--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 02:08 ---
I have a fix.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|un
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 01:32 ---
*** Bug 33586 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 01:32 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 31955 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 01:28 ---
This used to work in GCC 4.0.0 and 4.1.0.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
gcc_release is supposed to generate html files in HTML/ from
gcc/doc/install.texi for release candidates and final releases. This doesn't
happen since GCC 4.2.0
--
Summary: gcc_release does not generate HTML files from install
manual
Product: gcc
--- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 01:24 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This doesn't work in 4.2.0 but it did in 4.1.0
>
Forget this. Wrong tab.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 01:23 ---
This doesn't work in 4.2.0 but it did in 4.1.0
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
For explanation and patch see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg01735.html
--
Summary: make html does not work for install files
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
Executing on host: /xxx/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-B/
xxx/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../
/xxx/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/
gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_4.f90 -O -S -o
integer_exponentiation_4.
s(timeout = 600)
/xxx/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfor
Executing on host: /xxx/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-B/
xxx/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../
/xxx/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/
gfortran.dg/gamma_1.f90 -O0 -pedantic-errors
-L/xxx/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa1.1-
hp-hpux10.20/./libgfortran/.libs
-L/xxx/gnu/gcc/objdir/h
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 22:42 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 22:41 ---
Subject: Bug 33347
Author: pinskia
Date: Fri Sep 28 22:41:20 2007
New Revision: 128874
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128874
Log:
2007-09-28 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR ta
--- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-09-28 22:06 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 33198
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg02041.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #10 from dir at lanl dot gov 2007-09-28 20:34 ---
I have tried twice, but I cannot get the testsuite to work. After I added
"--enable-checking", The "make -k check-fortran" does a little and fails with -
ERROR:runtest.exe does not exit.
I not sure what is happening - it was
--- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-28 19:45 ---
Bugzilla is for *bugs* and this is not a bug. I would suggest sending a message
to the gcc-help mailing list.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from atamotua at comcast dot net 2007-09-28 19:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=14265)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14265&action=view)
point.h file... text
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33582
--- Comment #1 from atamotua at comcast dot net 2007-09-28 19:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=14264)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14264&action=view)
this is the checkers.cc file...
here's the .cc file... one other detail i need to mention is that it include
i have a "checkers.cc" and a "point.h" files from a long time ago when i was in
Cal State Univ in cs420 class... for some reason i dont have the compiled
checkers.exe program so i would like to be able to recompile it and make it
work... now i'm mostly on Windows XP platfoms... what would i need,
--- Comment #19 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 18:21
---
I believe that empty base optimization doesn't work for virtual inheritance.
Whether this is a GCC specific problem or a general fact I don't know.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31863
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 18:11 ---
Fixed for 4.3.0.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASS
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 18:08 ---
Subject: Bug 10179
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 28 18:07:57 2007
New Revision: 128871
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128871
Log:
PR c++/10179
* class.c (layout_empty_base): Take
--- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-28 17:53 ---
Fixed.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 17:52 ---
Subject: Bug 33213
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Sep 28 17:52:22 2007
New Revision: 128870
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128870
Log:
cp/
2007-09-28 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c+
--- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-28 17:45 ---
On it.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot g
--- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-28 17:04 ---
Short term at least, could be considered a duplicate of PR32256 (and PR32368).
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 16:56
---
Fixed on trunk
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Sta
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 16:55
---
Subject: Bug 33400
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Sep 28 16:55:07 2007
New Revision: 128868
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128868
Log:
2007-09-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 16:31 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from andrew dot stubbs at st dot com 2007-09-28 16:28
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> When -pedantic is not given (the default) a pedwarn is an hard error. A
> pedwarn
> becomes a warning when -permissive is passes (and the code is thus accepted as
> an extension, which I
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-28 16:20 ---
About the behavior when -fpermissive is passed - essentially, removing the
default and going ahead, I followed the other pedwarn in the same function -
but the alternate behavior, not doing anything special and just going a
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 16:18 ---
Subject: Bug 31434
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 28 16:17:58 2007
New Revision: 128867
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128867
Log:
PR c++/31434
* tree.c (cp_build_qualified_type_re
--- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-28 16:11 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I'm not a GCC expert, but that patch looks like it will silently change the
> behaviour of the compiler when -pedantic is not given.
When -pedantic is not given (the default) a pedwarn is an hard
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-28 16:01 ---
My patch for PR33461 fixes this one too ;)
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from andrew dot stubbs at st dot com 2007-09-28 16:00
---
I'm not a GCC expert, but that patch looks like it will silently change the
behaviour of the compiler when -pedantic is not given.
I would suggest that the first parameter should either be a regular,
non-pedantic
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 15:48 ---
It transpires that the fix that I used for use associated, derived type
parameters works here too:
Index: gcc/fortran/primary.c
===
*** gcc/fortran/prima
--- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-28 15:46 ---
Patch at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg01551.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31747
--- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-28 15:43 ---
Patch at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg01711.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31988
--- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-28 15:42 ---
Patch at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg01674.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30659
--- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-28 15:40 ---
Patch at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg01933.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31446
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-28 15:39 ---
Patch at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg01999.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33461
--- Comment #2 from boris dot gubenko at hp dot com 2007-09-28 15:34
---
Created an attachment (id=14263)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14263&action=view)
bzip2'ed preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33580
Dear Sir,
Good Morning!
We are Chinese manufacturer of woven polypropylene bags, bulk bags,
sandbags, box bags which are widely used in the packing of rice,
pulse, bean, grain, seed, feed, fish or shrimp meals, flour,
fertilizer, sugar, salt, chemicals, cement, charcoal, industrial, etc.
We could
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-28 15:10 ---
Fixed.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 15:10 ---
Subject: Bug 33118
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Sep 28 15:10:13 2007
New Revision: 128866
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128866
Log:
2007-09-28 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/33
--- Comment #25 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 14:45 ---
Fixed now.
--
matz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #24 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 13:33 ---
Subject: Bug 33552
Author: matz
Date: Fri Sep 28 13:33:09 2007
New Revision: 128865
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128865
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/33552
* gcc.target/i386/pr3355
--- Comment #23 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 13:32 ---
Subject: Bug 33552
Author: matz
Date: Fri Sep 28 13:31:50 2007
New Revision: 128864
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128864
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/33552
* function.c (match_asm_
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 13:25 ---
Moved to libgomp testsuite where it belongs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128863
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 12:59 ---
Honza, as only foo$ptr is marked for renaming and that from
update_ssa_across_eh_edges (), maybe this is a latent problem with inlining
and EH info? Can you have a look?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #6 from haubi at gentoo dot org 2007-09-28 12:52 ---
More analysis (solution (?) at the end):
Compared gmake's debug-output from powerpc-aix5.3 to x86-gentoo-linux:
x86-gentoo-linux:
<<<
Considering target file `build/genmodes'.
File `build/genmodes' does not exist.
Looki
See
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-09/msg00401.html
--- Nick Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:55:13 +0100
> From: Nick Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Sjei Ryhstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cross toolchain problem.
>
> Hi
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 12:28 ---
After inlining deallocate into main we end up with:
int main(int, char**) (argc, D.2111)
{
static struct __pool pool;
static struct __pool pool;
int * p;
struct Foo * foo$ptr;
struct Foo * D.2185;
struct
--- Comment #18 from alexander at kogan dot nnov dot ru 2007-09-28 10:14
---
Thank you very much for this workaround. Really we do not need virtual
inheritance there, we need only virtual inheritance from Factory. In this case
it works!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
--- Comment #22 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-09-28 10:04 ---
I don't think so, as you don't know which input will match the output (i.e.
whether the two inputs will be swapped) if you have a % constraint in the asm.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33552
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 09:41
---
Last patch before I stopped working on enhancing DCE:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg01978.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33562
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 09:40 ---
as is crashing. (also, 3.3.x is no longer maintained)
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 09:39 ---
Confirmed. Also happens on x86_64, -O -ftree-loop-linear. We have a freed
SSA_NAME in use:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0067da2a in extract_muldiv_1 (t=0x2b5d06c1af60, c=0x2b5d062
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 09:36 ---
What happens if you don't use -static?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 09:36 ---
-static is not really supported for glibc and pthreads/openmp.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 09:34 ---
Can you attach the preprocessed source?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33580
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 09:34 ---
Fixed according to the reporter.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 09:29 ---
Subject: Bug 31434
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 28 09:29:08 2007
New Revision: 128861
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128861
Log:
PR c++/31434
* tree.c (cp_build_qualified_type_re
--- Comment #1 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 08:57 ---
I have a patch, but I can't test it right now.
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from spollmann at gmail dot com 2007-09-28 08:22 ---
to clarify; the resultant executable of the test case above generates the
segmentation fault, not the compiler during compilation.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33581
The following code (a general case) generates a segmentation fault when
compiled with the -m32 and -fopenmp switch in gcc 4.2.1. With the -m32 switch
removed, the program executes correctly.
#include
int main()
{
int x;
#pragma omp parallel for
for (x = 0; x < 100; x++)
{
std::co
65 matches
Mail list logo
