mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core

Hi I have tried everything any page might say on this, still stuck. Any help would be great Hi all I am trying to install 3.4 on my AMD turion 64 machine with fedora core. But run into messages like this on gmake. Configure is fine libbackend.a(builtins.o): In function `fold_builtin_cbr

Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core

08:11:35PM -0500, drizzle drizzle wrote: > Hi > I have tried everything any page might say on this, still > stuck. Any help would be great > Hi all > > I am trying to install 3.4 on my AMD turion 64 machine with fedora > core. You mean 4.3 (or rather a snapshot or svn c

Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core

Not 4.3 but 3.4 yes the older version. And I built and installed mpfr and gmp. gmp4.1 and mpfr 2.2. I dont have a /usr/local/lib64 on my system. Did my mpfr/gmp install incorrecly ? dz On 1/3/07, Matt Fago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You do mean gcc 4.3 right (either a snapshot, or from svn)?

Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core

. See 'config.log' for details. And as matt suggested if mpfr is not needed by 3.4, how can I configure it that way. --disable -mpfr did not help. thanks for all the hints so far dz On 1/4/07, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2007-01-03 22:19:16 -0500, drizzle driz

Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core

Still no luck so far .. I got the gcc3.4 from the gcc archive. Any way I can make gcc 3.4 not use these libraries ? thanks dz On 1/4/07, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 07:25:03PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > In case you still get the warning after trying that, I

Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core

I configure with --enable-languages=c,c++ . Shudnt that disable gfortran ? thanks dz On 1/4/07, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/4/07, drizzle drizzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Still no luck so far .. I got the gcc3.4 from the gcc archive. Any way > I ca

Invariant division

Hi Does gcc do an divison by constant optimization for any 16 bit architecture. Can anyone point me to where it does that ? thanks dz

gcc preprocessor

Hi Can some one tell me if gcc preprocessor can support in some way the following features 1. Repeating a block a certain number of times 2. Multiline macros with new lines 3. Setting a symbolic constant inside a #define thanks dz

Re: gcc preprocessor

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:07:07PM -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote: > Can some one tell me if gcc preprocessor can support in some way > the following > features You are asking a beginner C programming question. gcc's preprocessor does what standard C preprocessors do.

Re: gcc preprocessor

Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 01:27:48PM -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote: > Ok can you tell me what directives does it provide to do what I > have said . And I am not a beginner to gcc. The answer is that gcc provides what the C standard specifies and

debug output and register allocation

Hi I am wondering how gcc handles producing debug information for automatic variables that do not reside inthe stack.For example when say register allocation decides to assign a particular register to a variable or say it decides that the value is a constant. Can some one point me to the rele

debugging quality and gcc

Hi I am wondering if from a developer perspective some body can tell me what debugging quality to expect when using -g with O3. Especially when the following happen 1. When a variable resides in multiple locations in different scopes such as different registers. If this works very well, I am wo

Annotations in tree

Hi, I am trying to find out how to insert annotations for certain array references identified in tree-loop-linear.c so that when converting to RTL they can be handled differently. I find that simply inserting a flag in the tree node is not enough as optimizations later on can lead to the node b

Re: Annotations in tree

generating a pointer to it instead of using the array). Sumesh On 7/26/05, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 04:21:51PM -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote: > > >I am trying to find out how to insert annotations for certain array > > references

Re: Annotations in tree

for the answers On 7/26/05, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 18:39 -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote: > > I am not sure if I unerstand ...can you elaborate please ? So what I > > need is if I identify say a reference a[i] inside a loop, I wan

Re: Annotations in tree

build_function_call fail. thanks once again ... On 7/26/05, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 19:42 -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote: > > What doesnt exist very long - the references ? > > By RTL, they've been expanded to pointer accesses. > > >

Inserting a call statement

Hi I am trying to insert a function call "foo" inside the tree list. Inside this particular loop for (bsi = bsi_start (bb); !bsi_end_p (bsi); bsi_next (&bsi)) { //if a particular condition is satisfied I do the following tree id =

Re: Inserting a call statement

Its inside this function static inline var_ann_t var_ann (tree t) from the error dump itseems to the following assertion gcc_assert (DECL_P (t)) thanks On 7/27/05, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 12:33 -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote: > >

Re: Inserting a call statement

July 2005 17:33, drizzle drizzle wrote: > > > Hi > > > I am trying to insert a function call "foo" inside the tree list. > > > > > > > > > Inside this particular loop > > > for (bsi = bsi_start (bb); !bsi_end_p (bsi

Insertng a call function

Hi I am inserting a call stmt in linear_transform_loops. Al though the call statement gets inserted , the compilation breaks. Can some one help me identify if I am missing some information in the call node that I create (thanks Daniel for all the help until now) here is the set of s

Re: Insertng a call function

ECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 01:15:22PM -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote: > > > I am inserting a call stmt in linear_transform_loops. Al though > > the call statement gets inserted , the compilation breaks. Can some > > one help me identify if I am missin

Re: Insertng a call function

Could it be that it being done lower in the pass unlike insertions in tree-profile, gomp - some ssa defintion information is missing. The reason I have been led to think is because it fails register_new_defintions. I would appreciate any suggestions. thanks On 7/28/05, drizzle drizzle <[EM

Re: how to compile gcc

If you are objective is to debug gcc, then all the necessary setup is already done...Check this documentation http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/DebuggingGCC. dz On 8/20/05, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 19 August 2005 20:26, Jiang Long wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I 'd like

Using Alias analysis

Hi . I want to use gcc's alias analysis in a standalone way. What I observe is that a lot of the information is hidden because of additional temporaries that have been generated. Can any one suggest as to if there is a simple workaround to this ? To illustrate what I am saying for a stmt