[Bug bootstrap/18107] [4.0 Regression] Bootstrap fails on i686-pc-mingw32

-- Bug 18107 depends on bug 18105, which changed state. Bug 18105 Summary: Compile errors in libgfortran/io/unix.c break Windows bootstrap http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18105 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug libfortran/16991] [meta-bug] libgfortran does not build every where

-- Bug 16991 depends on bug 18105, which changed state. Bug 18105 Summary: Compile errors in libgfortran/io/unix.c break Windows bootstrap http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18105 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug libfortran/18105] Compile errors in libgfortran/io/unix.c break Windows bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2004-11-06 04:34 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/18103] libgfortran system header conflict breaks bootstrap on MinGW

--- Additional Comments From aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2004-11-06 04:33 --- Still waiting for patch in comment #1 to be approved. -- What|Removed |Added Last reconfi

[Bug target/18106] Weak symbols are unimplemented on Windows

--- Additional Comments From aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2004-11-06 04:29 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/18106] Weak symbols are unimplemented on Windows

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-06 04:28 --- Subject: Bug 18106 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-06 04:28:11 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/i386: c

[Bug c++/8171] Cannot compare pointer to member function of base and derived class

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-06 03:17 --- PR 18040 shows a testcase where we ICE and the problem is related to this testcase. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/16702] ICE (segfault) when compiling qemu with -O on x86_64 with gcc 3.4

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Last reconfirmed|2004-08-05 16:43:58 |2004-11-06 03:13:46 date|

[Bug java/15576] [4.0 Regression] Class initialization optimization is disabled

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-06 03:05 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/18314] New: Abnormal behavior in optimization

For this program, -O2 will create an infinite loop: int test=0; void main(void) { while((volatile int)test!=0); } If "volatile int" is not allowed, there should be at least some warning or error, but it compiles successfully. -- Summary: Abnormal behavior in optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/18294] [4.0 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_flow_info during bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From sje at cup dot hp dot com 2004-11-05 22:51 --- I still don't understand the bug but it seems to be related to the code inside the POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED ifdef in function.c. If I comment this out things compile, if I leave it in and put a call to verify_f

[Bug AWT/16740] Unwanted expose events upon mouse enter/exit

--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2004-11-05 22:13 --- We're receiving these expose events as a result of the GtkButton changing from the NORMAL to the PRELIGHT state. I think we should accept this behaviour as a difference in the native widget's implementation. I'

[Bug c++/18313] Missing warning for superfluous const's in return types

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 21:25 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug c++/18313] New: Missing warning for superfluous const's in return types

The C++ frontend doesn't warn about superfluous const's in function return types like the following (even with -Wall -W -pedantic): = const void bar(); const int foo(); = This affects all compilers since 2.95.3. The C frontend does warn about such situation

[Bug rtl-optimization/16104] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:378 with SSE2 code on -O2

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 21:12 --- Hmm. I still the the ICE with my example in comment #4. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16104

[Bug bootstrap/17383] [4.0 Regression] Building in src dir fails

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 21:04 --- Read: for how people actually install/build GCC. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17383

[Bug bootstrap/17383] [4.0 Regression] Building in src dir fails

--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2004-11-05 21:01 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Really nobody builds inside the source directory. How does one actually build the compiler, then? gcc/doc/install.texi simply says # @section Building a native compiler # #

[Bug bootstrap/18310] [3.4 regression] "make bootstrap-lean" deletes stage2/xgcc

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Summary|[3.4.3 regression] "make|[3.4 regression] "make |bootstrap-lean

[Bug AWT/18312] Component.createImage() doesn't clear bitmap

--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2004-11-05 20:05 --- This looks good. Please commit. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/18111] spurious warnings with -W -Wunused

--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 20:03 --- The commit fixes the original issue, but not all of those mentioned in comment #4. The remaining issues are related to arrays with descriptors. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18111

[Bug libstdc++/17223] wrong/missing .so references in generated libstdc++ manpages

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 19:58 --- Subject: Bug 17223 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-05 19:58:03 Modified files: libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog libstdc++-v3/confi

[Bug libstdc++/17218] unknown subjects in generated libstdc++ manpages

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 19:58 --- Subject: Bug 17218 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-05 19:58:03 Modified files: libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog libstdc++-v3/confi

[Bug AWT/18312] Component.createImage() doesn't clear bitmap

--- Additional Comments From sven at physto dot se 2004-11-05 19:52 --- Created an attachment (id=7481) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7481&action=view) Suggested patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18312

[Bug fortran/18111] spurious warnings with -W -Wunused

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 19:52 --- Subject: Bug 18111 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-05 19:52:06 Modified files: gcc/fortran: ChangeLog trans-decl.c Log message:

[Bug AWT/18312] New: Component.createImage() doesn't clear bitmap

An image created with Component.createImage() is supposed to be filled with the default component background gray. Currently, it simply mallocs the pixmap data without initializing it, which is also a mild security flaw. Suggested fix is to do a fillRect() after creating the graphics context in G

[Bug c++/15552] template inheritance does not recognize member variables

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:34 --- *** Bug 18072 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/18072] Function overload being selected from file scope instead of template class scope when called from base template class

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:34 --- Duplicate of PR 15552. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15552 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/17152] Useless error message

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:33 --- Na, that was wrong, of course. W. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/15552] template inheritance does not recognize member variables

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:32 --- *** Bug 17403 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/17403] Inherited data member reported as undeclared.

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:32 --- Duplicate of PR 15552. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15552 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/15552] template inheritance does not recognize member variables

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:32 --- *** Bug 16713 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/16713] call of template member function rejected

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:32 --- Duplicate of PR 15552. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15552 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/15552] template inheritance does not recognize member variables

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:32 --- *** Bug 17772 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/17772] Derivating a templated class, the members of the base class are unknown

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:32 --- Duplicate of PR 15552. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15552 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/15552] template inheritance does not recognize member variables

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:32 --- *** Bug 18144 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/18144] Use of parent's field in template classes

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:32 --- Duplicate of PR 15552. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15552 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/15552] template inheritance does not recognize member variables

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:32 --- *** Bug 15639 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/15639] Fails to find inherited function

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:31 --- Duplicate of PR 15552. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15552 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/15552] template inheritance does not recognize member variables

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:31 --- *** Bug 15801 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/15801] g++ fails to identify member variables in templates

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:31 --- Duplicate of PR 15552. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15552 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/15552] template inheritance does not recognize member variables

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:31 --- *** Bug 18286 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/18286] templates with multipile inheritence fail compile

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:31 --- Duplicate of PR 15552. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15552 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/15552] template inheritance does not recognize member variables

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:31 --- *** Bug 17496 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/17496] cannot access member of template base class in template derived class

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:31 --- Duplicate of PR 15552. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15552 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/15552] template inheritance does not recognize member variables

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:30 --- *** Bug 17649 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/17649] template protected member: no visibility in derived class

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:30 --- Duplicate of PR 15552. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15552 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/15552] template inheritance does not recognize member variables

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:30 --- *** Bug 18311 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/18311] member visibility in inherited template classes

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:30 --- Duplicate of PR 15552. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15552 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/15552] template inheritance does not recognize member variables

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:29 --- *** Bug 18306 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/18306] seems not possible to specialize a template member function

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:29 --- Duplicate of PR 15552. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15552 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/15552] template inheritance does not recognize member variables

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:29 --- *** Bug 18061 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/18061] Problem with template class

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:29 --- Duplicate of PR 15552. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15552 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/18072] Function overload being selected from file scope instead of template class scope when called from base template class

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:27 --- These are all duplicates of PR 15552 -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/17152] Useless error message

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:27 --- These are all duplicates of PR 15552 -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/17403] Inherited data member reported as undeclared.

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:27 --- These are all duplicates of PR 15552 -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/16713] call of template member function rejected

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:27 --- These are all duplicates of PR 15552 -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/17772] Derivating a templated class, the members of the base class are unknown

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:27 --- These are all duplicates of PR 15552 -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/18311] member visibility in inherited template classes

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:27 --- These are all duplicates of PR 15552 -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/18144] Use of parent's field in template classes

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:27 --- These are all duplicates of PR 15552 -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/15639] Fails to find inherited function

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:27 --- These are all duplicates of PR 15552 -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/15801] g++ fails to identify member variables in templates

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:27 --- These are all duplicates of PR 15552 -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/18286] templates with multipile inheritence fail compile

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:27 --- These are all duplicates of PR 15552 -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/17649] template protected member: no visibility in derived class

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:27 --- These are all duplicates of PR 15552 -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/17496] cannot access member of template base class in template derived class

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:27 --- These are all duplicates of PR 15552 -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/18306] seems not possible to specialize a template member function

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:27 --- These are all duplicates of PR 15552 -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/18061] Problem with template class

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-05 19:27 --- These are all duplicates of PR 15552 -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/18211] [4.0 Regression] Parallel bootstrap failure: No rule to make target `hard-reg-set.h', needed by `build/insn-conditions.o'

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 18:07 --- So lets close this bug then. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING

[Bug bootstrap/18211] [4.0 Regression] Parallel bootstrap failure: No rule to make target `hard-reg-set.h', needed by `build/insn-conditions.o'

--- Additional Comments From lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2004-11-05 18:06 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Parallel bootstrap failure: No rule to make target `hard-reg-set.h', needed by `build/insn-conditions.o' It has not happened again. If it does, I'll open a new PR. --

[Bug c++/18311] member visibility in inherited template classes

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 17:54 --- Read the release notes for 3.4, this is invalid C++. -- What|Removed |Added Stat

[Bug libfortran/18297] gfortran : file opening fails if only read access

--- Additional Comments From mimo2 at free dot fr 2004-11-05 17:51 --- I forgot to reopen the bug after my last comment. -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/18311] New: member visibility in inherited template classes

Hi, I think I have found a bug related to template inheritance: parent class members seem not to be accessible from public derived classes despite the members' visibility (public/protected/private). Please refer to the code below. The code does not compile, complaining about the variable 'member

[Bug bootstrap/18310] [3.4.3 regression] "make bootstrap-lean" deletes stage2/xgcc

-- What|Removed |Added Summary|[3.4.2 regression] "make|[3.4.3 regression] "make |bootstrap-lean" deletes |bootstrap-lean" deletes

[Bug bootstrap/18310] New: [3.4.2 regression] "make bootstrap-lean" deletes stage2/xgcc

Sorry for the late notice. "make bootstrap" works for me, but "make bootstrap-lean" fails: make[4]: Entering directory `/fs/data/mount/home/prj/src/spf/gcc-3.4.3-20041031-build/gcc' stage2/xgcc -Bstage2/ -B/package/misc/spf/gcc-3.4.3-20041031/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -O2 -g -pipe -DIN_GCC -W -Wa

[Bug fortran/18218] Miscompare in sixtrack benchmark caused by loss of precision

-- What|Removed |Added CC||jgrimm2 at us dot ibm dot ||com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho

[Bug target/18309] ICE on valid code in print_operand_address, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:9678 (procps-3.2.4)

--- Additional Comments From lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2004-11-05 15:49 --- seems -m64 is causing the issue. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18309

[Bug tree-optimization/18250] [4.0 regression] ICE in var_ann, at tree-flow-inline.h:34

-- What|Removed |Added GCC target triplet||i586-*-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18250

[Bug target/18309] ICE on valid code in print_operand_address, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:9678 (procps-3.2.4)

-- What|Removed |Added Component|c |target Summary|ICE on valid code in|ICE on valid code in |print_operand_a

[Bug tree-optimization/18250] [4.0 regression] ICE in var_ann, at tree-flow-inline.h:34

==+ | 4.0.0 20041105 (experimental) (SUSE Linux) (i586-suse-linux-gnu) GCC error:| | in var_ann, at tree-flow-inline.h:34 | | Error detected at s-mastop.adb:594:1 | -- What|Removed

[Bug c/18309] ICE on valid code in print_operand_address, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:9678 (procps-3.2.4)

--- Additional Comments From lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2004-11-05 15:35 --- Created an attachment (id=7480) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7480&action=view) clean source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18309

[Bug c/18309] ICE on valid code in print_operand_address, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:9678 (procps-3.2.4)

--- Additional Comments From lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2004-11-05 15:34 --- Created an attachment (id=7479) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7479&action=view) preprocessed sources -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18309

[Bug c/18309] New: ICE on valid code in print_operand_address, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:9678 (procps-3.2.4)

cc -c -D_GNU_SOURCE -I proc -I/usr/include/ncurses -fno-common -ffast-math -W -Wall -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wredundant-decls -Wbad-function-cast -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Waggregate-return -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -O2 -s -m64 -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wpadded -Wstrict-aliasin

[Bug bootstrap/18211] [4.0 Regression] Parallel bootstrap failure: No rule to make target `hard-reg-set.h', needed by `build/insn-conditions.o'

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 14:56 --- Does this still happen? I don't see anyway for this to even happen as hard-reg-set.h is not a generated header at all. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0 Regression] gcc-4.0.0 bloats code by 31%

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 14:34 --- Hmm, for -O2 on PPC, we are not using the branch on count register instruction if we do that, -O2 will be smaller than -Os. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219

[Bug fortran/15164] trans-decl.c:411: gfc_finish_var_decl: Assertion failed

--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 14:15 --- The issue with Andrew's reduced testcase which had disappeared had resurfaced due to another bugfix, the above commit should fix it again for good. It remains the infinite recursion. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/b

[Bug fortran/15164] trans-decl.c:411: gfc_finish_var_decl: Assertion failed

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 14:10 --- Subject: Bug 15164 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-05 14:10:38 Modified files: gcc/fortran: ChangeLog trans-decl.c Log message:

[Bug tree-optimization/18308] ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 13:51 --- ifcvt produces non-gimple: _ifc_.2_15 = (j_6 != 0 || !_ifc_.1_16) && ivtmp.0_4 != 0; Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/18308] ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 13:25 --- Zdenek, the problem appeared with your patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-10/msg00030.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/18308] New: ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274

The following code snippet causes an ICE on mainline when compiled with "-O -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops": = void foo(); void bar() { int i, j, k=0; for (i=0; i<2; ++i) if (j) k=2; if (k) foo(); } = bug.c: In functi

[Bug ada/18302] ACATS test c94002f hangs on Solaris 10/x86

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 11:30 --- Same problem on i586-redhat-linux-gnu with c953002. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/18111] spurious warnings with -W -Wunused

--- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2004-11-05 11:20 --- Subject: Re: spurious warnings with -W -Wunused martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de wrote: > --- Additional Comments From martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2004-11-05 >

[Bug tree-optimization/18307] merge_pointed_to_info called incorrectly

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 10:56 --- Subject: Bug 18307 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-05 10:56:03 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-ssa-alias.c Log mess

[Bug tree-optimization/18307] merge_pointed_to_info called incorrectly

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/18307] merge_pointed_to_info called incorrectly

--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 10:48 --- Created an attachment (id=7478) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7478&action=view) test case Compile at -O2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18307

[Bug tree-optimization/18307] New: merge_pointed_to_info called incorrectly

The attached program (preprocessed gengtype) causes merge_pointed_to_info to be called with the same node as DEST and ORIG. This is an erroneous use of that function. I'm about to commit a check and early exit in that function, to prevent further breakage, but it really needs assertifying. --

[Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0 Regression] gcc-4.0.0 bloats code by 31%

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-05 10:34 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] gcc-4.0.0 bloats code by 31% uros at kss-loka dot si wrote: > It looks that this PR is related to PR17647. Should we > merge them together? We are still waiting for Zdenek's

[Bug c++/18304] unnecessary typename expected

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 10:29 --- For those in doubt, here's chapter and verse: [14.6]/6 says Within the definition of a class template [...] the keyword typename is not required when referring to the unqualified name of a previously

[Bug libfortran/18297] gfortran : file opening fails if only read access

--- Additional Comments From mimo2 at free dot fr 2004-11-05 09:15 --- I don't know what is the "true" fortran convention, but this code program test open(unit=10,file='test.txt',status='old') write(*,*) ' file is read' end works on g77 (and all the other compile

[Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0 Regression] gcc-4.0.0 bloats code by 31%

--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2004-11-05 09:10 --- It looks that this PR is related to PR17647. Should we merge them together? Uros. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219

[Bug fortran/18111] spurious warnings with -W -Wunused

--- Additional Comments From martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2004-11-05 08:31 --- Since the patch has been approved (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg02547.html), could someone please commit it? Or is it better to wait for the complete fix? -- http://gcc.

[Bug tree-optimization/17647] [4.0 regression] Missing i386 addressing modes

--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2004-11-05 08:00 --- Another comment on code in comment #3: LEA instruction uses only 32bit constant as a displacement. The code size of inner loop is considerably bigger in gcc-4.0 compiled code. (Note that LEA with a scale factor sho

  1   2   >