--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 07:58
---
This test can sometimes fail if you have a lot of background tasks running.
Check the tolerance on the timing accuracy and see if increasing that allows
the test to pass. I have seen it do this before. Or is th
--- Comment #19 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 07:54
---
Just so everyone understands. I am working one more modification to this patch
to allow 63 character long names in the tests for logical true or false in
namelist reads. The patch in Comment #18 works for all c
* stmt.c (decl_overlaps_hard_reg_set_p): Use DECL_HARD_REGISTER
instead of DECL_REGISTER.
* gcc.c-torture/compile/20060217-1.c: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20060217-1.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-br
I'm seeing bootstrap failing on x86 and amd64-linux:
WORK Thu Feb 16 21:06:28 UTC 2006 (revision 51)
FAIL Fri Feb 17 12:16:43 UTC 2006 (revision 80)
FAIL Fri Feb 17 20:56:47 UTC 2006 (revision 111208)
...
/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-head-20060217T133449/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/guerby/work
--- Comment #1 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-02-18 07:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=10872)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10872&action=view)
alpha-hidden-weak.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26347
noticed while playing with uClibc/alpha port ... a function that was defined as
being hidden/weak causes build failures for alpha but no other target.
testing mostly on my amd64 box cross-compiling for alpha/uclibc, but a native
alpha/glibc compiler exhibits the same issues. tested gcc 3.4.5, 4.0
--- Comment #18 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 07:22
---
Created an attachment (id=10871)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10871&action=view)
Updated patch.
Updated patch to fix problem found in Comment #16
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b
--- Comment #18 from falk at debian dot org 2006-02-18 07:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=10870)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10870&action=view)
alternative patch
Hi,
I've also been working on a patch, although as an SSA pass. It probably catches
more, but there
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23868
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 06:50
---
This is too obscure to be a P1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 06:49
---
I'm currently testing a patch for all of the critical problems in this PR;
we'll be left with an accepts-invalid regression, which would only be P2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 06:46
---
Due to the fact that the problem occurs with inline asm, not ordinary C code,
I'm making this P2, rather than P2. I've pre-approved a patch for this
problem.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 06:45
---
Objective-C is not release-criticial, and neither is Tru64.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26295
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 06:43
---
Not a showstopper, but definitely disappointing. I'd be very interested in
analysis of what's going wrong.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #2 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 05:22 ---
Subject: Bug 25600
Author: sayle
Date: Sat Feb 18 05:22:46 2006
New Revision: 111226
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111226
Log:
PR middle-end/25600
* fold-const.c (fold_binary)
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 05:15
---
Indeed you have found something I missed. I am on it. BTW Your
namelist.input.3 is correct, keeping in mind that gfortran does not initialize
variables and the result of an incomplete array is null value, meani
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 05:03 ---
Mine.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned
--- Comment #35 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 04:57
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFI
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 04:55 ---
Patch posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01489.html
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 04:55 ---
Confirmed, patch posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01489.html
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 04:53 ---
Fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26341
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 04:53 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #17 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 02:51
---
Created an attachment (id=10869)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10869&action=view)
patch
I'm currently testing this patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8268
--- Comment #24 from nomura at netapp dot com 2006-02-18 02:30 ---
The problem in my case was that during configuration of the cross gcc,
the host linker was being picked for the capability test of
HAVE_LD_RO_RW_SECTION_MIXING. ld is selected around the "in_tree_ld"
part of configure.
--- Comment #3 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 00:09 ---
Subject: Bug 26341
Author: dberlin
Date: Sat Feb 18 00:09:51 2006
New Revision: 111217
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111217
Log:
2006-02-17 Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fix P
--- Comment #1 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-02-18 00:04 ---
I believe this is the same as PR 24476 and like that problem, will work now
with the latest CVS binutils. I don't know if we want to resolve this or wait
until there is a binutils release that contains the fix to resolve
--- Comment #23 from nomura at netapp dot com 2006-02-17 23:58 ---
> Looks like in gcc-3.4.0, gcc/gcc/configure.ac picks up the wrong ld for me,
> which probably leads to the wrong value being set for
> HAVE_LD_RO_RW_SECTION_MIXING.
This problem also occurs when cross compiling freebsd
--- Comment #8 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 23:50 ---
Backported to 4.0.
--
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #7 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 23:49 ---
Subject: Bug 16045
Author: ghazi
Date: Fri Feb 17 23:49:13 2006
New Revision: 111215
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111215
Log:
Backport:
2005-08-18 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROT
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 23:17 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2006-02-17 23:04 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
[...]
> does not trigger the Array out-of-bounds-condition any more in our code.
> Therefore we are glad to have this fix!
>
> Tested on gcc-4.1-20060210 x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Negative. The follo
Executing on host: /home/gnu/gcc-3.4/objdir/gcc/testsuite/../gfortran
-B/home/gn
u/gcc-3.4/objdir/gcc/testsuite/../
/xxx/gnu/gcc-3.4/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.d
g/secnds.f -O0 -O0
-L/home/gnu/gcc-3.4/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00/./libgfo
rtran/.libs
-L/home/gnu/gcc-3.4/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux1
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfi
--- Comment #11 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 22:21
---
Fixed by patches.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Sta
--- Comment #10 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 22:19
---
Subject: Bug 26255
Author: danglin
Date: Fri Feb 17 22:19:05 2006
New Revision: 111214
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111214
Log:
PR target/26255
* pa.md: Create separate HI
--- Comment #9 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 22:10 ---
Subject: Bug 26255
Author: danglin
Date: Fri Feb 17 22:09:58 2006
New Revision: 111213
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111213
Log:
PR target/26255
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr262
--- Comment #39 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 21:49 ---
Subject: Bug 11953
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 17 21:49:22 2006
New Revision: 111212
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111212
Log:
PR libstdc++/11953
* gthr-posix.h (_REENTRANT):
--- Comment #12 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 21:39 ---
Subject: Bug 22209
Author: sayle
Date: Fri Feb 17 21:38:59 2006
New Revision: 111211
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111211
Log:
2006-02-17 Roger Sayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Richard
--- Comment #6 from law at redhat dot com 2006-02-17 21:19 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.2 Regression] three testsuite
failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 18:21 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030730-1.c scan-tree-dump-times if
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-02-17
20:51 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/nan_inf_fmt.f90 execution
> I can't reproduce that on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.23. I don't know if it's a
> difference between hpux version, or hppa1 and hppa2
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 20:40
---
> I don't know how I missed your proposed patch for PR 19061. I tested it on
> the test case in that bug and on my bootstrap bug that I reported here and
> both look good.
Great! My (limited) understanding is t
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 20:33
---
This is a problem in libgfortran scalbn fallback version not handling correctly
denormals. A i686-linux testcase is included below. I switch this to severity
"minor".
$ cat a.c
#include
#include
double
gfortra
--- Comment #7 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 20:05 ---
AIX 4.2 probably cannot be supported by current versions of GCC. If libstdc++
doesn't work on AIX 4.2, then it doesn't work. I do not have access to any AIX
4.2 system and AIX 4.2 was removed from IBM support a long ti
--- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-02-17 19:55 ---
David, can you please have a look? Certainly we have succesful reports:
http://gcc.gnu.org/buildstat.html
In the meanwhile, submitter should check that is following the target-specific
installation notes:
http://gcc.
--- Comment #9 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 19:54 ---
SFT for D.2477.a is SFT.12. Before vectorizer is run, SFT.12 has is_alias_tag
== false and may_aliases = {TMT.32}; thus, we would only add a vuse for TMT.32
to the statement, and this is subsumed by the VDEF.
Vector
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 19:52 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 19:52 ---
Subject: Bug 26272
Author: pinskia
Date: Fri Feb 17 19:52:28 2006
New Revision: 111206
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111206
Log:
2006-02-17 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR ta
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pcarlini at suse dot de
|dot org |
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 19:34
---
I can't reproduce that on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.23. I don't know if it's a
difference between hpux version, or hppa1 and hppa2 (well, I don't know what
these two are really), but I'd guess it's the OS version. I don'
--- Comment #5 from andrew dot lundgren at level3 dot com 2006-02-17 19:27
---
I am experiencing the same bug with GCC 4.0.1 & 4.0.2 on SLES 9 with:
gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-4.0.2/configure --enable-threads=posix
--prefix=/usr/local/
--- Comment #3 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-02-17 19:18 ---
I don't know how I missed your proposed patch for PR 19061. I tested it on the
test case in that bug and on my bootstrap bug that I reported here and both
look good. I used ToT sources for both tests and had to put your
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 19:07
---
Fixed.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSI
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 19:01
---
Subject: Bug 26161
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Fri Feb 17 19:01:04 2006
New Revision: 111205
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111205
Log:
PR bootstrap/26161
* configure.ac: Remov
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 18:44
---
Did you try my fix for PR target/19061?
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 18:43 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Just tar up the mess and pass them to me directly.
I will once the testsuite has finished running.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26344
--- Comment #16 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-17 18:42 ---
The patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01387.html
is incomplete:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] namelist-3]$ cat namelist.input.1
&dynamics
non_hydrostatic = .true.,
time_step_sound
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #13 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 18:38
---
Patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01461.html
--
rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-02-17 18:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=10868)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10868&action=view)
Test Case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26345
As of SVN version 110852, I cannot bootstrap IA64 HP-UX compiler. The compiler
dies while compiling tree-into-ssa.c. I have a preprocessed cut-down version
of this file that I will attach to this defect. I proposed a workaround/patch
earlier, it is at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/ms
--- Comment #4 from law at redhat dot com 2006-02-17 18:35 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.2 Regression] three testsuite
failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 18:21 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030730-1.c scan-tree-dump-times if
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 18:25 ---
Shows up on ia64 also:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg00886.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26344
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 18:24 ---
Maybe even between 72 and 75.
Which means the following change cause this:
2006-02-16 Jeff Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ * tree-vrp.c (set_value_range_to_nonnegative): New function.
+ (vrp_expr_co
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 18:22 ---
They were introduced between 29 and 75.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26344
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26344
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030730-1.c scan-tree-dump-times if 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030730-2.c scan-tree-dump-times if 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-2.c scan-tree-dump-times if 0
Looking at them, they look only to be problems in the testcases and not
actually missed optimizations.
Also hap
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 18:06
---
*** Bug 26343 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 18:06 ---
This is a dup of bug 20333 which was fixed in 3.4.4, you must have tested a non
released 3.4.4.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20333 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
Wha
--- Comment #13 from ron_hylton at hotmail dot com 2006-02-17 18:05 ---
>
> Are you sure you have enough virtual memory to compile this test case?
>
I just tried main branch r11 and the test case compiled fine. I have 2 GB
vm (and 2 GB ram) so I doubt the previous problem was vm
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 17:42
---
In fact, both these bugs originate from the same bug of the netbsd frexp(), as
reported in comment #1. Closing this as INVALID since there's nothing we can
do.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
gcc 3.4.3 (and also 3.4.4) segfault on x86_64; segfault doesn't occur on a i686
using gcc 3.3.4.
Please contact me if you need any further detail.
$ gcc -v -save-temps main.cpp
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/specs
Configured with: /var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.4.3-r1/work/gcc-
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 16:11 ---
Now fixed.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 16:05 ---
Subject: Bug 26315
Author: charlet
Date: Fri Feb 17 16:05:46 2006
New Revision: 83
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=83
Log:
2006-02-17 Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR ad
--- Comment #12 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 15:45
---
Patch is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-02/msg00251.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13408
--- Comment #2 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 14:42 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] 930217-1.c and
931013-3.c ICE at -O2 and above in add_virtual_operand
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 14:24 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #1 from pins
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 14:24 ---
From:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg00880.html
Confirmed independently also.
The testcase:
struct s
{
int f;
};
struct s
f ()
{
int addr;
return *(struct s *) &addr;
}
--
pinskia at gcc
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26341
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/930217-1.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/Users/regress/tbox/svn-gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/930217-1.c:16:
internal compiler error: in add_virtual_operand, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1873
--
Summary: [4.2 Regression] 930217-1.c and
--- Comment #1 from abel at ispras dot ru 2006-02-17 14:08 ---
I've see the same ICE on ia64 with rev. 76 and
gcc.c-torture/compile/930217-1.c. The backtrace is as follows:
(gdb) bt
#0 fancy_abort (file=0x40a4d260
"/home/bonzo/develop/loop/trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-operands.c", li
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 12:48 ---
Reopening to ...
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #85 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 12:49
---
*** Bug 26337 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 12:49 ---
Mark as a dup of bug 21920.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21920 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 12:31 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
PASS: Wed Feb 15 21:37:04 UTC 2006 (revision 18)
FAIL: Thu Feb 16 21:06:28 UTC 2006 (revision 51)
Note that at r51 it ICE on x86 but PASS on amd64-linux.
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.2.0 20060216 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu) GC
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 12:04
---
The code is invalid ISO C because "*((uint32_t *) &sy" breaks aliasing rules.
> Our workarounds include (i) not using the optimiser,
-fno-strict-aliasing should be sufficient.
> or (ii) using a
>
We are targetting the compilers for a system-on-chip solution we are
developing based on an ARM 926 which is without an FPU so we have
defaulted on SOFTWARE FLOATING POINT.
#define TARGET_DEFAULT (ARM_FLAG_SOFT_FLOAT | ARM_FLAG_APCS_32 | \
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 11:43
---
(In reply to comment #0)
> gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_set_exponent.f90
This one is a problem in netbsd libc, now known as lib/32861
(http://www.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=32861)
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 11:24 ---
*** Bug 26336 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26334
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 11:24 ---
Oops, sorry for the dups.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26334 ***
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 11:24 ---
*** Bug 26335 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26334
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 11:24 ---
Oops, sorry for the dups.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26334 ***
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #20 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 11:23
---
Fixed on every 4.x branch.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
struct U
{
unsigned int u[256];
};
struct S
{
int u, v, w, x;
int s[255];
};
int
foo (struct U *x, struct S *y)
{
register int i;
for (i = 0; i < 255; i++)
{
unsigned int v, w = x->u[i + 1];
__asm__ ("" : "=r" (v) : "0" (w) : "cc");
y->s[i] = v;
}
return 0;
}
struct U
{
unsigned int u[256];
};
struct S
{
int u, v, w, x;
int s[255];
};
int
foo (struct U *x, struct S *y)
{
register int i;
for (i = 0; i < 255; i++)
{
unsigned int v, w = x->u[i + 1];
__asm__ ("" : "=r" (v) : "0" (w) : "cc");
y->s[i] = v;
}
return 0;
}
--- Comment #19 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 11:21
---
Subject: Bug 20753
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Feb 17 11:21:46 2006
New Revision: 80
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=80
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2006-02-13 Gee
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
