--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-17 03:52 ---
Been fixed for a while now.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-05-17 02:17 ---
With this patch to verify alignment of caller-save slot:
Index: caller-save.c
===
--- caller-save.c (revision 2603)
+++ caller-save.c (work
--- Comment #17 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-17 02:04 ---
For cris-axis-elf, this was fixed on the branch with (e.g.) r135125 (never saw
a problem on trunk, FWIW, previous erroneous branch revision was r135087),
matching dje's reversion of bonzin's patch, so I'm closing this.
setup_save_areas calls assign_stack_local to allocate a stack
slot for a hard register in the widest mode. assign_stack_local
has
if (align == 0)
{
tree type;
if (mode == BLKmode)
alignment = BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT;
else
alignment = GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (mode
--- Comment #28 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-17 00:01
---
(In reply to comment #25)
> Reopened per new testcase.
Please open a new bug for that testcase.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
libgcj 4.3.0 as well as 3.4.3 and probably everything inbetween will get OOM on
this simple program when run on glibc based systems:
-->8--
import java.io.UnsupportedEncodingException;
public class TextProb
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
try {
byte
--- Comment #3 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2008-05-16 22:10 ---
Subject: Re: PUBLIC and PRIVATE abuse
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 09:58:47PM -, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> And using
>
> bind(C) :: a
Nice catch.
> gives even an ICE. For PUBLI
--- Comment #2 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2008-05-16 22:01 ---
Subject: Re: PUBLIC and PRIVATE abuse
I have a patch for this. It simply issues a warning
because it appears to be benign.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36251
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 21:58 ---
And using
bind(C) :: a
gives even an ICE. For PUBLIC and PRIVATE, see the patch below. "save" and
"value" are not needed they give already the error "Cannot change attributes of
USE-associated symbol a". (My hope
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-05-16 21:54 ---
find_reloads in reload.c has
/* Special case a simple move with an input reload and a
destination of a hard reg, if the hard reg is ok, use it. */
for (i = 0; i < n_reloads; i++)
if (rld[i].when_neede
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 21:12 ---
Subject: Bug 35743
Author: pault
Date: Fri May 16 21:12:04 2008
New Revision: 135443
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135443
Log:
2008-05-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 21:12 ---
Subject: Bug 35759
Author: pault
Date: Fri May 16 21:12:04 2008
New Revision: 135443
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135443
Log:
2008-05-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 21:12 ---
Subject: Bug 35756
Author: pault
Date: Fri May 16 21:12:04 2008
New Revision: 135443
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135443
Log:
2008-05-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 21:12 ---
Subject: Bug 35745
Author: pault
Date: Fri May 16 21:12:04 2008
New Revision: 135443
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135443
Log:
2008-05-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sgk at troutmask dot apl dot
|
gfortran compiles the following
module a
implicit none
integer :: i = 42
end module a
module b
use a
implicit none
private
public a ! <-- Is this legal? Can change to private, too.
end module b
program c
use b
implicit none
end program c
Lahey's syntax checker gives
Lahey
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 20:00 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This patch works for me:
Note we also need to check expression_list does not have a TREE_CHAIN.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36089
--- Comment #26 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 19:54 ---
FIXED on the trunk (4.4.0)
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #25 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 19:50 ---
Subject: Bug 27997
Author: burnus
Date: Fri May 16 19:50:04 2008
New Revision: 135439
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135439
Log:
2008-04-16 Daniel Kraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fort
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 19:45
---
Is this fixed on the branch?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36182
--- Comment #40 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 19:44
---
What is the status of this bug on the 4.3 branch?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36194
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36245
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36238
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 19:39 ---
Also, note that a workaround is to put the native method after
a non-native method.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36247
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36227
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36206
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36198
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36143
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36128
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3 |P2
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36099
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 19:36 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36057
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36038
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 19:33
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
quot;
Linux K72 2.6.22-14-server #1 SMP Tue Feb 12 03:10:53 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>From the messages of make bootstrap,
$ cat nohup.out |cut -c 1-60
...
GNATLINK 4.4.0 20080516 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 1995-2008, Free Software Foundation, Inc.
xgcc -c -gnatA -gnatWb -gnatiw -B../.
--- Comment #6 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-05-16 19:09 ---
There is still underlying RA problem left. Compiling the testcase from Comment
0 on 32bit i686 (-O2 -msse2), we get:
_mm_set_epi32:
pushl %ebp
movl%esp, %ebp
movd8(%ebp), %xmm0
mo
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 19:03 ---
in build_jni_stub, build_class_ref returns NULL because
this_classdollar is NULL.
Probably we should call cache_this_class_ref here, but that
would mean making java_add_stmt work in the jni stub case.
--
http://
--- Comment #7 from info at yourkit dot com 2008-05-16 19:00 ---
*** Bug 36248 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
info at yourkit dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #3 from info at yourkit dot com 2008-05-16 19:00 ---
Actually it's a dumb shit that make doesn't modify LD_LIBRARY_PATH. It will be
so naturally... For what purpose do we specify --with-mpfr-lib specified?
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35577 ***
--
info
--- Comment #5 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-05-16 18:58 ---
Fixed.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 18:34 ---
Subject: Bug 36246
Author: uros
Date: Fri May 16 18:34:04 2008
New Revision: 135437
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135437
Log:
PR target/36246
* config/i386/i386.h (SECONDARY_MEM
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 18:23 ---
Confirmed
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 17:54 ---
I just fixed this bug in reload1.c this week for the PS3 toolchain, I will
forward port the patch.
This is related to PR 26826.
Index: ../../gcc/reload1.c
==
--- Comment #10 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 17:43 ---
Subject: Bug 25561
Author: jb
Date: Fri May 16 17:42:44 2008
New Revision: 135433
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135433
Log:
Part 1.1 of PR25561.
2008-05-15 Janne Blomqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #14 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 17:38 ---
Subject: Bug 35632
Author: jb
Date: Fri May 16 17:37:30 2008
New Revision: 135432
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135432
Log:
Fix fallout from part 1 of PR25561 patch.
2008-05-16 Janne Blomqvist
--- Comment #2 from info at yourkit dot com 2008-05-16 17:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=15646)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15646&action=view)
config.log with error
I've attached config.log. It contains a message that libmpfr.so cannot be
loaded, but --with-mpf
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 16:47
---
Closing this. I doubt we can get them all but this gets quite a few more
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 16:46 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 16:45
---
Subject: Bug 34325
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri May 16 16:44:28 2008
New Revision: 135428
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135428
Log:
2008-05-16 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
gcc-4.3-20080515
binutils-2.18
Configured with:
target=m68k-elf --enable-threads \
--disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp --disable-libgomp \
--disable-libstdcxx-pch --with-arch=cf --disable-threads \
--with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-checking \
--disable-shared --with
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 15:53 ---
look at config.log inside $(target)/libgcc directory.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
I'm trying to compile gcc-4.3
Here is my configuration details
/home/vova/tmp/gcc-4.3.0/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-4.3.0
--enable-threads=posix --disable-checking --disable-libunwind-exceptions
--with-system-zlib --with-gmp=/opt/gmp-4.2.2 --with-mpfr=/opt/mpfr-2.3.1
--enable-__cxa_atexit --enabl
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de 2008-05-16 15:27 ---
Subject: Re: maxloc_bounds_[457].f90 fail with
-fdefault-integer-8
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 21:48 +, janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-15
--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-05-16 12:12 ---
Patch in testing:
Index: i386.h
===
--- i386.h (revision 135408)
+++ i386.h (working copy)
@@ -1516,6 +1516,14 @@
#define SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED(
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 11:12
---
C testcase:
struct A {
int i;
};
struct B {
struct A a;
int j;
};
int foo (struct A *p, struct B *q)
{
p->i = 0;
q->j = 1;
return p->i;
}
we should optimize this to return zero.
The reasoning is tha
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 10:00 ---
So on the trunk we have the same issue, we get a non-pointer parts->base.
We have the affine combination
{
type = unsigned int
offset = 0
elements = {
[0] = &buf2 * 1,
[1] = p_36 * 1,
[2] = &buf
When compiling a simple java file with gcj the compiler output a segfault.
After several test and simplifications, it appears that the conditions of this
failure is:
- Use the -findirect-dispatch flag
- Use the --jni flag
- The class contains at last one jni method
- The class contains at last one
: posix
gcc version 4.3.1 20080516 (prerelease) (GCC)
also for http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-05/msg01383.html
So I guess 4.3.1 is really fixed? I'm now trying i686 for trunk ...
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #2 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-05-16 08:35 ---
It is actually a target issue. SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED_MODE should be defined
to handle this. From reload.c:
rtx
get_secondary_mem (rtx x ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, enum machine_mode mode,
int opnum, enum reloa
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-05-16 08:14 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] internal compiler
error: in build2_stat, at tree.c:3116
On Fri, 16 May 2008, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-05-16 00:4
--- Comment #9 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 08:12 ---
Patch with some improvements for part 1 here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-05/msg00924.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25561
63 matches
Mail list logo
