--- Comment #1 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-09-17 05:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=12285)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12285&action=view)
seed48_r.i
reduced test case taken from glibc
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29114
attempting to cross-compile glibc-2.3.6 for the hppa2.0 target fails with an
ICE when the host system is 64bit:
$ hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -c seed48_r.i
seed48_r.i: In function 'main':
seed48_r.i:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 9 8 10 1 (set (reg:DI 95)
(plus:DI (reg:DI 96)
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-17 01:23 ---
This was caused by:
2003-04-01 Aldy Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/simd-3.c: New.
* expr.c (expand_expr): Handle VECTOR_CST.
(const_vector_from_tree): New.
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 23:45 ---
It also worked in "4.1.0 20051026".
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 23:42 ---
The front-end was produce an error_mark_node when no error had been produced.
This works on the today's mainline but failed with "4.1.2 20060814".
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|R
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 22:52 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 22:52 ---
Subject: Bug 29059
Author: pinskia
Date: Sat Sep 16 22:52:11 2006
New Revision: 116997
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116997
Log:
2006-09-16 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR tr
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 22:50 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRM
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 22:47
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFI
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||10915
Known to work||2.95.3
--- Comment #5 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-09-16 21:34 ---
Actually, it seems that the conditional on Wconversion was added before, at
revision 100541 by mmitchel (Notice the warn_conversion flag below).
@@ -8755,32 +8755,38 @@
if (operator_code == CALL_EXPR)
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 21:20 ---
Waiting for a real testcase then.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from kalium at gmx dot de 2006-09-16 21:17 ---
Like I already said, this has nothing to do with hardened extensions. Look at
my patch. It is a problem related to the parser: bad code gets produced when
"XWindowAttributes a;" is not at the beginning.
--
kalium at gmx do
--- Comment #4 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-09-16 21:14 ---
The change was made on revision 110567 on gcc/cp/decl.c
@@ -9012,7 +9011,7 @@
}
if (what)
- warning (0, "conversion to %s%s will never use a type "
+ warning (OPT_Wconversion
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 21:13 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I will not give an isolated test case, but the information on
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133301 may even help more.
SSP is not part of GCC until 4.x so we really cannot suppo
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
Known to work||3.4.0
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
Summary|[3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2|[4.0/4.1/4.2 R
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 20:57 ---
Confirmed via the dup and the testresults that I pointed to.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 20:56 ---
*** Bug 29110 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 20:56 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 29093 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #16 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2006-09-16
20:39 ---
Is this what we are waiting for? I came up with that by just placing
wrappers around the changes submitted on...
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/libjava/stacktrace.cc?r1=115069&r2=115235&pathrev=115235
--- Comment #14 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 20:07 ---
.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 20:07 ---
Note that there are other (wrong) occurances of the non gfc_*() warnings in
trans-decl.c.
These other "warning()" calls too should be converted to the respective
gfc_warning*() calls.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 20:06 ---
GNU F95 version 4.2.0 20060916 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.2.0 20060916 (experimental).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
In file
--- Comment #32 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 20:03
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] alias bug with cast and call clobbered
> --- Comment #31 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 18:09
> ---
> sec has passed.
> ping!
>
I'm down to two test
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 19:58 ---
I propose to submit Tobi's patch
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 19:57 ---
See list for choice of fixes. I will submit my favourite tomorrow.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-09-16 19:45 ---
Subject: Bug number PR25993
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-09/msg00645.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #4 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-09-16 19:45 ---
Richard,
and what is your opinion about the rest of my comment?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26298
--- Comment #13 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-09-16 19:45 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27742
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-09/msg00644.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
When a user tries to declare items e.g. at the
start of the handled_sequence_of_statements
of an accept_statment, the compiler issues
an error message. But it seems to be the default
Junk_Declaration message, which seems kind of wrong
in the following situations:
procedure errmsg is
task T is
--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 19:18 ---
(gdb) step
get_pointer_alignment (exp=0x40013108, max_align=64)
at ../../gcc/gcc/builtins.c:236
236 if (! POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (exp)))
(gdb) p debug_tree (exp)
unit size
alig
--- Comment #12 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 19:13 ---
Dorit, your comments please. If I don't hear from you I'll commit this as
obvious.
Index: tree-vectorizer.c
===
--- tree-vectorizer.c (revision 116
--- Comment #11 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 19:02 ---
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/steven/devel/build-trunk/gcc/cc1plus -O
-ftree-vectorize -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=1 --param ggc-min-expand=0 --param
ggc-min-heapsize=0 t.cc
void foo() {GC 2466k -> 2190k} void bar
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25993
--- Comment #31 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 18:09 ---
sec has passed.
ping!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28778
--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 18:03 ---
The code is wrong in the initial RTL expansion:
(insn 10 9 0 (set (reg:SI 94 [ D.1473 ])
(plus:SI (reg/f:SI 95)
(const_int 5 [0x5]))) -1 (nil)
(nil))
;; memcpy (D.1473, tp, 4)
(insn 11 10 12
--- Comment #4 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 18:02 ---
Not worth fixing.
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NE
Executing on host: /home/dave/gcc-4.2/objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/dave/gcc-4.2/objdi
r/gcc/ /home/dave/gcc-4.2/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr26565.c -O0
-fn
o-show-column -lm -o ./pr26565.exe(timeout = 300)
PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr26565.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
Setting LD_LIBRARY
--- Comment #3 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 17:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=12284)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12284&action=view)
Add diagnostic message
Attaching a copy of the patch from the initial bugreport.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-09-16 17:40 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 29087
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-09/msg00637.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #2 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 17:13 ---
This regression is a really severe defect in daily use.
Note that this works with gcc-2.95.4 but fails with any 3.x and 4.x i have.
$ gcc-2.95 -o pr.o -std=c99 -x assembler-with-cpp -c pr25993.S && objdump -D
pr.o
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.2/objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4
.2/objdir/gcc/
/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.2/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/dwar
f-file1.c -O2 -gdwarf-2 -dA -fno-show-column -S -o dwarf-file1.s(timeout
= 300)
PASS: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/dwarf-file1.c (test for
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 17:08 ---
26167, the one I added in the dependencies
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26298
--- Comment #3 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2006-09-16
17:00 ---
On reflection, I'm still confused by this problem. If the ppc64 runtime doesn't
exist earlier than Darwin 9, then shouldn't we have the entire the -m64
testsuite for
objc on Darwin <=8 bail out if you even
--- Comment #4 from kalium at gmx dot de 2006-09-16 16:54 ---
Note: the words "under hardened" in the title of the Gentoo Linux bug report
are wrong -- the problem also occurs with a plain vanilla/non-hardened gcc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29109
--- Comment #3 from kalium at gmx dot de 2006-09-16 16:52 ---
So you have a long-developed and relatively stable and good compiler and you
don't develop it any more? Not good. The 4+ branch is pretty unstable. I had
to downgrade the gcc 4.1.1 compiler on my Athlon XP and on my VIA C3 sy
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 16:43 ---
We need a self contained testcase for this issue.
Really reporting 3.4.x bugs means you will not see this fixed as 3.4.x is no
longer supported.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Rem
--- Comment #1 from kalium at gmx dot de 2006-09-16 16:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=12283)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12283&action=view)
qt-3.3.6-gcc3.patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29109
The problem becomes visible when one tries to execute kdesktop_lock in KDE
3.5.2. No problem with gcc 4.1.1.
The attached patch for qt-3.3.6 fixes the problem.
I'm running Gentoo Linux with CFLAGS="-march=athlon-xp -O2 -pipe". The
corresponding Gentoo ebuild is qt-3.3.6-r1.
--
Summa
--- Comment #2 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2006-09-16
16:33 ---
It appears this will be resolved with Leopard according to Apple's
web site.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29108
--- Comment #15 from kalium at gmx dot de 2006-09-16 16:32 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Fixed.
>
Where can I get fixes to gcc 3.4.6? (the branch is closed...)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25120
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 16:10 ---
the NeXT runtime for Objective-C does not exist at all for PPC64.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 16:07 ---
You are wrong.
There are two Objective-C runtimes.
One is the GNU runtime and one is the NeXt^wApple runtime.
Darwin defaults to the NeXt runtime.
Just PPC64 Darwin does not include a 64bit version of the NeXT Runti
When make check is run on objc built under Darwin PPC, the -m64 tests suffer
massive failures due to the absence of the proper path to the ppc64 libraries
built for gcc. This is described at...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-09/msg00285.html
--
Summary: objc testsuite at -m64 on Darw
Currently when the objc testsuite is run on Darwin PPC, the wrong (system)
libobjc is linked
in rather than the correct libobjc-gnu shared library. This problem is
described on the
gcc mailing list at...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-09/msg00286.html
and makes any test results for objc on Darwin
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29105
--- Comment #3 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 15:00 ---
more mailing list traffic on this topic:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-09/msg00210.html
--bud
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28974
--- Comment #1 from deb at pixar dot com 2006-09-16 14:18 ---
/*
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-4.0.3/configure x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
--prefix=/pixar/d2/sets/t\
ools-03 --exec-prefix=/pixar/d2/sets/tools-03
--bindir=/pixar/d2/sets/tools-03
#include
int main()
{
int* const savepos = sizeof(*savepos) ? 0 : 0;
// code for the next line is left out!
printf("size of thingy is %d\n", sizeof(*savepos));
}
Any line of code containing sizeof(*savepos) gets stripped. If you compile
and run this, nothing is printed.
--
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-16 11:55 ---
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
add_candidates (fns=0x2dd4ba20, args=0x0, explicit_targs=0x2fad4b70,
template_only=1 '\001',
conversion_path=0x0, access_path=0x0, flags=3, candidates=0x7fc
I get the following segfault with current mainline that I didn't get with
20060823:
(sid)312:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -c
adept-tagfilter.cc
adept-tagfilter.cc: In constructor 'aptFront::TagFilter::TagFilter()':
adept-tagfilter.cc:45: internal compiler error: Segmentatio
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfir
--- Comment #12 from echristo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 09:01
---
Subject: Bug 29030
Author: echristo
Date: Sat Sep 16 09:01:16 2006
New Revision: 116994
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116994
Log:
2006-09-16 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from echristo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 08:56
---
Subject: Bug 29055
Author: echristo
Date: Sat Sep 16 08:55:54 2006
New Revision: 116993
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116993
Log:
2006-09-16 Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bonzini at gnu dot org
|dot org |
--- Comment #4 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-09-16 08:19 ---
I can see what's going wrong. I'll look at it on monday.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29092
67 matches
Mail list logo
