submitted my first patch to a simple package that comes
with Ubuntu (glife). I have been programming in C for about 10 years
and C++ for less.
Phil Pratt-Szeliga
urry, they are due April 3rd). I will
mainly focus on this pdf:
http://www.khronos.org/developers/library/overview/opencl_overview.pdf,
page 13
Phil Pratt-Szeliga
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 01:09:56AM -0700, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> >
an be
used until the OpenCL C compiler is done.
=
Thanks for all of the support and interest so far everyone!
Sincerely,
Phil Pratt-Szeliga
Hi all!
I'm currently investigating adding support for demangling/undecorating MSVC
style symbols to libiberty.
Is anyone else already working on this?
Has this been considered in the past, but rejected for some reason?
Should I have posted this to a different GCC list? :P
Thanks,
2
.4byte 3
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.1.2 20061028 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-19)"
Many thanks in advance for any advice.
Regards,
Phil.
(you're welcome to Cc: any replies as I'm subscribed to the digest.)
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:51:06AM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> But seriously, I think we need to press autoconf into generating 100x
> faster code 90% of the time. Maybe prebundling answers for the
> common targets...
Ek, imake! :-)
Every time I've played with precomputing cache answers
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 12:56:20PM -0500, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 February 2005 11:03 am, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> > I though that #gcc on oftc.net was more active, anyway, or has this
> > changed?
>
> This was more of a request for the #gcc on freenode to catch up with the r
this code?
(I should explain that I have not seen this error first-hand myself.
I'm the author of a GPL program, Anyterm, and have had this error
reported by other users. I'm therefore "debugging at a distance". The
platform that causes the problems is Mandrake 10.1. I'm afraid I don't
even know what version of gcc it has.)
Thanks for any suggestions.
--Phil.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:07:33PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > Please name such systems. We can then know to not use them, and can
> > document in the manual they are broken if we wish.
>
> IIRC the Windows cut-n-paste cuts a rectangle, not as-printed.
Yes, to this day, even using their la
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:58:11AM +0100, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Joern RENNECKE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > P.S.: When I use a diff-cmd with -N, I not only get a diff for the 44
> > files that are different,
> > but also a header for each of the 752 files that are identical, i.e.
> > two line
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 07:42:35PM +0800, ?? wrote:
>
> The C++ standard said Container::size() should have constant complexity
> (ISO/IEC 14882:1998, pp. 461, Table 65), while the std::list::size() in
> current STL of GCC is defined as { std::distance(begin(), end()); }, whose
> complexiy is
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 01:17:42PM -0500, Howard Hinnant wrote:
> On Nov 25, 2005, at 9:28 AM, Phil Edwards wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 07:42:35PM +0800, ?? wrote:
> >>
> >>The C++ standard said Container::size() should have constant
> >>comp
inlining process seems to have
screwed up the potential optimizations. Is there a someway to prevent
this from happening short of disabling inlining? Or perhaps there is
a better way to write this code so that gcc would optimize more
predictably?
I would appreciate any advice, thanks.
Phil
I tried to look for a workaround for this. It seemed that using a
union instead of memcpy was enough to convince GCC to optimize into a
single "mov".
struct alpha unpack(uint64_t x)
{
union {
struct alpha r;
uint64_t i;
} u;
u.i = x;
> Can you please open a bugreport?
Done: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69871
ead.
>
> This one's very much alive, actually. I've added a few folks who are
> working on it (Keith, Alex, Phil), who could perhaps fill us in on
> status. It'd be great if more people got engaged in the project,
> of course!
As Pedro notes, the project is very muc
Hi,
I am the author of a deterministic memory manager:
https://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/block_ptr/
I just have a quick question: is it possible to overload all raw
pointers with a template "smart pointer"?
If not then I would hope this can be made possible.
Regards,
-Phil
^
Sorry for the issues. Jakub has a patch pending that disables libcc1
on bootstrap so that may alleviate the issue. However if you let me
know your ./configure parameters and any other build parameters I will
attempt to replicate the issue.
Cheers
Phil
ewpoint it looks fine. As long as the .so is
built, that's really our only goal from a GDB point of view. But I am
not a maintainer, so I have refrained from commenting on this change,
as it seems fairly straightforward. Though I am no expert on GCC
build systems.
Cheers
Phil
ndicates, this will be sorted
soon. Again from a libcc1 point of view, as long as we have the .so
built on all configurations, that is what matters. I have not chipped
into these threads as I have nothing to say/recommend about darwin
architectures :( I do read them all, though.
Cheers,
Phil
he arm926 does not according to their
respective reference manuals.
Am I mis-understanding what "define_insn_reservation" means? There
does not appear to be anything the arm_adjust_cost in arm.c which
affects branching costs.
Phil
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 02:51:00PM +0100, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> On 27/07/07, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >If you ask me, we should rename gcc@ to gcc-development@ and maybe rename
> > gcc-help@ to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ... gcc-dev@, keep gcc@ as an alias for gc
k.h a mistake, or by design? If by design, what
is the reason?
Thanks,
Phil
can certainly do work on your own and I would love to work with you.
I will let you know what my mentor says.
Sincerely,
Phil
=
Hello Phil,
I am happy to work with you, just tell me which parser do you use?
do you convert your parsed OpenCL grammar to ATI
ips to get this compiled?
Thanks.
Sincererly,
Phil Pratt-Szeliga
have experience with this IR or
any array SSA form? I want to use this in my research, so I would be
interested in paying a small consulting fee if someone was able to
give me real advice/algorithms/help on constructing an array SSA form
like the one in the paper.
Thanks for any help,
Phil Pratt
26 matches
Mail list logo
