[Bug middle-end/17756] [4.0 Regression] contained_3.f90

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-05 22:42 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED R

[Bug middle-end/17756] [4.0 Regression] contained_3.f90

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-05 22:42 --- Subject: Bug 17756 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 22:42:35 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-ssa-operands.c Log m

[Bug rtl-optimization/17853] [3.4/4.0 Regression] -O2 ICE for MMX testcase

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-05 22:32 --- : Search converges between 2003-02-08-trunk (#179) and 2003-02-10-trunk (#180). I almost this it was caused by: 2003-02-09 Jan Hubicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * i386.md (ahi?v*3): Set third operand t

[Bug rtl-optimization/17853] [3.4/4.0 Regression] -O2 ICE for MMX testcase

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||3.4.3 4.0.0 Known to work||3.3.3 Summary|-O2 ICE for MMX testcase

[Bug rtl-optimization/17853] -O2 ICE for MMX testcase

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-05 22:22 --- Really the const_int should be instead a const_vect. -- What|Removed |Added Compone

[Bug target/17853] -O2 ICE for MMX testcase

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-05 22:21 --- Confirmed, the problem comes down to: (insn 29 28 31 0 (set (reg:V8QI 59 [ D.2054 ]) (eq:V8QI (reg:V8QI 60 [ D.2051 ]) (reg:V8QI 60 [ D.2051 ]))) 627 {eqv8qi3} (insn_list 28 (nil)) (e

[Bug bootstrap/17817] [4.0 Regression] restage[1,2,3] and then bootstrap no longer cause build dir to be rebuilt

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-05 22:15 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/17817] [4.0 Regression] restage[1,2,3] and then bootstrap no longer cause build dir to be rebuilt

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-05 21:51 --- Subject: Bug 17817 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 21:51:24 Modified files: gcc: Makefile.in ChangeLog Log message:

[Bug c++/17846] Segfault in perform_or_defer_access_check

--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-10-05 21:42 --- Subject: Re: New: Segfault in perform_or_defer_access_check jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: >extern "C" long foo (int); > >struct A >{ > int i; >}; > >struct B >{ > static void foo (A &); > B (int x)

[Bug c/17853] New: -O2 ICE for MMX testcase

gcc -O2 -mmmx i386-mmx-5.c GCC fails thus: - i386-mmx-5.c: In function 'main': i386-mmx-5.c:15: internal compiler error: in simplify_binary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:2151 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See ht

[Bug rtl-optimization/17027] [3.4 regression] ICE with noreturn function in loop at -O2

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-05 20:58 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/17850] [3.4/4.0 regression] bootstrap failure - libstdc++ uses strtold when undeclared

--- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2004-10-05 20:58 --- Richard does the "obvious" one line fix to configure.ac restore bootstrap for you? It looks like my cygwin (a newlib target) doesn't even have _strtold. Index: configure.ac ==

[Bug c++/17852] [4.0 Regression] weird quoting with synax error

-- What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.0 Regression] werid |[4.0 Regression] weird |quoting with synax error|quoting with synax error http://gcc.gn

[Bug c++/17852] [4.0 Regression] werid quoting with synax error

--- Additional Comments From gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2004-10-05 20:40 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] werid quoting with synax error "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | The problem is the error message passed into c_parse_error is | outputted by %s which

[Bug c++/17852] [4.0 Regression] werid quoting with synax error

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-05 20:19 --- The problem is the error message passed into c_parse_error is outputted by %s which just outputs that string. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17852

[Bug c++/17851] [3.4/4.0 regression] Misleading diagnostic for invalid function decalrations

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-05 20:16 --- Confirmed, note I found another bug in that we now produce a werid quoting, see PR 17852. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/17852] [4.0 Regression] werid quoting with synax error

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17852

[Bug c++/17852] New: [4.0 Regression] werid quoting with synax error

struct B { int foo(size_t); }; gives: tt.cc:3: error: expected %<;%> before '(' token which is wrong. -- Summary: [4.0 Regression] werid quoting with synax error Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic

[Bug c++/17851] New: [3.4/4.0 regression] Misleading diagnostic for invalid function decalrations

Since gcc 3.4.0 I get an error message which is not very helpful for the following invalid code snippet: struct A { int operator[] (size_t); }; struct B { int foo(size_t); }; err.cc:3: error: declaration of `operator[]' as

[Bug java/17845] can't build GNU Classpath

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-05 20:02 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug libstdc++/10975] [3.4 only] [DR 453] incorrect initial ostringstream::tellp()

--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-10-05 19:52 --- Fixed for 3.4.3. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/10975] [3.4 only] [DR 453] incorrect initial ostringstream::tellp()

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-05 19:50 --- Subject: Bug 10975 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 19:50:03 Modified files: libstdc++-v3 : Change

[Bug target/13754] [3.4/4.0 regression] ip2k-elf ICE on multiple gotos

-- What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal Known to fail|3.4.1 4.0 |3.4.1 4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i

[Bug libstdc++/17850] [3.4/4.0 regression] bootstrap failure - libstdc++ uses strtold when undeclared

--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-05 19:21 --- As far as I can see, I think the problem is in configure.ac, where we automatically assume that newlib has strtold(). This is false AFAICT, newlib has _strtold, but it doesn't have strtold. R. --

[Bug c++/17801] [3.4 Regression] segfault in perform_or_defer_access_check

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-05 19:19 --- Fixed on the mainline by the patch which fixed PR 17829. -- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDep

[Bug libstdc++/17850] [3.4/4.0 regression] bootstrap failure - libstdc++ uses strtold when undeclared

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-05 19:16 --- A 3.4 regression also if it was caused by that patch. -- What|Removed |Added Summ

[Bug libstdc++/17850] [4.0 regression] bootstrap failure - libstdc++ uses strtold when undeclared

--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-05 19:05 --- Created an attachment (id=7288) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7288&action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17850

[Bug libstdc++/17850] New: [4.0 regression] bootstrap failure - libstdc++ uses strtold when undeclared

Bootstrapping is failing on an arm-unknown-elf cross because of the following error: /work/rearnsha/gnu/egcs-cross/gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/work/rearnsha/gnu/egcs- cross/gcc/ -nostdinc++ -L/work/rearnsha/gnu/egcs-cross/arm-elf/libstdc++-v3/src -L/work/rearnsha/gnu/egcs-cross/arm-elf/libstdc++-v

[Bug middle-end/17703] [4.0 regression] spurious error about end of function reached

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-05 18:58 --- Here's an example using the STL: = #include void foo() { int i; std::sort(&i,&i+1); } = -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Bug java/17848] segfault at java/class.c:2186 with PieSpy

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-05 18:47 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug middle-end/17849] intrinsic_pack.f90

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-05 18:40 --- Mine. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pinskia at gcc

[Bug middle-end/17849] New: intrinsic_pack.f90

compiling intrinsic_pack.f90 fails with the following error: [EMAIL PROTECTED] libgfortran]$ ~/src/gcc/build-clean/gcc/f951 ../gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_pack.f90 MAIN__ tests_with_temp ../gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_pack.f90: In functio

[Bug java/17848] segfault at java/class.c:2186 with PieSpy

-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor Keywords||error-recovery, ice-on- |