--- Comment #13 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-05-24 04:34
---
*** Bug 40231 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39738
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-05-24 04:34
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 39738 ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Hi, I meet some trouble in build GCC on Ubuntu 9.04.
I have the same question: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39738
I use cross mingw: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-cross/
My configure is:
../../src/gcc/configure --enable-languages=c,c++
--enable-cxx-flags='-fno-function-secti
--- Comment #2 from cortez8591 at gmail dot com 2009-05-23 21:28 ---
what's wrong ? no more details were put e.g. here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37179
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40226
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-23 17:23 ---
Related to PR24985?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40228
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-23 17:21 ---
Also works for me with 3.3.6. I guess your "propolice" changes cause this
error.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40229
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-23 17:20 ---
Works for me with 4.3.3. GCC 3.3.5 is no longer maintained (you can try
3.3.6).
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-23 16:37 ---
But maybe you want to return a const reference in get() anyway. It's also
fixed
in 4.4 and 4.5 where even with <50> it compiles instantly.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-23 16:19 ---
This is the effect of inlining that no longer completely happens with <30>.
You can fix it with
struct TermBase {
term_t obj;
term_t get() __attribute__((flatten)) {
return obj;
}
};
note the fl
With -O2, the source code below takes too much time (about 20s) to compile.
If I change the typedef as follows, compile finishes instantly.
- typedef BigTerm<30> term_t;
+ typedef BigTerm<29> term_t;
I tried to shorten the code as short as possible, so changing almost any part
of it will cause the
--- Comment #59 from dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com 2009-05-23
14:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=17909)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17909&action=view)
D'oh. Quick respin.
Huh. Alignment is passed to the backend as number of bits, but of course the
--- Comment #2 from ludo at ludikidee dot com 2009-05-23 14:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=17908)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17908&action=view)
source file that generated the error
this file generated a compiler segmentation fault when compiling under:
Readin
--- Comment #1 from ludo at ludikidee dot com 2009-05-23 14:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=17907)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17907&action=view)
.i file
.i file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40229
cc -Wall -save-temps -I/usr/local/include -c test1.c
test1.c: In function `main':
test1.c:43: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
c.c: error: "cc -Wall -save-temps
Hi,
I think it would be useful to display the preprocessed line with errors (in
C/C++ in my case) for those occasions when the problem is related to a macro
going wrong.I suggest this would be an option since most of the time you
wouldn't want it.
Crawling through the output of gcc -E and
--- Comment #58 from dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com 2009-05-23
11:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=17906)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17906&action=view)
Revised patch
Revised version of the patch that defines the autoconf feature test macro to
0/1 rat
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-23 11:42 ---
AFAIK, P3 regressions cannot be "enhancement", setting
severity to "normal".
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from loaden at gmail dot com 2009-05-23 09:46 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Are you sure your entire compiler is up to date, not just the library? And
> > the
> > build and install directories are clean? Because your first lines of failure
>
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-23 09:23 ---
Hm, with my fix for PR36327 there is now a natural place to do this in SCCVN.
The question is how to properly get to the desired value. We have (bit
access ranges):
c.[0..31] = 20;
... = c.[0..7];
... = c.[8..1
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-23 09:15
---
And for 4.4.1.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work
20 matches
Mail list logo
