--- Comment #1 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 05:22
---
We also get ICE without a previous error message for the following code:
==
#pragma pack(0.5)
==
bug.c:1: internal compiler error: tree check: expected integer_cst, have
re
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 04:43
---
Fixed on mainline.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
S
--- Comment #3 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 04:42
---
Subject: Bug 28250
Author: reichelt
Date: Mon Jul 17 04:42:24 2006
New Revision: 115516
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115516
Log:
PR c++/28250
* name-lookup.c (pushdecl_may
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 04:36 ---
*** Bug 28401 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 04:36 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11108 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
#include
#include
template
void test(T t)
{
char c;
t(c);
};
int main()
{
test(std::toupper);
}
The g++ compiler(version higher than 4.0) complained that no matching function
for call to 'test()', and got the same
result with all of the functions list in cctype.
--
--- Comment #1 from chris at contemporary dot net dot au 2006-07-17 04:20
---
Created an attachment (id=11903)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11903&action=view)
Add $(exeext) to gcc-$(version).
The patch allows the RTEMS crossrpm build to complete without error.
The RTEMS crossrpm specs fail on a Canadian cross for mingw32 as the versioned
'ln' (linked) of gcc the install-driver creates does not have the required
executable extension.
--
Summary: install-driver is missing $(exeext) from gcc-$(version)
Product: gcc
Versio
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 03:42
---
The trick of using -pedantic-errors to turn every invalid warning into
rejects-valid is not useful. Downgrading to P2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27961
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27952
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27668
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27667
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27572
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27494
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27493
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27492
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27425
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27397
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27329
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27316
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26938
--- Comment #16 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 03:17
---
Contrived, or not, what should we do?
I stand by my position that the middle end should not try to load a
TREE_ADDRESSABLE type from memory in this way.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26577
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28357
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28349
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28347
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28346
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28338
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28337
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28304
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28303
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28302
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28301
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28296
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28291
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28288
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28287
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28286
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28284
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28280
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28274
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28270
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28267
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28266
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28261
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28259
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28258
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28257
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28256
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28255
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28253
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28250
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28248
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28247
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28239
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28238
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28235
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 03:00
---
I don't think this code is invalid. To instantiate operator(), size_traits
would have to be complete, but that should not prevent the template
declaration.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28216
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28190
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28189
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28182
--- Comment #2 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-07-17 02:56
---
known to work: 4.0.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28025
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 02:53
---
m68k is not a primary or secondary platform.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 02:52
---
This code is not valid ISO C++; there is no conversion from function pointers
(including pointers to member functions) from one type to another.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28136
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 02:49
---
Janis --
IIUC, you checked in a fix for this issue. Or, do you want to keep the issue
open even though the patch has gone in? If so, would you please retitle the
issue and indicate what the current purpose of th
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28071
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28063
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28058
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28056
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28053
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28050
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28049
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28048
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28031
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28025
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28010
--- Comment #5 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 02:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=11902)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11902&action=view)
consistently calculate nregs for FLOAT_MODES
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24036
--- Comment #4 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 01:43 ---
Double Complex on e500 with double GPRs fundamentally does not interact well
with GCC's current design. GCC does not want to have a double placed in the
same register that can contain an int if the width of the register
--- Comment #2 from bim2006 at basistech dot com 2006-07-16 22:29 ---
Oh, of course. I should have thought of that.
--
bim2006 at basistech dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-16 22:24 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRM
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-16 22:24
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-16 22:13 ---
รข
Actually I think it is because your environment variables said your terminal
supports UTF-8 but they really don't. Can you try setting LANG to C and try
again?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
There are some useful warnings that gfortran could issue.
Examples:
$ cat chk.f
program main
double precision a
real b
b = 2.3**(2/3)
a = 4.3*1d5
print *,a,b
b = 1.23456789012345
print *,4**(-3)
end
$ ftnchek chk.f
FTNCHEK Version 3.3 November
The following sort of garbaged error messaged with accented latin characters in
the place where some string was supposed to be substituted into place are
chronic with gcj 4.1.1.
gcj -fjni -o gcj_test ../java/src/com/basistech/ne/batch/Extractor.java
../java/src/com/basistech/ne/batch/jni.java Tes
: Expected REAL for item 2 in formatted transfer, got
INTEGER
(F10.4)
^
$ gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../../gcc/trunk/configure --prefix=/home/ig25
--enable-languages=c,fortran
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.0 20060716 (experimental)
--
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-16 20:36 ---
You could try it yourself. But - do you have a testcase that shows how macros
and inline functions come into play here?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-07-16 20:27 ---
it works for me with 4.1.2 revision 115366.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28210
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-16 20:19 ---
Subject: Bug 28390
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Jul 16 20:19:27 2006
New Revision: 115504
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115504
Log:
PR fortran/28390
* trans-openmp.c (gfc_trans_omp_
--- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-16 20:17 ---
Subject: Bug 28370
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Jul 16 20:17:20 2006
New Revision: 115503
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115503
Log:
PR c++/28370
* decl2.c (note_vague_linkage_var):
--- Comment #10 from vda dot linux at googlemail dot com 2006-07-16 18:54
---
gcc-4.1.1 differs only by insterting one more useless insn:
movl$-858993459, %eax
mull8(%esp)
movl%edx, %eax
+ xorl%edx, %edx
shrl$3, %eax
mov
--- Comment #9 from vda dot linux at googlemail dot com 2006-07-16 18:47
---
The test program below shows that in this case doing division with div insn
takes more instructions than with mul+shift.
Also mul+shift path has absolutely useless "movl %edx, %eax" insn, shaving that
will mak
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-16 17:24 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.2
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-16 17:22 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.2
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-16 17:21 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.2
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-16 17:20 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.2
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-16 17:20 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.2
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo