--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-22 06:56 ---
I reconfirm this regression PR.
There seems to be a real bug lurking in packed4.C failing, exposed by Nathan's
"Undo DECL_PACKED when possible" change for PR 21166. Maybe I'm missing
something, but I doubt the FAIL shoul
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22141
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
Last reconfirmed|2005-10-13 20:55:07 |2005-10-22 04:0
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-22 04:02 ---
Here are the numbers for yesterday's 4.1 compiler:
4.0.2: 3.77
4.1.0: 3.05
3.4.0: 3.19
3.3.6: 3.34
So the mainline's number is the fastest so removing the regression marker.
--
pinskia at gcc do
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-22 03:36 ---
Fixed at least on the mainline:
t.c: In function 'ret':
t.c:3: warning: GCC vector returned by reference: non-standard ABI extension
with no compatibility guarantee
t.c: In function 'pass':
t.c:4: warning: GCC vector
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot
|
Take the following code:
int f ()
{ int j0, j1, j2, j3, j4, j5, j6, j7, j8, j9, a;
a = 0;
for (j0 = 0; j0 < 2; j0 ++)
for (j1 = j0; j1 < 2; j1 ++)
for (j2 = j1; j2 < 2; j2 ++)
for (j3 = j2; j3 < 2; j3 ++)
for (j4 = j3; j4 < 2; j4 ++)
for
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21715
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16913
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16306
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-22 03:00 ---
Does anyone have a testcase for this one?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-22 02:36 ---
Confirmed on the mainline.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-22 02:28 ---
java.security.SecureRandom is part of/comes from classpath on the mainline.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-22 02:27 ---
Testing
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFI
--
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libgcj |awt
Product|gcc |classpath
Targ
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |trivial
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.1
http:
test
--
Summary: tesdting
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
java.security.SecureRandom in GCJ 4.0.2 has no impact, so SecureRandom always
uses the same weak seed. This has obvious security issues, though they'd take
a targetted attack to mount (e.g. force a JVM restart so the SecureRandom
reverts to the default seed - "new java.util.Random(0l).nextBytes(ne
--- Comment #1 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 23:44 ---
Fixed as part of other goto and label cleanups.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
(This bug report is just one example of a category of bugs that may all revolve
around one bug in the compiler. I've run into this situation in various
guises. The sample code below is the smallest example of the problem I've
encounted so far.)
The bug manifests when:
a) a generic child package
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 22:49 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 22:48 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 22:38 ---
Confirmed, a regression from 4.0.x.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 22:27 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 22:23 ---
Can you supply more information? Like how to reproduce it.
Also can you double check to make sure that -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage is
being passed to all invokation of gcc/g++?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #3 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 22:10 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 22:07
---
Subject: Bug 24451
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gomp-20050608-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 22:06:53
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog.gomp
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 21:53 ---
Fixed in 4.1.0 by:
2005-10-05 Dale Johannesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* convert.c (convert_to_real): Don't convert
(float)floor(double d) to floorf((float)d).
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org ch
--- Comment #2 from dyang at mathworks dot com 2005-10-21 21:51 ---
I am quite surprised when i saw this bug report was marked as duplicate with
#323. I have to reopen the bug and here is the reason.
With bug 323, it is caused by hardware using excessive precision so that it
leads to di
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 21:48
---
Now the failure is:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0067d51c in output_line_info ()
at /home/eric/cvs/gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:7902
7902 if (function != line_info->function)
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 21:44
---
Subject: Bug 24460
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 21:44:42
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog bb-reorder.c
Log message:
PR
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC target triplet||ia64-*-*
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http
--- Comment #78 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 20:24
---
*** Bug 24479 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 20:24 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 323 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please run the following code through gcc with -O3 flag, then run the
executable. The expected result is -13275031.0, but the result from the code is
-13275030.0. That is because the result from the addition (a+0.5) was stored in
a signle precision, not double precision as ISO C++ standard mandates
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 20:19 ---
Only fails on targets which don't support alias attribut.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gmail dot com 2005-10-21 20:13 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Is this true any more on the mainline?
Yes, it is.
--
fxcoudert at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-14.c (test for excess errors)
has appeared on mainline on 20051021 on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11. This is a new
test.
/scratch/gcc/nightly-2005-10-21-mainline/src/gcc-mainline/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/weak/weak-14.c:20:
error: alias definitions not supported in this configuration
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.abi/vtable2.C (test for excess errors)
has appeared on mainline on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 on 20051021.
/scratch/gcc/nightly-2005-10-21-mainline/src/gcc-mainline/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.abi/vtable2.C:127:
error: alias definitions not supported in this configuration
--- Comment #7 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 19:49 ---
I took a closer look and discovered that compilation of prune.c also exhausts
memory without the patch, so the patch allows a latent problem to show itself.
With the patch, files fast-match.c, build-disjuncts.c, and po
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gmail dot com 2005-10-21 19:49 ---
Fixed.
--
fxcoudert at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/pr24428-2.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/pr24428.c execution test
have appeared on ia64-hp-hpux11.23 when those tests were added
(20051018-20051020), on both mainline and 4.0 branch.
These failures only appear with -milp32 not -mlp64, *except* that on mainline
only
FAIL: gcc.d
FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/pr24428-2.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/pr24428.c execution test
have appeared on i686-pc-linux-gnu when those tests were added
(20051018-20051020), on both mainline and 4.0 branch.
I also see such failures on IA64, for which I'll open a separate bug report.
--
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 19:40
---
Subject: Bug 24383
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 19:40:32
Modified files:
libgfortran: ChangeLog
libgfortran/io : unix.c
Log
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 19:34
---
Investigating.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assigne
--- Comment #9 from olivier_thomann at sympatico dot ca 2005-10-21 19:04
---
Looking at the two other bug reports, it looks like this might be a duplicate
of PR java/10632. So feel free to close is as a dup.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24454
--- Comment #7 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 18:59
---
Fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg01311.html
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 18:57
---
Subject: Bug 24455
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gomp-20050608-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-21 18:57:39
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog.g
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.0.3 4.1.0
Summary|[3.4/4.0/4.1 regression]|[3.4 regr
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 18:43
---
Works on mainline, the front-end doesn't generate the same expanded code:
--- gcc-4_0-branch/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/pr23995.ads.dg 2005-10-21
20:39:56.006059768 +0200
+++ gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/pr23995.ads.dg
--- Comment #16 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 18:04
---
Subject: Bug 15220
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 18:04:22
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
gcc/testsuite
--- Comment #15 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 17:56
---
Subject: Bug 15220
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 17:56:51
Modified files:
libcpp : ChangeLog file
--- Comment #14 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 17:54
---
Subject: Bug 15220
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 17:54:20
Modified files:
libcpp : ChangeLog files.c init.c internal.h
Log mes
--- Comment #6 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 17:24 ---
I tried the patch with today's sources on powerpc64-linux and got the
following errors:
/home/janis/tools/gcc-mline-20051021/bin/gcc -c -o prune.o-fprofile-use
-DSPEC_CPU2000 -m32 -O3 prune.c
pr
--- Comment #13 from thebohemian at gmx dot net 2005-10-21 16:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=10041)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10041&action=view)
proposed fix
This fixes this bug and bunch of related problems.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 16:15
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Andrew, why do you say that the location of the diagnostics in comment #5?
Those line numbers are different than what I orginally got. So something fixed
this already in 4.0.2 and 4.1.0
--- Comment #12 from thebohemian at gmx dot net 2005-10-21 16:13 ---
Tromey suggested to not transform all Utf8Const object into a canonical form so
I fixed the invokevirtual problem in the first way.
I introduced a new method _Jv_equalUt8Const_classnames method which reliably
compares
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 16:10
---
Andrew, why do you say that the location of the diagnostics in comment #5?
I get:
/home/mitchell/tmp/pr20164.cpp: In function 'void Bar2()':
/home/mitchell/tmp/pr20164.cpp:19: error: no matching function for cal
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 16:10 ---
Patch submitted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg01313.html
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 16:04
---
Fixed in 4.0.3.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Sta
--- Comment #10 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 16:03
---
Subject: Bug 24260
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-21 16:03:49
Modified files:
gcc/cp : parser.c ChangeLog
gcc/testsuite : Ch
--- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 16:03
---
Subject: Bug 24260
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-21 16:03:10
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:55
---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg01309.html
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 16:01
---
Subject: Bug 24260
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-21 16:01:26
Modified files:
gcc/cp : parser.c
Added f
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:57
---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg01310.html
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:56
---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg01309.html
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:56
---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg01309.html
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:55
---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg01309.html
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:54
---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg01309.html
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #15 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:54
---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg01309.html
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:50
---
Subject: Bug 22418
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 15:49:58
Modified files:
gcc/ada: ChangeLog decl.c
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:49
---
Subject: Bug 22418
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 15:49:13
Modified files:
gcc/ada: ChangeLog decl.c
Log message:
PR ada/22
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:48
---
Subject: Bug 22420
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 15:47:47
Modified files:
gcc/ada: ChangeLog utils2.c
--- Comment #11 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:48
---
Subject: Bug 22328
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 15:47:47
Modified files:
gcc/ada: ChangeLog utils2.
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:48
---
Subject: Bug 22419
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 15:47:47
Modified files:
gcc/ada: ChangeLog utils2.c
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:48
---
Subject: Bug 22381
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 15:47:47
Modified files:
gcc/ada: ChangeLog utils2.c
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:48
---
Subject: Bug 22383
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 15:47:47
Modified files:
gcc/ada: ChangeLog utils2.c
--- Comment #14 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:47
---
Subject: Bug 21937
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 15:47:47
Modified files:
gcc/ada: ChangeLog utils2.
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:46
---
Subject: Bug 22419
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 15:46:19
Modified files:
gcc/ada: ChangeLog utils2.c gigi.h trans.c
Log message:
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:46
---
Subject: Bug 22420
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 15:46:19
Modified files:
gcc/ada: ChangeLog utils2.c gigi.h trans.c
Log message:
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:46
---
Subject: Bug 22381
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 15:46:19
Modified files:
gcc/ada: ChangeLog utils2.c gigi.h trans.c
Log message:
--- Comment #10 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:46
---
Subject: Bug 22328
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 15:46:19
Modified files:
gcc/ada: ChangeLog utils2.c gigi.h trans.c
Log message:
--- Comment #13 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:46
---
Subject: Bug 21937
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 15:46:19
Modified files:
gcc/ada: ChangeLog utils2.c gigi.h trans.c
Log message:
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:46
---
Subject: Bug 22383
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 15:46:19
Modified files:
gcc/ada: ChangeLog utils2.c gigi.h trans.c
Log message:
--- Comment #8 from rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 15:14 ---
The bug about incorrect parsing and rounding of floating-point
literals is PR java/23432 and that about no support for strictfp
is PR java/10632. If this bug report is about either of these,
it can be closed as a dup
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 14:57
---
Here's the nice version:
stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/opt/build/eric/local/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/bin/ -c
-g -O2 -fprofile-use -freorder-blocks-and-partition -DIN_GCC -W -Wall
-Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototype
--- Comment #3 from erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi 2005-10-21 14:57
---
Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-10/msg00481.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24426
--- Comment #7 from rpjday at mindspring dot com 2005-10-21 14:15 ---
In case anyone is interested, this error appeared between gcc-4.1 snapshots
20050917 and 20050924. gcc-4.1-20050917 built a toolchain without incident.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24445
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 13:10
---
Subject: Bug 24473
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 13:10:17
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog gcc.c
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 13:10 ---
Fixed, sorry for that problem.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 13:08
---
Subject: Bug 24473
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 13:08:50
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog gcc.c
Log message:
2005-10-
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 13:01 ---
I used the wrong counter, I used the counter for all input files and not
language based input files.
I have a fix which I will be applying as obvious.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.0.0 3.4.4 4.0.2
Known to work||3.4
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 12:52 ---
Guess I have to look into this.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 12:51 ---
This is obviously caused by my patch. I could swore I tested this case.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 12:48 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn with -O -fgcse -fgcse-sm
On Oct 21, 2005, at 7:13 AM, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> pinskia, what do you think: Keep this marked as a regression, or not
On Oct 21, 2005, at 7:13 AM, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
pinskia, what do you think: Keep this marked as a regression, or not?
I think it should be kept as a regression. Otherwise it will get
overlooked before it is time to turn on store motion.
-- Pinski
--- Comment #7 from olivier_thomann at sympatico dot ca 2005-10-21 12:46
---
The problem seemed to be with precision in the floating point literal. When
converting a floating point literal to its double/float value, it ended up
having an unexpected value.
--
olivier_thomann at sympa
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 12:26 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|norma
$ touch hello.c
$ gcc -c hello.c -lm -o hello.o
gcc: cannot specify -o with -c or -S with multiple files
--
Summary: [4.1 regression] Linker input files no longer ignored
with -c and -o
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
