
-Wno-unused -maix32 -O0 -ffloat-store -g -pthread
--- Comment #35 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-12-22 16:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=19372)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19372&action=view)
result of "gfc -O3 -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=9
/opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execut
--- Comment #34 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-12-22 16:56 ---
The patch in comment #32 (without the one in comment #31) does fix the pr:
[karma] f90/bug% gfc -O3 -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=2 where_2.f90
where_2.f90:11: note: LOOP VECTORIZED.
where_2.f90:11: note: not vectorize
--- Comment #33 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-12-22 16:42 ---
> Dominique, could you please check this?
The patch in comment #31 fixes this pr:
[karma] f90/bug% gfc -O3 -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=2 where_2.f90
where_2.f90:11: note: LOOP VECTORIZED.
where_2.f90:11: note: not v
--- Comment #5 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 16:35 ---
Testing this patch. Thumb2 can't have signed numbers in the tbh instruction.
Index: arm.h
===
--- arm.h (revision 155371)
+++ arm.h (working
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 16:29 ---
And one can always bump the stack limit if needed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40760
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 16:27 ---
*** Bug 42464 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42463
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 16:27 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42463 ***
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Hello,
I think, the second word here below is wrong.
#: params.def:55
msgid "Maximal esitmated outcome of branch considered predictable"
Best regards,
Jorma K.
--
Summary: A typo with "estimated" word in gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot
file
Product: gcc
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-22 15:58
---
Fixed.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 15:58 ---
Subject: Bug 42463
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Dec 22 15:58:10 2009
New Revision: 155400
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155400
Log:
2009-12-22 Paolo Carlini
PR driver/42463
* pa
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |paolo dot carlini at oracle
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from karvonen dot jorma at gmail dot com 2009-12-22 15:38
---
Subject: Re: A typo with "estimated" word in
gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot file
OK, wrong Component from me then.
2009/12/22 paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com :
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from paolo dot car
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
