[Bug target/16111] generates invalid SSE movdqa instruction (instead of movaps)

--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2004-12-28 06:33 --- The original bug is fixed for 4.0.0. The problem described in comment #8 looks like a problem with aliasing (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-12/msg01096.html). -- What|Removed |A

[Bug target/19162] [4.0 regression] ICE while building libobjc's sendmsg.c

--- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2004-12-28 06:31 --- the patch fixes the ICE, libobjc built sucessfully. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/18107] [4.0 Regression] [meta-bug] Bootstrap fails on i686-pc-mingw32

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 05:29 --- Since the last bug was fixed so closing as fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|

[Bug c++/14607] [3.3 Regression] Duplicate symbol "vtable for node" in files div.o and env.o

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.0.0 |3.4.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14607

[Bug bootstrap/18107] [4.0 Regression] [meta-bug] Bootstrap fails on i686-pc-mingw32

-- Bug 18107 depends on bug 17406, which changed state. Bug 17406 Summary: [4.0 regression] ICE dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2out.c:1692 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17406 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug target/17406] [4.0 regression] ICE dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2out.c:1692

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 05:27 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/17406] [4.0 regression] ICE dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2out.c:1692

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 05:26 --- Subject: Bug 17406 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-28 05:26:25 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/i386: i

[Bug libstdc++/10606] uncaught_exception() returns false too early

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug target/17643] [3.3 Regression] ICE in propagate_one_insn, at flow.c:1582

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 05:05 --- Fixed also in 3.3.6. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |

[Bug target/17406] [4.0 regression] ICE dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2out.c:1692

-- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Last reconfirmed|2004-10-07 12:22:59 |2004-12-28 05:05:10 date|

[Bug target/6077] [alpha-osf].s with -x assembler-with-cpp breaks mips-tfile

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 05:03 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/19171] causes segfault ICE in GCC 4

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 05:02 --- (In reply to comment #9) > I finally figured out how to get a backtrace from the stage2 compiler, so here > it is (this is from running the posted testcase thru cc1): This backtrace does not makes sense as

[Bug c++/14607] [3.3 Regression] Duplicate symbol "vtable for node" in files div.o and env.o

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 04:51 --- Subject: Bug 14607 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-28 04:51:33 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug target/17406] [4.0 regression] ICE dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2out.c:1692

--- Additional Comments From dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-12-28 04:29 --- Richard Hendeerson's patch in comment #26 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg01983.html fixes mingw bootstrap with -gdwarf-2 Danny -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17

[Bug driver/16118] Preprocessed source error with -xf77-cpp-input

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 04:24 --- Subject: Bug 16118 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-28 04:24:33 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/doc: i

[Bug debug/19124] [4.0 regression] gcc generates incorrect dwarf2 debug info

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 02:34 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug debug/16788] [3.3 regression] Incorrect DWARF-2 offset for long long struct member

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-debug Last reconfirmed|2004-07-27 19:44:32 |2004-12-28 02:18:47 date|

[Bug c++/16413] [3.3 regression] operator() of private member accessible

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Last reconfirmed|2004-07-07 19:02:05 |2004-12-28 02:18:00 date|

[Bug target/15873] [3.3 only] hidden symbol `__floatsidf' is referenced by DSO

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-12-

[Bug c/13842] [3.3 Regression] static inline emitted when not used

-- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13842

[Bug c/13842] [3.3 Regression] static inline emitted when not used

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Last reconfirmed|2004-09-10 00:45:14 |2004-12-28 02:15:23 date|

[Bug target/14484] [3.3 regression] -mabi=64 and -O -> as error

-- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14484

[Bug middle-end/19171] causes segfault ICE in GCC 4

--- Additional Comments From bsdfan3 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-12-28 01:59 --- I finally figured out how to get a backtrace from the stage2 compiler, so here it is (this is from running the posted testcase thru cc1): --backtrace starts-- Starting program: /home/Lucas/b-gcc/g

[Bug target/17114] ColdFire ICE with illegal constraints

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 01:43 --- Hmm, this works on the mainline from 20041022. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17114

[Bug target/19129] [3.4 Regression] gcc-3.4.4 ICE while building libobjc

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 01:37 --- So closing as fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |

[Bug c++/19172] strcpy bug? or mine?

--- Additional Comments From rolosworld at gmail dot com 2004-12-28 01:36 --- true, didn't notice the brackets. scary bug from me lol thank guys -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19172

[Bug c++/19172] strcpy bug? or mine?

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 01:34 --- That is the bug: word = new char( strlen(str) +1); should be: word = new char[ strlen(str) +1]; Otherwise you are allocating only one char. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/19129] [3.4 Regression] gcc-3.4.4 ICE while building libobjc

--- Additional Comments From namsh at kldp dot org 2004-12-28 01:33 --- I confirmed that the "Richard's patch for PR19102" fixed this problem. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19129

[Bug c++/19172] strcpy bug? or mine?

--- Additional Comments From sebor at roguewave dot com 2004-12-28 01:32 --- Subject: Re: strcpy bug? or mine? rolosworld at gmail dot com wrote: > --- Additional Comments From rolosworld at gmail dot com 2004-12-28 > 01:00 --- > (In reply to comment #1) > >>You forgot C st

Re: [Bug c++/19172] strcpy bug? or mine?

rolosworld at gmail dot com wrote: --- Additional Comments From rolosworld at gmail dot com 2004-12-28 01:00 --- (In reply to comment #1) You forgot C strings are null terminated. I did this: word = new char( strlen(str) + 1 ); Don't you mean new char [strlen(str) + 1]? I.e., brackets,

[Bug middle-end/19171] causes segfault ICE in GCC 4

--- Additional Comments From bsdfan3 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-12-28 01:31 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Mark as unconfirmed. Ok, does anyone else have Cygwin? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19171

[Bug c++/19172] strcpy bug? or mine?

--- Additional Comments From rolosworld at gmail dot com 2004-12-28 01:30 --- ok, I'll keep experimenting here, I belive its probably one bug from me :-/ I'll try the C equivalent and try to learn from this! lol thanks for the help -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19172

[Bug middle-end/19171] causes segfault ICE in GCC 4

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19171

[Bug middle-end/19171] causes segfault ICE in GCC 4

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 01:28 --- Mark as unconfirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|

[Bug middle-end/19171] causes segfault ICE in GCC 4

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 01:28 --- Ok, then I will close this as invalid to ... -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITI

[Bug c++/19172] strcpy bug? or mine?

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 01:27 --- Can you try a released FSF gcc? Also if it is a bug in strcpy, then this is not a bug in GCC since GCC does not contain strcpy but in glibc, make sure that equivant C code works too. -- http://gcc.gnu.

[Bug target/17406] [4.0 regression] ICE dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2out.c:1692

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 01:24 --- new patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg01983.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/19172] strcpy bug? or mine?

--- Additional Comments From rolosworld at gmail dot com 2004-12-28 01:23 --- Im using: "khgukytit8igddd0" "0123456789qwertypoopp" Im compiling the code with: g++ (GCC) 3.4.3 20041125 (Gentoo

[Bug middle-end/19171] causes segfault ICE in GCC 4

--- Additional Comments From bsdfan3 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-12-28 01:23 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Do you mean 12-27-04 or 10-27-04? Sorry, I meant 12-27-04. The 10 was a typo. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19171

[Bug middle-end/19171] causes segfault ICE in GCC 4

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 01:20 --- Do you mean 12-27-04 or 10-27-04? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19171

[Bug middle-end/19171] causes segfault ICE in GCC 4

--- Additional Comments From bsdfan3 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-12-28 01:18 --- This bug still exists with GCC 4 as of 10-27-04, and I miscategorized this bug. It occurs during bootstrap in builds hosted on i686-pc-cygwin. -- What|Removed

[Bug c++/19172] strcpy bug? or mine?

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 01:07 --- I cannot reproduce this on powerpc-darwin with the mainline or 3.3.2? what target are you running on? Are you sure that you don't have an invisable character in the string? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil

[Bug c++/19172] strcpy bug? or mine?

--- Additional Comments From rolosworld at gmail dot com 2004-12-28 01:00 --- (In reply to comment #1) > You forgot C strings are null terminated. I did this: word = new char( strlen(str) + 1 ); word[strlen(str)] = '\0'; and still get the same output..? -- What|R

[Bug target/17406] [4.0 regression] ICE dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2out.c:1692

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 00:17 --- Testing a completely different patch. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gc

[Bug c++/19172] strcpy bug? or mine?

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 00:15 --- You forgot C strings are null terminated. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug target/19115] __builtin_frexpl and std::frexp(long double) broken

--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 00:10 --- libstdc++ is calling frexpl in libc.a, which expects an AIX format long double value, not a double. Things work if one uses -mlong-double-128. At some point we need to default to long-double-128 for AIX for th

[Bug c++/19172] New: strcpy bug? or mine?

I have been trying to figure out why I get this outoput: 4 4 khgukytit8ig 13 # And not this: 4 4 khgukytit8igddd0 36 # THE CODE # #include using namespace std

[Bug regression/19120] [4.0 Regression] ICE: in ten_to_ptwo, at real.c:2007

--- Additional Comments From v dot haisman at sh dot cvut dot cz 2004-12-28 00:01 --- I've tried to build it with GCC 2.95.4 that is the system compiler on the box with the same result. Previously I used older version of GCC 4.0.0. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1912

[Bug rtl-optimization/19103] [4.0 Regression] Current CVS (2004/12/21) doesn't compile with profiledbootstrap

--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 23:53 --- Actually it is even more stupid. Patch below, just testing. Index: loop-iv.c === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/loop-iv.c,v retrieving revision 2

[Bug rtl-optimization/19103] [4.0 Regression] Current CVS (2004/12/21) doesn't compile with profiledbootstrap

--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 23:40 --- A stupid bug in that patch -- the condition for "inifinite" needs to be negated. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug regression/19120] [4.0 Regression] ICE: in ten_to_ptwo, at real.c:2007

--- Additional Comments From v dot haisman at sh dot cvut dot cz 2004-12-27 22:43 --- This is my attempt to get you guys more info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:::~/tmp/gcc-head/objdir/gcc> make bootstrap make CC=" stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/home/4/wilx/i386-unknown-freebsd4.10/bin/" CC_FOR_BUILD="

[Bug target/19115] __builtin_frexpl and std::frexp(long double) broken

--- Additional Comments From jlquinn at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 22:28 --- I did the stock configuration, with the exception of specifying an install dir and --with-cpu=power4. So the floating point is whatever comes out of the box. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?

[Bug libfortran/19016] maxloc ignores mask

--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2004-12-27 22:24 --- I did some more digging around, and found that the error only occurred when the mask parameter was generated "on the fly". If the mask is a precomputed logical array, the function works correctly. $ ca

[Bug c/19171] causes segfault ICE in GCC 4

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 22:07 --- 10-26-04 is very old, I cannot reproduce it with a cross compiler with today's compiler, can you try a new snapshot. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/19163] __attribute__((aligned)) not working in template

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-12-27 22:07 --- Patch posted: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg01975.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/18384] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] ICE on zero-length array with empty initializer...

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-12-27 21:57 --- Jakub, many thanks for cleaning this up for me!! Just one comment: in your latest patch, the second error message is capitalized and shouldn't, plus it uses a double negation ("not a non-negative number")

[Bug fortran/19101] missing & in character continuation not caught

--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 21:47 --- Actually, my misleading reference is by the same authors the same as Erik's, it's the "Fortran 90 Handbook". Looks like they got it wrong. I think I have a fix, it wasn't too hard :-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug fortran/19101] missing & in character continuation not caught

--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 21:41 --- That's weird. I wrote some of this originally, and I was sure that this has to be interpreted in the way Erik quotes it. I double-checked the F95 and F2K standards and they both agree with Thomas, but I have a

[Bug c/19171] causes segfault ICE in GCC 4

--- Additional Comments From bsdfan3 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-12-27 21:32 --- Created an attachment (id=7832) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7832&action=view) Preprocessed source of the header file in question This is a preprocessed copy of a file that

[Bug c/19171] New: causes segfault ICE in GCC 4

Files that include on i686-pc-cygwin can cause GCC 4 (10-26-04) to bomb out due to a segfault in the compiler itself. I don't have a backtrace (I don't know how to get one if the ICE occurs during the bootstrap process itself, which it does). -- Summary: causes segfault ICE in GCC 4

[Bug tree-optimization/19038] [4.0 Regression] out-of ssa causing loops to have more than one BB

--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2004-12-27 21:08 --- Trying to solve this problem by avoiding copy-propagation in special cases is definitely not the right approach. Any time we do a copy propagation or redundancy elimination we run the risk of possibly creating overla

[Bug c++/19159] [4.0 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-12-

[Bug c++/19159] [4.0 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info

--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-12-27 20:42 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __c > Would you mind retesting with this patch? I think it will fix the problems, > but I'm not 100% sure. Will do. Dave -- http:/

[Bug rtl-optimization/19103] [4.0 Regression] unroll-loops creates bad code which causes profiledbootstrap to failure

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 20:39 --- (In reply to comment #12) > Here is the reduced testcase, compile at "-O2 -fprofile-generate": "-O1 -funroll-loops" is enough to reproduce the bug. -- What|Removed |Adde

[Bug rtl-optimization/19103] [4.0 Regression] Current CVS (2004/12/21) doesn't compile with profiledbootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 20:19 --- This was caused by (found by reverting the patch): 2004-12-18 Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR rtl-optimization/19001 * loop-iv.c (iv_number_of_iterations): Record assumptions for loop

[Bug rtl-optimization/19103] [4.0 Regression] Current CVS (2004/12/21) doesn't compile with profiledbootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 20:01 --- Note it worked with 20041211. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19103

[Bug rtl-optimization/19103] [4.0 Regression] Current CVS (2004/12/21) doesn't compile with profiledbootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 19:51 --- Here is the reduced testcase, compile at "-O2 -fprofile-generate": void abort (void); int main() { int j; for (j = 6; j >= 0; --j) if (j >= 7) abort () ; return 0; } -- http://gcc.gnu

[Bug c++/19170] Compilation error at a vector definition

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 19:46 --- Not a bug, again read the release notes. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/19170] New: Compilation error at a vector definition

Hi, The compiler (g++ 3.4.2) gives me an error when i write: B b; vectorelemA(2, b); B can be, for instance, a pointer to an integer, or a class. A is defined as: class A{ public: A(B b) {} private: A(const A&){} //!< disallow copying A& operator=(const A&){ return const_cast(*

[Bug c++/19169] Compilation error at a vector definition

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 19:29 --- Not a bug, read the release notes for 3.4.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCON

[Bug c++/19169] New: Compilation error at a vector definition

Hi, The compiler (g++ 3.4.2) gives me an error when i write: B b; vectorelemA(2, b); B can be, for instance, a pointer to an integer, or a class. A is defined as: class A{ public: A(B b) {} private: A(const A&){} //!< disallow copying A& operator=(const A&){ return const_cast(*

[Bug c++/19159] [4.0 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 19:14 --- Created an attachment (id=7829) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7829&action=view) Proposed patch Dave -- Would you mind retesting with this patch? I think it will fix the problems, bu

[Bug c++/19149] [4.0 Regression] seg fault on invalid code

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 19:04 --- Fixed in GCC 4.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RE

[Bug c++/19149] [4.0 Regression] seg fault on invalid code

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 19:03 --- Subject: Bug 19149 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-27 19:03:19 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/cp : C

[Bug middle-end/18887] [4.0 Regression] libgcc2.h Improperly determines required built-in function size requirements.

--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2004-12-27 18:34 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] libgcc2.h Improperly determines required built-in function size requirements. > From: berndtrog at yahoo dot com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- Additional Comments From berndtrog a

[Bug c++/19149] [4.0 Regression] seg fault on invalid code

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/19103] [4.0 Regression] Current CVS (2004/12/21) doesn't compile with profiledbootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 18:12 --- Hmm, here is the funny part is that I can reproduce this on ppc-darwin which case this is unusually as the profiling stuff is usually target dependent at producing wrong code. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bug

[Bug fortran/19168] Mismatched KINDs in SELECT CASE constucts is not handled correctly

--- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2004-12-27 17:56 --- The relevant promoton rule is found in 7.2.3. In the numeric relational operation x1 rel-op x2 if the types or kind type parameters of x1 and x2 differ, their values are converted

[Bug other/19165] (Natural) language independent error / warning classification

--- Additional Comments From walles at mailblocks dot com 2004-12-27 17:51 --- The IDE wants to present gcc's messages to people, so it's not as if the IDE wants to understand the messages themselves (except whether they are warnings or errors). Now that I read what I wrote again I can

[Bug fortran/15080] Forall bounds not calculated correctly (forall_3.f90)

--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 17:41 --- The test causes memory corruption, so the actual symptoms are fairly arbitrary. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15080

[Bug fortran/19168] New: Mismatched KINDs in SELECT CASE constucts is not handled correctly

Consider this program posted by James Van Buskirk in c.l.f. gfortran currently issues an error because the KIND of 7 and 200 do not match the KIND of x. program case_ex implicit none integer, parameter :: ik1 = selected_int_kind(2) integer(ik1) x integer io write(*,'(a)',advance='n

[Bug fortran/15080] Forall bounds not calculated correctly (forall_3.f90)

--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 17:37 --- I confirmed that glibc's error is indeed issued when running this testcase. gdb's output: (gdb) bt #0 0x003f07a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #1 0x00138955 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so

[Bug fortran/15080] Forall bounds not calculated correctly (forall_3.f90)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 17:24 --- This fails for me too on powerpc-darwin: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_3.f90 execution, -O1 -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/15080] Forall bounds not calculated correctly (forall_3.f90)

--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 17:22 --- I get this output from the testsuite after upgrading to Fedora Core 3 (I assume a new dejagnu version is responsible for this): Running /home/tobi/src/gcc/gcc-clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execu

[Bug c++/18384] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] ICE on zero-length array with empty initializer...

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 17:18 --- This patch is OK in pricinple. However, I don't think the designated_index change (to check for sizetype) is necessary. And, I think that the max_index should always be sizetype (and thus the check is unn

[Bug libfortran/19032] modulo generates wrong result for divisor 1 and -1

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19032

[Bug libfortran/19032] modulo generates wrong result for divisor 1 and -1

--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 17:13 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/19032] modulo generates wrong result for divisor 1 and -1

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 17:13 --- Subject: Bug 19032 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-27 17:13:07 Modified files: gcc/fortran: ChangeLog trans-intrinsic.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/19103] [4.0 Regression] Current CVS (2004/12/21) doesn't compile with profiledbootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 17:11 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Happens after stage1, and only with profiledbootstrap. actually this is after stage2 is built, compiling libgcc with stage2. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19

[Bug middle-end/18887] [4.0 Regression] libgcc2.h Improperly determines required built-in function size requirements.

--- Additional Comments From berndtrog at yahoo dot com 2004-12-27 17:10 --- Paul, I'd like to test your patch in comment #11. How do I apply it? Patch says: patch: Only garbage was found in the patch input. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18887

[Bug rtl-optimization/19103] [4.0 Regression] Current CVS (2004/12/21) doesn't compile with profiledbootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 17:08 --- So this is caused by wrong-code. -- What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug rtl-optimization/19103] [4.0 Regression] Current CVS (2004/12/21) doesn't compile with profiledbootstrap

--- Additional Comments From bero at arklinux dot org 2004-12-27 17:05 --- Still happening with today's CVS btw -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19103

[Bug rtl-optimization/19103] [4.0 Regression] Current CVS (2004/12/21) doesn't compile with profiledbootstrap

--- Additional Comments From bero at arklinux dot org 2004-12-27 17:04 --- Happens after stage1, and only with profiledbootstrap. stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/i586-ark-linux/bin/ -g -O2 -fprofile-generate -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes

[Bug target/17406] [4.0 regression] ICE dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2out.c:1692

--- Additional Comments From bsdfan3 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-12-27 16:51 --- Thanks for the pointer Andrew! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17406

[Bug target/17406] [4.0 regression] ICE dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2out.c:1692

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 16:48 --- (In reply to comment #22) > The patch supplied in this PR needs to be updated to reflect CVS (It will not > apply to a fresh checkout of CVS done on 10-26-04). If you taking about the one in comment #9, tha

[Bug target/17406] [4.0 regression] ICE dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2out.c:1692

--- Additional Comments From bsdfan3 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-12-27 16:46 --- The patch supplied in this PR needs to be updated to reflect CVS (It will not apply to a fresh checkout of CVS done on 10-26-04). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17406

[Bug target/17406] [4.0 regression] ICE dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2out.c:1692

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 16:38 --- *** Bug 19167 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17406

[Bug c/19167] ICE in DWARF2 generators during bootstrap Stage2...

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 16:38 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17406 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/19167] New: ICE in DWARF2 generators during bootstrap Stage2...

During the Stage2 build of 4.0.0 12-26-04 (fresh co), this happened: ../../gcc/gcc/sched-vis.c: In function 'print_pattern': ../../gcc/gcc/sched-vis.c:613: internal compiler error: in dwarf2out_frame_debug _expr, at dwarf2out.c:1717 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appro

[Bug c++/19148] [4.0 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 16:13 --- Subject: Bug 19148 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-27 16:13:45 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: gcc/t

  1   2   >