--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 06:41
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Richard, Roger's patch for VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR folding hit mainline now.
And VCE is documented as being undefined for types of different sizes.
maybe we can produce VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR[0] but
--- Comment #6 from echristo at apple dot com 2006-08-26 06:37 ---
Patch submitted.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26999
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 05:14 ---
Actually the easy way for this to be fixed (maybe) is not to allow DImode in
the fp register class. Though that might fail as we need that to support for
converting between floating point and integers.
--
http:
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 04:45 ---
This is not target specific.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC b
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 04:48 ---
This is not target specific.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 04:37 ---
The load issue is really the same as PR 25553 and this is target independent.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 04:26 ---
This is not target specific.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC ta
--- Comment #3 from bergner at vnet dot ibm dot com 2006-08-26 04:24
---
Ok, I tracked down where the expander is swapping the operands. It's occuring
at simplify-rtx.c:simplify_binary_operation() at line 1459:
/* Make sure the constant is second. */
if (GET_RTX_CLASS (code) == RT
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 04:23 ---
powerpc-linux-gnu has the same issue with local alloc.
Actually wait this is the same as PR 25381.
extsw is needed for the ABI as slwi zeros the top 32bits.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 25381 ***
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 04:23 ---
*** Bug 25848 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25381
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 04:19 ---
;; Register 120 in 0.
;; Register 121 in 3.
;; Register 122 in 3.
(insn:HI 6 16 10 2 (set (reg/v:DI 120 [ a ])
(reg:DI 3 3 [ a ])) 331 {*movdi_internal64} (nil)
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:DI 3 3 [ a ])
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 03:58 ---
GCC only produces a .s file so this is a binutils bug or you are configuring
binutils wrong.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 03:52 ---
This is not a target specific bug either.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #8 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 03:48 ---
My fix was completely wrong. I'll try again.
The problem is that we have
function f
class s
static function g
We never walk into f. So we never find out that it contains g, and g needs a
DIE. Normally,
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 03:38 ---
I get a different failure:
t.cc:1: error: void is not a valid type for a template constant parameter
t.cc: In instantiation of const int A< >::i:
t.cc:4: instantiated from here
t.cc:4: internal compiler error:
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 02:37 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 02:36 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 02:34
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #9 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 01:26 ---
I'm looking at this.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #5 from echristo at apple dot com 2006-08-26 01:15 ---
patch in testing
--
echristo at apple dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigne
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 01:01
---
Fixed on mainline, 4.1 branch, and 4.0 branch.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:59
---
Subject: Bug 28853
Author: reichelt
Date: Sat Aug 26 00:59:09 2006
New Revision: 116466
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116466
Log:
PR c++/28853
* typeck2.c (cxx_incomplete_t
--- Comment #2 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:46
---
Subject: Bug 28853
Author: reichelt
Date: Sat Aug 26 00:45:31 2006
New Revision: 116465
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116465
Log:
PR c++/28853
* typeck2.c (cxx_incomplete_t
--- Comment #1 from coolhand2 at gmail dot com 2006-08-26 00:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=12142)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12142&action=view)
Pre-processed file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28855
Internal Compiler Error / Segmentation Fault when compiling single self-made
header file.
Compiled using cygwin g++ with no options on header file: stats.h
Actual Results: stats.h:625: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Expected: No errors of any kind to show up. Clean compile no output
--- Comment #1 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:38
---
Subject: Bug 28853
Author: reichelt
Date: Sat Aug 26 00:37:48 2006
New Revision: 116464
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116464
Log:
PR c++/28853
* typeck2.c (cxx_incomplete_t
--- Comment #2 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:30
---
Fixed on mainline. WONTFIX on the branches, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00960.html
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:27
---
Subject: Bug 28852
Author: reichelt
Date: Sat Aug 26 00:25:59 2006
New Revision: 116463
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116463
Log:
PR c++/28852
* cp-tree.h (grok_op_properti
--- Comment #7 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:27
---
Subject: Bug 27547
Author: reichelt
Date: Sat Aug 26 00:25:59 2006
New Revision: 116463
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116463
Log:
PR c++/28852
* cp-tree.h (grok_op_properti
--- Comment #10 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:25 ---
Subject: Bug 28418
Author: jsm28
Date: Sat Aug 26 00:24:31 2006
New Revision: 116461
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116461
Log:
2006-08-25 Fariborz Jahanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c
--- Comment #5 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:23 ---
Subject: Bug 28299
Author: jsm28
Date: Sat Aug 26 00:22:23 2006
New Revision: 116459
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116459
Log:
PR c/28299
* c-decl.c (start_function): Don't try
--- Comment #5 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:16 ---
Subject: Bug 27893
Author: jsm28
Date: Sat Aug 26 00:16:07 2006
New Revision: 116454
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116454
Log:
PR c/27893
* gimplify.c (gimplify_decl_expr, gimp
--- Comment #9 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:12 ---
Although the patch applies to 4.0 (with fold_build2 (...) changed to fold
(build2 (...))), a different testcase seems to be needed there.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #10 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 00:11 ---
Not working on 4.0 fix, as noted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00566.html one test fails there
with the patch applied.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #16 from echristo at apple dot com 2006-08-26 00:10 ---
Should this be closed as "unlikely to fix in 4.0"?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21308
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-08-25 23:28 ---
the 0x12668 is a last valid return point.
0x00012630 <_start+0>: br gp,0x12634 <_start+4>
0x00012634 <_start+4>: ldahgp,2(gp)
0x00012638 <_start+8>: lda gp,-31092(gp)
0x000
--- Comment #13 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 23:23 ---
Working on a fix.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|u
on alpha-linux target the unwinder reports sentinel frame.
imho it has no sense.
$ gcc testcase.c -O2; ./a.out
ip = 0x12768
ip = 0x2076860
ip = 0x12668
ip = (nil)
a.out: testcase.c:10: helper: Assertion `ip != 0' failed.
$ cat testcase.c
#include
#include
#include
#include
_Unwind
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28853
The following testcase triggers an ICE since GCC 4.0.0:
==
template class A> int A<0>::i;
==
bug.cc:1: internal compiler error: in cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic, at
cp/typeck2.c:426
Please submit a full bug r
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 23:05 ---
Subject: Bug 27893
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Aug 25 23:05:20 2006
New Revision: 116452
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116452
Log:
PR c/27893
* gimplify.c (gimplify_decl_expr, gimp
--- Comment #3 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 23:01 ---
Subject: Bug 27893
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Aug 25 23:01:16 2006
New Revision: 116450
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116450
Log:
PR c/27893
* gimplify.c (gimplify_decl_expr, gimp
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:56 ---
Please read http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html.
This is not a bug except in GCCs before 3.3.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28852
Once again (see PR27547) the C++ frontend stumbles over an invalid operator:
struct A
{
operator int&(int);
};
A a;
int& i = a;
n4.cc:3: error: 'A::operator int&(int)' must take 'void'
n4.cc:7: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please
template derived class cannot access protected variables in template base class
complier: g++ version 4.1.1
error message:
main.cpp: In constructor D::D():
main.cpp:13: error: var was not declared in this scope
(compiling with g++ version 3.2, everything is OK)
Entire test program is liste
--- Comment #9 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:52 ---
Subject: Bug 28418
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Aug 25 22:52:40 2006
New Revision: 116446
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116446
Log:
2006-08-25 Fariborz Jahanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c/
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:50 ---
Subject: Bug 28299
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Aug 25 22:50:03 2006
New Revision: 116444
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116444
Log:
PR c/28299
* c-decl.c (start_function): Don't try
--- Comment #8 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:47 ---
Subject: Bug 27558
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Aug 25 22:47:00 2006
New Revision: 116442
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116442
Log:
PR c/27558
Backport:
2006-04-20 Jakub Je
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:46
---
Backporting the patch to the branches was considered to risky, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00804.html
So closing as fixed on mainline.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:39
---
*** Bug 28372 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26963
--- Comment #3 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:39
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26963 ***
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:39
---
This was fixed on 2006-08-23, most likely by Jason's fix for PR 23372.
The testcases in PR 27159 and 28372 compile, too.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #8 from mrs at apple dot com 2006-08-25 22:27 ---
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:03:00 -0400
From: Jason Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RFA: Fix PR 28139
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is OK.
:REVIEWURL http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg01295.html:
-
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #14 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:11 ---
Testing a patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28778
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:02 ---
Fixed in 4.2.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 22:01 ---
Subject: Bug 28814
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Aug 25 22:01:28 2006
New Revision: 116439
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116439
Log:
2006-08-26 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 21:59 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It's not entirely clear from your report, but this looks like a bug of
> PR13397?
No it is not fully related. One of the problems is that we don't remove empty
finnally blocks.
Reduced t
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 21:51 ---
It's not entirely clear from your report, but this looks like a bug of PR13397?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28850
--- Comment #10 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 21:47 ---
Working on a fix.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|u
--- Comment #8 from fjahanian at apple dot com 2006-08-25 21:36 ---
I was about to sub mit the patch. Thank you for this patch.
- Fariborz
> Subject: Bug 28418
>
> Author: jsm28
> Date: Fri Aug 25 21:14:24 2006
> New Revision: 116436
>
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=
--- Comment #7 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 21:14 ---
Subject: Bug 28418
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Aug 25 21:14:24 2006
New Revision: 116436
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116436
Log:
2006-08-25 Fariborz Jahanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c/
--- Comment #3 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 21:11 ---
Subject: Bug 28299
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Aug 25 21:11:46 2006
New Revision: 116435
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116435
Log:
PR c/28299
* c-decl.c (start_function): Don't try
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 21:09 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> OK, but what is PR 2252 ?
Try http://gcc.gnu.org/PR2252.
> Simple, but it's still a bug.
Yes but not a GCC one; it is a binutils bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
--- Comment #13 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 20:57 ---
Unfortunately Diego's gone and rewritten a bunch of aliasing code since that
revision. And there's no code corresponding to where the fix went 21 months
ago. So, congratulations: we've broken this testcase twice!
I
--- Comment #12 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 20:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=12141)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12141&action=view)
Aliasing fix.
Thank you Janis for the reghunt! Not too hard to track down given that.
I haven't tested this pat
--- Comment #26 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 20:41 ---
I'm going to test the patch in Comment #25.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2006-08-25 20:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=12140)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12140&action=view)
Sample RESHAPE with missed array bounds violation
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28849
--- Comment #8 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 20:40 ---
Subject: Bug 28621
Author: pbrook
Date: Fri Aug 25 20:39:48 2006
New Revision: 116431
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116431
Log:
2006-08-25 Jan Hubicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR target
$ cat fake_bomber.cpp
struct bomber
{
bomber() : bum( false ) { }
~bomber() { if ( bum ) throw 0; } // this will never throw
private:
bool bum;
};
void zoo() { }
void bar( void ( *f )() )
{
#ifndef CALL2JMP
bomber b; // fake bomber
#endif
f();
}
void foo
The assignment of a RESHAPE()d array does not trigger
a run-time error with bounds-checking turned on.
% gfortran -O0 -g -fbounds-check gfcbug39_bounds_check.f90 && ./a.out
Assignments with correct shapes after RESHAPE...
a(:,1) = 1.00
b(:,1) = 1.00 2.00
...and wi
--- Comment #13 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-25 20:09 ---
Reduced testcase:
double copysign (double x, double y);
double GetDouble();
double a = copysign (1.0, GetDouble());
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27883
--- Comment #11 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 19:57 ---
I am looking at this.
The difference between those two compilers in t16.ssa is:
- # blist_1 = PHI ;
+ # blist_1 = PHI ;
The difference in t17.alias1 is that, plus:
-Variable: list, UID 2, int[31], is addressable,
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-25 19:38 ---
FWIW, I cannot reproduce this with gcc 4.0.4 20060730 on hppa-linux-gnu, nor
with current 4.1 or 4.2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21122
--- Comment #7 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 19:31 ---
Reproduced. Looking at this now.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from ulvinge at gmail dot com 2006-08-25 19:27 ---
OK, but what is PR 2252 ?
Nevermind, it was easy to fix...
just change
lea ebx, ebx+buffer
to
lea ebx, buffer+ebx
Simple, but it's still a bug.
I wont care.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28847
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 19:15 ---
This is not a GCC issue really but a bug in as, yes we should not report to
file a bug here but that is PR 2252.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from ulvinge at gmail dot com 2006-08-25 19:13 ---
I fogot to mention, that the line that caused the bug is this line
"\n lea ebx, ebx+buffer"
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28847
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
Component|c |target
http:
gcc.dg/noncompile/pr16876 should actually compile with a warning, rather
than fail with an error.
Some work on related issues has been done before in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg00772.html
I suppose in this code:
case ic_argpass:
case ic_argpass_nonproto:
/* ??? Th
gcc: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program as)
Please submit a full bug report.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions,
see .
This is waht gcc gives me when I compile with
clear; gcc asciiFractal3.c -masm=intel -o asciiFra
--- Comment #19 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 19:06 ---
Subject: Bug 27075
Author: dje
Date: Fri Aug 25 19:06:18 2006
New Revision: 116426
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116426
Log:
PR target/27075
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (print_oper
--- Comment #12 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-25 19:05 ---
Update: mzero6.c fails because of this ICE too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27883
--- Comment #15 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 18:57 ---
I don't think I can sort this one out. I think the easiest solution will be to
check when marking a function as reachable whether it has an abstract origin,
and if so set a flag in the abstract origin preventing its b
--- Comment #18 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 18:56 ---
patch committed.
--
dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #17 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 18:56 ---
Subject: Bug 27075
Author: dje
Date: Fri Aug 25 18:56:08 2006
New Revision: 116425
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116425
Log:
PR target/27075
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (print_oper
--- Comment #16 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 18:52
---
Subject: Bug 16876
Author: amylaar
Date: Fri Aug 25 18:51:57 2006
New Revision: 116424
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116424
Log:
gcc:
PR tree-optimization/16876
* c-typeck.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #24 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 17:41
---
*** Bug 28846 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 17:41 ---
Actually the standard as written requires this behavior, even though the copy
constructor is not called. Anyways the standard has changed with DR 391 so
this is a dup of bug 25950.
*** This bug has been marked as a
gcc version 4.1.2 20060729 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-10)
g++ wants a Moo(const Moo&) in this code:
class Moo
{
Moo() { }
Moo(const Moo&) { }
public:
Moo(int) { }
};
void xyz(const Moo &)
{
}
int main()
{
xyz(Moo(0));
return 0;
}
test.cpp:5: error: 'Mo
--- Comment #7 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 17:27 ---
Testing a fix.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27017
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-08-25 17:18 ---
I'm looking a bit into this: one puzzling thing is that the corresponding leak
as reported by valgrind amounts to *zero* bytes... It may well be that
something is wrong in the testing machinery / internal leak detection cod
--
nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |nathan at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 17:09
---
On x86-64 linux:
(gdb) set args ' as free form.
.file ""
In file :598
use ModelParams
1
Error: The derived type 'p' at (1) is of type 'pp', which has not been defined.
In file :415
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 17:05
---
Fixed in 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 17:05
---
Subject: Bug 28056
Author: mmitchel
Date: Fri Aug 25 17:05:30 2006
New Revision: 116412
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116412
Log:
PR c++/28056
* decl.c (grokdeclarator): Di
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 17:04
---
Subject: Bug 28056
Author: mmitchel
Date: Fri Aug 25 17:04:35 2006
New Revision: 116411
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116411
Log:
PR c++/28056
* g++.dg/parse/local1.C: New
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
