--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 06:11
---
*** Bug 26304 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #25 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 06:11
---
This was fixed by the patch for PR 27603.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 27603 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 05:52
---
This version of HJ's patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg01013.html
is OK for mainline and 4.1.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26885
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 05:43
---
Fixed in 4.2.0.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27339
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 05:40
---
Subject: Bug 27339
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue May 16 05:39:49 2006
New Revision: 113819
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113819
Log:
PR c++/27339
* cp-tree.h (perform_access_c
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-16 05:00 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27584
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00718.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
On May 15, 2006, at 9:15 PM, Bar-Tov Aharon-R53349 wrote:
hello,
something that seems like a problem (havn't found something in the
bug base).
template
class t_base
{
public:
T *ptr;
};
template
class t_derived : public t_base
{
public:
t_derived() { ptr = NULL; }
};
This is desc
--- Comment #10 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 04:17 ---
Subject: Bug 26600
Author: sayle
Date: Tue May 16 04:16:00 2006
New Revision: 113818
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113818
Log:
PR target/26600
* config/i386/i386.c (legitimat
hello,
something that seems like a problem (havn't found something in the bug base).
the following program produces an error message on g++ 3.4 and above
(cygwin, if this matters). it does compile on 3.3.3 and other c++ compilers.
thx
ronny
//
#include
#includ
--- Comment #3 from dannysmith at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 03:14
---
Subject: Bug 27599
Author: dannysmith
Date: Tue May 16 03:14:00 2006
New Revision: 113816
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113816
Log:
PR target/27599
* config.host (i[34567
--- Comment #3 from saito at densan dot co dot jp 2006-05-16 02:53 ---
I could not build glibc for sh using 4.0.1 before, then I use 3.4.6 now,
but I will test and report the result using gcc-4.1.0.
--
saito at densan dot co dot jp changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 02:29 ---
Can you try 4.0.x or above as 3.4.x is no longer being updated?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27621
--- Comment #1 from saito at densan dot co dot jp 2006-05-16 02:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=11472)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11472&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27621
This problem depends on generated pic code for sh.
For reproducing, needs two files a shared library(musician.so) and a executable
file(main). I will attach these files.
musician.so is shared library compiled with -fPIC option.
musician.so is linked dynamically if main is excuted as follows.
g++
--- Comment #2 from bernds_cb1 at t-online dot de 2006-05-16 01:44 ---
safe_from_p always returns 0 for CONSTRUCTORs. That seems to be the fault of
revision 102182.
Off to bed now, I think I can fix this tomorrow.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27620
--- Comment #16 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 01:17 ---
Subject: Bug 22563
Author: sayle
Date: Tue May 16 01:17:13 2006
New Revision: 113810
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113810
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/22563
Backports from mainli
--- Comment #6 from mckinlay at redhat dot com 2006-05-16 01:03 ---
I've posted a suggested fix here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2006-q2/msg00168.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27352
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 23:36 ---
The needed patch is now in Classpath.
So, we're just waiting for a merge.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22579
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 23:29 ---
This is a middle-end issue when expanding:
a->b = {};
it creates a huge array on the stack.
In 4.0.3, we created a huge array on the heap which is just as wrong but not as
bad even though some heaps are limited (SPU)
With current svn head, as well as gcc-4.1.0, the testcase g++.dg/init/array15.C
uses 4MB of stack space for a temporary on the stack in the "foo" constructor.
This is a regression, as it did not happen with older compilers - 3.4.x calls
memset directly on the object, rather than doing a memset/mem
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 22:54
---
Subject: Bug 27505
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon May 15 22:54:19 2006
New Revision: 113803
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113803
Log:
PR c++/27505
* call.c (convert_like_real):
The following code fails on powerpc64-linux compiled with -mpowerpc64 and -O1
or -O2; it passes with -O0, or without -mpowerpc64:
-
extern void abort (void);
int i = 274;
float f = 1.0f;
int
main ()
{
double d = i / f;
if (d != 274.0)
abort ();
--- Comment #9 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-05-15 21:57 ---
That fixes the Ada build, but I haven't run a full regtest yet.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27536
--- Comment #39 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 21:56
---
Most of the time is now spent in global alloc (30% of wall time) and rtl loop
invariant motion (also about 30%). Almost all the time of rtl lim is in df
analysis.
--
rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 20:52 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 20:35 ---
Subject: Bug number PR19015
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00685.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 20:20 ---
Subject: Bug number PR25098
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00682.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #7 from berndtrog at yahoo dot com 2006-05-15 20:19 ---
> - r19 is modified, but not saved
I can confirm this bug for 4.1 and trunk using this line:
avr-gcc -c -O1 bug.i -funroll-loops
The bug goes away when -funroll-loops is not used.
The bug first appeared in july 2005 on
--- Comment #14 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 19:55 ---
No need for investigation anymore :-)
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:45 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27603
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00655.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:45 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27575
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00638.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:44 ---
Subject: Bug number PR rtl-optimization/27406
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00594.html
--
http://gcc.g
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:43 ---
Subject: Bug number PR25082
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00556.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:43 ---
Subject: Bug number PR25090
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00554.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #6 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:42 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/27582
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00537.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #6 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:42 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/27581
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00538.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:41 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/27559
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00492.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:41 ---
Subject: Bug number PR17741
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00483.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #6 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:40 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/27547
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00445.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:40 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27384
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00443.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:39 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27529
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00415.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:40 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27488
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00444.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:38 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 27470
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00365.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #11 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:38 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/27315
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00361.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:37 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27302
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00344.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #6 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:37 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/27496
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00333.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:37 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27498
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00326.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #6 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:36 ---
Subject: Bug number PR25746
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00296.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:35 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27411
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00252.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #11 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:35 ---
Subject: Bug number PR target/27421
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00244.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bu
--- Comment #6 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:34 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/27430
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00208.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:34 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/27427
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00207.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:33 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/27423
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00206.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:33 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/27422
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00205.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:32 ---
Subject: Bug number PR objc/27240
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00159.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
--- Comment #10 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:32 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27409
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00153.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #23 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:32 ---
Subject: Bug number PR26447
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00138.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #30 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:30 ---
Subject: Bug number PR15911
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00030.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #15 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:30 ---
Subject: Bug number PR24459
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg0.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #9 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:25 ---
Subject: Bug number PR22303
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00332.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:22 ---
Subject: Bug number PR3511
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00295.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 19:02 ---
I'll submit tonight, once I have got a couple of other pending patches out of
the door.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 18:57 ---
A patch is regtesting right now.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 18:54 ---
This is implemented on the mainline for 4.2.0:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Diagnostic-Pragmas.html#Diagnostic-Pragmas
You could also try -pedantic-errors if you want to error out for stuff that is
nonstandard.
There is currently no support in gcc for turning specific warnings into errors.
I do most of my developement with gcc while my colleagues use MSVC, which will
error out on -Wcast-qual's equivalent. Using -Werror would be completely
unpractical because our codebase is fairly large and spewing a LOT
--- Comment #7 from ttimo at idsoftware dot com 2006-05-15 18:42 ---
an XML output mode would solve this ( and potentially a number of other similar
issues .. like having to set -fmessage-length=0 for most analyzers )
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19165
--- Comment #38 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 18:25
---
Subject: Bug 26830
Author: rakdver
Date: Mon May 15 18:24:55 2006
New Revision: 113799
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113799
Log:
PR tree-optimization/26830
* tree-into-ssa.
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 18:14 ---
Also happens on x86-linux-gnu.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #22 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-05-15 17:41 ---
This should now be fixed on all open branches.
--
roger at eyesopen dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-05-15 17:37 ---
This should now be fixed on both mainline and the 4.1 branch. Thanks Andreas.
--
roger at eyesopen dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 17:36
---
Subject: Bug 27603
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon May 15 17:35:48 2006
New Revision: 113797
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113797
Log:
2006-05-15 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> compile fails using mingw gcc-4.0.3
>
> using ../configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++ --with-gcc --with-gnu-ld
> --with-gnu-
> as --prefix=/mingw
>
> i get an error:
>
> make[3]: *** No rule to make target `../../gcc/objc/objc-act.c', needed by
> `s-gtype'. Stop.
> make[3]: Leaving dir
--- Comment #7 from bjoern dot m dot haase at web dot de 2006-05-15 17:25
---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 regression] libssp causes a failure with cross compilers
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote on Montag, 15. Mai 2006 00:26 :
> --- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
compile fails using mingw gcc-4.0.3
using ../configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++ --with-gcc --with-gnu-ld
--with-gnu-
as --prefix=/mingw
i get an error:
make[3]: *** No rule to make target `../../gcc/objc/objc-act.c', needed by
`s-gtype'. Stop.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/user/gcc-4.2-
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 17:16 ---
Subject: Bug 25082
Author: pault
Date: Mon May 15 17:16:26 2006
New Revision: 113796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113796
Log:
2006-05-15 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 17:16 ---
Subject: Bug 25090
Author: pault
Date: Mon May 15 17:16:26 2006
New Revision: 113796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113796
Log:
2006-05-15 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 17:16 ---
Subject: Bug 24711
Author: pault
Date: Mon May 15 17:16:26 2006
New Revision: 113796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113796
Log:
2006-05-15 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-05-15 16:58 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I have tried to create simple test case (about 200 rows) where I tried to
> reproduce key code fragments. In simple test case leak not reproduced. But I
> have easy reproduced it with very small a
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|3.3.3 3.0.4 3.2.3 3.4.0 |3.3.3 3.0.4 3.2.3 3.4.0
|
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-05-15 16:49 ---
Feedback not forthcoming.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAIT
--- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-05-15 16:46 ---
Missing a self-contained, simple testcase, certainly we cannot even imagine
debugging this... Also, please use valgrind, very reliable and commonly
available.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Rem
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE (in fold_offsetof_1, at |[4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE (in
|c-common.c:5998) on s
--- Comment #21 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 16:14 ---
Subject: Bug 26729
Author: sayle
Date: Mon May 15 16:14:46 2006
New Revision: 113795
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113795
Log:
PR middle-end/26729
* fold-const.c (fold_trutho
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reco
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 15:59 ---
Reduced testcase (without any preprocessed macros or includes):
struct chunk_s {
unsigned int size;
int offset_next;
};
typedef struct chunk_s chunk_t;
void
gcc_bug_test(chunk_t *first)
{
chunk_t * cur;
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 15:53 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 15:51 ---
#2 0x081a4404 in lookup_as_function (x=, code=PLUS)
at /home/peshtigo/pinskia/src/gnu/gcc/src/gcc/cse.c:1453
#3 0x081a58d0 in fold_rtx (x=, insn=0x0)
at /home/peshtigo/pinskia/src/gnu/gcc/src/gcc/cse.c:4213
--- Comment #2 from nanjiang dot shu at gmail dot com 2006-05-15 15:50
---
Subject: Re: memory leak with libstdc++ set
I have compiled the problem with gcc4.1.0, which was builded under
linux-pc-i686 from tar balls. The program exited with similar error
message. But I did not debuge
= gcc41bug.c =
#include
typedef struct chunk_s chunk_t;
struct chunk_s {
unsigned int size;
int offset_next;
};
#define GET_ADDRESS(baseptr, offset) \
((chunk_t *)((char *)(baseptr) + (offset)))
void
gcc_bug_test(chunk_t *first)
{
chunk_t *cur;
while (1) {
c
--- Comment #2 from kminola at eng dot umd dot edu 2006-05-15 15:37 ---
Sorry, found my error.
--
kminola at eng dot umd dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 15:35 ---
Can you try a newer GCC since 3.3.x (and 3.4.x) are no longer being updated.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27615
--- Comment #8 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 15:30 ---
Andreas or AJ,:
Can you test with gcc/except.c:output_ttype() changed from expand_normal() to
expand_expr (..., EXPAND_INITIALIZER, ...) ?
--
dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
I used set ss
as a containtor for a list of unique, ordered strings. However, program
reports segmentation error when trying to allocate a block of memory.
I have used libcwd to debug the memory allocation, the libcwd detected
memory leaks:
+
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 15:22 ---
Please attach the relevant parts of config.log
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
With gcc-4.2-20060513
Configuring stage 1 in ./intl
...
checking for void *... yes
cchecking for void *... yes
checking size of void *... configure: error: cannot compute sizeof (void *), 77
See `config.log' for more details.
make[2]: *** [configure-stage1-gcc] Error 1
--
Summary: s
--- Comment #11 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 14:44 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27039
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00452.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de 2006-05-15
14:31 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE on broken switch condition
On 14 May, mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 22:35
> ---
>
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
