[Bug ada/17666] Ada tests hanging during make check

--- Additional Comments From aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2004-10-30 05:05 --- Oops, for what its worth, those configuration specs are completely wrong--copied and pasted from the wrong place. These are the correct specs for the configuration that the bug was reconfirmed on for 200410

[Bug ada/17666] Ada tests hanging during make check

--- Additional Comments From aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2004-10-30 05:02 --- GCC mainline 20041028 still has hangs on these three tests. (Complete test results are coming when the check completes, which might not be for another day.) Its also still the same three tests hanging: Ex

[Bug tree-optimization/18168] SPEC CPU2000 173.applu tree-loop-linear ICE

--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-30 03:10 --- I justed fixed this, so i might as well assign it to myself -- What|Removed |Added A

[Bug tree-optimization/18168] SPEC CPU2000 173.applu tree-loop-linear ICE

--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-30 02:03 --- The problem here is that find_data_references_in_loop is handing us data references that involve variables only outside the loop. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18168

[Bug rtl-optimization/17581] [3.4 Regression] Long long arithmetic fails inside a switch/case statement when compiled with -O2

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-30 00:57 --- Subject: Bug 17581 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-30 00:56:59 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog cselib.c gcse.c gc

[Bug ada/18221] Illegal program not detected, access to invisible type RM 8.2(9)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-30 00:46 --- *** Bug 18227 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/18227] incomplete type in private part of inner package visible in outer package

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-30 00:46 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18221 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/18228] Ada uses the wrong file ending for its shared library on darwin

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-30 00:43 --- Mine, I posted a patch: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/18228] New: Ada uses the wrong file ending for its shared library on darwin

cd rts; ../../xgcc -B../../ -dynamiclib -Wa,-force_cpusubtype_ALL \ -o libgnat-4.0.so \ a-caldel.o a-calend.o a-chahan.o a-charac.o a-chlat1.o a-chlat9.o a-colien.o a-colire.o a- comlin.o a-cwila1.o a-cwila9.o a-decima.o a-diocst.o a-direct.o a-direio.o a-dirval.o a-einuoc.o a- el

[Bug ada/18227] New: incomplete type in private part of inner package visible in outer package

An incomplete type declared in the private part of a nested package can be used in the declaration of an access type in the enclosing package. This goes unnoticed. The compiler seems to notice this if and only if the incomplete type is used in the definition of something else (I guess). For exampl

[Bug ada/17986] [4.0 Regression] Compile error for make.adb breaks bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-30 00:18 --- I posted the patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/17986] [4.0 Regression] Compile error for make.adb breaks bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 22:23 --- This should blow away GC times from the Ada compile times. I'd be interested to see -ftime-report results from before and after the patch, if someone can produce them... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi

[Bug tree-optimization/17986] [4.0 Regression] Compile error for make.adb breaks bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 22:06 --- Created an attachment (id=7433) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7433&action=view) patch which helps a lot The patch which works and improves the GC behavior for Ada. -- What

[Bug target/18010] bad unwind info due to multiple returns (missing epilogue)

--- Additional Comments From wilson at tuliptree dot org 2004-10-29 22:00 --- Subject: Re: bad unwind info due to multiple returns (missing epilogue) On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 02:24, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com wrote: > # of unexpected failures115 This is a lot more failur

[Bug middle-end/17526] [4.0 Regression] libcpp is miscompiled with -fno-pcc-struct-return -O2

--- Additional Comments From jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 21:46 --- The problem seems to be an incorrect tailcall. Before my patch, "*p = foo()" was turned into "T.1 = foo(); *p = T.1;". After my patch, the gimplifier no longer introduced a temporary. If A is returned in mem

[Bug tree-optimization/17986] [4.0 Regression] Compile error for make.adb breaks bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 20:46 --- The patch which I pasted is wrong, instead of: TREE_CHAIN (&%t.t) it should be: TREE_CHAIN (&%h.t) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17986

[Bug tree-optimization/17986] [4.0 Regression] Compile error for make.adb breaks bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 20:34 --- Ok, this patch to the Ada front-end should help: Index: ada/ada-tree.h === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/ada/ada-tree.h,v retrieving revision 1.2

[Bug tree-optimization/17986] [4.0 Regression] Compile error for make.adb breaks bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 19:46 --- Note the patch will not work as SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT is the same as TREE_CHAIN. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17986

[Bug tree-optimization/17986] [4.0 Regression] Compile error for make.adb breaks bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 19:36 --- Forgot to say I am testing this patch right now (it might also solve a fortran problem with GC failure which shows up sometimes). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17986

[Bug tree-optimization/17986] [4.0 Regression] Compile error for make.adb breaks bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 19:34 --- This patch should help but it might fix all the problems: Index: tree-ssanames.c === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/tree-ssanames.c,v retrieving r

[Bug tree-optimization/17986] [4.0 Regression] Compile error for make.adb breaks bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 19:32 --- Diego is there any way to reduce the number of SSA_NAMEs are TREE_CHAINed against each other: gt_ggc_m_9tree_node ((*x).t.ssa_name.common.chain); Did we forgot to clear TREE_CHAIN of the SSA_

[Bug bootstrap/18107] [4.0 Regression] Bootstrap fails on i686-pc-mingw32

-- Bug 18107 depends on bug 18226, which changed state. Bug 18226 Summary: [4.0 regression] EXCEPTION_STACK_OVERFLOW compiling make.adb http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18226 What|Old Value |New Value -

[Bug tree-optimization/17986] [4.0 Regression] Compile error for make.adb breaks bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 19:26 --- *** Bug 18226 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17986

[Bug tree-optimization/18226] [4.0 regression] EXCEPTION_STACK_OVERFLOW compiling make.adb

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 19:26 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17986 *** *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17986 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/17986] [4.0 Regression] Compile error for make.adb breaks bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 19:25 --- Actually this is a tree optimization problem, SSA_NAMEs cause too many function levels in the GC code from PR18226: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0x3f9

[Bug ada/18226] [4.0 regression] EXCEPTION_STACK_OVERFLOW compiling make.adb

--- Additional Comments From aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2004-10-29 19:22 --- Created an attachment (id=7432) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7432&action=view) Backtrace and tree node. Full backtrace (up until gdb crashed), printed tree node (gdb encountered Dwarf

[Bug ada/18226] New: [4.0 regression] EXCEPTION_STACK_OVERFLOW compiling make.adb

While building GCC 20041028 with Ada enabled, bootstrap fails while building libada: ../../xgcc -B../../ -c -O2 -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict- prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-common -gnatpg -gnata -I- -I../rts - I. - I/aaronwl/cs/compilers/gcc/src/cvs/head/gcc/gcc/ada /aaronw

[Bug bootstrap/18107] [4.0 Regression] Bootstrap fails on i686-pc-mingw32

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||18226 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18107

[Bug rtl-optimization/18224] [4.0 Regression] Bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/SPARC: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:391

-- What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/

[Bug bootstrap/18058] [4.0 Regression] Sun CC cannot bootstrap GCC (static inline)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 18:26 --- *** Bug 18225 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/18225] Bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/SPARC with Sun cc

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 18:26 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18058 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/18220] Test case libjava.lang/Process_3 does not end if "sed" not available

--- Additional Comments From green at redhat dot com 2004-10-29 18:24 --- I'm testing in a minimal chrooted environment. This is a simple way to test a new glibc/libgcj.etc. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18220

[Bug bootstrap/18225] New: Bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/SPARC with Sun cc

Due to the bootstrap problem described in PR bootstrap/18224, I tried to bootstrap mainline with Sun cc instead (using Sun Studio 8 cc aka cc 5.5), configuring with CC='/opt/SUNWspro-8.0/bin/cc -xc99=%none -xildoff'. The bootstrap failed in stage1, though: /opt/SUNWspro-8.0/bin/cc -xc99=%none -x

[Bug rtl-optimization/18224] [4.0 Regression] Bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/SPARC: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:391

--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2004-10-29 18:18 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/SPARC: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:391 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes: > Can you attach the preproces

[Bug libgcj/18220] Test case libjava.lang/Process_3 does not end if "sed" not available

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 18:12 --- I don't know how you Linux system even function without false or echo (well really I do, they are both builtins in the shells). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18220

[Bug libgcj/18220] Test case libjava.lang/Process_3 does not end if "sed" not available

--- Additional Comments From green at redhat dot com 2004-10-29 18:10 --- It seems that all the Process_* test cases depend on having a small number of simple executables on the target (false, sed, echo). It would nice if the testsuite could provide similar programs instead of assuming

[Bug rtl-optimization/18224] [4.0 Regression] Bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/SPARC: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:391

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 18:07 --- Can you attach the preprocessed source (the difference between solaris 8 and solaris 10 might be the headers are different). -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/18224] New: Bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/SPARC: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:391

Bootstrapping current mainline on Solaris 10/SPARC fails with an ICE in stage2 (both with GCC 3.3.2 und 3.4.3 as bootstrap compiler): stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/vol/gcc/share/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/bin/ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedant

[Bug libgcj/16997] WeakHashMap leaks memory

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 17:59 --- confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug c++/18223] c++ polymorphic functions not seen in child of adt

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 17:58 --- Invalid. The valid code for the class A would be: class A : public ADT { public: using ADT::a; virtual void a(ADT& a) { } }; once you define a function in derivered class it overrides all the functi

[Bug AWT/17351] java.awt.color.ICC_Profile unimplemented

--- Additional Comments From sven at physto dot se 2004-10-29 17:57 --- Ok.. my initial implementation is done. The built-in Photo YCC color space is not implemented yet. Some more work will be needed to bring it up to 1.5.0 later, too. Please merge it over from classpath. -- http:/

[Bug libgcj/18222] [4.0 Regression] libjava bootstrap failure on Tru64 UNIX: CPPFLAGS changed in libltdl

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Summary|libjava bootstrap failure on|[4.0 Regression] libjava |Tru64 UNIX:

[Bug c++/18223] New: c++ polymorphic functions not seen in child of adt

As shown below, the polymorphic functions in ADT with default implementations are not recognized in the derived class. I don't see anything in the spec ruling out this case, but I'm no guru so maybe this is in fact invalid code. The number of arguments and their types don't seem to matter, I used

[Bug libgcj/18222] New: libjava bootstrap failure on Tru64 UNIX: CPPFLAGS changed in libltdl

Bootstrapping current mainline fails when configuring libjava/libltdl on both Tru64 UNIX V4.0F and V5.1B with the following error: configure: configuring in libltdl configure: running /bin/ksh '/vol/gnu/src/gcc/gcc-dist/libjava/libltdl/configure' --prefix=/vol/gcc '--cache-file=./config.cache'

[Bug rtl-optimization/15362] cxh3002 fails check with bug-box

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 17:50 --- Fixed on the mainline (well after PR 18217 gets fixed, I worked around it by compiling the source by hand while in ada/rts subdirectory). -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug objc++/16826] cannot create instance variable of same type as class

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 17:39 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug c/18180] move special handling out functions into attributes

-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|

[Bug c/18183] Warning when supposedly unused parameters are used

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 17:37 --- unused is really a marker for maybe unused and that is it. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/17352] Uninitialized char variable causes erratic behavior

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17352

[Bug java/17915] [4.0 Regression] Compiling jars fails

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 17:36 --- Confirmed, I think this is related to PR 17963 (if not a dup of that bug). And Yes "gnu.crypto.pki.Util" is the jar file. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/16368] gnatmem, gnatdll are docmented but never built

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 17:27 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/16101] Illegal program not detected, pragma Convention after freeze

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 17:26 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/16076] Illegal program not detected, RM 13.14(5)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 17:21 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/16075] Wrong output from legal program, ordered generic parameter association

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 17:20 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/15616] Linking error on legal program using generic package

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 17:18 --- Confirmed on the mainline we get an ICE because the nested function is not being processed at all. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug libgcj/18220] Test case libjava.lang/Process_3 does not end if "sed" not available

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 17:09 --- Confirmed, this is only a testcase problem. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONF

[Bug ada/18221] Illegal program not detected, access to invisible type RM 8.2(9)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 17:05 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/18221] New: Illegal program not detected, access to invisible type RM 8.2(9)

Debian bug #278831: package Test_128 is package inner is private type T1; type T2 is null record; end inner; type T1_ptr is access inner.T1; -- line 9 ERROR: gnat mistakenly accepts type T2_ptr is access inner.T2; -- line 10 ERROR: gnat correctly rejects end Test_128;

[Bug java/18220] New: Test case libjava.lang/Process_3 does not end if "sed" not available

libjava.lang/Process_3.java should be changed to do something other than hang forever if "sed" is not available on the target test platform. -- Summary: Test case libjava.lang/Process_3 does not end if "sed" not available Product: gcc Version:

[Bug rtl-optimization/15342] [arm-linux] internal compiler error: in verify_local_live_at_start

--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 16:43 --- I think the key to what has failed here is that the reg-rename pass has missed the equivalence between start->index and a member of the copied structure. In pseudo code, the output from the previous pass h

[Bug target/17063] internal compiler error: in arm_print_operand, at config/arm/arm.c:9816

--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 15:54 --- Fixed in 4.0. Not intending to fix for 3.4 or earlier, since not a regression. int f (int x, int y) { __asm__("rorw $8, %w0" : "=r"(x): "0" (y) : "cc"); return x; } test.c: In function 'f': test.c:3:

Problems with -mregparm=2 and unsigned long long

This program int main() { unsigned long high = 0x0013ABC; unsigned long low = 0xB388B94A; unsigned long long time1 = (((unsigned long long)high << 32L) + low); unsigned long long time = time1 / 450; return t

[Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0 Regression] gcc-4.0.0 bloats code by 31%

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-29 15:43 --- Zdenek, this is another PR about ivopts and -Os. The test case is very very simple, so if you could give a look it would be great. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/15172] [3.3/3.4 regression] Copy constructor optimization in aggregate initialization

--- Additional Comments From TazForEver at dlfp dot org 2004-10-29 15:15 --- and ppc32 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15172

[Bug ada/15846] Illegal program not detected, self renames

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/15804] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.8.1(2)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/16096] Illegal program not detected, RM 8.5.4(5)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/16086] Legal program rejected, procedure of protected object should be visible

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/16097] Illegal program not detected, RM 6.3.1(9), RM 8.5.4(5)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/15604] Ambiguous aggregate -- Accepts invalid

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/16094] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.4.1(5)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/15799] Legal program rejected, using 'Base

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/15803] Illegal program not detected, RM 8.3(19)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/15847] Legal program rejected, RM 3.10.2(32)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/15845] Illegal program not detected, circular renames

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/16081] Illegal program not detected, ambiguous call to "="

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/15611] Invalid program not detected, RM 3.7(11)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/15840] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.7(14)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/15605] invalid program not detected, RM 8.3(22)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/15915] Illegal program not detected, RM 13.11(15)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/16095] Illegal program not detected, X'Access of wrong type

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/16083] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.9.2(13)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/15613] Accepts named parameters not last

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/15805] Illegal program not detected, allows writing through access to constant

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/15916] Illegal program not detected, RM 12.4(7)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/16087] Legal program rejected, RM 7.3(13)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:44 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/15808] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.9.3(10)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:44 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/16084] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.10.2(24)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:44 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/15843] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.7.2(2)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:44 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/16097] Illegal program not detected, RM 6.3.1(9), RM 8.5.4(5)

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16097

[Bug ada/16096] Illegal program not detected, RM 8.5.4(5)

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16096

[Bug ada/16095] Illegal program not detected, X'Access of wrong type

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16095

[Bug ada/16094] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.4.1(5)

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16094

[Bug ada/16087] Legal program rejected, RM 7.3(13)

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16087

[Bug ada/16086] Legal program rejected, procedure of protected object should be visible

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:36 --- Woops read the bug wrong. -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug ada/16086] Legal program rejected, procedure of protected object should be visible

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:36 --- Fixed on the mainline: test_248172.ads:7:30: expect valid subprogram name as default -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug ada/16084] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.10.2(24)

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16084

[Bug ada/16083] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.9.2(13)

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16083

[Bug ada/16081] Illegal program not detected, ambiguous call to "="

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16081

[Bug ada/16079] Illegal program not detected, RM 8.2(9)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:33 --- Fixed on the mainline: test_247573.ads:20:29: "x" is not a visible entity of "new_pak1" test_247573.ads:21:18: "T1" is not a visible entity of "new_pak1" -- What|Removed

  1   2   >