--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-09-28 05:21 ---
We are not waiting for anything in this bug, as far as I can tell.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-09-28 05:16 ---
I think we should just close this PR. In comment #9 Andrew suggests that this
should be a pessimizes-code, but there is no test case for that and no reason to
think that we do pessimize the code. If there is some prob
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
Summary|macro definition|pasting xxx and xxx does not
|
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
04:05 ---
*** Bug 12607 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
04:05 ---
Mark this as a dup of bug 7976.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 7976 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
04:04 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 7976 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
04:04 ---
Reopening to ...
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOP
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
04:05 ---
*** Bug 17638 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
04:04 ---
Reopening to ...
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOP
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
04:02 ---
*** Bug 24098 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
04:02 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 7976 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
04:01 ---
The error is correct. Just remove ##
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24098
[I am not an expert bug reporter, my apologies if this is a known bug or
incomplete]
1. Description of problem.
Consider test file:
#define INC_X11(aaa)
#include INC_X11(Xlib.h)
int main() {
return 0;
}
When compiled with gcc -E tst.C, output (some 4300 lines) dumped to stdout looks
fine
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
02:48 ---
Confirmed, only a 3.4 regression.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
With this testcase:
int foo (int (*cb)(void)) { return (*cb)(); }
static int callback(void) { return 0; }
int main (void)
{
int callback (void);
return foo (callback);
}
On x86_64 with -fPIC, the address of callback as passed to foo is incorrect.
If callback isn't static, it works (through th
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
02:34 ---
Assigning to Daniel Berlin by his request.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|mark at
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
02:31 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] C++ generates incorrect
overlapping fields
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 02:06 +, mark at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From mark at codesource
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
02:11 ---
Actuall, I think this is better:
mov %edx, %ebx
shld $9, %eax, %edx
shld %9, %ebx, %eax
Right?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17886
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-09-28 02:06
---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] C++ generates incorrect overlapping
fields
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> However, the questions still remains, what is the offset supposed to be
> relative to?
The
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
02:03 ---
I meant the next field of *B* was a type_decl
fields
unsigned SI
size
unit size
align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1>
unsigned virtual SI file /home/dbe
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
01:53 ---
I think the optimal sequence for f3 would look something like this, assuming
that EAX contains the low-order word and EDX contains the high-order word after
the prologue:
movl %edx, %ebx
shrl $23, %ebx
sal
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
00:57 ---
I don't understand how, on IA32, we can use rol; rcl to perform the rotation in
f3. Would you please add the complete code sequence you have in mind?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
00:28 ---
Fixed for 4.0.2 as requested by Janis.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
00:28 ---
Fixed for 4.0.2 as requested by Janis.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.3
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
00:18 ---
With the change suggested in Comment #4, we do indeed get roll for f2 and rorl
for f4.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17886
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
00:15 ---
Shouldn't f2 use (32 - y) instead of (64 - y), since unsigned is a 32-bit type?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17886
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |amodra at bigpond dot net
|dot org |dot au
Status|UNCONFIRME
powerpc64-linux, powerpc-darwin, and other targets that use the IBM extended
double format for long double currently fail gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_1.f90,
due to huge() returning infinity.
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-09/msg00533.html
--
Summary: huge() returns infini
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
00:06 ---
PR 21805 was filed after PR 21639 was worked around. But the weird part is
that nobdoy applied the
testcase for PR 21639.
One more thing, it seems like the vector_lower pass should be dependent on
tree-
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
00:04 ---
Note the older bug for this was PR 21639. I wonder why the testcase was not
applied.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24049
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-09-27
23:57 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] compiler error: Segmentation fault In function
'DESX_CBCUpdate'
On Sep 27, 2005, at 7:52 PM, janis187 at us dot ibm dot com wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From j
--- Additional Comments From janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2005-09-27
23:52 ---
The reghunt for 24095 (now a duplicate of this one) identified this patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-09/msg00635.html
which is the one prior to the one that Andrew suspected.
--
http://gcc.g
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
23:45 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
23:37 ---
We have consensus to change this to a pedwarn by default; I'll take care of
that.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
23:33 ---
Fixed in 4.1.0.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESO
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
23:33 ---
Subject: Bug 22147
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-27 23:32:16
Modified files:
gcc/cp : name-lookup.c pt.c ChangeLog
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
23:29 ---
*** Bug 24095 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
23:29 ---
There is an even shorter testcase in PR 24049, there was another bug about this
somewhere too which
was fixed and a bug which was opened for being able to call ggc_collect in the
loop optimizers but I
ca
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
23:26 ---
This is not critical as there is a work around of not configuring java, so
doing --enable-
languages=c,c++,f90,objc while configuring. But from the looks of it, libz is
not building before
fastjar.
--
--- Additional Comments From janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2005-09-27
22:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=9824)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9824&action=view)
minimized test case
Test case mentioned in the submittal message.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho
GCC mainline for powerpc-linux segfaults when compiling several of the
SPEC CPU2000 tests with "-ftree-vectorize -maltivec -mabi=altivec".
For most of them this happens with both -m32 and -m64.
The minimized test case (to be attached) causes the failure when
compiled with "-O2 -ftree-vectorize -ma
--- Additional Comments From david at davidfavor dot com 2005-09-27 22:45
---
This actually fails in the bootstrap, rather than the configure step.
I'm currently building 4.0.1 and it seems to get past this and fails
later with another problem of:
gmake[2]: *** No rule to make targe
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
22:42 ---
Hmm, fastjar is only built when java is enabled which is not very useful as
libgcj is not yet builtable for
AIX.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Component|gcov/profile
The file fastjar/jartool.c does an "#include "
and AIX provides the getopt definition in "".
Doing:
#ifdef _AIX
#include
#else
#include
#endif
causes other failures.
Suggestions?
--
Summary: AIX 51 configure fails with getopt.h not found
Product: gcc
--- Additional Comments From hubicka at ucw dot cz 2005-09-27 22:22 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ACATS FAIL 17 regressions on x86-linux, fixed
and decimal arithmetic broken
>
> --- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-09-23 19:46
> ---
> Beginning of
Beginning with mainline from 2005-09-25, GCC dies with "virtual memory
exhausted: cannot allocate memory" when building the SPEC CPU2000 test
197.parser with -O3 and -fprofile-generate/-fprofile-use. In my parallel
build of 197.parser the failures are for fast-match.c, build-disjuncts.c,
and post-
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
21:46 ---
Subject: Bug 18518
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-27 21:46:15
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
gcc/fortran: C
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
21:45 ---
Subject: Bug 23625
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-27 21:44:55
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog tree-flow-inline.h
This module is taken from one of the Meissner tests and is the last to crash
with gfortran:
! copyright 1996 Loren P. Meissner -- May be distributed if this line is
included.
! Linked List operations with Pointer to Pointer
module llo
type :: it
character*10 :: k
int
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-09-27 21:13
---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] C++ generates incorrect overlapping
fields
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
> 20:42 ---
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
21:13 ---
Subject: Bug 23552
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-27 21:12:52
Modified files:
libgfortran: ChangeLog acinclude.m4 configure.ac c
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
20:58 ---
We're not sure if this is valid or not.
See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-09/msg01732.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11987
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
20:55 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
20:52 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Just a note:
> I was able to profiledbootstrap on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (but that was over a
> week ago).
> On powerpc-darwin, it failed, and I got PR 23396 out of it, from what I h
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
20:42 ---
We have a var of type C named D.2117
unit size
align 32 symtab 0 alias set 21
fields
ignored decl_6 BLK file /home/dberlin/22488.cc line 18
size
I want to get help about the properties of gcc and its differences from other
compilers. Could you help me? It's very urgent. In a one day time I have to
make a presentation about this subject and I could only find two useful
resources. Thanks for your help.
Selcuk Dogru
---
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-09-27 20:34 ---
See PR 7874 (http://gcc.gnu.org/PR7874) for more discussion. Basically gcc now
conforms to the ISO C++ standard in this regard. This is a change from earlier
releases, and is documented at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.1/c
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-09-27 20:24 ---
A friend declaration only changes the visibility, it does not declare the
name.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From steinmtz at us dot ibm dot com 2005-09-27
20:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=9822)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9822&action=view)
Smaller dwarf2out.i
Attached a smaller .i file. Any further reduction causes profile data
mismatches.
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
20:04 ---
Fixed on trunk; waiting for 4.0 thaw to fix there.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23367
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
20:03 ---
Subject: Bug 23367
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-27 20:03:10
Modified files:
libjava: ChangeLog Makefile.in aclocal.m4 conf
If test.cc is:
class F {
friend void global_f() {}
};
class G {
void member_of_g() { global_f(); }
};
then gcc -c test.cc yields
test.cc: In member function 'void G::member_of_g()':
test.cc:5: error: 'global_f' was not declared in this scope
which appears to be wrong.
% gcc -v
Using bui
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
19:49 ---
We should fix bug #23367 on the branch, either by importing the
fix or by simply disabling the method cache.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24018
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
19:48 ---
There seems little point in leaving this open now that 4.0 has shipped.
Any required patches should be mentioned in bug #24018
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From tsv at solvo dot ru 2005-09-27 18:42 ---
Yes, I tested the reported gcc version just with your patch. After trying to
trace "synth_mult" I started to think that there should be a simplier way. :)
In my testcase the "choose_mult_variant" was called with follow
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-09-27 18:24
---
ICE on all versions including HEAD. I would say this is not legal Ada since RM
6.4.1(5) allows a default_expression to be a variable name but here you put a
protected object component name, so for now I set this
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |target
Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Additional Comments From gerald at pfeifer dot com 2005-09-27 17:38
---
Yes, and no. ;-)
My testing finished earlier today, and $PREFIX/share/classpath/api/ isn't
created any longer. Thanks!
Unfortunately, the parent directory $PREFIX/share/classpath/ still is created
even though
--- Additional Comments From fabio dot giovagnini at aurion-tech dot com
2005-09-27 17:38 ---
it is only a problem with sh-hms; with sh-elf everything works fine
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24085
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27 17:38
---
Forget that last comment. Wrong PR.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19505
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27 17:37
---
We also need http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2005-09/msg00053.html.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24018
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag CXX
--mode=compile
/home/fgiovagnini/archive/arn/sw/crosstools/gcc-4.0.1/objdir/gcc/xgcc
-shared-libgcc
-B/home/fgiovagnini/archive/arn/sw/crosstools/gcc-4.0.1/objdir/gcc/ -nostdinc++
-L/home/fgiovagnini/archive/arn/sw/crosstools/gcc-4.0.1/objdir/sh-hms/libstdc++-v3/sr
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27 17:35
---
We also need http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2005-09/msg00053.html.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19505
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
17:34 ---
Should be fixed by recent classpath import.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGN
--- Additional Comments From janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2005-09-27
17:18 ---
This is fixed in 4.0.2. I forgot and checked it into the branch before RC2;
Paolo said it was safe and to leave it in unless Mark said to yank it out.
I've messed up my Bugzilla settings and can't change t
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.5 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23287
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
17:11 ---
There are other non tree-ssa functions which have the same issue.
--
What|Removed |Added
T
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18274
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16865
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16991
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
17:09 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||15234
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14325
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14329
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|URL.openStream doesn't throw|[4.1 Regression]
|a FileNotFoundException with|URL.openStream doesn't throw
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19704
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
16:32 ---
I don't see what the alleged front-end bug is in this PR.
The layout I would expect for C on IA32 GNU/Linux would be:
0: B's vptr
4: i0
8: i1
12: c
16: A's vptr
20: i
24: c0
25: c1
That is exactly what I
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
16:26 ---
Subject: Bug 13764
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-27 16:04:25
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog c-common.c
gcc/cp
--- Additional Comments From segher at kernel dot crashing dot org
2005-09-27 16:19 ---
Looks like the issue is that lex.c:save_comment() doesn't look at line_note's.
An analogous issue happens with trigraphs.
Btw, the C standard _does_ require escaped newlines and trigrpahs to be
proce
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23293
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23125
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19565
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16306
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17863
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22360
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22415
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20077
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20928
1 - 100 of 310 matches
Mail list logo
