[Bug middle-end/21939] [3.4 Regression] corrupted memory with deque of >63 items

2005-06-06 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-07 06:46 --- Yup, segfaults for 64 on x86-64 too with 3.4.5pre: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. main (argc=-1781549440, argv=0x0) at stl_deque.h:134 134 { return *_M_cur; } --

[Bug libgcj/21944] [4.0 Regression] libgcj.so fails to link on IRIX 6: GOT overflow

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code, wrong- | |code| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21944

[Bug libgcj/21944] [4.0 Regression] libgcj.so fails to link on IRIX 6: GOT overflow

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code, |

prblm with compiling libstdc++

2005-06-06 Thread ravi kumar
hai, I tried to compile libstdc++-2.8.1 on linux fedora core 2. but i got errors like the following can any one help me with this? ../../../libio/libio.h:270: invalid exception specifications ../../../libio/libio.h:271: invalid exception specifications ../../../libio/libio.h:272: inv

[Bug fortran/21912] Wrong implied do-loop

2005-06-06 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2005-06-07 04:06 --- Tobi, can we close this PR? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21912

[Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type

2005-06-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-07 02:55 --- Subject: Bug 21770 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-07 02:55:06 Modified files: libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog libstdc++-v3/inclu

[Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type

2005-06-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-07 02:23 --- Subject: Bug 21770 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-07 02:23:44 Modified files: libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog libstdc++-v3/inclu

[Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type

2005-06-06 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-06-07 00:51 --- Actually, we can fix that elegantly, removing some inconsistencies in the typedefs of the debug-mode code ;) I'm on it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21770

[Bug bootstrap/20155] [4.0 Regression] libgcj build fails with "execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long"

2005-06-06 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
--- Additional Comments From gerald at pfeifer dot com 2005-06-07 00:37 --- Confirmed. Also on FreeBSD this has been fixed on mainline, so I'm removing the 4.1 tag from the summary. Having a backport to 4.0 would be great. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug testsuite/21945] gfortran testsuite dies on cygwin (again)

2005-06-06 Thread billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-07 00:32 --- Patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg00554.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21945

[Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type

2005-06-06 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-06-07 00:10 --- Well, of course they do. They also fail with concept-checks enabled. Do we really want to allow for this extension in debug-mode too? If we agree about that, I can work on it, lower priority, really, however ;) -

[Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type

2005-06-06 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-07 00:06 --- Paolo Note that the new testcases (explicit_instantiation/3.cc) fail in debug mode. To test this, use -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG in scripts/testsuite_flags -benjamin -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug tree-optimization/21831] [4.1 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-97.c fails

2005-06-06 Thread kbesaw at us dot ibm dot com
--- Additional Comments From kbesaw at us dot ibm dot com 2005-06-06 23:45 --- I tried vect-97.c on power-pc and couldn't reproduce the problem. I don't know if this means that the problem goes away with recent patches or that it only occurs when vectorizing on ia64. I don't have the ab

[Bug tree-optimization/21884] [4.1 regression] ICE with -ftree-vectorize

2005-06-06 Thread kbesaw at us dot ibm dot com
--- Additional Comments From kbesaw at us dot ibm dot com 2005-06-06 23:41 --- I tried compiling x.ii on power-pc and couldn't reproduce the problem. I don't know if this means that the problem goes away with recent patches or that it only occurs when vectorizing on pentium. I currently

[Bug testsuite/21945] gfortran testsuite dies on cygwin (again)

2005-06-06 Thread billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 23:37 --- I'll take it. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGN

[Bug testsuite/21945] New: gfortran testsuite dies on cygwin (again)

2005-06-06 Thread billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
The gfortran testsuite fails on cygwin with FAIL: gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90 execution test ERROR: tcl error sourcing /usr/local/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dg.exp. ERROR: rm: cannot remove `./forall_1.exe': Permission denied I have seen this before. It seems that dejagnu tries to delete th

[Bug bootstrap/20155] [4.0/4.1 Regression] libgcj build fails with "execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long"

2005-06-06 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 23:21 --- At least on Tru64 UNIX (which is affected as mentioned in Comment #12), this is fixed on mainline by this patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg01552.html So it should probably be backported to

[Bug libgcj/21944] New: libgcj.so fails to link on IRIX 6: GOT overflow

2005-06-06 Thread gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
libgcj.so doesn't link on IRIX 6: /vol/gcc/obj/gcc-4.0.0-20050414/6.5-gcc/gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/vol/gcc/obj/gcc-4.0.0-20050414/6.5-gcc/gcc/ -nostdinc++ -L/vol/gcc/obj/gcc-4.0.0-20050414/6.5-gcc/mips-sgi-irix6.5/libstdc++-v3/src -L/vol/gcc/obj/gcc-4.0.0-20050414/6.5-gcc/mips-sgi-irix6.5/li

[Bug libgcj/21943] New: O32 libffi.so fails to link on IRIX 6

2005-06-06 Thread gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
Building the O32 libffi on IRIX 6.5 fails, thus we get a bootstrap failure with --enable-libgcj: /bin/ksh ./libtool --mode=link /.vol/gcc/obj/gcc-4.0.0-20050414/6.5-gcc-java/gcc/xgcc -B/.vol/gcc/obj/gcc-4.0.0-20050414/6.5-gcc-java/gcc/ -B/.vol/gcc/share/mips-sgi-irix6.5/bin/ -B/.vol/gcc/share/

[Bug middle-end/21939] Corrupted memory with deque of >63 items under gcc-3.4.4

2005-06-06 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-06-06 23:01 --- Maybe (a wild guess) Andrew refers to apparently similar problems that may occur with std::sort, when the comparison doesn't fulfil the strict weak ordering reqs, like libstdc++/18640. Those are user errors, defin

[Bug libgcj/21942] New: boehm-gc doesn't compile on Solaris 10/amd64

2005-06-06 Thread gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
The amd64 multilib of boehm-gc doesn't build on i386-pc-solaris2.10: the compilation fails with /vol/gnu/src/gcc/gcc-dist/boehm-gc/include/private/gcconfig.h:435: error: parse error before '--' token Environment: System: SunOS cumaru 5.10 Generic_Patch i86pc i386 i86pc Architecture: i86pc

[Bug libgcj/21941] New: NPE in Socket.connect()

2005-06-06 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
I get a NullPointerException in Socket.connect(). This seems to happen when the nameserver is not available. My current test case is with gcjappletviewer; I can reproduce it by stopping my VPN but leaving my /etc/resolv.conf untouched (so it tries to contact a DNS server which is not available) (I

[Bug middle-end/21939] Corrupted memory with deque of >63 items under gcc-3.4.4

2005-06-06 Thread magerman at rentec dot com
--- Additional Comments From magerman at rentec dot com 2005-06-06 22:46 --- (In reply to comment #2) > The last time I saw a bug like this, it was actually a bug in the person's > code. I wish it were true. We've got this code (well, a more complicated version of it) working optimize

[Bug libgcj/21940] New: boehm-gc gctest fails on Solaris 10/x86

2005-06-06 Thread gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
During a make check on Solaris 10/x86, make check in boehm-gc fails (which unfortunately goes almost unnoticed since the failure is not included in mail-report.log, cf. PR libgcj/11412): /bin/ksh: 2246 Segmentation Fault FAIL: gctest === 1 of 1 tests failed === mak

[Bug middle-end/21939] Corrupted memory with deque of >63 items under gcc-3.4.4

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 21:27 --- The last time I saw a bug like this, it was actually a bug in the person's code. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/21939] Corrupted memory with deque of >63 items under gcc-3.4.4

2005-06-06 Thread magerman at rentec dot com
--- Additional Comments From magerman at rentec dot com 2005-06-06 21:25 --- Created an attachment (id=9043) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9043&action=view) the preprocessed file that triggers the bug -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21939

[Bug c++/21939] New: Corrupted memory with deque of >63 items under gcc-3.4.4

2005-06-06 Thread magerman at rentec dot com
It took me a long time to whittle this down to a small example, but here it is: #include #include #include using std::deque; using std::auto_ptr; struct A { long x; char y; A() : x(0) {} }; auto_ptr > foo(int l){ auto_ptr > d(new deque); A a, b, c; for (int i=0; ipush_back(a); return

[Bug ada/21937] Member record alignment triggering an ICE

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21937

[Bug middle-end/21430] Quadratic behavior with constant initializers

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 21:16 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/21937] Member record alignment triggering an ICE

2005-06-06 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
-- What|Removed |Added CC||pluto at agmk dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21937

[Bug middle-end/21766] [4.1 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-pc-cygwin

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 20:59 --- *** Bug 21938 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/21938] ../.././gcc/libgcc2.c:1803: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed.

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 20:59 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21766 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/21938] New: ../.././gcc/libgcc2.c:1803: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed.

2005-06-06 Thread dcorbit at connx dot com
Environment is Mingw. Bison version used is 1.29 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mingw/gcc-4.1-20050604 $ make make[1]: Entering directory `/mingw/gcc-4.1-20050604/host-i686-pc-mingw32/zlib' true "AR_FLAGS=rc" "CC_FOR_BUILD=gcc" "CFLAGS=-g -O2" "CXXFLAGS=-g - O2" "CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD=" "CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-O2 -g -

[Bug ada/21937] Member record alignment triggering an ICE

2005-06-06 Thread macro at linux-mips dot org
--- Additional Comments From macro at linux-mips dot org 2005-06-06 20:45 --- Created an attachment (id=9042) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9042&action=view) gcc-4.0.0-ada-record-pack-align.patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21937

[Bug ada/21937] Member record alignment triggering an ICE

2005-06-06 Thread macro at linux-mips dot org
--- Additional Comments From macro at linux-mips dot org 2005-06-06 20:43 --- Created an attachment (id=9041) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9041&action=view) This is the set of the sources -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21937

[Bug ada/21937] New: Member record alignment triggering an ICE

2005-06-06 Thread macro at linux-mips dot org
This problem happens for platforms that set STRICT_ALIGNMENT. For them it is possible for a given record type to be expressed using an integer mode if used as a member record, and the BLK mode if used standalone. As a result an assignment where lhs is BLKmode and rhs is *Imode may be generated an

[Bug bootstrap/21936] New: Ada bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/x86 with native as

2005-06-06 Thread gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
Bootstrapping mainline on i386-pc-solaris2.10 with the native as fails in stage2: stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/vol/gcc/share/i386-pc-solaris2.10/bin/ -c -g -O2 -gnatpg -gnata -I- -I. -Iada -I/vol/gnu/src/gcc/gcc-dist/gcc/ada /vol/gnu/src/gcc/gcc-dist/gcc/ada/exp_ch3.adb -o ada/exp_ch3.o Assemb

[Bug fortran/19015] shape / rank mismatch in maxloc / minloc could be caught at compile time

2005-06-06 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 20:22 --- This is also a runtime error in 4.0 now. I am changing the subject to reflect my preference that this should be caught at compile time. Thomas -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug libgcj/21935] New: All libjava execution tests fail on IRIX 6

2005-06-06 Thread gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
All libjava execution tests fail on IRIX 6 like this: % LD_LIBRARYN32_PATH=../../../gcc:../.libs ./PR9577 3709255:./PR9577: rld: Error: unresolvable symbol in ../.libs/libgcj.so.7: pthread_kill 3709255:./PR9577: rld: Error: unresolvable symbol in ../.libs/libgcj.so.7: pthread_sigmask 3709255:./

[Bug bootstrap/21934] Bison files are missing or misnamed under MINGW

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 20:13 --- Yep that is it: : GNU Bison version 1.28 (or later) Berkeley yacc (byacc) is also reported to work other than for java. Necessary when modifying *.y files. Ne

[Bug bootstrap/21934] Bison files are missing or misnamed under MINGW

2005-06-06 Thread dcorbit at connx dot com
--- Additional Comments From dcorbit at connx dot com 2005-06-06 20:09 --- Subject: RE: Bison files are missing or misnamed under MINGW Perhaps this version is not new enough: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mingw/gcc-4.1-20050604 $ bison --version bison++ Version 1.21-7, adapted from GNU bison by

[Bug bootstrap/21934] Bison files are missing or misnamed under MINGW

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 20:08 --- Do you have bison installed, if not you need it to compile a snapshot? -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/21934] New: Bison files are missing or misnamed under MINGW

2005-06-06 Thread dcorbit at connx dot com
The product area is a wild guess. Probably, you should pay no attention to it. Here is the output of make, after the failure has occurred (to shorten the output size): == $ make make[1]: Entering directory `/mingw/gcc-4.

[Bug fortran/21184] fortran built and tested despite target-libgfortran disabled

2005-06-06 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 20:00 --- Patch rejected, immediate interest lost. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|hp at gcc dot

[Bug bootstrap/17383] [4.0 Regression] Building in src dir fails

2005-06-06 Thread grondin at fr dot fm
--- Additional Comments From grondin at fr dot fm 2005-06-06 19:35 --- I'm used ./configure --prefix=/usr I've the make error : (...) updating cache ./config.cache configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: executing default-1 commands ./config.st

[Bug middle-end/21916] [4.1 Regression] ICE: segmentation fault in stage3

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 19:31 --- I think this is the same as: . -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/21897] [4.1 Regression] Segementation fault in fold_ternary

2005-06-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 19:26 --- Subject: Bug 21897 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-06 19:26:10 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog fold-const.c gcc/t

[Bug middle-end/21916] [4.1 Regression] ICE: segmentation fault in stage3

2005-06-06 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-06-06 19:24 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE: segmentation fault in stage3 On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:00:57PM -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/21933] New: [4.1 regression] ICE with -ftree-vectorize

2005-06-06 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
Compiling the following code snippet with today's mainline (g++ -O -march=pentium4 -ftree-vectorize) I get an ICE: == struct A { int a[4]; A& foo() { for (int i=0; i<4; ++i) a[i]=0; return *this; } int bar(); }; struc

[Bug libfortran/21926] matmul does not deal with non-packed result

2005-06-06 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/21932] [3.4 Regression] -O3 -fno-unit-at-a-time causes ICE

2005-06-06 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 18:47 --- To be more explicit: it ICEs on x86-64 too. -- What|Removed |Added Known to fail|3.4

[Bug c/21911] named parameter mistakenly identified as sentinel

2005-06-06 Thread ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 18:41 --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg00507.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21911

[Bug middle-end/21916] [4.1 Regression] ICE: segmentation fault in stage3

2005-06-06 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2005-06-06 17:53 --- (In reply to comment #7) > On hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, there are about a dozen files which differ > between stage2 and stage3. (...) Could You also check the testcase from PR20586? (-funroll-loops issue)

[Bug c++/21903] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Default argument of template function causes a compile-time error

2005-06-06 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 17:30 --- Fixed mainline 2005-06-06 Nathan Sidwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR 21903 * cp-tree.def (DEFAULT_ARG): Document TREE_CHAIN use. * parser.c (cp_parser_late_parsing_default_args): Propaga

[Bug c++/21903] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Default argument of template function causes a compile-time error

2005-06-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 17:29 --- Subject: Bug 21903 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-06 17:29:41 Modified files: gcc/cp : ChangeLog cp-tree.def parser.c pt.c

[Bug middle-end/19699] [4.0/4.1 Regression] warning about not returning from end of a non-void function because of dead code

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 16:07 --- (In reply to comment #14) > This is how I came to this "conclusion": > There are new (not very rare) regressions in gcc-4.0 that will never > be fixed. These regressions will be fixed only in gcc-4.1. > As a

[Bug debug/21932] [3.4 Regression] -fno-unit-at-a-time causes ICE in gcc-3.4.4 on solaris2.8

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 16:03 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug debug/21932] [3.4 Regression] -fno-unit-at-a-time causes ICE in gcc-3.4.4 on solaris2.8

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |debug Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Summary|-fno-unit-at-a-time

[Bug target/21041] [4.0 Regression] ICE: output_operand: Cannot decompose address

2005-06-06 Thread uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 15:57 --- Here's another reduced test case, this time without uninitialized variables: // ICEs with -O2 -fPIC struct args { short int matrix[8][8]; char **current; }; int test (struct args *args, char *init, i

[Bug fortran/21931] problem with fugly-logint flag and evaluating if statements

2005-06-06 Thread mark_l_hansen at yahoo dot com
--- Additional Comments From mark_l_hansen at yahoo dot com 2005-06-06 15:51 --- Created an attachment (id=9038) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9038&action=view) Test program -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21931

[Bug c++/21932] New: -fno-unit-at-a-time causes ICE in gcc-3.4.4 on solaris2.8

2005-06-06 Thread magerman at rentec dot com
The following sequence produces an ICE in gcc-3.4.4: $ cat > foo.C < search starts here: /work/external/wwc/prgcc/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/../../../../include/c++/3.4.4 /work/external/wwc/prgcc/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/../../../../include/c++/3.4.4/sparc-sun-solaris2.8 /w

[Bug middle-end/7776] const char* p = "foo"; if (p == "foo") ... is compiled without warning!

2005-06-06 Thread trt at acm dot org
--- Additional Comments From trt at acm dot org 2005-06-06 15:48 --- I recommend a version with fewer false positives. I've been using a warning like this for years, with zero false positives. The current gcc-4-ified version is: - /* check for comparing string constant with anything be

[Bug fortran/21931] New: problem with fugly-logint flag and evaluating if statements

2005-06-06 Thread mark_l_hansen at yahoo dot com
The -fugly-logint flag allows FORTRAN to treat integers as logicals and vice versa. The following example program shows some inconsistencies in how the if statements evaluate. If you change VAR1 to 3,2,1,0,-1 and view the results you will see some interesting things. The best way to see the p

[Bug tree-optimization/21923] [4.1 Regression] Ada compiler fails to build on gcc 4.1

2005-06-06 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-06-06 15:44 --- Testresults with the patch from comment #10: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-06/msg00361.html -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/19699] [4.0/4.1 Regression] warning about not returning from end of a non-void function because of dead code

2005-06-06 Thread veksler at il dot ibm dot com
--- Additional Comments From veksler at il dot ibm dot com 2005-06-06 15:20 --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > Will the patch be applied to 4.0 branch too? > No because it is too big in that it also changes the inliner to be a CFG aware inliner. In that case,

[Bug target/21642] [3.4 Regression] wrong code with -O2

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Summary|wrong code with -O2 |[3.4 Regression] wrong code ||with -O2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/21642] wrong code with -O2

2005-06-06 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 15:17 --- This appears to be related to strength reduction. -O2 -fno-strength-reduce succeeds -O1 -fstrength-reduce fails. The bug is not present in GCC 4. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/21921] [4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: in tsi_link_before, at tree-iterator.c:113

2005-06-06 Thread bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 15:08 --- The patch fixes the bug because in the poster's test case we have to insert a reciprocal computation in an empty basic block. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21921

[Bug middle-end/7776] const char* p = "foo"; if (p == "foo") ... is compiled without warning!

2005-06-06 Thread roger at eyesopen dot com
--- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2005-06-06 15:06 --- C front-end patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg00369.html -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/21916] [4.1 Regression] ICE: segmentation fault in stage3

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 15:00 --- Can you try -fdump-tree-all and see if any of the dumps there differ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21916

[Bug target/19923] openssl is slower when compiled with gcc 4.0 than 3.3

2005-06-06 Thread rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz
--- Additional Comments From rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz 2005-06-06 15:00 --- Subject: Re: openssl is slower when compiled with gcc 4.0 than 3.3 > Looks like the culrpit is this: > > = > st

[Bug middle-end/21916] [4.1 Regression] ICE: segmentation fault in stage3

2005-06-06 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-06-06 14:51 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE: segmentation fault in stage3 > I will need someone with accesss to hppa to binary search the miscompiled file > from stage2 and send me a .i file. > > Either tha

[Bug c++/21930] [4.1 regression] pretty printer confusion

2005-06-06 Thread gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-06-06 14:50 --- Subject: Re: New: [4.1 regression] pretty printer confusion "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | The error message reads: | | bug.cc: In function 'void foo(const A&) [wi

Re: [Bug c++/21930] New: [4.1 regression] pretty printer confusion

2005-06-06 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
"reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | The error message reads: | | bug.cc: In function 'void foo(const A&) [with int N = 0]': | bug.cc:7: instantiated from here | bug.cc:3: error: no match for 'operator-' in '-((const A<0>&)#'convert_expr' | not supported by dump

[Bug c++/21930] [4.1 regression] pretty printer confusion

2005-06-06 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-06-06 14:47 --- Ot looks like dump_expr must support CONVERT_EXPRs, and just strip them. Before, there was no way to discern between unary plus and a real conversion, but now they are different codes. Not all occurrences o

[Bug target/19923] openssl is slower when compiled with gcc 4.0 than 3.3

2005-06-06 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-06-06 14:40 --- Looks like the culrpit is this: = static unsigned int S[256]; unsigned md2_block (unsigned int *sp1, unsigned int *sp2, const unsigned

[Bug c++/21930] [4.1 regression] pretty printer confusion

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 14:37 --- Confirmed, -- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia a

[Bug c++/21930] New: [4.1 regression] pretty printer confusion

2005-06-06 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
On mainline I get a hosed error message for the following invalid code snippet: template struct A {}; template void foo(const A &a) { -A(a); } void bar() { foo(A<0>()); } The er

[Bug c++/21903] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Default argument of template function causes a compile-time error

2005-06-06 Thread bangerth at dealii dot org
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-06 14:28 --- My last message refers to the code snippet in comment #4. W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21903

[Bug c++/21903] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Default argument of template function causes a compile-time error

2005-06-06 Thread bangerth at dealii dot org
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-06 14:27 --- Sure it is a regression: gcc3.3.x compiles it just fine, and so does 3.2.x. gcc2.95 ICES, and from 3.4 onward we have the present error. W. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/21929] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE on invalid template parameter

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 14:20 --- Confirmed, started to fail between "3.5.0 20040909" and "4.0.0 20050225". -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/20637] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Confusing message with different using declarations

2005-06-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 14:18 --- Subject: Bug 20637 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-06 14:18:22 Modified files: gcc/cp : ChangeLog class.c cp-tree.h decl2.c m

[Bug c++/21929] New: [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE on invalid template parameter

2005-06-06 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
For the following invalid code snippet I get an ICE since gcc 4.0.0: template struct A { struct B; }; template<> struct A::B {}; bug.cc:6: error: type/value mismatch at argument 1 in template parameter list for 'templa

[Bug target/19923] openssl is slower when compiled with gcc 4.0 than 3.3

2005-06-06 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-06-06 13:33 --- Uhm, at this point, I don't believe anymore that the loop I posted is the cause of the regression. Maybe the regression is somewhere else. I'll investigate. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug c++/20637] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Confusing message with different using declarations

2005-06-06 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |nathan at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/21847] [4.0/4.1 Regression] misscompiling of the following java code

2005-06-06 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From aph at redhat dot com 2005-06-06 13:15 --- With that change, passes bootstrap with c/c++/java, perfect i686-pc-linux-gnu libgcj test result. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21847

[Bug tree-optimization/20803] Pseudo-infinite recursion in ivopts

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 20803 depends on bug 20742, which changed state. Bug 20742 Summary: [4.0 Regression] Hang in tree_ssa_iv_optimize_loop http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20742 What|Old Value |New Value ---

[Bug tree-optimization/20742] [4.0 Regression] Hang in tree_ssa_iv_optimize_loop

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 12:59 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/21530] libstdc++ not supported on this target

2005-06-06 Thread gcc at mailinator dot com
--- Additional Comments From gcc at mailinator dot com 2005-06-06 12:57 --- Same problem in 3.4.4 -- What|Removed |Added Version|3.4.3 |3.4.

[Bug c++/15674] [DR214] template argument binding differs between member and static fumctions

2005-06-06 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 12:35 --- Closing this, it is not a bug. What special cases the structure member example is that one of the function is a template and the other is not. Thus overload resolution picks the non-template (all other thin

[Bug preprocessor/21815] -E output depends on -g

2005-06-06 Thread joerg dot richter at pdv-fs dot de
--- Additional Comments From joerg dot richter at pdv-fs dot de 2005-06-06 12:33 --- Whoever has the same problem: -fno-working-directory solves it -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21815

[Bug tree-optimization/20742] [4.0 Regression] Hang in tree_ssa_iv_optimize_loop

2005-06-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 12:13 --- Subject: Bug 20742 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-06 12:12:53 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug tree-optimization/21847] [4.0/4.1 Regression] misscompiling of the following java code

2005-06-06 Thread amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From amacleod at redhat dot com 2005-06-06 12:07 --- I agree, you should need 'mark_stmt_necessary (stmt, true)' Presuming that it bootstraps and passes tests, its approved. Andrew -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21847

[Bug c++/15674] [DR214] template argument binding differs between member and static fumctions

2005-06-06 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 11:44 --- Not a regression, but still a bug. We should reject the static member case too. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/21847] [4.0/4.1 Regression] misscompiling of the following java code

2005-06-06 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From aph at redhat dot com 2005-06-06 11:34 --- I think you want mark_stmt_necessary (stmt, true) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21847

[Bug tree-optimization/21847] [4.0/4.1 Regression] misscompiling of the following java code

2005-06-06 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From aph at redhat dot com 2005-06-06 11:09 --- Failure during bootstrap: ./xgcc -B./ -B/home/aph/gcc4/install/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -isystem /home/aph/gcc4/install/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem /home/aph/gcc4/install/i686-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include -L/home/ap

[Bug tree-optimization/19768] [4.0 Regression] ICE: SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI should be set

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 10:51 --- (In reply to comment #13) > I know. Andrew: when you backported this patch: >PR tree-optimization/21085 > * fold-const (fold): Don't change X % -C to X % C if C has > overflowed.

[Bug fortran/13257] [4.0 only] Error instead of warning for missing comma in format string

2005-06-06 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-06-06 10:45 --- ping this, it looks like Andrew just missed 4.0.1 too for this bug :) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13257

[Bug tree-optimization/21847] [4.0/4.1 Regression] misscompiling of the following java code

2005-06-06 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From aph at redhat dot com 2005-06-06 10:44 --- OK, I'm looking at it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21847

[Bug c++/20240] [3.3 Regression] invalid using-redeclaration accepted

2005-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06 10:43 --- *** Bug 21928 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

  1   2   >